Dima wrote (View Post): |
Stiener,
Cathartes is obviously very busy with a new release but most of the points you mentioned will take you less than half an hour to change with LSA workbook. I bet Mark can help you as AFAIK he has an experience in CC data tweaking. |
Quote: |
That`s good to know but I hoped Cathartes would put his considerable ability toward a fully AI compatible version of LSA GJS to match CC5 GJS. |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
Stiener,
Cathartes is obviously very busy with a new release but most of the points you mentioned will take you less than half an hour to change with LSA workbook. I bet Mark can help you as AFAIK he has an experience in CC data tweaking. |
Quote: |
ive been dueling with the panthers with 17 PDR a/t guns, M10 17 PDR's and FireFlys.
ive found that the panthers win most duels even if the 17 pdr gets the 1st hit and even the 1st two hits. the 17 PDR'S seem to miss more than they should also i think |
Schmal_Turm wrote (View Post): |
The info I found on a book called "British and American Tanks of WWII" and a site online say about 185/1000m using APDS. Can't remember what that would be in yds. |
Quote: |
the 6 pdr had APDS in june |
Quote: |
The Firefly 17-pounder was able to penetrate some 140 mm of armour at 500 m (550 yd) and 131 mm at 1,000 m (1,100 yd) using standard Armour Piercing.
The panther front hull had 80 mm of armor angled at 55 degrees from the vertical. point is...the FireFly at CC ranges could pen a panthers front armour with standard AP ammo. |
Quote: |
our info differs Dima. Confused im not getting into a you said / i said .....my info / your info debate. |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT