The Ukraine
Select messages from
# through # Forum FAQ
[/[Print]\]

Close Combat Series -> The Mess

#1: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:23 pm
    —
I am following this one as best I can from Canadian news outlets and the BBC.

From what I gather Russia has seized control of Crimea to protect its citizens in Crimea. Since Crimea is a province or territory of the Ukraine, many countries including the Ukraine are saying this is basically an act of war. I would agree with that. If this doesn't seem wrong to you yet, take this example and apply it to any other two countries sharing a border.

I suppose Russia is going to try and bring Crimea back under Russian control, as it lost it years ago. The Ukraine has to get Russian to pull out of Crimea. Politically or by force, hopefully politically. Third option is to split up the Ukraine, would Crimea join Russia or become its own country? Statistics say about 60% of Crimea's population identify themselves as Russian. If the Ukraine tries to take back Crimea by force, would the citizens turn on the Ukrainian military? Becoming a sort of militia like we see in the Middle East conflicts.

Chechnya is not far away. If this blows up into a conflict it will be as disastrous as Chechnya was and destabilize the region.

I think Russia has over stepped its bounds by seizing Crimea. If their intentions were to only protect citizens then this could be acceptable. But its obvious that they will use this as a way to split up the Ukraine and potentially bring Crimea back under Russian control. The most they should of done was a military buildup across the border.

#2: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:07 am
    —
Well, I won't say that I am happy about all these possibilites that you just enumerated.

But, I do know that I already have a nice Russian counter set for CCMT.

So maybe I will add a Ukraine counter set, and do something similar to my Arab Spring mod.

#3: Re: The Ukraine Author: TejszdLocation: Canada PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:32 am
    —
Protecting a minority has been used many times as an excuse/reason (depends on which side you support) to attack/take land from a neighbor country...

#4: Re: The Ukraine Author: Drizzt PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:53 am
    —
Crimea, historically speaking, it’s part of Russia (something like from 200 years until 1954 and substantially also later). The russian president is an oligarch like many others in the area (I really don’t like him), but he is a leader: I think he will defend russian interests and it’s difficult for me, in this specific situation, to say that he makes a total mistake. A thing that let me think it’s the fact that Ukrainian president has been elected (he was not a dictator, just an oligarch) so Crimean government, after his fall, it has taken its decisions.
Anyway, after the end of the real socialism, the “shadow” of a (potential) oligarchy it’s present also in all western democracies thanks to a capitalism poor of good rules because, finally, remained without any kind of fears (differences between left and right parties diluted more and more plus this kind of UE = neoliberal economic doctrine always rules despite elections, like an oligarchy regime). So I’m sure no more if we (europeans) have the right to judge Russia, not after what we have done in Greece (“we” = European Union) recently. Having said this, if there will be a real war (and not a political solution) the reasons of both sides will become very, very weak at the end.
Of course, it’s just my opinion.

Drizzt

#5: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:10 am
    —
Putin is going to do what he wants to do. There will be little to no repercussions from this, at east in the short term. Understand many of the fellow members here are European, but the governments there are as weak as Obama has made the US. It might as well be Neville Chamberlain waving a piece of paper.

I would hope it's been obvious the last few years that the US is pulling the protection it gave from every corner of the world, one area at a time. I expect NATO's time will come if he gets around to it in the next 3 years, or if another Obama act alike becomes president. It's what you get with a hands out population.

Hope didn't offend anyone with this, wasn't my intention and really hope that the entire world wakes up soon as to what is coming.

#6: Re: The Ukraine Author: BungarraLocation: Murchison region, West Australia PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:31 am
    —
Gold price jumped $20... this morning... bit of nervousness about...

#7: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 6:41 am
    —
For now we still have less troops in Crimea than allowed by Kharkov agreement for the Russian base in Sevastopol.
We'll see how it goes though. Too much lies coming from all the sides to make good judgements.

#8: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:12 am
    —
Delete

#9: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 5:31 pm
    —
Some nice articles to help understanding background a little Smile
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116818/russia-has-always-thought-eastern-ukraine-russian-land
http://jackmatlock.com/2014/03/ukraine-the-price-of-internal-division/#more-629

#10: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 5:40 pm
    —
Doesn't really look too much of an invasion basing on these photos:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152689818938902&set=pcb.10152689820193902&type=1&theater

#11: Re: The Ukraine Author: Tippi-SimoLocation: Helsinki PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 6:47 pm
    —
There is no such thing as Ukrainian independence (that is a Western creation to weaken Russia). Ukraine has always been part of Russia.

#12: Re: The Ukraine Author: Pzt_CrackwiseLocation: Switzerland PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 12:04 am
    —
Some of modern Ukraine has belonged to Crimean Khanate before, which was an Ottoman vassal and some of it was possessed by the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth. So it has not belonged to Russia always.

#13: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 12:31 am
    —
Pzt_Crackwise wrote (View Post):
Some of modern Ukraine has belonged to Crimean Khanate before, which was an Ottoman vassal and some of it was possessed by the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth. So it has not belonged to Russia always.

Yes, Russia first conquered the Crimean Khanate and then annexed Poland and those were the Russian kings who first added alot of Polish territory to Ukraine starting since 17th century and then the Soviet leaders (starting from Lenin) who gifted more area to Ukraine as beeing part of USSR.
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=210886&d=1386643518
 
So I wonder if these guys are so bold to demolish the statues of Lenin, maybe they should give the area gifted by Lenin back to Russia?

#14: Re: The Ukraine Author: pt11070 PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 2:35 am
    —
I just hope that cooler heads prevail. In war everybody is at loss. At this point there is still hope for political solution, but there is a lot geopolitical back and forth between Russia and EU/USA that has little to do with Ukraine. Looking back to what happened to Yugoslavia and the way that was done, I really hope that cooler heads prevail. So much life lost and so much future destroyed by the conflict.
Pt

#15: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 2:19 pm
    —
Well it seems like its calming down today according to Western media. Theres a lot political wording being thrown around, for example...

Unconstitutional Coup - Aren't they all unconstitutional?
Military force as last resort - Military force was already used, deadly force is now the last resort

Sure it doesn't look like an invasion by those photos Dima. What do you call it when troops from one nation enter another? Occupation? Peace keeping? If the Ukrainians put up any type of defense at the border it would of been an invasion right? Instead they were either surprised or would'nt call Russia's bluff.

The troops in those photos are doing presence patrols if I were to guess. Some have no mags on their weapons, some do. I would even gamble that they do not have live rounds loaded in the magazines either, but they would have some in their tacvests. But to the general public, those are infanteers with guns. The posing with civilians reminds me very much of Bosnia days.

#16: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 5:20 pm
    —
How many in the former Eastern Block states, as well as in Europe now would like to see their old favorite whipping boy/girl leaders in Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagen, over Socialist and ultra liberals like have been mostly elected to office since the fall of the iron curtain?

Encroachments like this on sovereignty of an independent state more than likely wouldn't have gone mildly unchallenged under a moderate leader just 6 years ago. Europe has learned (or should have) after what happened with Syria several months ago that they are going to have to build up a common military buffer on the East side, once again at least short term and not be able to count on any support from the out side for assistance. This is not good considering they have several members teetering on bankruptcy already.

Kind of off topic, but does this lead to Germany being the new lead member of this block as they are in the best financial support and being one of the closest in danger?

#17: Re: The Ukraine Author: TTorpedoLocation: Portugal PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 7:45 pm
    —
Its always difficult to understand this affairs from the distance. Specially from a country where the borders are 900 years old and  every piece of terrain as a wall around it.

It looks like another step from Russia to re-take their hold place at the table. After the Georgia affair, backing Syria, now is Crimea.  All success in their book.

My main concern is since Crimea is being so easy to take they just might take the eastern Ukrainian half and, worse, encourage one of the other notorious bully's, China, to up their game in the China Sea.
Europe as usual is in conversations, until Germany (my bet) will jump ship and push their "OK".
All rests in how mush is the US (the other bully) willing to let go.

In the mean time the XXI century called to say it´s already 14.

#18: Re: The Ukraine Author: southern_land PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:34 am
    —
The lowdown is the Russians are looking for WMDs... the US couldn't find them in Iraq, maybe they're in the Ukraine

#19: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:00 am
    —
WMDs are like fruitcakes. You hear about them, and you might see a picture of them, but you never see them in "person".

#20: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 8:16 am
    —
Quote:
Sure it doesn't look like an invasion by those photos Dima. What do you call it when troops from one nation enter another? Occupation? Peace keeping? If the Ukrainians put up any type of defense at the border it would of been an invasion right? Instead they were either surprised or would'nt call Russia's bluff.

Our troops are only in Crimea where our Naval base is and where 60% of population are Russians. Officially they provide security and peace keeping and were asked to do that in Crimea by both president Yanukovitch (who's fled to RF) and the Parliament of the Crimean Autonomy and as you can see most of the people is happy with their presence.

Here they talk that we are not going to annex Crimea but most likely to have it as full autonomy region within Ukraine under controll and protection of RF.

#21: Re: The Ukraine Author: ke_mechial PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:29 pm
    —
Did you see in the news, the russian soldier pointing a rocket launcher at a column of ukrainian soldiers? Omg aren't they supposed to be used against vehicles? Smile Boy that should really scare me off...

#22: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 6:07 pm
    —
ke_mechial wrote (View Post):
Did you see in the news, the russian soldier pointing a rocket launcher at a column of ukrainian soldiers? Omg aren't they supposed to be used against vehicles? Smile Boy that should really scare me off...

RPG-7 has an HE-Frag rocket Smile.

#23: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 6:50 pm
    —
Quote:
RPG-7 has an HE-Frag rocket


Pretty sure the 122m cannon on several Russian tanks during the war had HE shells also, rather than AP, yet they were pretty effective against armored vehicles.

Point is.. From the start.. An agreement was made to close ties toward the east and many didn't want it, preferring it to the West.. Vast corruption was found, from those favoring ties with the East.

I see the Ukraine split into 2 (for now) at best, or sitting from afar. Corruption on one side and the Euro side on the other. Hopefully there is some way to over come those old ways, we read about how it was always done, but seeing it is another.

#24: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:58 pm
    —
...and now they will have a referendum to vote on whether or not to join Russia or stay with Ukraine. A vote while being occupied by foreign troops!! The outcome of this vote is SOOOOO predictable!!

#25: Re: The Ukraine Author: ke_mechial PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:40 pm
    —
To me, it is pretty worth of notice that this crisis has come out right after US wanted to cut the budget of the Army and bring in new sparing plans, e. g. decommissioning A-10s and other things. I suppose Arm Manufacturers are always the happy faces before and after wars and conflicts...

#26: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 10:00 am
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
How many in the former Eastern Block states, as well as in Europe now would like to see their old favorite whipping boy/girl leaders in Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagen, over Socialist and ultra liberals like have been mostly elected to office since the fall of the iron curtain?


Only Dr Strangelove miss them at times like this.

FYI, It may be good to know that a “liberal” in US is not the same as a “liberal” in Europe.



johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Encroachments like this on sovereignty of an independent state more than likely wouldn't have gone mildly unchallenged under a moderate leader just 6 years ago.


johnsilver wrote (View Post):
the governments there are as weak as Obama has made the US. It might as well be Neville Chamberlain waving a piece of paper..


Whats the cost of the Bush wars?

Follow link: http://nationalpriorities.org/cost-of/

Heres a thought, what if the trigger happy cowboy dint start those wars, or both wars, would the American economy be in its present state then? Would there be needs for the defence cuts at all? So, who caused the decline in US military might, thus the present "power vacuum"??



johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Europe has learned (or should have) after what happened with Syria several months ago that they are going to have to build up a common military buffer on the East side, once again at least short term and not be able to count on any support from the out side for assistance. This is not good considering they have several members teetering on bankruptcy already.


Can you explain your thoughts here, please? Isn’t the Syria war an internal fight? A defence force such as most European has, are for DEFENDING our territory. As far as I know, Syria has not threatened any European nation? Or?



johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Kind of off topic, but does this lead to Germany being the new lead member of this block as they are in the best financial support and being one of the closest in danger?

That might be a strictly logical development, but, consider feelings… Makes German an unlikely and unwilling leader.

#27: Re: The Ukraine Author: BungarraLocation: Murchison region, West Australia PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 12:28 pm
    —
The history of the Crimea is long & complex..

Russia cannot give up its only all year port... that is the facts

Lets hope cool heads prevail..

IMHO it has nothing to do with Europe or the US.. .. its in Russias backyard no one elses..

Sanctions will just drag the saga on & who wins.... certainly not the average Ukrainian.

My wish is for harmony to prevail & peace for all......

#28: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 2:00 pm
    —
I keep seeing reports that Putin is saying no Russian troops are in Crimea. These troops we are seeing are local militias. What are they saying about this in Russia Dima?

#29: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:37 pm
    —
Quote:
...and now they will have a referendum to vote on whether or not to join Russia or stay with Ukraine. A vote while being occupied by foreign troops!! The outcome of this vote is SOOOOO predictable!!

doesn't remind you Kosovo? :)

Quote:
I keep seeing reports that Putin is saying no Russian troops are in Crimea. These troops we are seeing are local militias. What are they saying about this in Russia Dima?

same Smile.

but almost 60% of Russians support this action so far...

#30: Re: The Ukraine Author: carusoLocation: Livorno PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:53 pm
    —
All the problems come from the western propaganda  Evil or Very Mad

#31: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 6:26 pm
    —
Quote:
Whats the cost of the Bush wars?


You mean the victory that was turned into defeat by (US) liberal policies and socialist agendas?



Quote:
Only Dr Strangelove miss them at times like this.


I highly doubt the USSR, China, or anyone else would have gone on a 'conquering" spree with Reagan and they didn't.. Look at Carter.. iran and the Mullahs..at iran, the Soviets knew they had a free hand to get a warm water port in Afghanistan (or thought it would be easy). Clinton and his no clue foreign policy with eastern block states.. SHAMED into finally using cruise missiles to start with, then his Bosnia debacle, then his same mistake at Somalia. Obama and his ham fisted mess at Libya.. Reagan didn't play at Libya, i know, my ship was there. You go to war, or teach a lesson and make it a nasty hard one the other side doesn't forget.

Just like Thatcher taught Argentina with the Falklands skirmish/war. Go hard, or not at all. Sending a few missiles does nothing. Take it to where it hurts. All other is nonsense.

#32: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 6:27 pm
    —
Quote:
All the problems come from the western propaganda
 
well, alot of the active the Russian population and media/known persons were badly against Putin's actions but after the EU and US have shown the worst example of double standards, a support became much much wider and stronger...

like those famous footage of lethal shooting of the rebels that was told to be done by the regime sniper but appears there were some mercenaries hired by the rioters (telecon by Estonian minister released these days).
this video tries to track bullet trajectories https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0TCDY4nc6A - for me it really looks they were shot from the rear.

interesting that one of the first legal act released by the provisional goverment was a banning of a Russian language as a regional language - so no wonder the South-East part of Ukraine didn't like it and especially Crimea where there are 60% of the Russians. Btw, Crimea declared to have a referendum for independency from Kiev if nationalists come to power in December or November.

anyway, most likely, everything is agreed between the US and RF and Crimea is just a trade card...

#33: Re: The Ukraine Author: HogansHeros PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 6:34 pm
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
the Soviets knew they had a free hand to get a warm water port in Afghanistan (or thought it would be easy). .

I take it geography is not your strong suit.

#34: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 6:38 pm
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
, the Soviets knew they had a free hand to get a warm water port in Afghanistan (or thought it would be easy). .


Rolling Eyes  

Yeh, the many major warm water ports in Afghanistan...

#35: Re: The Ukraine Author: carusoLocation: Livorno PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 6:52 pm
    —
Seriousley, i think that lies and propaganda come from all the directions. As it has always been since the ancient times and the first kinds of propaganda which today, we call  "news".

Truth lies in the middle, but honestly the principle of, as remembered by tejszd :"...Protecting a minority has been used many times as an excuse/reason (depends on which side you support) to attack/take land from a neighbor country..."  (or even encouraging or protecting riots or secession movements i would add) is not really acceptable. This overcomes any simpathy for a country or another, for a kind of government or another, is just a matter of principle which should regard all of us, all countries.

edit: i would add that making examples on historical past contests, it's a waste of time as ethical principles have changed a lot over the years and centuries.

#36: Re: The Ukraine Author: Schmal_Turm PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:55 pm
    —
"In war, the first casualty is truth."
Greek writer/poet Aeschylus (525-456BC)

#37: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:15 pm
    —
I learned today that Russian news agencies are controlled by the government. Is that true?

#38: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 9:22 am
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
I learned today that Russian news agencies are controlled by the government. Is that true?

well, yes, there is a couple of state owned media companies like RT for example, in addition we have like several dozens of more or less independent medias but they are mainly controlled by close-to-goverment oligarkhs, well more or less like US and some European medias.
still we also have a couple of far-from politics news channels similar to Bloomberg and internet media resources that pretend to be control by "political opposition"...and of course a full access to the Western "independent" media either by internet or TV channels Wink.

so basically we have all-around covering of news from different angles if one is interested Smile.

#39: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 9:30 am
    —
From a couple of days ago they started to quote the Den Haage court process regarding Kosovo in Dec 2009 where the US, Germany, British, Austria representatives all said that any part of any country could declare independancy through referendum - we all know what was a court decision that time Smile

#40: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 5:29 pm
    —
That's a nice page about situation in Ukraine http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/02/27/world/europe/ukraine-divisions-crimea.html?hp&_r=1

#41: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 5:48 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
From a couple of days ago they started to quote the Den Haage court process regarding Kosovo in Dec 2009 where the US, Germany, British, Austria representatives all said that any part of any country could declare independancy through referendum - we all know what was a court decision that time Smile


I know there's lots of comparing going around. Every one of these situations are very very different though. Most of the foreign intervention in Kosovo came after all the bloodshed of the Balkan wars. From what I can tell Crimea was never headed towards civil war in the first place, so why are all the Russian troops there?

#42: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 5:52 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
That's a nice page about situation in Ukraine http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/02/27/world/europe/ukraine-divisions-crimea.html?hp&_r=1  


There is a reason the NY Times has lost all respect, as well as readership the last 15 years. They are a schill for liberal policies. They are in the bag for any far left policy known to man and will echo their thoughts.

If Obama speaks it? They will invent facts to represent it.

#43: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 6:01 pm
    —
Here we go again with our Fox News Clone and Obama-bashing.  That's rich you accuse a REAL news outlet of inventing facts when Fox is run by Partisans and contributes their own money to the party.  What the hell does Obama have to do with Ukraine?  I know, when you live in the Republican news media bubble you can't help it.

warm water port in Afghanistan?  Yeah when you are swimming in the soup of Conservative media bubble you have both make-believe facts and geography.

So let me get this straight...if Mitt Romney or McCain was President, Putin would tremble and knees would shake in fear of getting Nuked?  Or we would stay in Iraq and Afganistan for 100 years, then invade Syria and then invade Russia or just drop a nuke.  Insane.

#44: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:15 pm
    —
Quote:
I know there's lots of comparing going around. Every one of these situations are very very different though. Most of the foreign intervention in Kosovo came after all the bloodshed of the Balkan wars. From what I can tell Crimea was never headed towards civil war in the first place, so why are all the Russian troops there?

once again, in December 2013 or maybe January 2014 the Parliament of the Crimea Autonomy declared that they would declare independancy from Kiev and apply for RF protection in case the radical seized power.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Court_of_Justice_advisory_opinion_on_Kosovo's_declaration_of_independence  
Serbia by initiating proceedings before the ICJ wants to set back the clock, and seeks an advisory opinion that would compel Kosovo to re-engage with Serbia over its status. There is, however, no reason whatever to believe that an agreed outcome would be any more achievable now than it was in the past. The United Kingdom warns about the misleading approach of Serbia, which would like the court to assess the legality of the declaration, ignoring the events that led to it.
Serbia has made it quite clear that it will never accept an independent Kosovo. Kosovo, for its part, has made it quite clear, that, given the legacy of abuse, it cannot again become part of Serbia. Courts do not order estranged spouses to continue in a broken marriage.
Although the Resolution 1244 referred to the territorial integrity of Yugoslavia, this principle was not the cornerstone for a political solution of Kosovo's status. The United Kingdom did not come to support independence for Kosovo quickly or easily and does not see these proceedings as adversarial to Serbia. Serbia's democracy is not much older than Kosovo's. Independence of Kosovo brought stability to the region after a traumatic decade. The common future for both Kosovo and Serbia lies in eventual membership for both States in the European Union and the United Kingdom will continue to work towards the realisation of that vision.(
c)Daniel Bethlehem QC, Legal Adviser to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office on behalf of the GB.

The United States invites the International Court of Justice to leave the declaration of independence intact as an expression of the will of the people of Kosovo, either by refusing to comment on its legality, or by determining that the international law does not prohibit declarations of independence. The declaration of independence did not violate any principle of territorial integrity because under international law, only states must comply with this principle, and not internal entities.
The Court should not deal with the broader issue of self-determination in international law, or at least it should see Kosovo as a "special case".
There is no contradiction between the peacefully declared Declaration of Independence and international law, including Resolution 1244. Evidence of this is that 9 out of 15 Security Council members that voted for Resolution 1244, later recognised Kosovo as independent.
The Resolution 1244 has not guaranteed the territorial integrity of Serbia, but Yugoslavia, which now does not exist, and that only during the interim period of international administration in Kosovo
(c) Harold Hongju Koh, Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State on behalf of the USA.

