Author |
Message |
Topic: Theater of War 3 : Korea !!! |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 8
Views: 7493
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:32 pm Subject: Re: Theater of War 3 : Korea !!! |
I dont know.
Playing LSA this afternoon, I used a full squad to storm a single house defended by the last two guys of a battered ennemy squad. The result was a full squad crawling for cover after the first shot and being stabbed to dead one after the other while seeking cover. It can't be as bad as this, can it? |
Topic: Theater of War 3 : Korea !!! |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 8
Views: 7493
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:27 pm Subject: Re: Theater of War 3 : Korea !!! |
There are 3 new video AAR for the new Combat Mission here .
I'm afraid CC has been outclassed. |
Topic: Theater of War 3 : Korea !!! |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 8
Views: 7493
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 2:35 pm Subject: Re: Theater of War 3 : Korea !!! |
WOW!
I had a look at those two games and what can I say... Impressive!
The new Combat Mission will be playable in real time and will represent each sodiler of a squad so it definatly look very promising. it does not look like it has a strat map so maybe if they release a future WWII game using Theater of War 3's engine with strat map would do the trick!
They are also cheaper (or the same price) than LSA! |
Topic: I don't get Merging |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 5
Views: 9280
|
Forum: Close Combat Last Stand Arnhem Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 1:58 pm Subject: Re: I don't get Merging |
What iId like to know, it is what BG will merge in the other before doing the merger. I may not want to lose that tanks by sending it back to the FP. Is it possible to control what bg will be «lost». For exemple, I might not want the Kriegmarine BG to absorbd the SS armored recon BG but rather the opposite. So far, it looks like the largest BG will automaticly absorb the smaller one. |
Topic: Change expiring time setting |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 3
Views: 6328
|
Forum: Close Combat Last Stand Arnhem Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:37 am Subject: Re: Change expiring time setting |
I know it was possible to do so in CCV. You had to use some usermade application to modify the save file. I think it's CCReg but I have no idea if it has been adapted to LSA and TLD. Might simply have to restart if you are not too far in your GC. |
Topic: GJS for tLD |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 239
Views: 166457
|
Forum: Close Combat The Longest Day Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:20 pm Subject: Re: GJS for tLD |
Tejszd wrote (View Post):
|
I would vote to just add single night turn for the night drop before the landings.
|
I'm also in favor of a single night turn on first day only. And please, if possible, avoid the random drop thingy |
Topic: TRSM 0981 |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 15
Views: 28369
|
Forum: Total Realism Sub Mod Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:27 pm Subject: Re: TRSM 0981 |
I also noticed all the Churchills have a 6 pdrs like in old version. MK III had a 6 pdrs, MK V had a 95mm howitzer(like centaur) and the MK IV ou VI had a 75mm.
I think we settled to have a ratio of 1 MK III for each 2 MK VI? or was it 1 MK III for each 3 MK VI?? |
Topic: TRSM 0981 |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 15
Views: 28369
|
Forum: Total Realism Sub Mod Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:57 pm Subject: Re: TRSM 0981 |
Hi Dima,
good work as usual :)
However, I've noticed the unit icon at the battlegroup screen for Churchills in the 49th and 15th is an armored car.
Cheers,
Serk |
Topic: TRSM v098 is released. |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 21
Views: 38014
|
Forum: Total Realism Sub Mod Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:08 am Subject: Re: TRSM v098 is released. |
Well I wondered what would be the cause of the slow RoF and how it was «fixed» in the Tiger II according to you so I suspected it was in the turret interior layout.
I guess the answer is in the heavier 88mm shell then.
Thanks for clarifying this up :)
Cheers, |
Topic: TRSM v098 is released. |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 21
Views: 38014
|
Forum: Total Realism Sub Mod Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:45 pm Subject: Re: TRSM v098 is released. |
Quote:
|
edit: forgot to ask what you found wrong in TRSM?
|
I just wanted to verify out of curiosity.
I thought Tiger and Firefly had same Rof in TRSM and just discovered it was slower. Then I got curious on how a tank with similar shell type (not two part ammo) would fire slower than a tank «known for its reduced RoF with cramped modified turret to fit in a gun with a rotated loading breach». , as I had heard about the reduced RoF for the Firefly but never about a slow RoF for the Tiger tank before TRSM. So I just made a quick search by myself and found those unexpectedly high numbers that contradicted TRSM.
What was flawed with the Tiger turret that got corrected in Panther/Tiger II? That ammo rack disposition?
