mooxe
Rep: 221.7 votes: 25
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:07 am Post subject: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
Can someone please explain this bug? |
Join Discord for technical support and online games. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
papa_whisky
Rep: 42.2 votes: 4
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 3:01 am Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
Can someone describe the bug? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kojusoki
Rep: 22.7
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:55 pm Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
when the bridge is destroyed, allies have supply as it would be all ok.
for example allied AB BGs receive tanks and armoured BGs have ammo and fuel marked as ++ |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
papa_whisky
Rep: 42.2 votes: 4
|
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:50 am Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
The AB resupply with tanks I think is bad scenario design rather than a bug. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dima
Rep: 87.3 votes: 16
|
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:06 am Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
Quote:
|
The AB resupply with tanks I think is bad scenario design rather than a bug
|
why? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
papa_whisky
Rep: 42.2 votes: 4
|
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:23 am Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
If I am not mistaken some units if in supply, with or without being connected to XXX corps are provided tanks after a certain date. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kojusoki
Rep: 22.7
|
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 6:36 pm Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
papa is right - if you find campaign.txt file you can that there is an option that you can choose wheter AB is in full supply the givin day.
But certainly there is a bug as in the manual it states that a bridge can be repaired only if there is supply connection. Now if yopu have a few bridges down in a raw, ALL ARE BEING repaired at the same time.
Also, armoured BGs (so not AB) have full supply |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bordic
Rep: 20.8
|
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 12:11 am Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
Well, I have the idea that this bug will need more than a simple patch to fix it... |
Et agere et pati fortiter romanus est
Last edited by Bordic on Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:39 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papa_whisky
Rep: 42.2 votes: 4
|
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 2:24 am Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
I am sure it can be fixed, the question is when? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
schrecken
Rep: 195 votes: 15
|
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 6:06 am Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
Quote:
|
Well, I have the idea that this bug will need more than a simple patch to fix it... Sad
|
it will only require a simple patch
Quote:
|
I am sure it can be fixed, the question is when?
|
Currently there are no plans announced with regard to releasing another patch.
Matrix have already dropped, without notice, support for their still advertised 24/7 on-line H2H campaigns (MMCC3) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
schrecken
Rep: 195 votes: 15
|
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 6:11 am Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
double post |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sapa
Rep: 76.3 votes: 8
|
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:42 am Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
Its really sad... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kweniston
Rep: 57.9 votes: 1
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 9:32 am Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
If Matrix can/will not help us, can someone with some modding skills fix at least some of the issues?
I would do it myself if I had the skills. Thanks. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronson
Rep: 36.7 votes: 5
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 12:06 pm Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
papa_whisky wrote (View Post):
|
If I am not mistaken some units if in supply, with or without being connected to XXX corps are provided tanks after a certain date.
|
Rightly so, the 101st AB took under command the 15/19 Hussars the armoured recce regt. of 11th Armoured Div from at least the 19th September. Around the 22nd Sept. 44RTR was also attached from 4th Armoured Brigade. Both these formations came from the flanking VIII Corps.
The 82nd AB took under command the Nottinghamshire Yeo. (Sherwood Foresters) from the 8th Armoured Brigade from around 22nd Sept. They had , after the arrival of Guards armoured, up to this point been supported by one of the Guards armoured Regts. who took part in the fighting around Mook with them. (I believe it was the Coldstream, but I could be wrong).
I think however that you do have a point in so far as these attachments came about AFTER the link up by the main forces of XXX Corps, this should be the governing factor of recieving this support, rather than the question of supply or not.
Cheers
Ronson |
GR member Ronson1 ac 4247033 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tejszd
Rep: 133.6 votes: 19
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:36 pm Post subject: Re: Bridge/Blown Bridge/Supply Issue in LSA |
|
|
There is an option in the LSA fpool on a BG unit change if it requires supply or not to have it happen.
I wonder since these are AB BG's and have supply for a period of time, even if not connected on the ground, that these are happening??? It could also just be set wrong??? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|