The existence of the state of Kosovo cannot be ignored. Its existence is based on the right of self-determination by the people of Kosovo.
The principle of efficiency, is "the only principle that can be applied in the case of Kosovo, since Kosovo fulfills the elements of statehood and its people, territory and government have nation-building qualities
(c) Susanne Wasum-Rainer, Legal Adviser, Federal Foreign Office on behalf of Germany.

In international law there is no rule that prohibits the declaration of independence, or secession. The declaration was adopted by elected representatives who have expressed the will of the people of Kosovo and international law does not prohibit this.
The only exceptions are Northern Cyprus and Rhodesia; their independence is illegal as it was declared with the use of illegal outside force and by racist minority regimes, respectively
(c)Helmut Tichy, Deputy Legal Adviser, Federal Ministry of European and International Affairs on behalf of Austria.

so please tell me why Crimea populated by the Russian minority that doesn't want to be part of Ukraine has less rights to be independent than Kosovo populated by Albanian minority that didn't want to be part of Serbia?

#45: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:29 pm
    —
I guess the typo mistake on warm water port will be here to stay.. Might as well.. NY Times, or CCS front page news for the next decade...

If Romney, or McCain had been president? Same thing could have been a possibility, granted. The trail of errors leading up to it would not have been.. Slashing of military budgets. Removal of US forces around the globe (portraying weakness). Attempting a "reset" with someone who never wanted it to start with (and both McCain/Palin are on record with this from 2008).

Portraying weakness invites this type of behavior. Yes, it doesn't particularly involve the US, but it eventually could. I understand where Obama is coming from and he is of the total isolationist movement, which also doesn't work and been proven to not work. Nobody ever else is willing to step up to the plate, except for tyrannies.

If the US could conceivably back off entirely, protect Israel and forget Europe, allow them to protect themselves? Isolationism would be great, but threats have a way of growing, expanding, just like they did during the 30's when nobody is willing to confront pure evil.

#46: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:55 pm
    —
Quote:
I keep seeing reports that Putin is saying no Russian troops are in Crimea. These troops we are seeing are local militias. What are they saying about this in Russia Dima?  

today an interesting version appeared that these "polite armed troopers in the Russian camo" could be the EU based PMCs hired by Crimean authorities - we'll see if this version will have any proofs though.
but in case they are really PMCs it appears that Putin was not lying Smile.

#47: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 8:16 pm
    —
Interesting analogy with Kosovo and what we witnessed in the 90's with disentegration of Yugoslavia.  I remember in college in the early 90's speaking with one of my professors about the pending collapse of USSR...and how in some ways I predicted this was going to happen.

#48: Re: The Ukraine Author: HogansHeros PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 4:24 pm
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
If Romney, or McCain had been president? Same thing could have been a possibility, granted. The trail of errors leading up to it would not have been.. Slashing of military budgets. Removal of US forces around the globe (portraying weakness). Attempting a "reset" with someone who never wanted it to start with (and both McCain/Palin are on record with this from 2008).

I don't think this is accurate--it is certainly not realpolitik (not that we'll ever actually know how an alternate timeline would turn out). If Romney/McCain is president the Republican congress simply continues to raise the debt ceiling with no conditions?--You must think they really are just playing politics and have no principles--Or the Democratic senate simply folds and allows 100% of cuts to be to discretionary spending and entitlement programs? McCain is president and suddenly the Bush era agreement to withdraw from Iraq is nullified; He keep troops in Iraq without immunity from Iraqi prosecution? Bush looked into the soul of Putin and decided he was a good guy--the type who would vacation with Bush at his ranch. Bush may be a lot of things but "weak" is not an accusation thrown around much--none of that had any deterrent effect once Georgia/South Ossetia/Abkhazia can up.

Were Romney/McCain not going to try to get Russian help with Iran/Syria/any other problem?
Realistically, either hypothetical administration was going to have to attempt a "reset" with Russia because you can't get things done without at least Russia's tacit agreement. They still would have viewed Medvedev as a chance for a more cooperative Russia but, ultimately, Russia would have done what it wanted to in response to developments in Ukraine. Russia knows the west, under any president, isn't going to risk getting into a shooting war with a nuclear armed country over part of Georgia or part of Ukraine--and having more troops hypothetically still in  Iraq and Afghanistan doesn't put America in a stronger position to respond to Russian actions.

#49: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 5:22 pm
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Slashing of military budgets. Removal of US forces around the globe (portraying weakness). Attempting a "reset" with someone who never wanted it to start with (and both McCain/Palin are on record with this from 2008).
.

The Iraq 2 war, and Afgan war, does have a bill. The tax payers have to pay for it, or you have to save on something.. The republicans don’t want to pay taxes… And you want even more wars, thus more costs… Who’s gona pay, or on what are you to save?

johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Portraying weakness invites this type of behavior. Yes, it doesn't particularly involve the US, but it eventually could. I understand where Obama is coming from and he is of the total isolationist movement,


Hm, the Russian attack on Georgia and anexation of South Ossetia took place when  George W Bush was president…    Isnt that intresting, Russian does that even though a republican president is in power..? And a president who has started 2 wars, thus shown how “strong” he is..

johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Portraying weakness invites this type of behavior.


Okay, if thats true, then Russia saw that the republican president George W Bush had made US “weaker” by starting 2 resource draining wars…

#50: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 6:37 pm
    —
delete

#51: Re: The Ukraine Author: MajorFrank PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 1:09 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
Quote:
I keep seeing reports that Putin is saying no Russian troops are in Crimea. These troops we are seeing are local militias. What are they saying about this in Russia Dima?  

today an interesting version appeared that these "polite armed troopers in the Russian camo" could be the EU based PMCs hired by Crimean authorities - we'll see if this version will have any proofs though.
but in case they are really PMCs it appears that Putin was not lying Smile.


Maybe they are from planet Mars...?  Surprised  Smile

#52: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 4:02 am
    —
March 4th - Liveleak video with subtitles of man questioning "Russian" soldiers guarding a base in Simferopol. No insignia visible, no license plates.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=118_1394165011

March 10th - Western Media now reporting that Russia media is claiming Eastern Ukraine has fallen into lawlessness.

March 10th - NATO sending AWACS to monitor situation in Ukraine.


Last edited by mooxe on Tue Mar 11, 2014 2:23 pm; edited 1 time in total

#53: Re: The Ukraine Author: pvt_GruntLocation: Melbourne, Australia PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 5:46 am
    —
I'm guessing the next step will be some "attacks" on innocent Russian citizens by unknown assailants, which will need more Russian troops to "stabilise" the situation. This could lead to a "helpfull" takeover of the area as the Ukrainian authorities have obviously lost control.

#54: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 9:20 am
    —
The discussion in the western media revolves entirely around what the Russians are doing in the Crimea, their aims and whether or not they have a “legal” right to do it. This all serves as a diversion from the central question, “what are the US and EU doing in the Ukraine and do they have a right to do it?”

According to Victoria Nuland, US Assistant secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs,“Since the declaration of Ukrainian independence in 1991, the United States supported the Ukrainians in the development of democratic institutions and skills in promoting civil society and a good form of government – all that is necessary to achieve the objectives of Ukraine’s European. We have invested more than 5 billion dollars to help Ukraine to achieve these and other goals.”

As is clearly demonstrated in her now infamous leaked discussion with US ambassador in Kiev, Geoffrey Pyatt, this is a euphemism for installing a US puppet regime in Kiev.

Some of our media feel obliged to acknowledge the existence of the Ukrainian extreme right wing only to make their propaganda line appear balanced and to then relegate this lead element to a "minority" In this way, for example,  UK Channel 4 acknowledges Svoboda leader Oleh Tyahnybok's  "history of anti-Semitic comments," quoting his reference to a “Muscovite-Jewish Mafia”  which allegedly controls Ukraine. This is disingenuous in the extreme. You might well consider such a remark a throwaway by perhaps an unsavoury character. It does not allude to or explain Svoboda's neo-Nazi make up and political program. Allow me to fill in the gaps deliberately left by our "free press".

Oleh Tyahnybok hailed John Demjanjuk, accomplice in the murder of 30 000 people in Sobibor, a hero. His deputy, Yuriy Mykhalchyshyn, founded the “Joseph Goebbels Political Research Center,” a Neo-Nazi think tank. Andriy Parubiy is a founder of this movement. He orchestrated the Right Sector including the UNA-UNSO para-militaries, who, when not dressed and waving swastika like banners in the style of 1930s fascist thugs, provoked pitched battles with the police during the protests. Parubiy is now minister for the armed forces in the Kiev junta.

This movement venerates OUN leader Stepan Bandera a collaborator with the Nazis in their genocide of Ukrainian Jewry. Their stated aim is to end parliament, ban all political parties, liquidate all Russian intellectuals, and members of hostile political parties, ban imports of literature from Russia, clean out the civil service of anyone who won’t implement these policies etc etc etc. This organisation currently has six ministers in the putschist government, not minor positions but posts like education and the military.

The first act of this new “moderate” US-EU backed democratic government was to abolish minority rights in the Ukraine. Russian is no longer an official language in Ukraine. They are planning to revoke laws that criminalise excusing the crimes of fascism.

Had this movement arisen in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya or Syria it would have been used as pretext enough for military intervention by the West. As it happens, it’s Russia that wants to remove these made in Washington Neo-Nazis. Instead of articles detailing the threat of fascism in the Ukraine, then, we are treated to the unsavoury sight of cossacks whipping feminist agitators in Moscow. Vile, but why are they not showing us what these Ukrainian fascist thugs are doing and what they represent? This choice of what we are shown can only be deliberate.

The US long ago decided upon the dismemberment of the Soviet Union/ Russian Federation as a geo-political entity capable of challenging its hegemony. http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_chessboard.htm
Control of the Ukraine was the strategic aim both of Kaiser Wilhelm and Hitler. Further, should Germany, in the guise of the EU, gain control of the Ukraine, it will itself represent a geo-political landmass capable of challenging US hegemony. There is a second tension, then, which threatens to erupt as Germany embarks upon rearmament and an aggressive, military foreign policy it has renounced since 1945.

That there is genuine popular revulsion at the corrupt state of Ukrainian politics and fear of impending economic disaster is undeniable. The US and EU are exploiting this for their own ends, however and the Ukrainian people, East and West, find themselves between a rock and a hard place. Their choice is between one group of corrupt oligarchs leaning on Moscow and another group of no less corrupt oligarchs resting on neo-nazi muscle and the US-EU. Either way, living conditions for the mass of the population are set to crash dive with no hope of recovery. Putrid nationalism and patriotism on both sides offer an outlet for social frustration and fear as they always have, a diversion from a global economic system that promotes social inequality and which is destroying the remnants of democracy it can no longer sustain.

There is no resolution to this crisis in the phoney pretexts presented by any politicians or their media accomplices. The solution lies in the unity of the Russian with Ukrainian working class around an internationalist socialist program against the warmongers of the Kremlin, Washington and Berlin and against all the Ukrainian oligarchs. Clearly, we're a long way from that.

#55: Re: The Ukraine Author: pvt_GruntLocation: Melbourne, Australia PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:09 am
    —
sieterayos wrote (View Post):

There is no resolution to this crisis in the phoney pretexts presented by any politicians or their media accomplices. The solution lies in the unity of the Russian with Ukrainian working class around an internationalist socialist program against the warmongers of the Kremlin, Washington and Berlin and against all the Ukrainian oligarchs. Clearly, we're a long way from that.


Clearly, and moving further away from the internationalist socialist "ideal" for about 30 years now. I agree that it cannot be solved through outside interests, but I cant' see an honest open referendum occuring under current conditions either.

#56: Re: The Ukraine Author: pvt_GruntLocation: Melbourne, Australia PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:19 am
    —
btw Siet, Sulla is waiting for you..... Wink http://www.closecombat.org/csoforums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=14633

#57: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 12:45 pm
    —
Quote:
Oleh Tyahnybok hailed John Demjanjuk, accomplice in the murder of 30 000 people in Sobibor, a hero. His deputy, Yuriy Mykhalchyshyn, founded the “Joseph Goebbels Political Research Center,” a Neo-Nazi think tank. Andriy Parubiy is a founder of this movement. He orchestrated the Right Sector including the UNA-UNSO para-militaries, who, when not dressed and waving swastika like banners in the style of 1930s fascist thugs, provoked pitched battles with the police during the protests. Parubiy is now minister for the armed forces in the Kiev junta.

and today they were legalised as the National Guards...

#58: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 2:50 pm
    —
pvt_Grunt wrote (View Post):
btw Siet, Sulla is waiting for you..... Wink http://www.closecombat.org/csoforums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=14633  


Wow I just had a flashback from 10 years ago.  Shocked

You know that really IS Siet when he plants the longest post in the thread.

Ukraine is screwed...they have no money, no jobs, no oil or natural resources ( at least that keeps them safe from potential rise of another war-hawk right wing USA regime ).

So it is true they will be torn like a rag doll between Putin and the "West".  Putin is shrewd and calculating...he knows full well when to exploit a situation for political gain.

#59: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:48 pm
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
pvt_Grunt wrote (View Post):
btw Siet, Sulla is waiting for you..... Wink http://www.closecombat.org/csoforums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=14633  


Wow I just had a flashback from 10 years ago.  Shocked

You know that really IS Siet when he plants the longest post in the thread.

Ukraine is screwed...they have no money, no jobs, no oil or natural resources ( at least that keeps them safe from potential rise of another war-hawk right wing USA regime ).

So it is true they will be torn like a rag doll between Putin and the "West".  Putin is shrewd and calculating...he knows full well when to exploit a situation for political gain.



And you know it really is deej when he gets all his details wrong yet manages to sound like he knows what's going on.

Ukraine has vast resources, that's why everyone's always wanted to control it. Iron and steel are obvious, still big exports in spite of obsolete technology. Manganese has declined but massive reserves remain. Loss of Ukrainian manganese would have screwed the Nazi war effort, making steel production impossible if the war wasn't over before German reserves were used up. Most of all, Ukraine produces a massive surplus of food, again, a strategic German interest as Europe uses far more food calories than it produces. For the US, it's a great chunk out of the Eurasian land mass. and another gouge out of Russia.

It has escaped deej too, that the worst militarism flows from economic inadequacy, not strength. That's why the US is making wars all over the globe, their economy is screwed and military might is all that's left.... except perhaps the biggest government debt in all human history.

In what way Putin is gaining from this, I just can't imagine. A temporary patriotic surge will give way to unrest as sanctions kick in and/or a shooting war with US backed Ukraine opens up. Nuclear conflagration? That's good for his opinion pol ratings, sure.

#60: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:18 am
    —
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
dj wrote (View Post):
pvt_Grunt wrote (View Post):
btw Siet, Sulla is waiting for you..... Wink http://www.closecombat.org/csoforums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=14633  


Wow I just had a flashback from 10 years ago.  Shocked

You know that really IS Siet when he plants the longest post in the thread.

Ukraine is screwed...they have no money, no jobs, no oil or natural resources ( at least that keeps them safe from potential rise of another war-hawk right wing USA regime ).

So it is true they will be torn like a rag doll between Putin and the "West".  Putin is shrewd and calculating...he knows full well when to exploit a situation for political gain.



In what way Putin is gaining from this, I just can't imagine. A temporary patriotic surge will give way to unrest as sanctions kick in and/or a shooting war with US backed Ukraine opens up. Nuclear conflagration? That's good for his opinion pol ratings, sure.


Except for those pesky facts like annexing S. Ossetia and now Crimea.  Troops are now amassing along the broader eastern border with Ukraine.  So yeah who knew what Putin could gain from that.

Rolling Eyes

#61: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 9:52 am
    —
Quote:
Except for those pesky facts like annexing S. Ossetia

South Ossetia is not a part of RF...

#62: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:23 am
    —
Except for those pesky facts like annexing S. Ossetia and now Crimea.  Troops are now amassing along the broader eastern border with Ukraine.  So yeah who knew what Putin could gain from that.

Rolling Eyes[/quote]

There speaks the great strategist, from his armchair, as he momentarily tears his gaze from CNN imperialist news.

An EU commission found Georgia legally responsible for the conflict with Russia. That it embarked on an attack against Russia was only because it believed the US would back it up. But Georgia was always a pawn to probe the Russians for the US. Little snippets of land are nothing in the game being played by the US. The Ukraine is another matter.

It's a shame all those CSO discussions are lost. The positions I put forward I guess would be about 90% vindicated. The crash of '08 which I predicted as imminent in '05 is nowhere near over. In fact, the contradictions that created it are not only unresolved but intensifying, preparing a new crash of even more catastrophic proportions.

The Obama administration, hailed by many as a reversal of its reactionary predecessor, has gone far beyond any before it, in dismantling the US constitution and democracy. In the face of intractable economic decline and an ever widening gap in social inequality, the democratic norms of government of the West are being replaced by a police state apparatus with an elected façade in which all political parties represent the same super-rich interests. Nowhere is this more advanced than in the US.

Using the military might that is residual to its former economic supremacy, the US is seeking to isolate China, Russia and any state that refuses to do its bidding, and to destroy them. The German led EU is an emerging rival.

That is the meaning of US involvement in the Ukraine. The world's populations are being sleep walked by the capitalist media into world war three.

#63: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:15 pm
    —
Russia still was itching to get revenge against the separatists in the South...and the U.S. even under an imperialist war-hawk president did not intervene.  Although Senator McCain and his war-hawk friends at that time did in fact try to prop-up the Georgian regime but their alliance failed to get enough political support.  The U.S. has little interest in getting involved in the internal affairs of former USSR nations.  Are you not watching your BBC or other outlets???  Do you not see what the people of Ukraine are doing?  

Wow you sound like you have been indoctrinated by Rupert Murdoch Corp in accusing Obama of violation of Constitution.  I assume you are referring to the Intel agency scandals.  Now there is a brand new scandal exposed by Obama's own party.  Senator Feinstein made accusations about spying on the very committee assigned to oversight of the Intel agencies.  Nice try...  These are Institutional issues that really answer to no party or partisan teams...regardless of whom is elected to political office.  BTW - Feinstein was attempting to subpoena records about torture at the time she alleged her committee was under surveillance.  So please enlighten me on how that is trampling on the Constitution when she is the one attempting to expose injustice in the first place.

Re: Ukraine, the U.S. really has not much appetite to get involved.  Just as Putin was the guy who stopped military action in Syria, the U.S. is simply trying to diffuse the situation and be a peacemaker.  I do give credit to Putin for his brilliant strategy in Syria, to preserve lucrative $ arms deals, while preventing another wasteful war in the Mid-East.  Like I said he is a very shrewd and calculating leader.

#64: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 9:47 pm
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Russia still was itching to get revenge against the separatists in the South...and the U.S. even under an imperialist war-hawk president did not intervene.  Although Senator McCain and his war-hawk friends at that time did in fact try to prop-up the Georgian regime but their alliance failed to get enough political support.  The U.S. has little interest in getting involved in the internal affairs of former USSR nations.  Are you not watching your BBC or other outlets???  Do you not see what the people of Ukraine are doing?  

Wow you sound like you have been indoctrinated by Rupert Murdoch Corp in accusing Obama of violation of Constitution.  I assume you are referring to the Intel agency scandals.  Now there is a brand new scandal exposed by Obama's own party.  Senator Feinstein made accusations about spying on the very committee assigned to oversight of the Intel agencies.  Nice try...  These are Institutional issues that really answer to no party or partisan teams...regardless of whom is elected to political office.  BTW - Feinstein was attempting to subpoena records about torture at the time she alleged her committee was under surveillance.  So please enlighten me on how that is trampling on the Constitution when she is the one attempting to expose injustice in the first place.

Re: Ukraine, the U.S. really has not much appetite to get involved.  Just as Putin was the guy who stopped military action in Syria, the U.S. is simply trying to diffuse the situation and be a peacemaker.  I do give credit to Putin for his brilliant strategy in Syria, to preserve lucrative $ arms deals, while preventing another wasteful war in the Mid-East.  Like I said he is a very shrewd and calculating leader.


The only difference between McCain, Obama and any other faction is tactical. That is, timing, and pre-requisites. They are all bent on dismembering the Russian federation because the policy runs through all administrations until it is accomplished or the US is no longer able to pursue the project. I suggest you subscribe to STRATFOR and read what your leaders read and consider. That will help you put into context the crap put out for public consumption on CNN, Fox or the BBC.

As mentioned in my first post, Victoria Nuland admitted the US has spent $5 billion since the 1990s  on regime change in the Ukraine alone, she didn't give figures for money used in the Caucasus. That is the extent in USD terms that the US is uninterested in getting involved in the former USSR republics.

That an adversary exists capable of restraining US aggression is a reason to get rid of them, not one to avoid confrontation. Again, timing is the issue, not difference of ultimate aim. Again, read  Zbigniew Brzezinski or STRATFOR. Arms sales has little to do with Putin's obstruction of US policy. Did CNN tell you that? The policy of the US is to surround an isolate Iran as a key ally of Russia and China. Syria is an ally of and supported by, Iran. The US had broken Iranian resistance through sanctions, sufficiently to move on for the moment. The end game is always Russia and China.

