Author |
Message |
Topic: Battle of the Scheldt has been released |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 80
Views: 109066
|
Forum: CC5 Battle of the Scheldt Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:03 pm Subject: Re: Battle of the Scheldt has been released |
Hooray for Buck!!!! Was a nice suprise finding it was released Thanks |
Topic: faster pc? |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 10
Views: 5644
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:30 pm Subject: faster pc? |
Your HD write speed is VERY low, even most crappy USB sticks have a faster write speed than 13mb/s, if it's really 13mb/s, you should get a better disk or if you have one allready, recheck the settings. My Samsung F1 750 does about 80-90 mb/s avg and my WD raptor 300G does about 120 mb/s avg. You should notice alot of improvement with a better HD/better configured HD, since the HD is allways the slowest part in a pc.
EDIT: ok I just ran that novabench and the F1 did 37mb/s and raptor did 55 mb/s. Which is kinda odd when HDtune and ATTO and all other disk benchmarks i know report way higher write speeds. Still I would check with one of the other benches. |
Topic: Tank AP levels |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 2
Views: 2243
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:15 am Subject: Tank AP levels |
Yes and no ! It could and it could not depending on all kinds of variables people will end up argueing about for pages to come! Not to hijack this thread, but personally I'd like to know which is better m16 or ak47 ...discuss |
Topic: Polemarcho's Youtube-thread of classics |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 21
Views: 11046
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:58 am Subject: Polemarcho's Youtube-thread of classics |
All glory to the Hypno Toad |
Topic: Afghanistan? |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 20
Views: 14719
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 11:00 am Subject: Afghanistan? |
squadleader_id wrote:
|
pzjager wrote:
|
Hi,
Sorry, but I stay on my position. Islam is a sect for a lot of reasons but at least two are even more obvious:
1) In Islam, there is no separation butween the spiritual and all the other aspects of the life.
2) In Islam, if you quit your religion, you are condamned to death.
If this is not a sect, so what it is??
Cheers
PJ
P.S. The fact that they are 1 billion does not change anything
|
Are you sure about those 2 points, PJ?
Umm...let's just get back to just enjoying our fave CC shall we
|
All religions have people taking stuff way to serious in one way or the other.
Atleast Taliban are honest and clear about their ideas and intentions
But than there is the question, who or what are the Taliban |
Topic: Sick is sick |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 8
Views: 8485
|
Forum: Tech Support Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:11 pm Subject: Sick is sick |
Might be the cooler on your video card or some other heat problems ? Does it happen with other games or just CC? |
Topic: Alternate AAR for Treetop op |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 14
Views: 10269
|
Forum: H2H Multiplayer Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:34 am Subject: Alternate AAR for Treetop op |
Well maybe it has something to do with you coming here telling how you think the operation is pointless and actually insulting the people who played in the OP. While we made it clear from the start how this public OP for new Pzt recruits would be played. We can't help it if people don't care to read the goddamn rules and than accuse us afterwards we changed the strat for the benefit of Pzt, while anyone with half a brain can see how that deploy in Carp would totally screw the allies in tactical and strat layer, if anything we safed the allies from certain defeat, which is why we didn't want the public todo the strat in first place. Since the public will never put in the time needed to get a good overall view on the strategic situation and really I don't expect them to do that either. So no Mooxe we wouldn't second guess your strat movement, we wouldn't let you do the strat movement in the first place, again, read the rules before you think about joining an OP. Anyway there are enough "desperate" people around to keep the show on the road. Thanks for your interest anyway ... |
Topic: News update |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 99
Views: 88007
|
Forum: CC5 Battle of the Scheldt Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:45 pm Subject: News update |
Well if you count slapping on a Phillips radio and a Dutch smoke discharger as partly Dutch ...well ok |
Topic: Tupolev Tu-95 |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 13
Views: 8414
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:40 am Subject: Tupolev Tu-95 |
Yeh that, if it was a militairy tupolev from the russians, you would have heared the f16's scrambling aswell |
Topic: News update |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 99
Views: 88007
|
Forum: CC5 Battle of the Scheldt Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:47 pm Subject: News update |
Fennek is partly Dutch too
But one hell of a sexy vehicle allright The other week one sneaked up on me in traffic, I checked my rearviewmirror and was looking into a .50 ...