Cheers,
Serk |
Topic: TRSM v098 is released. |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 21
Views: 38014
|
Forum: Total Realism Sub Mod Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 3:37 pm Subject: Re: TRSM v098 is released. |
Dima!
What info did you base yourself on for the RoF of tanks?
In Tiger vs Firefly, the technical datas state Tiger (15 rpm, same for Panther and Tiger II) had a faster RoF than Firefly (10 rpm and reg sherman would be 20 rpm). Theses numbers seem very high and must be different in combat situation but I'd be suprised the ratio would change that much.
Here is the link to the book, look at pages 22 (Tiger) and 23(Firefly) for techinical datas.
I'm trying to find more infos and the book Panzers at war looks promising but I can't acces the full copy. At the page 121, the books indicates the Tiger II normal RoF would be 5 to 8 rounds a minute, but the sections on the tiger I/ Panthers are not available unfortunately.
Cheers,
Serk |
Topic: Mods available or in progress for TLD |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 26
Views: 19776
|
Forum: Close Combat The Longest Day Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:25 pm Subject: Re: Mods available or in progress for TLD |
Where can I download the GJS mod for TLD? |
Topic: TRSM v098 is released. |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 21
Views: 38014
|
Forum: Total Realism Sub Mod Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 1:28 pm Subject: Re: TRSM v098 is released. |
Allright!
It hasn't been reported as it takes a while to reach june 21rst in a gc ;)
And where are the Churchill III? I can't find them so far. |
Topic: TRSM v098 is released. |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 21
Views: 38014
|
Forum: Total Realism Sub Mod Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:26 pm Subject: Re: TRSM v098 is released. |
Regarding Churchills, so far in TRSM, I've found Churchill V and VI in the 43th ID, both using 6 pdrs. Are there any others in different BGs?
I made a quick search and the info I've found says it's the Churchill III that had a 6 pdrs. (Did they use APDS too or was it only issued to ATG? I don't know) Churchill IV had either a 6 pdrs or 75mm gun (looks like 75mm Churchill IV were only used in North Africa and Italy)
Churchill V had a 95mm howitzer and the Churchill VI and VII had a 75mm gun.
Here is an interesting discussion on the Churchill issued in Normandy with great info on armor upgrade and gun used.
Maybe our expert on British army (AKA Ronson) could add more info on this :)
EDIT - Ok looks like the 6 pdrs were issued with APDS but many Churchill were re-armed with 75mm for better HE shells. It appears the ratio was two 75mm Churchills for every Churchill equiped with a 6dprs.
Cheers, |
Topic: Morale and Grand Campaigns |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 4
Views: 5456
|
Forum: Close Combat The Longest Day Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:09 pm Subject: Re: Morale and Grand Campaigns |
the H2H rule is usually that you can't deploy in area not connected to one of your VL. So you should be allowed to do so. |
Topic: TRSM v098 is released. |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 21
Views: 38014
|
Forum: Total Realism Sub Mod Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:38 am Subject: Re: TRSM v098 is released. |
Some minor glithes here, all Churchills (except for crocodile) in the 43ID have wrong picture in BG screen as well as in battle, and the new lebesy map has avl wrongly named «2 story manoir» while its a hedge in the the middle of the map.
Cheers. |
Topic: TRSM v098 is released. |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 21
Views: 38014
|
Forum: Total Realism Sub Mod Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:40 am Subject: Re: TRSM v098 is released. |
Dima, You forgot to get rid of the PaK 40 and the extra Marders in the II/726 from the 716 ID (Starting in Hillmann batt.) |
Topic: having tried both TLD and TRSM.... |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 5
Views: 7821
|
Forum: Total Realism Sub Mod Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 3:03 am Subject: Re: having tried both TLD and TRSM.... |
I don't recall CCV ever working in single player mode??? |
Topic: The Webmeister is in Afghanistan |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 18
Views: 11402
|
Forum: The Mess Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 4:21 am Subject: Re: The Webmeister is in Afghanistan |
Thanks again for your service in Afghanistan Mooxe...the pen does need a little help sometimes |
Topic: 50.cals, Little John, Stuart and SODs |
Pzt_Serk
Replies: 11
Views: 11868
|
Forum: Total Realism Sub Mod Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 12:58 am Subject: Re: 50.cals, Little John, Stuart and SODs |
ronson wrote (View Post):
|
In game terms therefore always have an infantry squad nearby to keep them safe from wicked minded German infantry with their nasty Fausts
|
Those German infantrymen are not wicked minded, what they have is a high sense of duty |
|