Only the CIA scandals? Snowdon has blown the criminality of the CIA wide out into the open, exposing material I wouldn't even have thought possible. Thanks Edward, every freedom lover owes you a debt of gratitude.

You attempt to defend Obama by pointing out that the issue of the CIA is institutional, yet you are doubtless oblivious to the logic of your own argument,  that the CIA is out of control, behaving as it wishes, regardless of which administration controls the White House.

Why is Feinstein making accusations against the CIA? She has been covering for them for years, and as she admitted, tried to settle any issues behind closed doors, out of sight of the US and world's population. In other words, she is as culpable for the dismantling of the US constitution as much as Bush and Obama. The CIA threatened her and her committee because they will no longer accept any oversight, however perfunctory, whatsoever. She went to the Senate like a frightened rabbit. The agencies of state oppression, surveillance and violence now operate with autonomy from any government oversight, domestically and overseas, relative autonomy from the class whose interests they serve, in other words, they are out of control. Yet Obama defends them and nobody within the US ruling class is interested in taking them on. Only the American working class has the power and interest in overthrowing this tyranny.

If you think that mass indiscriminate surveillance, assassination by presidential decree, torture, abduction and detention, the abolition of habeas corpus, the list is endless, has nothing to do with the destruction of the US constitution and democracy, you've been drinking too much soma and for much too long.

#65: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:37 pm
    —
Media reports there's only two options on the voting cards.

1. Join Russia
2. Become independant


What about stay with Ukraine?

#66: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:49 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Media reports there's only two options on the voting cards.

1. Join Russia
2. Become independant


What about stay with Ukraine?


False report. Options are Join Russia or remain within Ukraine with more autonomy.

#67: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:57 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Media reports there's only two options on the voting cards.
1. Join Russia
2. Become independant
What about stay with Ukraine?

interesting reports you have :)

1) to join the RF.
2) to stay with Ukraine but with more autonomy.



Krim.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  67.78 KB
 Viewed:  315 Time(s)

Krim.jpg



#68: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:13 pm
    —
Kind of like how many American elections are rigged by unlimited campaign $$$ from secret donors that do not have to disclose their info.  Democracy for sale for the highest bidder or by the leader with the most guns.  Sasha Cohen "Dictator" style.

#69: Re: The Ukraine Author: tedy28 PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:24 pm
    —
http://fakty.interia.pl/raport-zamieszki-na-ukrainie/galerie/glosowanie-na-krymie-z-urna-do-domow-zdjecie,iId,1392062,iAId,111470
referendum Smile)

#70: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:47 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Media reports there's only two options on the voting cards.

1. Join Russia
2. Become independant


What about stay with Ukraine?


What about other countries?

3. Join Jamaica
4. Join Turkey
5. Join Mexico

#71: Re: The Ukraine Author: pvt_GruntLocation: Melbourne, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:57 pm
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):

3. Join Jamaica

They would need to chnge their name to JACRAINE.

#72: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:57 pm
    —
tedy28 wrote (View Post):
http://fakty.interia.pl/raport-zamieszki-na-ukrainie/galerie/glosowanie-na-krymie-z-urna-do-domow-zdjecie,iId,1392062,iAId,111470
referendum Smile)

home voting is a normal practice to cover disabled people for example.

#73: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 6:17 pm
    —
By this moment exit polls show 93% voted for #1.

#74: Re: The Ukraine Author: TejszdLocation: Canada PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 7:31 pm
    —
Not surprising results given;

- their Russian language and recent (as far as countries/peoples) attachment to the Ukraine
- economic dependence on the Russian military bases
- and oh ya the thousands of guys with guns

#75: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 7:44 pm
    —
Tejszd wrote (View Post):
Not surprising results given;

... ....
- and oh ya the thousands of guys with guns


Did anyone object to the elections held in Iraq under the guns of a universally loathed and feared occupation force that was deliberately stoking sectarian conflict to divide and rule the population? Not to mention abducting, torturing and murdering suspected political opponents in the tens of thousands? Utterly illegal under international law, yet because the US was overseeing it, no one in mainstream politics did more than wring their hands in mock concern.

By comparison, the guns of any Russian soldiers and volunteers who are protecting the population from fascist usurpers in Kiev whose stated aim is to liquidate all Russian intellectuals, seems reasonable and democratic.

Just shows, with regard to legality, it's not what you do but who you are.

#76: Re: The Ukraine Author: ke_mechial PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 8:29 pm
    —
Today I was watching CNN. They interviewed with an Ukrainian woman who ran a store in a border town with russia, besides her home  was  just near border  about 50 meters away from Russia. She was just worried about, in case Border is closed , which means no customers from Russia, or if some clash begins that she is just on the frontline. Other people they interviewed seemed to be unhappy about situation,too. They say that Europe has just been demanding until now, before it gives anything. It seems to me, Ukraine relies more on Russia in terms of Trade, until they form an economy with EU, which is already in tight situations economically,  and I do not see that this  can be easily set up in short term.

And I think the bottomline and the real question is: When will Ukraine prospectively become an EU-Member? It is a fact that Ukraine has valuable vast resources, ( and what everything goes about), but EU was anxious about visa-issue about Romania just short time ago.

#77: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 9:01 pm
    —
The new status of Russian MID (foreign affairs ministry) on FB
https://www.facebook.com/MIDRussia/posts/467855943313852 :

Wait for me, and I'll come back!
Wait with all you've got!
Wait, when dreary yellow rains
Tell you, you should not.
Wait when snow is falling fast,
Wait when summer's hot,
Wait when yesterdays are past,
Others are forgot.
Wait, when from that far-off place,
Letters don't arrive.
Wait, when those with whom you wait
Doubt if I'm alive.

Wait for me, and I'll come back!
Wait in patience yet
When they tell you off by heart
That you should forget.
Even when my dearest ones
Say that I am lost,
Even when my friends give up,
Sit and count the cost,
Drink a glass of bitter wine
To the fallen friend -
Wait! And do not drink with them!
Wait until the end!

Wait for me and I'll come back,
Dodging every fate!
"What a bit of luck!" they'll say,
Those that would not wait.
They will never understand
How amidst the strife,
By your waiting for me, dear,
You had saved my life.
Only you and I will know
How you got me through.
Simply - you knew how to wait -
No one else but you.

(Konstantin Simonov)

Now that's really frightening Sad.

#78: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 9:31 pm
    —
To anyone unfamiliar with the above, Konstantin Simonov was a poet for the Stalinist counter revolution. This is a WW 2 war poem about a soldier asking his woman to wait for him. This posting would suggest that the Russian Federation is preparing for war, either an invasion, or, more likely, preparing to repel a Ukrainian fascist/NATO attempt to retake the Crimea.

#79: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 9:36 pm
    —
Russian reporter voted using only her Russian passport as identity. Says she is a a citizen of Russia, not of Crimea or the Ukraine. There's so many voter fraud stories coming out on ALL news outlets. Minorities in Crimea boycotting vote.

Ukraine says they will not initiate any military action in Crimea because it will leave their Eastern borders less secure. The Ukraine knows Crimea is lost. If its the people's true wish to join Russia, military action would be futile.

Here in Canada we have our own separatist movement in Quebec. Its been going on for years and is gaining light in media again recently. The separatist party very narrowly lost a referendum in 1995 by less than 1%, and they had 93% voter turnout. There was tons of campaigning spanning weeks and weeks. That referendum was not rushed and there was no military involvement. There was no fear, only uncertainty over the future if they did split from Canada. Maybe it was only a matter of time before Crimea split anyways. However, this referendum seems very rushed and very forced.


Last edited by mooxe on Sun Mar 16, 2014 9:49 pm; edited 1 time in total

#80: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 9:43 pm
    —
Perhaps Dima can tell us, but dint the people of former USSR receive a national passport of choice? As I remember, many of the SO people had Russian passports, not Georgian. Beeing Russian in Crimea would then mean they got a Russian passport... ? Dima??

#81: Re: The Ukraine Author: TejszdLocation: Canada PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 9:45 pm
    —
Comparing Saddam's Iraq to the Ukraine is a bit premature. The Ukraine has not taken over a neighbouring country or started killing its own citizens (but that didn't prevent the Russians from claiming the unrest in Ukraine was only a threat to Russian minority which is actually the majority in the Crimea).

The aim of the new Ukraine government might not be good but is still unknown/unproven. Russia I would not think should claim the morale high ground with the gulag system for its own citizens and attacks on other neighbouring countries; Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland or Poland and what happened to their government, intellectual, military and religious leaders?

Unfortunately for most smaller countries the big countries/super powers like to exert their power and try to make themselves look good while doing it!

#82: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 10:37 pm
    —
Tejszd wrote (View Post):
Comparing Saddam's Iraq to the Ukraine is a bit premature. The Ukraine has not taken over a neighbouring country or started killing its own citizens (but that didn't prevent the Russians from claiming the unrest in Ukraine was only a threat to Russian minority which is actually the majority in the Crimea).

The aim of the new Ukraine government might not be good but is still unknown/unproven. Russia I would not think should claim the morale high ground with the gulag system for its own citizens and attacks on other neighbouring countries; Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland or Poland and what happened to their government, intellectual, military and religious leaders?

Unfortunately for most smaller countries the big countries/super powers like to exert their power and try to make themselves look good while doing it!


The Ukraine has been taken over by a US sponsored, Neo-Nazi led putsch. That is known and proven, as are the political goals of the US- to dismember the Russian Federation, and the Ukrainian fascists- to liquidate all Russian intellectuals as the Nazis did to the Polish,  ban all opposition political parties, clear out the civil service of anyone unwilling to implement their reactionary agenda etc etc. Let's not even start on what they have planned for Ukrainian Jews.  What is not commonly known is how the Western media are deceiving their people because, far from being "free," they are the property and tools of the super-rich and promote policy of the super-rich as they further enrich themselves and destroy the democracy we grew up in.

Perhaps you'd prefer to wait for the slaughter to start. You know what will happen? We've seen it a few times already. The media will drag out a load of hand wringing liberals and pseudo-lefts who will tell us what a tragedy it all is, but, of course, nobody could have anticipated it.

Russia has no moral high ground and can offer no progressive solution to this crisis. It is an oppressive nation and seeks to dominate those close to it, in part to protect the economic interests of its oligarchy, but also because the Russian elite know the US and EU are bent on destroying it. It is not the instigator of the crisis however. Let the Russians deal with Putin and the oligarchs. The duty of every working class westerner is to create a political organisation to turn the aggressive wars of our rulers into revolutionary wars to overthrow our rulers. What more inspiration could Russian and Ukrainian workers need, to deal with Putin and the Kiev fascists?

#83: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 11:17 pm
    —
sieterayos wrote (View Post):


Did anyone object to the elections held in Iraq under the guns of a universally loathed and feared occupation force that was deliberately stoking sectarian conflict to divide and rule the population? Not to mention abducting, torturing and murdering suspected political opponents in the tens of thousands? Utterly illegal under international law, yet because the US was overseeing it, no one in mainstream politics did more than wring their hands in mock concern.


That's becuase the US needs more experience in these matters. It will take decades before the US can hone their skills to the levels attained by the USSR and now days the RF.  Laughing

If I am not mistaken, the USSR still holds the Un-Official World Record for eliminating tens of millions of political and religious dissenters in a single conflict. A truely inspiring "Gold Medal" effort.

#84: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 11:38 pm
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
sieterayos wrote (View Post):


Did anyone object to the elections held in Iraq under the guns of a universally loathed and feared occupation force that was deliberately stoking sectarian conflict to divide and rule the population? Not to mention abducting, torturing and murdering suspected political opponents in the tens of thousands? Utterly illegal under international law, yet because the US was overseeing it, no one in mainstream politics did more than wring their hands in mock concern.


That's becuase the US needs more experience in these matters. It will take decades before the US can hone their skills to the levels attained by the USSR and now days the RF.  Laughing

If I am not mistaken, the USSR still holds the Un-Official World Record for eliminating tens of millions of political and religious dissenters in a single conflict. A truely inspiring "Gold Medal" effort.


I think a lot of people objected. Didn't we hear about it in the news every day for years? I think even the UN said it was illegal.

#85: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 11:47 pm
    —
This government held elections on January 30, 2005 to begin the process of writing a constitution. International groups and the formerly excluded factions claimed that the January 2005 elections were the first free elections in Iraq's history, with a fair representation of all groups. This is in stark contrast to previous elections. After the 16 October, 2002 referendum on the extension of his role as President, Saddam Hussein claimed that %100 of the voters voted "yes" and that %100 of Iraqi's had voted (approximately 24,001,820 people).

Elections in Iraq


Last edited by Stwa on Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:32 am; edited 2 times in total

#86: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 11:49 pm
    —
Since Vladimir Putin became President of Russia there has been increasing international criticism of the conduct of Russian elections. European institutions who observed the December 2007 legislative elections concluded that these were not fair elections. Göran Lennmarker, president of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), said that the elections "failed to meet many of the commitments and standards that we have. It was not a fair election." -wiki

Elections in Russia


Last edited by Stwa on Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:39 am; edited 2 times in total

#87: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 11:51 pm
    —
I think a lot of people objected. Didn't we hear about it in the news every day for years? I think even the UN said it was illegal. - mooxe

How would I know, I live in Arizona. That's not exactly the US, now is it?  Laughing

Me thinks the NSA is recording this thread.  Shocked  Idea

#88: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:38 am
    —
sieterayos,

I read the Jewish papers online daily for the "truth" factor and believe you are correct in the anti semite regard being thrown around the press, such as the known to stretch the truth NYT..

Check this story out from yesterday for example from The Times of Israel:

Times of Israel

It's got a twist the far left (US) press doesn't want to print, or even think of.

#89: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:45 am
    —
Quote:
How would I know, I live in Arizona. That's not exactly the US, now is it?


You gotta' be kidding STWA?? That is one of the free est states in the Union! LOW taxes, OPEN CARRY, plenty of free and open ground to live on if you wish?

My wife and I visited back in '08.. We ever move and it's NE Arizona bro.. Florida USED to be like Arizona is, but it's done gone off and filled up with Yankees now. Open ground and Citrus groves are all gone.. Destroyed.

#90: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 5:41 am
    —
You gotta' be kidding STWA?? That is one of the free est states in the Union! LOW taxes, OPEN CARRY, plenty of free and open ground to live on if you wish? My wife and I visited back in '08.. We ever move and it's NE Arizona bro... - johnsivler

Translation  Arrow  I want to move from the US to Arizona, so I can be free.   Idea  

BTW, the video is shot somewhere near Rte 87 and AZ 260 which intersect in Payson or Rte 87 and US 40 and intersect near Winslow. [near the Navajo Res ... in NE AZ] Hint  Arrow  maybe the Navajo Res is not part of the US either,  dunno  Question    

Be careful, US forumites ...  Confused   Obama May Seize Your Assets

Don't worry. I am pretty sure the NSA has already seen this video.  Razz ... After all "NSA" is bound to be a keyword when they search through the "metdata".  Exclamation


Link



At one point the guys in the video were local heros (to some). They were able to get the state to remove all the photo radar sites. So here is another video.  Arrow



Link


Last edited by Stwa on Wed Mar 19, 2014 3:50 am; edited 1 time in total

#91: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:47 am
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
If I am not mistaken, the USSR still holds the Un-Official World Record for eliminating tens of millions of political and religious dissenters in a single conflict. A truely inspiring "Gold Medal" effort.

And which conflict would that be?

#92: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:51 am
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Stwa wrote (View Post):
sieterayos wrote (View Post):


Did anyone object to the elections held in Iraq under the guns of a universally loathed and feared occupation force that was deliberately stoking sectarian conflict to divide and rule the population? Not to mention abducting, torturing and murdering suspected political opponents in the tens of thousands? Utterly illegal under international law, yet because the US was overseeing it, no one in mainstream politics did more than wring their hands in mock concern.


That's becuase the US needs more experience in these matters. It will take decades before the US can hone their skills to the levels attained by the USSR and now days the RF.  Laughing

If I am not mistaken, the USSR still holds the Un-Official World Record for eliminating tens of millions of political and religious dissenters in a single conflict. A truely inspiring "Gold Medal" effort.


I think a lot of people objected. Didn't we hear about it in the news every day for years? I think even the UN said it was illegal.


Clearly you remember my voice and those of other unofficial dissenters more than the UN, Mooxe. Smile AS far as I recall, the UN actually oversaw the elections to give them a veneer of legitimacy. What could be more criminal?

#93: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:57 am
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
This government held elections on January 30, 2005 to begin the process of writing a constitution. International groups and the formerly excluded factions claimed that the January 2005 elections were the first free elections in Iraq's history, with a fair representation of all groups. This is in stark contrast to previous elections. After the 16 October, 2002 referendum on the extension of his role as President, Saddam Hussein claimed that %100 of the voters voted "yes" and that %100 of Iraqi's had voted (approximately 24,001,820 people).

Elections in Iraq


So a country under occupation by an illegal invading force which had bombed, murdered, abducted and tortured it into semi-submission held a free and fair election, while the Crimea referendum, held in the presence of a military force welcomed by the majority of the population and which had killed, murdered, tortured or abducted nobody, is illegal. I can see you are as open to reason as the criminals from whom you take your political cue.

#94: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:59 am
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
Since Vladimir Putin became President of Russia there has been increasing international criticism of the conduct of Russian elections. European institutions who observed the December 2007 legislative elections concluded that these were not fair elections. Göran Lennmarker, president of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), said that the elections "failed to meet many of the commitments and standards that we have. It was not a fair election." -wiki

Elections in Russia


No doubt, but who are the US to point a finger?

#95: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:06 am
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
sieterayos,

I read the Jewish papers online daily for the "truth" factor and believe you are correct in the anti semite regard being thrown around the press, such as the known to stretch the truth NYT..

Check this story out from yesterday for example from The Times of Israel:

Times of Israel

It's got a twist the far left (US) press doesn't want to print, or even think of.


You read the Zionist media for the truth? I pity you.

This issue does reveal two things though. The far right elements that say the US does the bidding of a Jewish conspiracy can now see, not that they'll want to, that the Zionists are actually a pawn of US foreign policy. So slavish is their obedience to the pentagon that they will sacrifice their religious brethren to Neo-Nazis in the Ukraine and write horse shit to justify it.

#96: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:24 am
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
Me thinks the NSA is recording this thread.  Shocked  Idea


When the drone strikes, it strikes. Until then, I keep going.

#97: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:54 am
    —
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
Stwa wrote (View Post):
If I am not mistaken, the USSR still holds the Un-Official World Record for eliminating tens of millions of political and religious dissenters in a single conflict. A truely inspiring "Gold Medal" effort.

And which conflict would that be?


Impossible to determine the exact amount, even close. Most historians will agree on a general number between 20-40m in Stalin's purges which is more than enough. Can't really say he/Soviets were more evil than hitler at the time as they didn't initiate a war that engulfed the planet. hitler was responsible for that and directly responsible for more deaths.

@ STWA


Be careful, US forumites ...  Confused   Obama May Seize Your Assets

Don't worry. I am pretty sure the NSA has already seen this video.  Razz ... After all "NSA" is bound to be a keyword when they search through the "metdata".  Exclamation


You know they track everyone with concealed weapons permits, purchased assault rifles lately dude. Especially with all the scumbag NE newspapers that have released concealed permit holders of late. I have a permit, had it for years in Florida. Have probably long been on these goof balls list.  Shocked Don't matter to me.

The far right elements that say the US does the bidding of a Jewish conspiracy can now see, not that they'll want to, that the Zionists are actually a pawn of US foreign policy.

Haven't heard that very often with this administration, even really the last 20 years. I'd like to see Israel just say F*6K Y*U to the US and go fix it's problem that's been brewing again after the last 35 year problem. The middle east is due for another lesson on warfare and they are the ones who know how to teach it.

#98: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:34 am
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
Stwa wrote (View Post):
If I am not mistaken, the USSR still holds the Un-Official World Record for eliminating tens of millions of political and religious dissenters in a single conflict. A truely inspiring "Gold Medal" effort.

And which conflict would that be?


Impossible to determine the exact amount, even close. Most historians will agree on a general number between 20-40m in Stalin's purges which is more than enough. Can't really say he/Soviets were more evil than hitler at the time as they didn't initiate a war that engulfed the planet. hitler was responsible for that and directly responsible for more deaths.


I would have thought you'd thoroughly approve. Stalin undid the social relations established by the Bolshevik revolution and wiped out several generations of Marxists, his greatest and most enduring achievement for today's oligarchs.

The figure you cite is clearly inaccurate by its own parameters, but also lumps together intentional murder and the result of mind blowingly stupid economic and social policy which goes beyond the scope of the great purges.

Assuming we are to judge the "evil" of an individual or regime by the raw figures of their victims- a big assumption- that leaves Stalin/USSR trailing far behind the US. Quite apart from the extermination of the indigenous Americans, the holocaust of slaves, the victims of colonial oppression and the first concentration camps- a US invention in the Philippines, and the obvious casualties of US imperialist aggression in, for the sake of brevity, Iraq, Afghanistan, Panama, Honduras, Chile, Nicaragua and Indonesia, Vietnam, there are the countless millions who die each and every year from poverty and starvation, held in subjugation by the US, its proxies and supported regimes who favour US banks and corporations.