Pretty strange when you don't expect it ..."hey a .50 ..... WTF? " |
Topic: News update |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 99
Views: 88007
|
Forum: CC5 Battle of the Scheldt Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 8:03 pm Subject: News update |
Last time I checked Oregon wasn't a Dutch city (yet) Buck |
Topic: Fighting in GJS sector |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 26
Views: 17859
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:01 pm Subject: Fighting in GJS sector |
AA_Megadeth wrote:
|
This is pretty sad Pzt, i used to be a member of Pzt and though you guys were ok. This thread, and your dishonorable behaviour in that Clan war, is changing my view about you.
I played in that war, and as far as I could see it Pzt was more and more awol as the game turned against them. I know Bjorn and he is always active, always hanging out on Gamespy and is not hard to find. The way I see it pzt just started fading away as things turned sour.
|
Dude you didn't even play in that war, what the fuck are you talking about ... Poor attempt to stir shit up I say, so really we couldn't care less if you think we are sad for telling the facts, everything better than a nobhead pulling shit out of his arse.
P.S. Sorry Kevin, but had to set this straight |
Topic: New Close Combat release |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 47
Views: 26981
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:34 pm Subject: New Close Combat release |
platoon_michael wrote:
|
What?
Ask a serious question and the thread dies?
|
I doubt the question killed the thread
With the Verbal command you can try to order civilians to move to a safe location or away from the location you are protecting.
With Search command you can search civilians looking for insurgents who might be hiding among the crowd with weapons afaik. |
Topic: Fighting in GJS sector |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 26
Views: 17859
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 9:01 pm Subject: Fighting in GJS sector |
"When Pzt quit the field" Yeh Bjorn you actually have to be online to meet Pzt in the field... H2H doesn't work offline to well, try to remember next time or atleast tell your members, next time you are gone for several weeks, so the 2ic can take over. |
Topic: GJS 4.4 TRSM |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 75
Views: 44702
|
Forum: Total Realism Sub Mod Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 6:25 pm Subject: GJS 4.4 TRSM |
right, just give us our fix ok,...GIVE US OUR FIX ARGFGGHHH |
Topic: New Close Combat release |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 47
Views: 26981
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 3:29 pm Subject: New Close Combat release |
Polemarchos wrote:
|
the main argument still is, that a game covering WW2 is better (in terms of political and historical correctness) than a game covering a recent,still ongoing conflict.
And what bothers me most is the question if civilians will be around in the public version as well...
What happens if you kill civilians? no decorations?
|
Well afaik, the public version doesn't have civvies. But even if there were, and I wish there were, what does it matter?
It's ok to defend the 3rd reich, which stands for persecution and killing of the jews and untermenschen, but it's more wrong or politicaly incorrect to kill a civillian directly, cause he threw a rock at you ? ...All this in a virtual world offcourse, where noone gets hurt. I don't think so and I really don't see the problem. Eventho we try and make things as realistic as possible, it is still fiction.
My virtual marines have lots of virtual civvie blood on their hands and frankly I was laughing my ass off, like a bloodthirsty maniac, Mac can vouch for that If that makes me politically incorrect ...so be it.
Does that mean the marines train at killing civilians and get medals for it, offcourse not. It's used to train how to deal with angry mobs without killing people. But obviously I don't make a good marine commander But that's the whole point of this simulation in the first place, you can fuck up without consequences.
As for historical correctness, the addition of civilians would in many battles only add to historical correctness.
Once Dima releases TRSM I'm so out of this thread |
Topic: New Close Combat release |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 47
Views: 26981
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:11 pm Subject: New Close Combat release |
Incompetent_Commander wrote:
|
Quote:
|
2. A commercial release will have the features. No one, absoulty no one said it will not be historical.
|
but thn again No one said it will.
Look, the thing is that this kind of ideas,in my opinion, cannot just be released under a pretext of a harmless computer game! What would be the reaction of the US Government and the public in general if a company would start to publish hundreds of pc games where the aim would be to destroy the evil Americans (would be nice to see)? hypocrisy is a strong point of American leaders, but PC games should be left aside for educational and recreational only.
In a long run everyone will loose, no exception for US.
About the idea of pc games, where the enemies of america would be heroes, i think it would be a blow out sale!
|
Well here we go yet again, what kind of ideas would that be ? That terrorists are bad? You think they aren't? Please enlighten us ... I must have missed that propaganda pamflet that came with CCMAT when testing.