No need to be so modest, the US ruling class and its stooges took gold again.

#99: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:44 am
    —
I can see you are as open to reason as the criminals from whom you take your political cue. -sieterayos

I suppose you directed this comment to me?

FWI,

The bolded italisized comments in red fonts within the posts that you quoted are not MY words, but rather quotes from articles held within the Wiki. The underlined phrases in those same posts are actually links to the same Wiki articles, so forumites can check them out and determine for themselves if they are germain to this conversation.

Remember to click on the underlined phrases (they are somewhat obvious) to take you to the actual article.  Idea

Here, you can practice with this one.  Arrow Elections in Iraq

#100: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:54 am
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Can't really say he/Soviets were more evil than hitler at the time as they didn't initiate a war that engulfed the planet. hitler was responsible for that and directly responsible for more deaths.
.


I dont belive Hitler/germany alone started WW2, ever Heard of the  Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact

#101: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:56 am
    —
Tejszd wrote (View Post):
Comparing Saddam's Iraq to the Ukraine is a bit premature. The Ukraine has not taken over a neighbouring country or started killing its own citizens



By 2003 Iraq occupied non, nor killed its people in any grater number than many other repressive regimes.

The [official] reson for Iraq 2 war was WMD.


BTW, isn’t it better that the people makes there "freedom fight" with out all the killing?

Or does that only apply when its in the West’s interest?


Last edited by AT_Stalky on Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:24 pm; edited 1 time in total

#102: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:36 pm
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
I can see you are as open to reason as the criminals from whom you take your political cue. -sieterayos

I suppose you directed this comment to me?

FWI,

The bolded italisized comments in red fonts within the posts that you quoted are not MY words, but rather quotes from articles held within the Wiki. The underlined phrases in those same posts are actually links to the same Wiki articles, so forumites can check them out and determine for themselves if they are germain to this conversation.

Remember to click on the underlined phrases (they are somewhat obvious) to take you to the actual article.  Idea

Here, you can practice with this one.  Arrow Elections in Iraq


What you quote, unless you qualify it, is going to be taken as something you believe to be true and that you advocate on this forum. There is a consistency in what you choose to quote and what you choose not to quote. It adds up to the general and thoroughly criminal political line of US imperialism.

I don't give a flying *&$% whether as part of their propaganda campaign CIA stooges declared the 2005 elections in Iraq to be the most free and fair in the country's history or that US imperialism and its lackeys criticise Putin for this that or whatever. In the first case, the elections were illegal under international law for infinitely more justifiable reasons than the Crimean referendum, and in the second, filthy pots, each  calling the other black is not a contest in which I take sides.

The side I advocate for is that of the international working class which currently enjoys neither statehood, political party as far as I'm aware, and therefore no "official" representatives. The policies I put forward, I believe will further the interests of the international working class.  To concieve such policies, it is necessary to understand the dynamics of the imperialist and capitalist world we live in. The US is seeking the dismemberment of the Russian Federation. Their machinations and provocations towards that end are the source of the current crisis.

Here's a word for you to look up and admire as if it were a mirror-

Obfuscate.

#103: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:42 pm
    —
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post):
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Can't really say he/Soviets were more evil than hitler at the time as they didn't initiate a war that engulfed the planet. hitler was responsible for that and directly responsible for more deaths.
.


I dont belive Hitler/germany alone started WW2, ever Heard of the  Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact  


Indeed not. The second world war, a continuation of the first, was the product of an imperialist relationship. That of the established empires of France and Britain attempting to protect what they regarded as "theirs" and the new comers, primarily Germany and the US, barging in for a cut of the action. In both wars, the Ukraine was the strategic german objective, as it most probably remains today, though admittedly I can not justify that claim.

#104: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:44 pm
    —
Assuming we are to judge the "evil" of an individual or regime by the raw figures of their victims- a big assumption- that leaves Stalin/USSR trailing far behind the US. Quite apart from the extermination of the indigenous Americans, the holocaust of slaves, the victims of colonial oppression and the first concentration camps- a US invention in the Philippines, and the obvious casualties of US imperialist aggression in, for the sake of brevity, Iraq, Afghanistan, Panama, Honduras, Chile, Nicaragua and Indonesia, Vietnam, there are the countless millions who die each and every year from poverty and starvation, held in subjugation by the US, its proxies and supported regimes who favour US banks and corporations.

The Polish historian W?adys?aw Konopczy?ski has suggested that concentration camps originated in Poland during the Bar Confederation rebellion (1768-1772), when the Russian Empire established three concentration camps for Polish rebel captives awaiting deportation to Siberia. -w

Concentraion Camp

Sieterayov: the above underlined phrase is a link to an article in the Wiki. I hope you used the "practise link" I supplied in my previous post. Also, it would help me a great deal, if you could cut down on the run-on sentences. Its no biggy, we all do it from time to time. Thanks ...

#105: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:50 pm
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
Assuming we are to judge the "evil" of an individual or regime by the raw figures of their victims- a big assumption- that leaves Stalin/USSR trailing far behind the US. Quite apart from the extermination of the indigenous Americans, the holocaust of slaves, the victims of colonial oppression and the first concentration camps- a US invention in the Philippines, and the obvious casualties of US imperialist aggression in, for the sake of brevity, Iraq, Afghanistan, Panama, Honduras, Chile, Nicaragua and Indonesia, Vietnam, there are the countless millions who die each and every year from poverty and starvation, held in subjugation by the US, its proxies and supported regimes who favour US banks and corporations.

The Polish historian W?adys?aw Konopczy?ski has suggested that concentration camps originated in Poland during the Bar Confederation rebellion (1768-1772), when the Russian Empire established three concentration camps for Polish rebel captives awaiting deportation to Siberia. -w

Concentraion Camp

Sieterayov: the above underlined phrase is a link to an article in the Wiki. I hope you used the "practise link" I supplied in my previous post. Also, it would help me a great deal, if you could cut down on the run-on sentences. Its no biggy, we all do it from time to time. Thanks ...


In modern usage, that is the arbitrary internment of civilians, I think you'll find the US and British Empire led the way.

I'm afraid I don't understand your term "run-on sentences."

#106: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:12 pm
    —
In modern usage, that is the arbitrary internment of civilians, I think you'll find the US and British Empire led the way... I'm afraid I don't understand your term "run-on sentences". -sieterayov

I read the article, and the definition changed after the experiences in the Nazi camps, implying at least to me, that the Germans led the way, hence the modern defintion.

You might try finding support for your assertions and including them in your original posts, because I have a funny feeling your just trying to blow infammatory bullshit into the forum for your own amusement. Again, no biggy, we have all done it ourselves at some point in our lives. Thanks ...

#107: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:37 pm
    —
Quite apart from the extermination of the indigenous Americans, the holocaust of slaves, the victims of colonial oppression and the first concentration camps- a US invention in the Philippines, and the obvious casualties of US imperialist aggression in, for the sake of brevity, Iraq, Afghanistan, Panama, Honduras, Chile, Nicaragua and Indonesia, Vietnam, there are the countless millions who die each and every year from poverty and starvation, held in subjugation by the US, its proxies and supported regimes who favour US banks and corporations. -sieterayov

While epidemic disease was by far the leading cause of the population decline of the American indigenous peoples after 1492, there were other contributing factors, all of them related to European contact and colonization. One of these factors was warfare. According to demographer Russell Thornton, although many lives were lost in wars over the centuries, and war sometimes contributed to the near extinction of certain tribes, warfare and death by other violent means was a comparatively minor cause of overall native population decline. -wiki

Population History of Indigenous Americans

#108: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:47 pm
    —
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post):
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Can't really say he/Soviets were more evil than hitler at the time as they didn't initiate a war that engulfed the planet. hitler was responsible for that and directly responsible for more deaths.
.


I dont belive Hitler/germany alone started WW2, ever Heard of the  Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact  


Indeed not. The second world war, a continuation of the first, was the product of an imperialist relationship. That of the established empires of France and Britain attempting to protect what they regarded as "theirs" and the new comers, primarily Germany and the US, barging in for a cut of the action. In both wars, the Ukraine was the strategic german objective, as it most probably remains today, though admittedly I can not justify that claim.


Siet, about Uk and France, I agree.

But the question was who actually started the war..
It was not British and/or French soldiers who stepped over the border on the 1 st & 17:th September 1939, in full agreement.

And don’t forget that [Soviet]-Russia was moving forward to its old western empire borders.

#109: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:01 pm
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
In modern usage, that is the arbitrary internment of civilians, I think you'll find the US and British Empire led the way... I'm afraid I don't understand your term "run-on sentences". -sieterayov

I read the article, and the definition changed after the experiences in the Nazi camps, implying at least to me, that the Germans led the way, hence the modern defintion. [/color]
The meaning might have changed after WW2 but if you read your Polish historian, he claims the Russian "concentration camps" were for interning rebels prior to moving them. The US and British camps, then, fall firmly into the modern use of the term into which use we were both born. Did you look up obfuscation?

Stwa wrote (View Post):
You might try finding support for your assertions and including them in your original posts, because I have a funny feeling your just trying to blow infammatory bullshit into the forum for your own amusement. Again, no biggy, we have all done it ourselves at some point in our lives. Thanks ...
No, I don't deal with such BS, and you will find several references to material in my first posts in this thread. perhaps if you could specify any assertions you want supported, I can help.  Very Happy

#110: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:45 pm
    —
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post):


But the question was who actually started the war..
It was not British and/or French soldiers who stepped over the border on the 1 st & 17:th September 1939, in full agreement.

And don’t forget that [Soviet]-Russia was moving forward to its old western empire borders.


We may be talking at crossed purposes Stalky, but I'll continue because I like the sound of my own keyboard.

If we're looking purely at who crossed a border first, it has to be Germany that started the war. That Russia was criminally complicit in this arrangement is neither here nor there in that technicality, and neither did the Western Allies declare war on Russia as a result of their annexing eastern Poland. We could go to how Poland acquired that territory in 1921 through an unprovoked attack on the Soviet Union, but that's for another day.

By mentioning the Molotov-Ribentropp Pact, though, you are taking a step down the road to investigating the reasons for the war, which, if you continue, will eventually take you to economy, where the origins of all  wars are to be found. I'm not in any way saying that who crossed a border first is irrelevant in determining responsibility for a war. But I do dispute that it is the be all and end all of the question. The fact does not give the reason. Without the reason the underlying cause remains a mystery. Facts taken out of context are the sustenance of every duplicitous and disingenuous argument given to obscure the real relations of the world.

Russia was undoubtedly attempting to advance its borders westwards and, as with the Nazis with their expansionism, it did not shirk from criminal intrigue and violations of neutrality to achieve that. However, the differing economic imperatives of Stalin's Russia and Hitler's Germany simply don't allow one to be equated with the other, whatever the similarities of their outer form.

German finance capital was stifled by the old world empires and sought to break out into the world through war, conquest and, in WW2, the establishment of an autarchic economic hegemony under Germany's rule. As was seen by the subsequent lack of economic integration of Eastern Bloc countries, Russia was not driven by finance capital seeking lucrative investment opportunities. Russia had no interest in seeking protection through spreading a revolution which had been extinguished within its own borders, this could only rekindle the flame of revolution in Russia itself. Stalin's Russia sought to defend itself through the annexation of buffer territory while it hoped to catch up economically with the West. A forlorn hope, given the internal contradictions of an unregulated economy, but not one that was going to launch a world war. That would defeat the object of the exercise.

#111: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:06 pm
    —
The US and British camps, then, fall firmly into the modern use of the term into which use we were both born. -sieterayov

During the 20th century, the arbitrary internment of civilians by the state reached a climax with Nazi concentration camps (1933–1945). As a result, the term "concentration camp" today carries many of the connotations of "extermination camp" (or "death camp"), and is sometimes used synonymously with these terms by people who are unaware of its original pre-1933 usage. Not all Nazi concentration camps were "extermination camps". Many were used primarily to house forced laborers. The inmates in these camps were held there for the purpose of exploitation, rather than for extermination. -wiki

Concentration Camp

So, to believe your BS, someone would have to prove that the American Camps in the Phillipines in 1902 were deliberately set up for the express purpose of exterminating the residents of the camp.

And, if so established, me thinks you would then have to realize that the Spanish camps in Cuba in 1897 were also extermination camps. It is fairly clear to me that the American and Spanish camps were not established with the express intent to exterminate the inhabitants of the camps, and therefore do NOT fit the tenants of the modern definition of same.

So, unless new info arrives, and since I do not believe you to be stupid, I will just conclude that you are trolling for amusement.  Laughing


Last edited by Stwa on Tue Mar 18, 2014 2:52 am; edited 1 time in total

#112: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:33 pm
    —
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
you are taking a step down the road to investigating the reasons for the war, which, if you continue, will eventually take you to economy, where the origins of all  wars are to be found. .


Siet

I do agree that many reasons for war can be found in economy. However not all wars. Sweden has for example; one war started due to a King felt his popularity was going down… Another is the UK/Argentinean Falkland war.. Also that due to people at home, due to failing popularity… [yes, economy failing]…
And we can fined many wars like this, started due to abstracting the population at home, and spur national feelings, trying to make us forget the incompetence of the unpopular rulers. Shifting focus, playing on safty and nationalism..
May we fined wars started due to strategic safety.. ?

The question is what Russia is doing now, and why?

I can imagine that Russia feels like NATO/West is closing in on them. Baltic states = NATO. Poland, and many of the East Euro states, former WP countries are now in NATO.
NATO flirted with Georgia, making the leaders there having a fit of hubris. Can’t help but feel that NATO/West ought to think of the consequence of there flirting with Russians neighbors. If NATO/West is not prepared to start WW3 over Georgia, thus nuclear war, then they should not flirt with Georgia in first place. No?

And now we have Ukraine.

A question US ought to ask them self, what if China would make a defence agreement with Mexico, station some million soldiers there and hardware..  How did US react to Cuba and the missiles? Somewhere there ought the Russians feelings be today, maybe…?

Though Putin may also Shifting focus.. ?

#113: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:17 pm
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
The US and British camps, then, fall firmly into the modern use of the term into which use we were both born. -sieterayov

During the 20th century, the arbitrary internment of civilians by the state reached a climax with Nazi concentration camps (1933–1945). As a result, the term "concentration camp" today carries many of the connotations of "extermination camp" (or "death camp"), and is sometimes used synonymously with these terms by people who are unaware of its original pre-1933 usage. Not all Nazi concentration camps were "extermination camps". Many were used primarily to house forced laborers. The inmates in these camps were held there for the purpose of exploitation, rather than for extermination. -wiki

Concentration Camp

So, to believe your BS, someone would have to prove that the American Camps in the Phillipines in 1902 were deliberately set up for the express purpose of exterminating the residents of the camp.

And, if so established, me thinks you would then have to realize that the Spanish camps in Cuba in 1868-1878 were also extermination camps. It is fairly clear to me that the American and Spanish camps were not established with the express intent to exterminate the inhabitants of the camps, and therefore do NOT fit the tenants of the modern definition of same.

So, unless new info arrives, and since I do not believe you to be stupid, I will just conclude that you are trolling for amusement.  Laughing


Do you even bother to read the references you supply?

".. the term "concentration camp" today carries many of the connotations of "extermination camp" (or "death camp"), and is sometimes used synonymously with these terms by people who are unaware of its original pre-1933 usage. Not all Nazi concentration camps were "extermination camps". "

Clearly I am someone aware of its pre-1933 usage, but believe about me what you will.

Your pedantry, however, serves only to distract yourself from the original point which you have nowhere even attempted to refute, that with regards to raw figures of killing, the US ruling class holds the crown over all contenders.

#114: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:30 pm
    —
Quote:
I dont belive Hitler/germany alone started WW2, ever Heard of the  Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.


Absolutely AT_Stalky. My intentions there were not to bring in here (and not start another "war" with our eastern friends here). I am pretty much "read up" on the axis aligned partners that carved up Poland together.

#115: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:32 pm
    —
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post):
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
you are taking a step down the road to investigating the reasons for the war, which, if you continue, will eventually take you to economy, where the origins of all  wars are to be found. .


Siet

I do agree that many reasons for war can be found in economy. However not all wars. Sweden has for example; one war started due to a King felt his popularity was going down… Another is the UK/Argentinean Falkland war.. Also that due to people at home, due to failing popularity… [yes, economy failing]…
And we can fined many wars like this, started due to abstracting the population at home, and spur national feelings, trying to make us forget the incompetence of the unpopular rulers. Shifting focus, playing on safty and nationalism..
May we fined wars started due to strategic safety.. ?

The question is what Russia is doing now, and why?

I can imagine that Russia feels like NATO/West is closing in on them. Baltic states = NATO. Poland, and many of the East Euro states, former WP countries are now in NATO.
NATO flirted with Georgia, making the leaders there having a fit of hubris. Can’t help but feel that NATO/West ought to think of the consequence of there flirting with Russians neighbors. If NATO/West is not prepared to start WW3 over Georgia, thus nuclear war, then they should not flirt with Georgia in first place. No?

And now we have Ukraine.

A question US ought to ask them self, what if China would make a defence agreement with Mexico, station some million soldiers there and hardware..  How did US react to Cuba and the missiles? Somewhere there ought the Russians feelings be today, maybe…?

Though Putin may also Shifting focus.. ?


If you think of economy in the broader sense, including the social relations of production and class conflicts that flow from these, I'd say we seem pretty much in agreement.

What you observe in NATO closing in on Russia is not an accident that the US would refrain from if its leaders were more empathic with the Russians. It is a deliberate, calculated policy detailed by Zbigniew Brzezinski in "The Grand Chessboard". The global community is not one in which states and power blocs consider the feelings of their competitors. It is a ruthless strategy game kept secret from the mass of the worlds population and which today threatens world war three at every new turn. Behind threadbare and hypocritical pretexts of democratic rights, legality and suchlike, the great powers manoeuvre to grasp each other by the throat. Appeals to these psychopaths will fall on deaf ears. They must be removed and the commanding heights of economy, the great banks and corporations, put under democratic control to serve social needs.

#116: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:30 pm
    —
Your pedantry, however, serves only to distract yourself from the original point which you have nowhere even attempted to refute, that with regards to raw figures of killing, the US ruling class holds the crown over all contenders. -sieterayov

Well, my points are progressing, but just not as fast as you would like. Partly because I am slower now days, but also because of your constant effort with every post to obscure facts. On the forums, your posts aren't really classified as lies per se, but rather the rants of a troll that is just amusing himself. So when it goes slow, it is less enjoyable for you.

Your first point created the impression that the US planned a systematic extermination of indigenous peoples (their non-combatants) from North America. You know that is total BS. My response is on page 8. You chose the word "extermination" so that forumites might think it was pre-meditated and always viloent, which is not true.

Your third point led forumites to believe the US invented the concentration camp. After some time, we now know that is total BS no matter which defintion we apply. The pre 1933 definition according to the Wiki article would have Russia as the inventor of the first concentration camp, and using the later defintion, it would be Germany. My responses are on page 7 and 8.

So far your points have something in common. You are trying to relate deaths of civilians caused by disease or famine to the US Government, while avoiding making the same correlation to other nations, like Spain. But in so doing, you attempt to insinuate that all these people were violently exterminated in a PRE-MEDITATED scheme. It's already a slippery slope for you, because we will discuss 1933 Ukraine at some point.

#117: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:29 pm
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
Your pedantry, however, serves only to distract yourself from the original point which you have nowhere even attempted to refute, that with regards to raw figures of killing, the US ruling class holds the crown over all contenders. -sieterayov

Well, my points are progressing, but just not as fast as you would like. Partly because I am slower now days, but also because of your constant effort with every post to obscure facts. On the forums, your posts aren't really classified as lies per se, but rather the rants of a troll that is just amusing himself. So when it goes slow, it is less enjoyable for you.

Your first point created the impression (at least in my mind, becuase of its coupling with your other points), that the US planned a systematic extermination of indigenous peoples from (presumably) North America. You know that is total BS. My response is on page 8. You chose the word "extermination" so that forumites might think it was pre-meditated and always viloent, which is not true.

Your third point led forumites to believe the the US invented the concentration camp. After some time, we now know that is total BS no matter which defintion we apply. The pre 1933 definition according to the Wiki article would have Russia as the inventor of the first concentration camp, and using the later defintion, it would be Germany. My responses are on page 7 and 8.


I have nowhere obscured facts. On the contrary, I bring them to light and put them into historical context. Could it be that context and relationship, which give facts meaning, you take for obscuring them? The upside down world of the common pragmatist!

"Quite apart from the extermination of the indigenous Americans, the holocaust of slaves, the victims of colonial oppression and the first concentration camps- a US invention in the Philippines..."

The extermination of indigenous Americans was certainly, in part, deliberate, a result of the 1830 Indian Removal Act and policies resulting from the ideas of Manifest Destiny. Beyond physical extermination, the forcible assimilation of indigenous children  to be brought up and brutalised by "Christians" to live like Europeans also constitutes an attempt, largely successful, to exterminate cultures and indigenous ways of life.


Yes, the US did invent the concentration camp but actually, it's not central to my argument. The US used concentration camps in which thousands died of disease and summary executions.

#118: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:43 pm
    —
Quote:
The US used concentration camps in which thousands died of disease and summary executions.


You do realize those summary executions go as far back as the Ancient Egyptians that we know of and probably even farther? Not to mention, I wouldn't call internment camps (1940's) concentration camps, and would stop short of calling what you are describing as concentration camps the Indian internment camps.

Was the trail of tears a bloodbath? it certainly was. My father in law passed away 10 years ago at the age of 88 and was bitter, a full blooded Cherokee, as is my wife. Still, that is not running people into buildings and poisoning them with -0- chance of survival. many Cherokee's made the trip to North Carolina, as hard as it was.

You Sir, are twisting facts.

#119: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:28 pm
    —
Yes, the US did invent the concentration camp but actually, it's not central to my argument. The US used concentration camps in which thousands died of disease and summary executions. -sieterayov

The Spannish camps in Cuba seem to predate the American camp in the Phillipines?

After Arsenio Martínez Campos had failed to pacify the Cuban rebellion, the Conservative government of Antonio Cánovas del Castillo sent Weyler out to replace him. This selection met the approval of most Spaniards, who thought him the proper man to crush the rebellion. While serving as a Spanish general, he was called "Butcher Weyler" because hundreds of thousands of people died in his concentration camps.

He was made governor of Cuba with full powers to suppress the insurgency (rebellion was widespread in Cuba) and restore the island to political order and its sugar production to greater profitability. Initially, Weyler was greatly frustrated by the same factors that had made victory difficult for all generals of traditional standing armies fighting against an insurgency. While the Spanish troops marched in regulation and required substantial supplies, their opponents practiced hit-and-run tactics and lived off the land, blending in with the non-combatant population. He came to the same conclusions as his predecessors as well—that to win Cuba back for Spain, he would have to separate the rebels from the civilians by putting the latter in safe havens, protected by loyal Spanish troops. By the end of 1897, General Weyler had relocated more than 300,000 into such "reconcentration camps".


This article goes on to state that Weyler learned this "tactic" by studying Tcumseh Sherman in Civil War days.

Valeriano Weyler

#120: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:27 am
    —
Yes, the US did invent the concentration camp but actually, it's not central to my argument. The US used concentration camps in which thousands died of disease and summary executions. -sieterayov

BTW, me thinks this is the explanation for the summary executions. Harsh indeed, but of imprisioned combants, and therefore outside the realm of all definitions of concentration camp, which I believe requires us to consider the interments of civilians. Maybe you were trying to lead us to believe the American's were executing civilians?

And if I am not mistaken, the pre 1933 definition of concentration camp does NOT require violence to the internees of the camp. Only the post 1933 defintion (an extermination camp actually) requires that, and it also requires the pre-planned intention to exterminate ALL of the internees. It would be logical if the the camp included GAS CHAMBERS, there is some evidence for pre-meditation. You know, a system that could kill alot of internees in a short amount of time.  

And also notice the "war of extermination" that Bell was planning, seems to be refering to enemy combatants, not the civilians that were interned in the safe zones of the Phillipine Camps.

One circular by Bell explained, when an American was "murdered", soldiers were instructed to "by lot select a P.O.W.--preferably one from the village in which the assassination took place--and execute him."

Another circular rationalized that "it is an inevitable consequence of war that the innocent must generally suffer with the guilty" and that "a short and severe war creates in the aggregate less loss and suffering than a benevolent war indefinitely prolonged."

Bell warned his commanders that young officers should not be restrained or discouraged without excellent reason. "It is not necessary to seek or wait for authority from headquarters to do anything or take any action which will contribute to the end in view."

Bell reasoned that since all natives were treacherous, it was impossible to recognize "the actively bad from only the passively so."

Chaffee received copies of Bell's directive and was aware of Bell's plan to launch a what the anti-imperialists labeled a "war of extermination".

Most notable of Bell's numerous engagements with the Filipinos was that near Porac in the island of Luzon, in which he was wounded while leading a charge. Despite his alleged war crimes, the U.S. awarded Bell the Medal of Honor, for "gallantry in action".


Franklin Bell

#121: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 2:30 am
    —
Yes, the US did invent the concentration camp but actually, it's not central to my argument. The US used concentration camps in which thousands died of disease and summary executions. -sieterayov

Although the first modern concentration camps used to systematically dissuade rebels from fighting are usually attributed to the British during the Boer War, in the Spanish-American War, forts and camps were used by the Spanish in Cuba to separate rebels from their agricultural support bases. Upwards of 200,000 Cubans died by disease and famine in these environments. -wiki

I guess, I have finally read enough to understand what was happening in these turn of the century conflicts between the colonial powers and the rebels.

These camps were not intended for extermination/genocide at all. But in every case (Phillipines, Cuba, and South Africa), the necessary food and medical supplies needed to sustain the civilans in their camp was underestimated or could not be provided, and generally malnutrition lead to disease and widesperad death. The numbers at the American camps seems to be lower than the Camps in Cuba and South Africa, with one source noting 8,000 deaths in the Phillipines.  

So far, I have not encountred one article that describes the Americans as the "inventor" of the concentration camp, but this article attributes the FIRST modern concentration camp to the British.

List of Concentration and Internment Camps

#122: Re: Obfuscation and the US Right Wing Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:05 am
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
[quote]The US used concentration camps in which thousands died of disease and summary executions.


johnsilver wrote (View Post):
[quote]You do realize those summary executions go as far back as the Ancient Egyptians that we know of and probably even farther?



Irrelevant to this discussion.

johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Not to mention, I wouldn't call internment camps (1940's) concentration camps, and would stop short of calling what you are describing as concentration camps the Indian internment camps.



What you personally call anything is also irrelevant to this discussion.

johnsilver wrote (View Post):
[quote]Was the trail of tears a bloodbath? it certainly was. My father in law passed away 10 years ago at the age of 88 and was bitter, a full blooded Cherokee, as is my wife. Still, that is not running people into buildings and poisoning them with -0- chance of survival. many Cherokee's made the trip to North Carolina, as hard as it was.



Nobody cited the Trail of tears as an example of US using a concentration camp, also irrelevant to this discussion.

johnsilver wrote (View Post):
[quote]You Sir, are twisting facts.


No sir, it is you that twists facts and the arguments put before you in this thread.

Allow me to re-post-

Do you even bother to read the references you supply?

".. the term "concentration camp" today carries many of the connotations of "extermination camp" (or "death camp"), and is sometimes used synonymously with these terms by people who are unaware of its original pre-1933 usage. Not all Nazi concentration camps were "extermination camps". "

Clearly I am someone aware of its pre-1933 usage, but believe about me what you will.

Your pedantry, however, serves only to distract yourself from the original point which you have nowhere even attempted to refute, that with regards to raw figures of killing, the US ruling class holds the crown over all contenders.

#123: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:09 am
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
Yes, the US did invent the concentration camp but actually, it's not central to my argument. The US used concentration camps in which thousands died of disease and summary executions. -sieterayov


These camps were not intended for extermination/genocide at all. But in every case (Phillipines, Cuba, and South Africa), the necessary food and medical supplies needed to sustain the civilans in their camp was underestimated or could not be provided, and generally malnutrition lead to disease and widesperad death. The numbers at the American camps seems to be lower than the Camps in Cuba and South Africa, with one source noting 8,000 deaths in the Phillipines.  

So far, I have not encountred one article that describes the Americans as the "inventor" of the concentration camp, but this article attributes the FIRST modern concentration camp to the British.

List of Concentration and Internment Camps


So chronologically, the British pipped the US by a few months.

Do you contend that the US went to South Africa to study civilian internment techniques and then went to apply what they had learned in the Philippines? No? In that case they needed no instruction and they invented the concentration camp.

#124: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:37 am
    —
Yes, the US did invent the concentration camp but actually, it's not central to my argument. The US used concentration camps in which thousands died of disease and summary executions. -sieterayov

Stwa wrote (View Post):
BTW, me thinks this is the explanation for the summary executions. Harsh indeed, but of imprisioned combants, and therefore outside the realm of all definitions of concentration camp, which I believe requires us to consider the interments of civilians. Maybe you were trying to lead us to believe the American's were executing civilians?


What a tangled web you weave, when first you practice to deceive.

"A summary execution is a variety of execution in which a person is accused of a crime and then immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial. This includes show trials, but is usually understood to mean capture, accusation, and execution all conducted during a very short span of time relative to the severity of the punishment. Summary executions have been practiced by police, military, and paramilitary organizations and are frequently associated with guerrilla warfare, counter-insurgency, terrorism, and any other situation which involves a breakdown of the normal procedures for handling accused prisoners (either civilian or military)."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_execution

You're damn right the US executed civilians.

Stwa wrote (View Post):
And if I am not mistaken, the pre 1933 definition of concentration camp does NOT require violence to the internees of the camp. Only the post 1933 defintion (an extermination camp actually) requires that, and it also requires the pre-planned intention to exterminate ALL of the internees. It would be logical if the the camp included GAS CHAMBERS, there is some evidence for pre-meditation. You know, a system that could kill alot of internees in a short amount of time.  

Could you please try to keep your arguments on point.

Stwa wrote (View Post):
And also notice the "war of extermination" that Bell was planning, seems to be refering to enemy combatants, not the civilians that were interned in the safe zones of the Phillipine Camps.


I'm glad you're learning at last about early US imperialism and its extermination policies. It's a shame you should attempt to justify them as you do so. With regard to what the US called "safe zones,"  at Dachau, they were trying to free the Jews through helping them to work, it was the motto on the camp gate. Or is it just the US military that you believe unconditionally? For whom were the zones safe?

#125: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 10:04 am
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
Yes, the US did invent the concentration camp but actually, it's not central to my argument. The US used concentration camps in which thousands died of disease and summary executions. -sieterayov

The Spannish camps in Cuba seem to predate the American camp in the Phillipines?

[color=red][i][b]After Arsenio Martínez Campos had failed to pacify the Cuban rebellion, the Conservative government of Antonio Cánovas del Castillo sent Weyler out to replace him. This selection met the approval of most Spaniards, who thought him the proper man to crush the rebellion. While serving as a Spanish general, he was called "Butcher Weyler" because hundreds of thousands of people died in his concentration camps.

This article goes on to state that Weyler learned this "tactic" by studying Tcumseh Sherman in Civil War days.

Valeriano Weyler


You may have found an example of concentration camps that predate US and British use, but the reference to Sherman during the civil war is unsupported and I can find no supporting reference to it on any web search. I did find an article detailing Hitler's inspiration for his camps, however, which I'm sure will be of interest to you-

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/01/thomas-dilorenzo/was-hitler-inspired-by-lincolns-army/

#126: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:18 pm
    —
Quote:
but the reference to Sherman during the civil war is unsupported and I can find no supporting reference to it on any web search


Just Sherman burning down an entire city that was of NO strategic value, had NO soldiers in it, nor garrison in it and killed more slaves and women than elderly white men proves that he was a war criminal alone at Atlanta, not to mention his path of rape, rob, burn and then burn, rape, rob some more all along the southern path he was on.

What kind of documentary evidence was needed? Just follow the bodies and burn out land was all that was needed, or do you also deny the holocaust ever occurred as well???

#127: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:50 pm
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Quote:
but the reference to Sherman during the civil war is unsupported and I can find no supporting reference to it on any web search


Just Sherman burning down an entire city that was of NO strategic value, had NO soldiers in it, nor garrison in it and killed more slaves and women than elderly white men proves that he was a war criminal alone at Atlanta, not to mention his path of rape, rob, burn and then burn, rape, rob some more all along the southern path he was on.

What kind of documentary evidence was needed? Just follow the bodies and burn out land was all that was needed, or do you also deny the holocaust ever occurred as well???


None of which demonstrates that Sherman employed concentration camps of any description. Not saying he didn't, but I've seen no evidence.

#128: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 7:26 pm
    —
Johnsilver,

I thought I would share this reservation map with you. I live about 200 yards off the Salt River reservation (near Phoenix). We are trying to get a house in an Anglo development adjacent to the map reference for the Yavapi Res, close to Fort McDowel.

The Western side of Navajo Res looks like the moon. There is not much water up there either. The Eastern side is very elevated. In the NE there is also the Painted Desert, and the Petrified Forest.

If you were to superimpose a map of AZ public lands (not administered locally), then the amount of AZ land shrinks down to a much smaller space.

So, I wonder if there was a referendum in AZ, certainly there would have to be more choices than what was provided on the Crimea ballot.

And in what order should the choices be listed on the ballot.

For instance,

1. Join Mexico
2. Join California
3. Join Navajo Res
4. Join Apache Res
...
5. Become Independent

#129: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:15 am
    —
OK,

I am ready to move on to genocide of the indigenous within the modern borders of the USA. At least here, this topic will be more dear to myself. I won't speak for johnsilver.

But, this is really the Ukraine thread, and the forumites may want it back for that purpose. I intended to get back to Ukraine, it just didn't happen.

But, it is clear to me No genocide occurred in the Phillipine War, and the notion the the USA "invented" the concentration camp is laughable. It appears the tactic of seperating guerillas from their civilian supports was applied, and perhaps studied at the US War department, even by the Spanish, prior to the conflicts in Cuba and the Phillipines.

The civilians in the Phillipines were given a deadline to move into tent cities (concentration camps) in order to avoid a scortched earth policy that would commence in the areas adjacent to the camps. In effect, they authorties were trying to protect the civilians. But malaria, dengue, yellow fever, and dysentry took their toll.  

If seiterayov feels that strongly about it he could edit any of the Wiki articles, and then supply them as proof the Americans invented the concentration camp.  Wink

But he supplied no credible reference that say this, and I could not find them in the Wiki.

But what is worse, sieterayov tried to lead this forum to believe that the United States tried to establish German style extermination camps in the Phillipines. For that, I not only call him a troll ... I call him a liar.

#130: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 3:12 am
    —
Ok back on topic...

That is a wrap - Putin just declared Crimea annexed to RF.  

"March 18 (Reuters) - Defying Ukrainian protests and Western sanctions, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a treaty in Moscow on Tuesday making Crimea part of Russia again but said he did not plan to seize any other regions of Ukraine.

On the peninsula, a Ukrainian serviceman was killed when a base still held by Kiev came under attack in the main town of Simferopol, the first death in Crimea from a military clash since Russia seized control three weeks ago.

Kiev said the attackers had been wearing Russian military uniforms and responded by authorising its soldiers in Crimea to use weapons to protect their lives, reversing previous orders that they should avoid using arms against attack."

#131: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 9:22 am
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
OK,

I am ready to move on to genocide of the indigenous within the modern borders of the USA. At least here, this topic will be more dear to myself. I won't speak for johnsilver.

But, this is really the Ukraine thread, and the forumites may want it back for that purpose. I intended to get back to Ukraine, it just didn't happen.

But, it is clear to me No genocide occurred in the Phillipine War, and the notion the the USA "invented" the concentration camp is laughable. It appears the tactic of seperating guerillas from their civilian supports was applied, and perhaps studied at the US War department, even by the Spanish, prior to the conflicts in Cuba and the Phillipines.

The civilians in the Phillipines were given a deadline to move into tent cities (concentration camps) in order to avoid a scortched earth policy that would commence in the areas adjacent to the camps. In effect, they authorties were trying to protect the civilians. But malaria, dengue, yellow fever, and dysentry took their toll.  

If seiterayov feels that strongly about it he could edit any of the Wiki articles, and then supply them as proof the Americans invented the concentration camp.  Wink

But he supplied no credible reference that say this, and I could not find them in the Wiki.

But what is worse, sieterayov tried to lead this forum to believe that the United States tried to establish German style extermination camps in the Phillipines. For that, I not only call him a troll ... I call him a liar.


It does appear that concentration camps predate the US and British use of them in the Phillipines and Boer war, I concede that. The rest is right wing mouth froth from someone whose interest is not in revealing the concealed truths of history but in continuing to conceal the ruthless brutality of US imperialism. Hence, while I have at no time suggested that the US used "German style extermination camps in the Phillipines" Stwa maintains that in forcibly herding Filipinos into concentration camps, in which thousands died "they authorties [sic] were trying to protect the civilians".

This is the twisted rationale of police state advocates and fascists, the social milieu that justifies any crime by US imperialism in pursuit of maintaining its global hegemony. The entire argument is twisted by Stwa on a detail, to avoid the substance. The fact remains that the US killed thousands of Filipinos in concentration camps, in a brutal colonial war which, by conservative estimates, claimed the lives of 200 000 Filipino civilians.

Tellingly, while there is no crime of  US imperialism these apologists will not attempt to spin in a favourable, humanist light, the alleged crimes of the Union in the Civil War, which abolished human beings as private property in the US, remain a source of rancour. Know what you're dealing with.

Where this discussion started-  in raw terms of people it kills, the US ruling class leaves all contenders far behind. After several days of right wing obfuscation, the essential point I made, then, remains unchallenged. My assertion that the US invented the concentration camp maybe innacurate, but the liar here is Stwa. I need no bold, enlarged or coloured font to point that out.


Last edited by sieterayos on Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:36 am; edited 1 time in total

#132: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 9:23 am
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Ok back on topic...

That is a wrap - Putin just declared Crimea annexed to RF.  

"March 18 (Reuters) - Defying Ukrainian protests and Western sanctions, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a treaty in Moscow on Tuesday making Crimea part of Russia again but said he did not plan to seize any other regions of Ukraine.

On the peninsula, a Ukrainian serviceman was killed when a base still held by Kiev came under attack in the main town of Simferopol, the first death in Crimea from a military clash since Russia seized control three weeks ago.

Kiev said the attackers had been wearing Russian military uniforms and responded by authorising its soldiers in Crimea to use weapons to protect their lives, reversing previous orders that they should avoid using arms against attack."


No, it's not a wrap. It moves to a new phase of pressure and provocations on Russia.

#133: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 8:48 pm
    —
Quote:
The Western side of Navajo Res looks like the moon. There is not much water up there either. The Eastern side is very elevated. In the NE there is also the Painted Desert, and the Petrified Forest.


1st thing I noticed along the drive was lack of water STWA and the deep water pumps, like oil well pumps at many places in that barren place in the NE. It's remote, but the "charm" factor of it and the Navajo people to my wife were very comforting and inviting. She got along quite well with them. We would be able to go there, though as you know it's not exactly.. Normal to what most people are used to and I am not native American myself. All on a see how she can do basis before we got a house possibly in AZ.

Don't think the referendum idea works in AZ. The government guarantees the tribes those lands now and they have already taken away all of the good lands as it is and left them with the back wash, or desert left overs.. There is nothing left to take. Every other minority in this country is treated better as it is. Why would they take the time to kicking around the native Americans a little bit more?

#134: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 8:51 pm
    —
Did anyone else laugh at the sanctions?

#135: Re: The Ukraine Author: ke_mechial PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 9:50 pm
    —
I actually felt pretty sad for those russian officals, they will never be able to visit paris or london in holiday again...Smile

#136: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 10:03 pm
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
I am not native American myself.


Just to avoid any confusion, I am not Native American per se, but there are several in my expanded family up two generations. They are dead and gone now, but while I was growing up, they could always be counted on to provide a story or two.

Yes, the Navajo Nation and NE AZ is very rugged. So try for Salt River Res. I have no idea about the Tribal Rules.

In the map everything East of Pima Road is the Res. Talking Stick Fields is a big MLB Spring training facility.

The Pavilions is a mega outdoor shopping center. Everything between Pima and Hwy 101 is basically business parks of some kind. East of Hwy 101 is the reservation proper, with schools, residences, and agricultual areas.

I live west of Pima Rd, just off the reservation.


Last edited by Stwa on Wed Mar 19, 2014 10:46 pm; edited 1 time in total

#137: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 10:06 pm
    —
Quote:
Did anyone else laugh at the sanctions?

absolutely rediculous, especially against Mizulina becourse she is "Duma State Deputy"....there are 400+ more Duma State Deputies - now they feel very sorry to be forgotten and are preparing symmetric answer...
she is just crazy (she really is) and in charge of all these anti-gay laws - prolly that's a reason why she is under sanctions now :)

ke_mechial wrote (View Post):
I actually felt pretty sad for those russian officals, they will never be able to visit paris or london in holiday again...Smile

hey, now they have Sochi and Crimea to visit on holidays Wink.

#138: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 10:25 pm
    —
And you probably know that yesterday (19th of March) the new prime-minister of Ukraine Yatsenuk has refused to sign the association agreement with the EU after checking this document so looks like a circle is complete...

#139: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:08 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
And you probably know that yesterday (19th of March) the new prime-minister of Ukraine Yatsenuk has refused to sign the association agreement with the EU after checking this document so looks like a circle is complete...

That is interesting. I doubt there was anything in it he didn't know about.

Possible explanations would be, pressure from autarchic Neo-Nazi elements, or, far more likely, particularly given the close ties between Nuland and "Yats," its a manoeuvre by US to ensure Germany doesn't get the control of Ukraine it has always wanted. Ukraine can't stand alone, will find it very difficult to approach Russia, so who's waiting with open arms?