I don't know if you noticed, but you can play CC as both sides, switch to the other side and you can just do what you said ... kill the evil infidel americans ...OMG THE OUTRAGE!!!! As a matter of fact every CC version to date gives you this option , doesn't it ? And CC is hardly the only game where you can kill Americans... Maybe you should have thought about that one abit longer ...
And again this is a bloody training tool for marines training them in asymetrical warfare. Get over the hypocrite political bullshit allready, these factions they fight in this training tool can be other American people for all you know. This is a training tool for the army, armies have shit to do with policy making... |
Topic: New Close Combat release |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 47
Views: 26981
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 10:17 am Subject: New Close Combat release |
No offense but pzjager just asks for it with his complete bullshit, he hasn't got a clue what he's talking about. He hears something faintly about terrorism and US and starts shouting about US propaganda and what not.
For one there is not even a faction called terrorists (they are called french) , secondly it's not even meant to be released to the public. People tell him this a few of times, yet he continues his bullshit, ignoring people who actually know what they are talking about. And you expect a friendly and serious response in return?
CSOSimtek decided to give people abit of a peek into the things they are up to with the CC engines and indirect the future of CC6 (something they weren't obliged to do) and all you guys can do is whine about how they should do things differently, while non of you have actually played it or has any knowledge about what CSOSimtek has to deal with.
It's one thing being sceptical and believe me I'm still sceptical, but it 's a completely different thing shouting unsubstantiated bullshit about things you know nothing about. There is nothing wrong with criticism either, hell that's why they asked people to test, yet somehow the ones with the biggest mouths here didn't bother signing up.
There someone had to do it ...
and don't worry, the faction isn't called France either |
Topic: New Close Combat release |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 47
Views: 26981
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:44 pm Subject: New Close Combat release |
mooxe wrote:
|
Flight sims cannot be compared to simulating a battlefield with 100s of troops. I am not sure what exacly they use CC for in training, but I believe its very limited and does not substitute the experiences of field exercises. I would like to see some USMC or RAF document stating in detail how its helped. I would also like to know exactly how much time they spend playing CC and under what circumstances.
|
http://www.2ndbn5thmar.com/ccm/ccmtoc.htm
This should give you abit of an idea of what the marines train with CC |
Topic: New Close Combat release |
Pzt_Coyote
Replies: 47
Views: 26981
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 9:29 am Subject: New Close Combat release |
Man we have alot of good new CC waiting down the line
First the commercial version of this to keep us busy till CC6 will be released and Sulla also mentioning CC7 with a totally new engine now over at CSO forums. That combined with the rereleases aswell could actually give the CC community a great boost.
The 5 vs 5 will give a whole new twist to clan wars I'm sure, clans should start recruiting so they can field 5 men.
5 vs 5 , 1 hour battle, clan wars...hmmm drewl, that will make for some interesting tournaments/ladders.
And AAR's with all the screenshots and writing will be a thing of the past mostly, since you can simply download the replay, I can't wait ...
And for computer simulations not working, I seriously doubt it, offcourse you can't simulate bullets and mortars landing around you with a computer, but for teaching tactics it's a great tool. Commanders can see exactely what went wrong or right and why, from a view you will never have in the field. Offcourse the real thing is different when there are mortars coming in and you took casualties, but the tactics/ execution remains the same. The commander will offcourse need other training to remain cool in battle situations and I agree you won't be able to simulate that with a computer, but to say such simulation doesn't work...noway. Just look at flightsims, you can learn a pilot to basicly fly a plane without him ever leaving the ground. You can learn him to do all kinds of manoevres in certain situations. Will this simulate the stress in combat, no hardly, will this make him experienced with the plane and the manoevres, yes offcourse it will.
Same for ground warfare, an officer with the right info, will be way more familiar with tactical situations in the field, even if he only executed them on sims before. He will still know what's important for succes and knows how to act on it.
Can you replace training only by sims, no offcourse not, but sims do give the opportunity to learn 100's of different situations at a fraction of the cost and time of when you were to train all of those situations in real exercises.
P.S. The only downside I can think off is that officers now will tell their squad with only less than 50% survivors (you won't get them back next round anyway), to "VL RUSH THAT POSITION AT ALL COST" and expect the enemy to piss off after 15 minutes of fighting "What do you mean the enemy is still there? Did you tell them about the 15 minutes and the deploy rule? What do you mean they don't care ? It's a fucking violation of CC rules damned!!! Allright that's it guys back to GameSpy... I mean base , they cheat...!" |
|