#140: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:11 pm
    —
Quote:
That is interesting. I doubt there was anything in it he didn't know about.

well one thing is to be in opposition and yell that a goverment doesn;t want to be in the EU and another is to be in goverment and to sign a document that would eventually kill half of the East Ukraine industry....

#141: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:16 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
Quote:
That is interesting. I doubt there was anything in it he didn't know about.

well one thing is to be in opposition and yell that a goverment doesn;t want to be in the EU and another is to be in goverment and to sign a document that would eventually kill half of the East Ukraine industry....


He knew what he was getting in to. Everyone knew why Yanukovich wouldn't sign. I strongly suspect the US has pulled a fast one on Germany. If so, ramping up sanctions that will hurt Europe is going to be very difficult. Possibly a serious rift opening between US and German imperialism.

#142: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:24 pm
    —
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
He knew what he was getting in to. Everyone knew why Yanukovich wouldn't sign. I strongly suspect the US has pulled a fast one on Germany. If so, ramping up sanctions that will hurt Europe is going to be very difficult. Possibly a serious rift opening between US and German imperialism.

Looks like Crimea was traded for Syria and soon the US will start to bomb it to help rebels as they are desperate. Israel has already started today.

#143: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:31 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
He knew what he was getting in to. Everyone knew why Yanukovich wouldn't sign. I strongly suspect the US has pulled a fast one on Germany. If so, ramping up sanctions that will hurt Europe is going to be very difficult. Possibly a serious rift opening between US and German imperialism.

Looks like Crimea was traded for Syria and soon the US will start to bomb it to help rebels as they are desperate. Israel has already started today.


Possibly, I wouldn't put it past Putin. Or equally, Israeli bombing Syria could be another means to ratchet pressure on Russia.

#144: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 2:32 am
    —
Quote:
Yes, the Navajo Nation and NE AZ is very rugged. So try for Salt River Res. I have no idea about the Tribal Rules.


My wife is Cherokee and made an impression on some of the elders then, so back then it was a non issue. The ruggedness you described to me is and was then. We spent a bit over 2 weeks in AZ and most all of it was in NE AZ, much of that was with the Navajo people even. It was a rugged place, even much of the NE not belonging to the Navajo isn't grand, tho it is open land and possibly sustainable, just not near to much for people who would need to have access for possible medical reasons.

Interesting that you bring up a picture of Talking Stick stadium and Highway 101. Have watched several S/Training games there already this spring there on mlb.com. That would be 1 reason for that locale, as well as close proximity to all the other S/Training sites in the southern section of AZ. That is how it used to be in central Florida.. Before they destroyed it... Most of the MLB teams had ST here in CF, now 2 do..

#145: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:22 pm
    —
I noticed today that a large amount of Russian speaking citizens in the Ukrainian province of Kherson (adjacent to Crimea), might want a referendum of their own.

Which suggests to me, that perhaps everyone should be able to vote on who has the right to govern them.  Laughing  Idea

So, perhaps a referendum here in Arizona is not such a far fetched idea at all.  Idea

We have a large amount of Spanish speaking citizens. There is also a large indigenous population as well. They all couldn't be as they say "full blood" natives. Even the ones in my own family are no where near full blood. So, subtacting Navajo Nation and the other tribes from my original list, and adding another state or two, maybe the AZ referendum might look as follows.

1. Join Mexico
2. Join California
3. Join Utah
...
4. Become Independant

However, I might mention that there could be immediate benefits by going "native". First and foremost, Casinos could now be constructed all over the state, not just at Salt River and Gila River. Alcoholic beverages would be banned and the prices of tobacco products would plummet and I suppose marijuana might be legalized.  Idea

Furthermore, the idea of joining Mexico might get alot more votes than people imagine. The coorelations to Crimea are too obvious. Of course, the immediate downside would be the confiscation of all firearms, all the Arizona and Gadsen flags, and all the Indian lands within the state.  Laughing

Only the Gays within the state would vote for California, but there is a sizeable Moorman population in AZ, which would probably vote for Utah, while the remaining Protestants would vote for indepenance. The idea here is to dilute the Anglo (Gays, Moormans, Protestants) vote, because Catholics are going to vote for Mexico.  Confused

When you consider all the Spanish speakers, and the vast number of Mexican citizens living here now, it seems like a no brainer that Mexico would win. But like in Russia, making the vote fair would be difficult. Perhaps Arizona could allow pre-referendum absentee ballots from anywhere on the planet, which is basically what they do now. This would allow residents (not just citizens) to vote more than one time.

But, it would be prudent to just create and on-line ballot that allows people to vote as often as they like, lets Google and the NSA count them, and the results could be determined in perhaps a week. Besides, no one really believes all that caca that the poor don't have access to the internet.  Laughing

And for those of you that think if Mexico wins, the cartels would take control of Arizona ... there is alot of evidence here that suggests they are already in control of the state. But don't worry, they totally favor open carry, making AZ a scary place for local police forces.


Last edited by Stwa on Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:46 pm; edited 1 time in total

#146: Re: The Ukraine Author: deVastator PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:18 pm
    —
Guys,

back to the topic:
in my opinion the situation is not black and white (as anything else in this world).

1. It looks like great majority of Crimea citizens prefered to be a part of Russia, than a part of Ukraine. The right of a nation to take decisions on themselves is one of the basic democratic rules. For sure it should not be done the way it has been done on Crimea, but on the political and legal way. There are more examples of such processes than Quebec: Scotland (UK), Catalunia (Spain) or casus of Kosovo (Serbija). On the other hand, the process of an authority change in democratic way should looks also differently - president having such strong protests should resign and call a new election. So this should go different way, but the final effect would be the same. Maybe there was some Russian inspiration, but does not matter too much.

2. Putin claims the above right of the nation to be important, but didn't let Chechenians to decide themselves, just bring them government on tanks.

3. Western democracies does not do anything without having some interest in it. It's visible within EU. Central (rich) countries are puzzled, as should talk same voice with whole EU, but having a lot of businesses in Russia. Southern/West countries does not give a shit about Ukraine, just want to have cheap gas from Russia and not spend any cent due to the situation. Eastern and Northern countries support Ukraine as they are close to the Russia and would like to have some buffer from Russian Federation and it's imperial aspirations. This is understable (for me) as post WP countries have experienced this imperialism many times in their history. Specialy post USSR countries, where big part of citizens are Russians, affraid that they can be the next (Baltics). If the answer from the west will be too weak, then anything can happen. 1939 is still fresh in nations memories. Later on Soviets claimed they came in to bring protection against nazi Germans (I don't think any of protected countries has been glad).

4. US is not the only good guy. They do similar things, but in white gloves.

5. I think it's true, that nationalism is quite strong in Ukraine, but don't think any of minorities have been treated badly. Why Crimean Tatars didn't vote for joining Russia if they were affraid of nationalists ? They remember who has moved most of the population from Crimea to Kazakhstan steppes... Same as Ukrainians remember Holodomor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor.

All the world powers (its list changing still) plays the game for their own winning. Maybe at some time China or Japan will claim the right to protect their community leaving in Russia close to the border... Would Russians then say it's OK ?

#147: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:51 pm
    —
deVastator wrote (View Post):
Guys, back to the topic: ...


Yes of course, but for those of us that are drawing inspiration from the referendum in Crimea, is it NOT possible for us to speak (or dream  Laughing ) of a similar referendum, in the places that we inhabit.  Razz

And in so doing, is it possible for us to be ON TOPIC.  Question

#148: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:20 pm
    —
Eastern and Northern countries support Ukraine as they are close to the Russia and would like to have some buffer from Russian Federation and it's imperial aspirations. This is understable (for me) as post WP countries have experienced this imperialism many times in their history. -deVastator

Ya think.  Question

It wasn't that long ago that the Soviet Union was considered just one beeg fucking concentration camp. Note: feel free to apply the pre or post 1933 definition that you feel is appropriate. Of course part of the terminology defined some of the spaces as "Closed Cities". That would be an understatement, IMHO.

The internees (all of its "citizens") were resticted from leaving the camp, except for those belonging to the military or the hockey team (really just part of the military),  but only when they needed to steamroll or engulf another adjacent country in war or hockey.

#149: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:03 pm
    —
Quote:
2. Putin claims the above right of the nation to be important, but didn't let Chechenians to decide themselves, just bring them government on tanks.

you probably forgot that Chechnya had an independency since 1996 after the First War and it ended with their attack on Dagestan (Russian muslim republic) in 1999 which led to the Second War that was won by the RF.

Quote:
Why Crimean Tatars didn't vote for joining Russia if they were affraid of nationalists ? They remember who has moved most of the population from Crimea to Kazakhstan steppes...

they did in some areas in some they vote for staying in Ukraine.
the youngsters don't give a ..... about that move and just want to live happy and earn money. Don't forget that Kadyrov (Chechnya leader) and not Kiev leaders has been sponsored them for quite a time.

Quote:
Same as Ukrainians remember Holodomor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor.

that's a myth invented to feed the Ukranian nationalism. I mean that Holodomor was aimed on Ukranians as it affected the whole European population of USSR.
in the Empire times starvations were not seldom as well.

the most freightening thing in this situation for me is that it is really very similar to 1938 in most of aspects...
but anyway, after an annexation of Crimea the Putin's support was raised by 20% and the majority of the Russian population is happy. For now sanctions make the majority like Putin more and hate the West in the best traditions of the USSR Sad.

#150: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:40 pm
    —
that's a myth invented to feed the Ukranian nationalism. I mean that Holodomor was aimed on Ukranians as it affected the whole European population of USSR. in the Empire times starvations were not seldom as well. -Dima

Holodomor was a famine in Ukraine caused by the government of Joseph Stalin, a part of Soviet famine of 1932–1933. Holodomor is claimed by contemporary Ukrainian government to be a genocide of the Ukrainians. As of March 2008, Ukraine and nineteen other governments have recognized the actions of the Soviet government as an act of genocide. The joint statement at the United Nations in 2003 has defined the famine as the result of cruel actions and policies of the totalitarian regime that caused the deaths of millions of Ukrainians, Russians, Kazakhs and other nationalities in the USSR. On 23 October 2008 the European Parliament adopted a resolution that recognized the Holodomor as a crime against humanity. -wiki

List of Genocides

But perhaps even in the current RF, if you speak out against the government, you get hauled off the the Gulag, just like in the old days.  Shocked


Last edited by Stwa on Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:43 pm; edited 1 time in total

#151: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:42 pm
    —
Quote:
So, if starvations rarely occured in Empire times, then I am more convinced that Holodomor was genocide.

please read carefully what I posted - starvations were not seldom in the Empire times.
the last big one was not long before WW1.

#152: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:45 pm
    —
RGR,

I changed it in the original response.

#153: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:58 pm
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
that's a myth invented to feed the Ukranian nationalism. I mean that Holodomor was aimed on Ukranians as it affected the whole European population of USSR. in the Empire times starvations were not seldom as well. -Dima
Holodomor was a famine in Ukraine caused by the government of Joseph Stalin, a part of Soviet famine of 1932–1933. Holodomor is claimed by contemporary Ukrainian government to be a genocide of the Ukrainians. As of March 2008, Ukraine and nineteen other governments have recognized the actions of the Soviet government as an act of genocide. The joint statement at the United Nations in 2003 has defined the famine as the result of cruel actions and policies of the totalitarian regime that caused the deaths of millions of Ukrainians, Russians, Kazakhs and other nationalities in the USSR. On 23 October 2008 the European Parliament adopted a resolution that recognized the Holodomor as a crime against humanity. -wiki
List of Genocides
But perhaps even in the current RF, if you speak out against the government, you get hauled off the the Gulag, just like in the old days.  Shocked

anyway, the death rate of villagers from starvation in the Ukrainian SSR was pretty same as a death rate from starvation in the Russian FSSR in 30s.
thing is that f.e. in 2012 the death rate per 1.000 in Ukraine was same as during so-called Holodomor.

#154: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:09 am
    —
Right,  Laughing

So, I am cathing on to your argument. Since there is always famine in Russia, no matter what the epoch, this is pure empircal evedence that these events are NOT genocide.  Laughing

The United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG) defines genocide in part as "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group". Determining what historical events constitute a genocide and which are merely criminal or inhuman behavior is not a clear-cut matter. In nearly every case where accusations of genocide have circulated, partisans of various sides have disputed the interpretation and details of the event, often to the point of promoting different versions of the facts. An accusation of genocide will almost always be controversial. Determining the number of persons killed in each genocide can be just as difficult, with political, religious and ethnic biases or prejudices often leading to downplayed or exaggerated figures.

Some of accounts below may include ancillary causes of death such as malnutrition and disease, which may or may not have been intentionally inflicted. -wiki


List of Genocides

See, the wiki might agree with you. So can the same be attributed to the alleged genoicde of Native Americans. I am interested in those that lived within the modern borders of the USA.  Question

#155: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:13 am
    —
One more thing about that, USSR started to buy bread from Canada in spring 1932 to compensate bad crop yield of 1931/32 due to weather and in 1932/33 a crop yield was even worse (55% of 1931/32) and that led to a starvation in 1933 on all the territory of USSR.

Last edited by Dima on Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:16 am; edited 1 time in total

#156: Re: The Ukraine Author: Drizzt PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:15 am
    —
to devastator: we (Italy) have yet the nine GDP (nominal) in the world after 10 years of economical crysis due in part to a currency (euro) too strong and good only for Germany and that year after year, day after day, it begins to create problems also in northern europe. You can call us poor, if you are in the first eight positions. Of course some european neo-liberism treaties have also a great part in this crisis. Neo-liberism propaganda about debt (about high debt see Japan and USA) for sure will destroy us: the European Union I dream it's a community of peoples, not this rule of bankers and technocrats.
We don't need russian gas in the way you think: gas supply sources are many, one of them becomes important only when rulers decide in this way.
Ukraine? A government elected by nobody: inside it there is a good quantity of right-extremists. Support what? A Government in Rome, Berlin, Paris etc. etc. can be changed with a simple revolt? It's normal in democracy? A government can be dethroned only if it destroy its own democratic constitution.
This is my opinion, but many italian politicians (both right and left traditional parties) love new ukranian government, they love it because European Union (Merkel) love it, and because USA love it.

Drizzt

#157: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:43 am
    —
One more thing about that, USSR started to buy bread from Canada in spring 1932 to compensate bad crop yield of 1931/32 due to weather and in 1932/33 a crop yield was even worse (55% of 1931/32) and that led to a starvation in 1933 on all the territory of USSR. -Dima

Right  Laughing

And how did the Canadians ship the BREAD to Russia. Did they [air]ship it overnigt by Federal Express, or did they [sea]ship it on a long trans-atlantic route. The guys that made this video suggest grain was taken from the citizens and exported to the West. Maybe to make bread and return ship that to Ukraine. BTW, is it possible for you to translate the subtitles in the video for us.  Question

At this point I DEEM DIMA out of control.


Link

#158: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 1:20 am
    —
well, Stwa, looks like you really into it...

Quote:
And how did the Canadians ship the BREAD to Russia. Did they [air]ship it overnigt by Federal Express, or did they [sea]ship it on a long trans-atlantic route.

ok, so what is your idea of freight for 49.000 tons of bread from Canada to USSR in May 1932, and when do you think it will reach USSR?
bread=grain=wheat or whatever, stated bread in the document.

Quote:
The guys that made this video suggest grain was taken from the citizens and exported to the West.

maybe you or the guys can give us the numbers for the grain export in USSR in 1931-33?

Quote:
Maybe to make bread and return ship that to Ukraine.

maybe you could give us numbers of deaths in 1931-33 for Ukranian SSR and Russian FSSR to compare?

#159: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 1:48 am
    —
No need to be so modest, the US ruling class and its stooges took gold again. -sieterayov

RGR That  Laughing


Link

#160: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:25 am
    —
thing is that f.e. in 2012 the death rate per 1.000 in Ukraine was same as during so-called Holodomor. -Dima

Jeez Dima, there is NO EXCUSE for that.  Exclamation

OMG! Please note the reference to "Brain Injuries". Arrow


Link



Link

#161: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:38 am
    —
Quote:
Jeez Dima, there is NO EXCUSE for that now days.  

for what?

#162: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:20 am
    —
ok, so what is your idea of freight for 49.000 tons of bread from Canada to USSR in May 1932, and when do you think it will reach USSR? bread=grain=wheat or whatever, stated bread in the document.

Duuno, but here you go.  Arrow

#163: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:38 am
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
ok, so what is your idea of freight for 49.000 tons of bread from Canada to USSR in May 1932, and when do you think it will reach USSR? bread=grain=wheat or whatever, stated bread in the document.
Duuno, but here you go.  Arrow

ok, 8-10 days in your picture is a freight by air.
as you probably know it was kind of hard to fly the goods between the countries in 1932 not mentioning that it would cost an amount of average European country gold reserve to fly 49.000 tons of grain from Canada to USSR.
just for your understanding altogether USSR imported 100.000 tons of grain from Canada in 1932.

#164: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:05 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
ok, 8-10 days in your picture is a freight by air.
as you probably know it was kind of hard to fly the goods between the countries in 1932 not mentioning that it would cost an amount of average European country gold reserve to fly 49.000 tons of grain from Canada to USSR.
just for your understanding altogether USSR imported 100.000 tons of grain from Canada in 1932.


please read carefully what I posted - sea parcel pricing and delivery times were also included by Meest.  Laughing

#165: Re: The Ukraine Author: BungarraLocation: Murchison region, West Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:09 am
    —
I think here fellas that we should all step back take a deep breathe & get back on topic..

We are all a band of brothers... with Close Combat Series as our interest & outlet for a great game.

That you have a difference of opinion it is just that... PM each other if you wish to continue but please be mindful of whats happening now.

The people in Crimea have voted & so be it...

I only wish the ordinary people of the Ukraine well & they too take a deep breathe take stock & continue to produce & thrive in their nation. Without being the chess board for every other Tom, Dick, or Harry.

The sooner that happens the sooner everyone can get on with it..

Cool

#166: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:11 am
    —
just for your understanding altogether USSR imported 100.000 tons of grain from Canada in 1932. -Dima 

Extensive export of grain and other food

Some publications claim that after recognition of the famine situation in Ukraine during the drought and poor harvests, the Soviet government in Moscow continued to export grain rather than retain its crop to feed the people,though at a significantly lower rate than in previous years. In 1930–31, there had been 5,832,000 metric tons of grains exported. In 1931–32, grain exports declined to 4,786,000 metric tons. In 1932–33, grain exports were just 1,607,000 metric tons, and in 1933–34, this further declined to 1,441,000 metric tons. Officially published data differed slightly:

Cereals (in tonnes):

1930 – 4,846,024
1931 – 5,182,835
1932 – 1,819,114 (~750,000 during the first half of 1932; from late April ~157,000 tonnes of grain was also imported)
1933 – 1,771,364 (~220,000 during the first half of 1933; from late March grain was also imported)

Only wheat (in tonnes):

1930 – 2,530,953
1931 – 2,498,958
1932 – 550,917
1933 – 748,248

In 1932, via Ukrainian commercial ports the following amounts were exported: 988,300 tons of grains and 16,500 tons of other types of cereals. In 1933, the totals were: 809,600 tons of grains, 2,600 tons of other cereals, 3,500 tons of meat, 400 tons of butter, and 2,500 tons of fish. Those same ports imported the following amounts: less than 67,200 tons of grains and cereals in 1932, and 8,600 tons of grains in 1933.

The following amounts were received from other Soviet ports: in 1932, 164,000 tons of grains, 7,300 tons of other cereals, 31,500 tons of, and no more than 177,000 tons of meat and butter; in 1933, 230,000 tons of grains, 15,300 tons if other cereals, 100 tons of meat, 900 tons of butter, and 34,300 tons of fish.

Michael Ellman states that the 1932–33 grain exports amounted to 1.8 million tonnes, which would have been enough to feed 5 million people for one year. -wiki


Causes of Holodomor

You just cant help yourself, eh Dima.  Question

#167: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:17 am
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
Dima wrote (View Post):
ok, 8-10 days in your picture is a freight by air.
as you probably know it was kind of hard to fly the goods between the countries in 1932 not mentioning that it would cost an amount of average European country gold reserve to fly 49.000 tons of grain from Canada to USSR.
just for your understanding altogether USSR imported 100.000 tons of grain from Canada in 1932.

please read carefully what I posted - sea parcel pricing and delivery times were also included by Meest.  Laughing

yeah, so when you know that it takes 4 weeks today by sea freight to get goods from Canada to USSR, maybe you can make a guess when USSR received the grain ordered in Canada in May 1932 to compensate a bad crop yield of 31/32 and when the population was starting to feel that there is not enough bread?

#168: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:20 am
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
just for your understanding altogether USSR imported 100.000 tons of grain from Canada in 1932. -Dima 

Extensive export of grain and other food

Some publications claim that after recognition of the famine situation in Ukraine during the drought and poor harvests, the Soviet government in Moscow continued to export grain rather than retain its crop to feed the people,though at a significantly lower rate than in previous years. In 1930–31, there had been 5,832,000 metric tons of grains exported. In 1931–32, grain exports declined to 4,786,000 metric tons. In 1932–33, grain exports were just 1,607,000 metric tons, and in 1933–34, this further declined to 1,441,000 metric tons. Officially published data differed slightly:

Cereals (in tonnes):

1930 – 4,846,024
1931 – 5,182,835
1932 – 1,819,114 (~750,000 during the first half of 1932; from late April ~157,000 tonnes of grain was also imported)
1933 – 1,771,364 (~220,000 during the first half of 1933; from late March grain was also imported)

Only wheat (in tonnes):

1930 – 2,530,953
1931 – 2,498,958
1932 – 550,917
1933 – 748,248

In 1932, via Ukrainian commercial ports the following amounts were exported: 988,300 tons of grains and 16,500 tons of other types of cereals. In 1933, the totals were: 809,600 tons of grains, 2,600 tons of other cereals, 3,500 tons of meat, 400 tons of butter, and 2,500 tons of fish. Those same ports imported the following amounts: less than 67,200 tons of grains and cereals in 1932, and 8,600 tons of grains in 1933.

The following amounts were received from other Soviet ports: in 1932, 164,000 tons of grains, 7,300 tons of other cereals, 31,500 tons of, and no more than 177,000 tons of meat and butter; in 1933, 230,000 tons of grains, 15,300 tons if other cereals, 100 tons of meat, 900 tons of butter, and 34,300 tons of fish.

Michael Ellman states that the 1932–33 grain exports amounted to 1.8 million tonnes, which would have been enough to feed 5 million people for one year. -wiki


Causes of Holodomor

You just cant help yourself, eh Dima.  Question

I want you to help yourself.
Now looking at these numbers can you come to a any conclusion for 32-33?

And does it correspond to:
Quote:
The guys that made this video suggest grain was taken from the citizens and exported to the West.


and

Quote:
Holodomor was a famine in Ukraine caused by the government of Joseph Stalin, a part of Soviet famine of 1932–1933. Holodomor is claimed by contemporary Ukrainian government to be a genocide of the Ukrainians. As of March 2008, Ukraine and nineteen other governments have recognized the actions of the Soviet government as an act of genocide. The joint statement at the United Nations in 2003 has defined the famine as the result of cruel actions and policies of the totalitarian regime that caused the deaths of millions of Ukrainians, Russians, Kazakhs and other nationalities in the USSR. On 23 October 2008 the European Parliament adopted a resolution that recognized the Holodomor as a crime against humanity. -wiki

#169: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:43 am
    —
That you have a difference of opinion it is just that... PM each other if you wish to continue but please be mindful of whats happening now. -Bungara

On January 12, 2010, the court of appeals in Kiev opened hearings into the "fact of genocide-famine Holodomor in Ukraine in 1932–33", in May 2009 the Security Service of Ukraine had started a criminal case "in relation to the genocide in Ukraine in 1932–33".[13] In a ruling on January 13, 2010 the court found Stalin and other Bolshevik leaders guilty of genocide against the Ukrainians. -wiki

List of Genocides

Obviously the relationship of the USSR and Ukraine is changing once again. I see any discussion of recent events such as the court actions mentioned above and the accusations of the alleged genocide in the 20th century as ON TOPIC.

Dima is just a Holodomor denier, thats all.  Wink

#170: Re: The Ukraine Author: BungarraLocation: Murchison region, West Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:44 am
    —
Evil or Very Mad

Mooxe!

Trainwrecks!!!!!!

#171: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:58 am
    —
Quote:
On January 12, 2010, the court of appeals in Kiev opened hearings into the "fact of genocide-famine Holodomor in Ukraine in 1932–33", in May 2009 the Security Service of Ukraine had started a criminal case "in relation to the genocide in Ukraine in 1932–33".[13] In a ruling on January 13, 2010 the court found Stalin and other Bolshevik leaders guilty of genocide against the Ukrainians. -wiki

yeah, didn't actually think about it before but Stalin was a Georgian jew, most of the top persons in bolsheviks that time were jews (Zinoviev, Kamenev, Trotskiy) so yeah probably they wanted to genocide slavic population of USSR !!!

Quote:
I see any discussion of recent events such as the court actions mentioned above and the accusations of the alleged genocide in the 20th century as ON TOPIC.

sure, these jews were very bad.

#172: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:59 am
    —
Bungarra wrote (View Post):
Evil or Very Mad
Mooxe!
Trainwrecks!!!!!!

Seems you just hate the Ukrane and it's history Sad

#173: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:14 am
    —
yeah, didn't actually think about it before but Stalin was a Georgian jew, most of the top persons in bolsheviks that time were jews (Zinoviev, Kamenev, Trotskiy) so yeah probably they wanted to genocide slavic population of USSR !!! -Dima

No doubt.  Exclamation  Laughing [ducking]

#174: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:15 am
    —
Bungarra wrote (View Post):
Evil or Very Mad

Mooxe!

Trainwrecks!!!!!!


There's still hope!

Debating the tonnage of cereal that was exported to the Ukraine in the 1930s really walks the line, but I've got faith!

#175: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:27 am
    —
To get back to nowadays:

Replacing the Ukranian Navy flag with the Russian Navy flag in Black Sea Navy Academy named after Nakhimov (the hero of the Crimean war).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOjw_hR00oI&feature=youtu.be

#176: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:33 am
    —
The surrender of the Ukranian Navy HQ (some photos)
http://sevastopol.su/news.php?id=58997




#177: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:35 am
    —
Btw, these are for sure not the Russian servicemen, probably members of the disbanded Ukranian riot police (Berkut).

#178: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:42 am
    —
Well, I mentioned Kherson and its possible referendem on page 10, but nobody wanted to talk about that. It's Friday nite and Bugara doesn't want to post either. I also mentioned Arizona, and my proposed referendum too.

So how about Catalan. Seems they want to seceed from Spain. So what is gonna be on their ballot?

1. Join Italy
2. Join Morocco
...
3. Become Independent

Catalan Independence

#179: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 6:12 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
Btw, these are for sure not the Russian servicemen, probably members of the disbanded Ukranian riot police (Berkut).


Wait...What?

I don't get it.  If Putin is doing everything fair and square, then why does every single soldier shown on Eastern border of Ukraine or inside Crimea have ski masks to hide their identity.  Plus the Russian soldiers are wearing unmarked uniforms with no insignias like special forces.  These are certainly not police.  Maybe they hide their faces to avoid reprisals or problems with the Russian mafia.  Putin is afraid of populist overthrow of his own government.  Much like what just happen to the puppet leader of Ukraine when all this mess began.  Putin is making a big mistake if he gets too greedy...blowback is a bitch.  

But in reality all Police State militant countries are terrified of populist overthrow.  America spends more than the rest of world combined on military spending and has the highest incarceration rate in the world...we too could end like Ukraine as could other nations in the West if the elitists continue to ignore poverty and mass unemployment.  Sending jobs to third world slave labor sweatshops is not working out quite so well after all.  So much for our wonderful Global World Economy that serves the needs of the Corporatists, while leaving slave labor sweatshop workers with deformed hands for life.  But of course the Media will keep that a secret.

#180: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 8:19 am
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Dima wrote (View Post):
Btw, these are for sure not the Russian servicemen, probably members of the disbanded Ukranian riot police (Berkut).

Wait...What?
I don't get it.  If Putin is doing everything fair and square, then why does every single soldier shown on Eastern border of Ukraine or inside Crimea have ski masks to hide their identity.  Plus the Russian soldiers are wearing unmarked uniforms with no insignias like special forces.  These are certainly not police.  Maybe they hide their faces to avoid reprisals or problems with the Russian mafia.  Putin is afraid of populist overthrow of his own government.  Much like what just happen to the puppet leader of Ukraine when all this mess began.  Putin is making a big mistake if he gets too greedy...blowback is a bitch.

sorry to say but you are all wrong.
First of all, the RA soldiers on the Eastern border of Ukraine don't wear masks although such masks are included in the uniform set as it could be pretty cold this time of year. Btw, the US army has neck gaiters in their uniform sets as well that could be used as same type of mask.
Second, the guys on the photos I posted are definetly not the Russian servicemen as they have different uniform, equipment and armament. They are most likely former servicemen of the Ukranian riot-police units (Berkut) that were loyal to the regime by the end and because of that were disbanded with one of the first legal act of the provisional goverment (along with cancelling the Russian language as beeing the official regional language in Ukraine). The RF offered them the Russian citizenship and support if they will defend Crimea and quite a number of them fled to Crimea to be a backbone of the Crimean self-defence units. Btw they were the ones who were shooting in the air when the Ukranian army unarmed column was trying to get into that airfield. And yes, they really hate all these west Ukranian rebels after standing 2 month under molotov cocktails and sniper fire in the end.

#181: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 8:35 am
    —
Shocked  Arrow

#182: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:13 pm
    —
Ok, since mobilisation was announced in Ukraine, they lost 4 MBT and 1 Bomber trying to run the equipment that wasn't in use or duly serviced for many years.

#183: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:12 pm
    —
Dima are you arguing that Russian troops were not deployed into Crimea? Or just that not all the troops we see in the pictures are Russian?

#184: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:20 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
dj wrote (View Post):
Dima wrote (View Post):
Btw, these are for sure not the Russian servicemen, probably members of the disbanded Ukranian riot police (Berkut).

Wait...What?
I don't get it.  If Putin is doing everything fair and square, then why does every single soldier shown on Eastern border of Ukraine or inside Crimea have ski masks to hide their identity.  Plus the Russian soldiers are wearing unmarked uniforms with no insignias like special forces.  These are certainly not police.  Maybe they hide their faces to avoid reprisals or problems with the Russian mafia.  Putin is afraid of populist overthrow of his own government.  Much like what just happen to the puppet leader of Ukraine when all this mess began.  Putin is making a big mistake if he gets too greedy...blowback is a bitch.

sorry to say but you are all wrong.
First of all, the RA soldiers on the Eastern border of Ukraine don't wear masks although such masks are included in the uniform set as it could be pretty cold this time of year. Btw, the US army has neck gaiters in their uniform sets as well that could be used as same type of mask.
Second, the guys on the photos I posted are definetly not the Russian servicemen as they have different uniform, equipment and armament. They are most likely former servicemen of the Ukranian riot-police units (Berkut) that were loyal to the regime by the end and because of that were disbanded with one of the first legal act of the provisional goverment (along with cancelling the Russian language as beeing the official regional language in Ukraine). The RF offered them the Russian citizenship and support if they will defend Crimea and quite a number of them fled to Crimea to be a backbone of the Crimean self-defence units. Btw they were the ones who were shooting in the air when the Ukranian army unarmed column was trying to get into that airfield. And yes, they really hate all these west Ukranian rebels after standing 2 month under molotov cocktails and sniper fire in the end.


Yes maybe half of the soldiers in U.S. army squad in the snow deployed in Alaska or some other arctic region wear ski masks.  But never 100% of the soldiers shown in every single photo or video clip wears ski mask.  Unless it is action vs Mafia, Cartels or illegal special forces activity.  Crimea is not exactly known to be cold weather region.

I don't think so.  These are highly trained special forces under instructions to wear ski masks to hide their identity and wearing unmarked uniforms.  Militias wear Adidas and street clothes with AK-47's.  These guys are heavily armed and well organized.  Plus there are "militias" positioned on border with Crimea to interfere with Ukrainians.

The deposed leader of Ukraine was a puppet leader.  That is why the people rebelled. It could happen to Putin himself if he is not careful or to other nations.  America is too much of Police State for that to happen here.  The Police in America is like Military already and will storm into your home and shoot your dogs if even you are a suspect.   I think what happened in the Ukraine could be the beginning of Arab Spring style uprisings in Europe & former USSR nations.

#185: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:35 pm
    —
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ukraine-tension-has-roots-in-hunger-extermination-of-1930s-1.2578837
 
Quote:
The tumult we’re seeing in Ukraine isn’t simply a recent tension over Crimea. Its roots go back to the defining event of Ukraine’s modern history: the Holodomor or "hunger-extermination" of the 1930s, in which as many as eight million people died.

Ukraine in 1932 was a satellite of the Soviet Union that had long been struggling to find its place as an independent republic in the USSR. In that year and the one following, Joseph Stalin closed the borders and seized almost all the harvest, leaving little for Ukrainians themselves.

After the Holodomor that left so many millions dead, opposition to Moscow was crushed. But the push-back against the Soviets flared a number of times over the following decades: in 1954, 1972, 1988, in 1991 after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and again in 2004 with the Orange Revolution against a corrupt and eastward-looking government.

#186: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:43 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Dima are you arguing that Russian troops were not deployed into Crimea? Or just that not all the troops we see in the pictures are Russian?

Im saying that those guys shown in my post are definetly not the Russian servicemen (although they will be soon when they swear to the RF) and if you look closer you would notice that they are equipped and armed differently then the "polite armed men" during first days.

#187: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:43 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ukraine-tension-has-roots-in-hunger-extermination-of-1930s-1.2578837
Quote:
The tumult we’re seeing in Ukraine isn’t simply a recent tension over Crimea. Its roots go back to the defining event of Ukraine’s modern history: the Holodomor or "hunger-extermination" of the 1930s, in which as many as eight million people died.
Ukraine in 1932 was a satellite of the Soviet Union that had long been struggling to find its place as an independent republic in the USSR. In that year and the one following, Joseph Stalin closed the borders and seized almost all the harvest, leaving little for Ukrainians themselves.
After the Holodomor that left so many millions dead, opposition to Moscow was crushed. But the push-back against the Soviets flared a number of times over the following decades: in 1954, 1972, 1988, in 1991 after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and again in 2004 with the Orange Revolution against a corrupt and eastward-looking government.

Sorry to say but that's total bullshit.

#188: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:47 pm
    —
dj wrote (View Post):

Yes maybe half of the soldiers in U.S. army squad in the snow deployed in Alaska or some other arctic region wear ski masks.  But never 100% of the soldiers shown in every single photo or video clip wears ski mask.  Unless it is action vs Mafia, Cartels or illegal special forces activity.  Crimea is not exactly known to be cold weather region.

tried to walk along the streets for several hours at 5-8 deg C and wind?

Quote:
I don't think so.  These are highly trained special forces under instructions to wear ski masks to hide their identity and wearing unmarked uniforms.  Militias wear Adidas and street clothes with AK-47's.  These guys are heavily armed and well organized.  Plus there are "militias" positioned on border with Crimea to interfere with Ukrainians.

Ukranian riot-police is something in between of US national guards and SWAT.
They are authorized with AK-47, sniper rifles, RPGs and GPMGs.

Quote:
The deposed leader of Ukraine was a puppet leader.  That is why the people rebelled. It could happen to Putin himself if he is not careful or to other nations.  America is too much of Police State for that to happen here.  The Police in America is like Military already and will storm into your home and shoot your dogs if even you are a suspect.   I think what happened in the Ukraine could be the beginning of Arab Spring style uprisings in Europe & former USSR nations.

whose puppet he was? as the RF had big problems with Ukraine during his term.

#189: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:02 pm
    —
These are ex-Berkut policemen as well who were shooting at the air to stop unarmed Ukranian army column trying to reach Belbek airbase.


And that's a "polite armed man" telling them to calm down:

#190: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:45 pm
    —
Hehe, that "polite armed man" on the last photo looks similar to 1st Lt Nathaniel Fik from "Generation Kill" series to me Smile.

#191: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 6:07 pm
    —
Now the Russian Special Forces are officially there - see the difference?






Last edited by Dima on Sat Mar 22, 2014 6:57 pm; edited 1 time in total

#192: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 6:55 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
Ok, since mobilisation was announced in Ukraine, they lost 4 MBT and 1 Bomber trying to run the equipment that wasn't in use or duly serviced for many years.

update: 2 T-64BV destroyed by catching fire, 3 more T-64BV got badly damaged, 1 152mm SP gun (Msta) destroyed by catching fire (1 crewman died), 1 Su-24 bomber crashed due to malfunction.

#193: Re: The Ukraine Author: southern_land PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 7:43 pm
    —
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KB5ljM3AJ2c&feature=youtube_gdata_player
 
for those of you who think the west is as pure as the driven snow

Pretty much evidence that global politics is a game and we're all being played

#194: Re: The Ukraine Author: deVastator PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 9:15 pm
    —
In my post the clue was that the situation is not black & white there. If we look back closer to the history of the region there are more and more evidencies of its complexity. There no bad Russians and good&poor Ukrainians as well as no the only fair Russians and bad EU/US (and oposite).

to Drizzt: I mean that Southern EU countries have now more important (for them) problems than Ukraine which is far away. For sure the economical situation in Italy is not a real crisis. The real crisis is on Cuba or in Somalia, not in Italy.
Peacefull change of government is quite common. Im not sure how that has gone with Berlusconi (that was a final effect of a pressure from the street), but in young democracies (post WP countries) it was rare situation for the first 10-15 years that periods between elections have not been shortened due to government fall.

#195: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 9:25 pm
    —
If this is how their MPs behave, you can imagine what their grunts are doing. US's and EU's pals at work in democratic Ukraine.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nnmbR-MWFA

#196: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 10:03 pm
    —
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
If this is how their MPs behave, you can imagine what their grunts are doing. US's and EU's pals at work in democratic Ukraine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nnmbR-MWFA

it doesn't matter as the bad guy is still and will always be the RF Smile.
even if I say that armed masked persons patroll Kiev and if you are stopped and not speaking the Ukranian they can seize your car or treat as Moscal (like in this video) that would only be the Russian propaganda Wink.

#197: Re: The Ukraine Author: Drizzt PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 10:30 pm
    —
to Devastator: we are a parliamentary republic, not a presidential republic: this fact means that governments can fall in parliament (never in streets) and immediately new governments can born in parliament (if a majority of parties can’t find this new government, of course we return immediately to vote). Normally we should vote every five years (sometime, if not often, before 5 years as I have explained).
The clown Berlusconi is now officially a criminal (officially because finally certificated by an italian sentence): the only reason of his power for so many years has been the sloth, the “undercover accommodation”, the mediocrity and the cowardice of the traditional left party leaders.
The crisis is also here: our small and average industries suffer a lot (they are the backbone and the prestige of our economy). We don’t have and we don’t want to have many big multinationals (of course we have some of them, but only few): euro rulers want to force us to become “more similar” to USA and/or German economy but, in my opinion, they will destroy us in this way (the only good thing are some ethical rules that I hope we will import, but that’s all).
Speaking more in general, after the end of the real socialism, the desertification of the middle class and the foolish accumulation of wealth in very small hands it’s a common problem in all western democracies: the ruling classes of all states don’t have fear of nothing now, so they try to re-take all (and they have the media to support their lies): conditions of work like in 1800 it’s their final goal for masses (or something like a technological middle ages). Democracies all risks to die (I mean to die as democracies) in this neo-liberalism system. A good kind of European Union should be the tool to avoid this fate, for now it's exactly the opposite. (sorry to all for the off- topic).
Drizzt

#198: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 2:23 am
    —
Yes I think Democracy is a big lie and most of the "Free" world Government are frauds.  America is suppose to be the beacon of light and the great Democracy.  Yet we have elections like Banana Republics, where greedy multi-national corporations, Foreign Government and Partisan billionaires can simply purchase elections...with unlimited amounts of cash and in complete secrecy. What almost brought American and the World Economy to the brink of collapse was the complete Fraud of the Real Estate market...with completely bogus bank loans for properties that nobody could afford.  Yet nothing real was done to correct these problems and the masses of unemployed still have no hope for jobs or to ever afford a neighborhood that is not infested with hoodlums or in disrepair.  The media demonizes Socialism or even Social Programs to indoctrinate the masses to oppose the very policies that help them.  So there is really no such thing as Socialism I agree.   Big Government and Big Corporations are one in the same.  

#199: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 11:33 am
    —
Drizzt wrote (View Post):
to Devastator: we are a parliamentary republic, not a presidential republic: this fact means that governments can fall in parliament (never in streets) and immediately new governments can born in parliament (if a majority of parties can’t find this new government, of course we return immediately to vote). Normally we should vote every five years (sometime, if not often, before 5 years as I have explained).
The clown Berlusconi is now officially a criminal (officially because finally certificated by an italian sentence): the only reason of his power for so many years has been the sloth, the “undercover accommodation”, the mediocrity and the cowardice of the traditional left party leaders.
The crisis is also here: our small and average industries suffer a lot (they are the backbone and the prestige of our economy). We don’t have and we don’t want to have many big multinationals (of course we have some of them, but only few): euro rulers want to force us to become “more similar” to USA and/or German economy but, in my opinion, they will destroy us in this way (the only good thing are some ethical rules that I hope we will import, but that’s all).
Speaking more in general, after the end of the real socialism, the desertification of the middle class and the foolish accumulation of wealth in very small hands it’s a common problem in all western democracies: the ruling classes of all states don’t have fear of nothing now, so they try to re-take all (and they have the media to support their lies): conditions of work like in 1800 it’s their final goal for masses (or something like a technological middle ages). Democracies all risks to die (I mean to die as democracies) in this neo-liberalism system. A good kind of European Union should be the tool to avoid this fate, for now it's exactly the opposite. (sorry to all for the off- topic).
Drizzt


“A development of the productive forces is the absolutely necessary practical premise [of Communism], because without it want is generalized, and with want the struggle for necessities begins again, and that means that all the old crap must revive.”

Karl Marx

Where, then, was the real socialism? Was it not the reviving of all the old crap dressed in "Marxist" rhetoric? As Trotsky put it, "Marxism converted socialism into a science, but this does not prevent some ‘Marxists’ from converting Marxism into a Utopia."

The growth of giant, monopolistic banks and corporations is the progressive content of capitalism. They represent the most efficient organisation of labour and technology with the capacity to eliminate generalised want. The problem are capitalist social relations which make this massive social advance an enemy of the people that create the wealth, the working class. The task of the real socialist, then, is not to advocate for small and medium size business, which in any case only desires to become big business, but to replace market regulation and private ownership with democratic control by producers and consumers and social ownership of the great banks and corporations.

To promote small business against large is not only socially and economically regressive, it is also, in times of crisis, the rallying cry of fascism, "national socialism." The middle class, is only "socialist" in so far as it is ruined by finance capital and threatened with demotion to the working class or unemployed rump. It is nationalist because it fears the international working class which threatens its privileges and pretensions. As history has shown, fascism ditches its "socialism" at the first opportunity, to become the most violent, repressive political tool of big capital.

Whatever their origins, Social Democracy since WW1, Stalinism and various middle class radical groups never had social ownership of the means of production controlled by the working class, as their objectives or social revolution as the means to that end. They have always, at best, sought to gain for the working class, a fairer share of the capitalist cake, so as to ensure their own privileges. Neo-Liberalism since 1978-9 has only exposed the bankruptcy of this project. In the changed economic conditions since deregulation, where national reformism is no longer possible, what were once capitalist parties for the working class have been converted into new big business parties. The elections faced by workers the world over are now between different parties entirely hostile to their interests. Class compromise is virtually finished. Anti-terrorism laws, police state surveillance programs and extra judicial executions are filling the vacuum.

#200: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:12 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
If this is how their MPs behave, you can imagine what their grunts are doing. US's and EU's pals at work in democratic Ukraine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nnmbR-MWFA

it doesn't matter as the bad guy is still and will always be the RF Smile.
even if I say that armed masked persons patroll Kiev and if you are stopped and not speaking the Ukranian they can seize your car or treat as Moscal (like in this video) that would only be the Russian propaganda Wink.


I'm not sure what you have access to, but in the UK, the anti-RF propaganda offensive is absolutely relentless. Anyone who has not yet figured that the media is not free and objective but spouts a political line determined by the interests of British and US finance capital, can only come away, at best, confused. Nevertheless, there is no enthusiasm here for war.

Most reports here show a division of support in Ukraine for the EU or RF line. This is how they make the reports appear balanced. Typically, in interviews with what purport to be ordinary Ukrainian citizens, the pro-RF people are given sound bites in which they state their support for RF while the pro-putsch people are given much more time to denounce Russian "imperialism". The reportage is then rounded up by an interview either with a Russian speaking Ukrainian who wants to stay with the Ukraine/is leaving the Crimea to go back to the Ukraine/regards Russia as their roots but not their Ukrainian present or just wants "peace and to get on with my life" etc etc  or with a representative of the "democratic" Kiev putsch who lies and distorts at will and to their heart's content. The reporter then makes a snide remark about the illegality of what RF is doing and then we're back to the TV studio. This is what's dished up night after night.

On radio, we have more interviews with the putsch government officials and all manner of "intellectuals" and pundits clamouring to stick the boot into RF. These range from equating Putin with Hitler, to pseudo-psychological analogies of the RF with a  mental patient and a whole lot in between.

I return to my original point in this thread, then, that nowhere does anyone mention what the US/EU are doing in the Ukraine or that evidence already in the public domain demonstrates clearly that once again, the US had illegally engineered a regime change to install a puppet government, this time supporting Neo-Nazis. That the West is interested only in human rights, freedom and international law, is taken as a given. How could it be otherwise? It's as if the Balkans, Afghanistan and Iraq, Libya and Syria (anyone ever mention the deployment of masked, unidentified special ops forces by the West there? Sshhhh) never happened.

#201: Re: The Ukraine Author: Drizzt PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 2:17 pm
    —
To sieterayos: Yes, I understand the danger inside some of my words (I agree with you about born of fascism - middle class etc.). The reborn of fascism (in all Europe) it’s a real danger in this crisis. There is nothing of regressive in what I have tried to explain because we are now in this way (we don’t want become in this way to react to this crisis, we are in this way already). The enemy of the "middle class" in 1920 were workers and socialism ideas, now, in my opinion, it’s clear to almost all that it’s the ruling class the problem (small businnessmen suffer because working class suffer: there is few money to buy goods/services).
Socialist ideas heritages are anyway for sure deep in many small businessmen (because almost all come from working class): I know about small businessmen died suicidal because they can’t pay anymore their workers. Many of them are like workers in all, and they earn not so much more then their workers. Moreover, the cooperative system of production it’s another piece of this puzzle (I mean the real cooperative system of production, there is also a false one that have lost its roots).
Having said this, there are of course also many small businessmen really egoist. Anyway, who attacks constantly the working class (and ignore the small businessmen) it’s the ruling class (of “left”, of right and economical).

Drizzt

#202: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 5:06 pm
    —
Yes what is constantly indoctrinated into the masses that there are 3 types of government Communism , Socialism and Capitalism is no longer valid.  China for instance is nowhere near a true Communist state...it is very much a hybrid.  It's all a bunch of lies.  American media has told us for decades that Communism is the evil empire and dangerous...yet we have witnessed the greatest transfer of wealth the world has ever seen, sending many millions of American jobs to China using slave labor prison style conditions.  Moreover virtually every consumer item sold in America is stamped "made in China".  If Commmunism was truly so dangerous then why did America terminate millions of jobs and replace them in Commie China?  And subsequently sent trillions of $ USD worth of revenues to China at the expense of the middle class? It's all lies fed to the masses so the ruling class elitists can brainwash the people and control them via the modern day Police State.

The collapse of Ukraine is not going to have the ripple effect of what happened in Iceland with their banking system going belly up...but I think the political impact on both Russia and the E.U. is going to be significant to say the least.  I wonder if the Krauts will take action like the old days...they seem to call the shots in the EU right now.  Russia makes some serious cash from the Krauts importing their energy resources...so it will be interesting to see if they want to risk that relationship.

#203: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 8:32 pm
    —
So, did we sort out which thugs were in the costumes.  Question

Another genocide in Ukraine would be unacceptable.  Arrow


Link



Link

#204: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:50 am
    —
OMG  Exclamation  Arrow

#205: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:12 pm
    —
American media has told us for decades that Communism is the evil empire and dangerous...yet we have witnessed the greatest transfer of wealth the world has ever seen, sending many millions of American jobs to China using slave labor prison style conditions. -dj

You must live East of the Mississippi.


Link

#206: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:29 pm
    —
That the West is interested only in human rights, freedom and international law, is taken as a given. -sieterayov

And this would be the reason why  Arrow


Link

#207: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:39 pm
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
That the West is interested only in human rights, freedom and international law, is taken as a given. -sieterayov
And this would be the reason why  Arrow

Link

yeah, that's a known funny video - peaceofshit.rf  Wink.

#208: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:27 am
    —
Now it is rumoured that there could be tensions or fighting between ethnic Ukrainians and Russian-speaking Putin loyalists in Ukraine.  Putin will have a lot of problems with control of ethnic Ukrainians if he takes any more lands in Ukraine.  Although I think RF will try one last small land grab to connect Crimea.  Otherwise Putin risks real sanctions or trade deals especially with the Germans.  

#209: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 11:24 am
    —
Are these the guys on page 13.  Question


Link

#210: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 11:28 am
    —
Ski masks.  Exclamation  Arrow


Link

#211: Re: The Ukraine Author: MajorFrank PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:51 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
Now the Russian Special Forces are officially there - see the difference?


What's Chris Kyle doing in the Crimea?  Question  Smile




#212: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 6:33 am
    —
And Eric Bana Smile

#213: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 12:36 pm
    —
Here we go again....

#214: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 1:16 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Here we go again....


It never stopped. Provocations against RF have been constant and will not end until the US gets the war it wants.

Interesting news, Seymour Hirsh has revealed that Turkey was behind the sarin gas attacks in Syria looking to supply the US a pretext for regime change war it needed.

http://www.lrb.co.uk/2014/04/06/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line
 
The snipers that killed so many Kiev demonstrators were in all probability employed by the protest leaders, again to provide a pretext for their putsch.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2573923/Estonian-Foreign-Ministry-confirms-authenticity-leaked-phone-call-discussing-Kiev-snipers-shot-protesters-possibly-hired-Ukraines-new-leaders.html
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/ukraine-kiev-snipers-reportedly-hired-by-opposition-leaders-not-yanukovich-according-to-bugged-call-9171328.html
 
Here's a link to Per Anders Rudling's study of the forces spearheading the US backed putsch

http://www.academia.edu/2481420/_The_Return_of_the_Ukrainian_Far_Right_The_Case
 
Anyone wonder why the US and Israel are backing Neo-Nazis and calling them democrats? No probs, the EU are too-

8.  Is concerned about the rising nationalistic sentiment in Ukraine, expressed in support for the Svoboda Party, which, as a result, is one of the two new parties to enter the Verkhovna Rada; recalls that racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic views go against the EU's fundamental values and principles and therefore appeals to pro-democratic parties in the Verkhovna Rada not to associate with, endorse or form coalitions with this party;

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2012-0507+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
 
When is a neo-Nazi a democrat? When the US and EU want a pretext for regime change and war.

#215: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:27 am
    —
“There is a script being written in the Russian Federation, for which there is only one purpose: the dismemberment and destruction of Ukraine and the transformation of Ukraine into the territory of slavery under the dictates of Russia.”

-Arseniy Yatsenyuk

As the figurehead of the US/EU backed putsch, "Yats" would know all about following scripts. Standing reality on its feet again, we have- “There is a script being written in the White House, for which there is only one purpose: the dismemberment and destruction of the Russian Federation and the transformation of Ukraine into the territory of slavery under the dictates of the US, EU and their proxies.”

#216: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:36 am
    —
They say here that Kiev hired 150 PMCs from Greystone (ex-Blackwater) and sent them to the East Ukraine to help dealing with separatists.

#217: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:34 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
They say here that Kiev hired 150 PMCs from Greystone (ex-Blackwater) and sent them to the East Ukraine to help dealing with separatists.


Possibly, but given they have a new National Guard for domestic repression, incorporating thousands of Right Sector fascists, I wonder if it's really necessary?

#218: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:50 am
    —
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
Dima wrote (View Post):
They say here that Kiev hired 150 PMCs from Greystone (ex-Blackwater) and sent them to the East Ukraine to help dealing with separatists.

Possibly, but given they have a new National Guard for domestic repression, incorporating thousands of Right Sector fascists, I wonder if it's really necessary?

well, their militia is not really combat ready in case of real actions that's why they need some core troops to reinforce the militants.

#219: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:17 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
Dima wrote (View Post):
They say here that Kiev hired 150 PMCs from Greystone (ex-Blackwater) and sent them to the East Ukraine to help dealing with separatists.

Possibly, but given they have a new National Guard for domestic repression, incorporating thousands of Right Sector fascists, I wonder if it's really necessary?

well, their militia is not really combat ready in case of real actions that's why they need some core troops to reinforce the militants.


Possibly. There's also the issue of the Right Sector's reliability given they are less concerned about maintaining appearances for Western opinion than other factions. One of their leaders was killed, they say executed, by police last week. Night of the Long Knives? Not clear yet.

#220: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 4:51 pm
    —
America's National Public Radio interviewed residents in Eastern Ukraine.  Do not call Ukraine "The" Ukraine...translates to the borderlands.  It is regarded as patronizing.  One Ukrainian that was interviewed by American journalist put it best...neither control by Russia or control by the "West" EU/USA are good options.  Ukrainians want to be truly independent without the overly controlling Russia or selling-out to the EU/USA.  However he acknowledged that Ukraine really does not have any other options since the economy is in shambles.  

The shit Global Economy trying to compete with Communist China and cheap slave labor in India is wrecking economies all over the world.  Especially with the Troll multi-national corporations that treat workers like dirt.  Ukraine is going to need economic support whether they like or not otherwise they will become a bottom tier eastern european nation without a future.

#221: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:04 am
    —
Pro-Russia separatists have "No Fascism" signs in English at barricaded building.  Also they have anti-Nazi signs out.  It's as if they are trying to say the West are all fascists...or accusing the Ukrainian nationalists of being fascist sell-outs.  

Poles must be getting nervous?  It's not like this part of Europe has not been sliced up already 100 times over the years.  This reminds me of Yugoslavia situation with the collapse of USSR.

#222: Re: The Ukraine Author: tedy28 PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:57 pm
    —
Poles like russian....only normal russian

#223: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:06 am
    —
I am glad the Ukraine has started cleaning house. They are going to have to be careful though. No doubt the Russians will be trying very hard to manipulate and steer the Ukrainian forces into larger "actions" in order to have a reason to deploy the Russian military inside the Ukraine.

#224: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 6:16 am
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
I am glad the Ukraine has started cleaning house. They are going to have to be careful though. No doubt the Russians will be trying very hard to manipulate and steer the Ukrainian forces into larger "actions" in order to have a reason to deploy the Russian military inside the Ukraine.

ahha, looks the brainwashing machine is working at full speed at your places Smile.
why when the Ukraine tried to clean their house in Kiev 3-4 months ago using riot police against protesters all the West was against it and even forced the cabinet and president to flee? What has changed and why the new Ukranian goverment is allowed to use deadly forces against protesters in the South East?
Why hasn't Russia deployed military in the Ukraine before even when the legal president was asking for that? Why would the RF willing to do that now?

#225: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:53 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
mooxe wrote (View Post):
I am glad the Ukraine has started cleaning house. They are going to have to be careful though. No doubt the Russians will be trying very hard to manipulate and steer the Ukrainian forces into larger "actions" in order to have a reason to deploy the Russian military inside the Ukraine.

ahha, looks the brainwashing machine is working at full speed at your places Smile.
why when the Ukraine tried to clean their house in Kiev 3-4 months ago using riot police against protesters all the West was against it and even forced the cabinet and president to flee? What has changed and why the new Ukranian goverment is allowed to use deadly forces against protesters in the South East?
Why hasn't Russia deployed military in the Ukraine before even when the legal president was asking for that? Why would the RF willing to do that now?


Yup.

There are links or references to factual sources in this thread that demonstrate-

1. The US spent $5 billion in the Ukraine since the 1990s creating and cultivating friendly political forces.
2. The aim of this cultivation was regime change and the installation of a compliant puppet regime.
3. The US/EU knowingly employed neo-Nazi forces which the latter had only in 2012 asked other political parties in Ukraine not to ally or associate with, to spearhead their putsch in Kiev.

This known and verifiable information is seldom mentioned in the western media and never investigated, in favour of publicising as good coin, the belligerent, hypocritical and utterly false utterances of western and Kiev putsch politicians and diplomats.

Further, there are links to evidence that strongly suggest that western backed fascists were responsible for killing protesters in Kiev to justify regime change.

From this we can deduce that the western media, state and privately owned, is acting in concert to deceive its populations in the run up to a western provoked war with the Russian federation. That the Russian Federation media and its politicians are no less corrupt is irrelevant to this situation. This situation is clearly not of their making.

#226: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:44 pm
    —
Is what I said really that absurd after what happened in Crimea? I don't think I'm brainwashed. I look at this situation in very simple terms. If government buildings are being taken over by armed people, then the government must clear them out and regain control. Is this not whats happening?

They must regain control of the country and stabilize it. I could care less about the back story and conspiracy theories. After Crimea I do know that if things start to get bloody in areas predominantly Russian, ofcourse Russia will start stepping in. They did it in Crimea before any violence started! If they step in in a peacekeeping/protective and leave after the violence is quelled then fine. But if they step in and support a referendum then that gives credence to all the stories of Russian trying to take the Ukraine piece by piece.

How it got to this point doesn't really matter anymore, it's whats happening now and in the future that matters.

#227: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 5:42 pm
    —
Quote:
I look at this situation in very simple terms. If government buildings are being taken over by armed people, then the government must clear them out and regain control. Is this not whats happening?

when the exactly same was happening 2-3 months ago in the Central and West Ukraine the US and the EU supported these actions of "peaceful protesters" against the corruption regime.
now absolutely the same is happening in the East Ukraine but now the protesters are against the current provisional goverment and now the US and the EU supports the provisional goverment against peaceful protesters.
these are the protesters supporting the federalization in Kramatorsk for instance:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=5Eew9bGi8KA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGW_wXRdDMY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31oLk4M7L48

do they look like the Russian SF?
btw on one of the videos one of the Ukranian goverment soldiers who decided to give up their BMD and fight along the protesters says that he'd better go fighting americans....

NATO claims the RF has 35-40K (some say up to 80k) of troops with armors at the border of Ukraine but why they only show a couple of jet squadrons and battalions? Where are all other troops? Not a single APC, MBT or soldier tent...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/russian/international/2014/04/140409_vj_russian_army_conditions.shtml
http://www.bbc.co.uk/russian/russia/2014/04/140411_russian_army_map.shtml
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26940375
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26968312
http://graphics.wsj.com/russian-forces-near-ukraine/#27

So yes for now I believe that's a brainwashing and propaganda, we'll see how it goes though.

#228: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 8:45 pm
    —
With an unstable country next door, what country wouldn't bolster its military presence along the border. I barely need evidence to believe it.

I am going to assume this. The current government is supported by countries to its West mainly because they need an interim government during this turmoil. The West would not like to see the current government stay in power without fair elections. Can the Ukraine call fair elections now? Definitely not, not after losing control of parts of the country. Would Russia take advantage of the situation and manipulate events so parts of the Ukraine would become part of Russia? I think so. Would countries in the West try to manipulate events so the Ukraine stays whole? I believe so. I bet most reasonable people would agree.

I am not interested in propaganda or conspiracy theories. One can call any competing story either of those.

#229: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:53 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Is what I said really that absurd after what happened in Crimea? I don't think I'm brainwashed. I look at this situation in very simple terms. If government buildings are being taken over by armed people, then the government must clear them out and regain control. Is this not whats happening?

They must regain control of the country and stabilize it. I could care less about the back story and conspiracy theories. After Crimea I do know that if things start to get bloody in areas predominantly Russian, ofcourse Russia will start stepping in. They did it in Crimea before any violence started! If they step in in a peacekeeping/protective and leave after the violence is quelled then fine. But if they step in and support a referendum then that gives credence to all the stories of Russian trying to take the Ukraine piece by piece.

How it got to this point doesn't really matter anymore, it's whats happening now and in the future that matters.


I look at this situation in very simple terms.

The world, and this situation are not simple and its face values are false. Yet we see from your various posts that the simplicity of your view is selective. It is simple fact in the public domain that Victoria Newland admitted the US has spent $5 billion fostering political parties in the Ukraine since the 1990s. It is a simple fact that that in a leaked telephone conversation, the Same Victoria Newland discussed with Geoffrey Pyatt, who was going to take what position in the putsch administration and who play what role. From those simple facts we see that the politicians of the putsch, including neo-Nazis, were agents of US foreign policy. You choose to dismiss and denigrate this as "conspiracy theory." It is not. It is incontrovertible fact.

How it got to this point doesn't really matter anymore, it's whats happening now and in the future that matters.

Words that defy belief. If you don't understand the past, you have no clue about the present and less about the future. If the Ukraine has been taken over by a US backed Russophobe fascist putsch, the Russian population are in danger. Yet you celebrate the intervention of the armed wing of this Russophobe putsch thus-  "I am glad the Ukraine has started cleaning house."

What exactly do you think these Russophobe Right Sector thugs in National Guard uniforms are going to be doing in Eastern Ukraine? And we also see that your openness to conspiracy theory is no less selective than the simplicity of your world view. You continued thus- "They are going to have to be careful though. No doubt the Russians will be trying very hard to manipulate and steer the Ukrainian forces into larger "actions" in order to have a reason to deploy the Russian military inside the Ukraine."

So the Russians are attempting to manipulate the situation for their own nefarious ends but-

The West would not like to see the current government stay in power without fair elections.

The Ukrainian fascists are violently cleaning out the media of dissenting voices and attacking pro Russian politicians. In what sense can any elections carried out under these circumstances be "fair"? Democracy is not just about votes. It is the social structure and freedom of information in which the votes take place.

I am going to assume this. The current government is supported by countries to its West mainly because they need an interim government during this turmoil.

Incorrect, you are going to assume it because you have dismissed the factual evidence of who installed the putsch government and why as "conspiracy theory." The vacuum you now try to fill with fairy tales.



I am not interested in propaganda or conspiracy theories. One can call any competing story either of those.


You should be, you regurgitate propaganda in every word. As stories compete, you have to check out their veracity, something you have avoided at every turn in favour of fantasies, comforting assumptions and propaganda that sits well with you.

Show me a brainwashed person that understands  they are. Your reasoning is at best, inadequate to understand this situation.

#230: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:23 am
    —
I believe a reasonable person would agree with my previous post. To add to it, I am predicting the Ukraine will be further split up. Not necessarily ceded to Russia, but maybe made a country or state on its own, ripe for the picking years down the road.

I guess we can just agree that everything I say, you say and what everyone else says is propaganda. You literally cannot form an opinion on anything without the influence of something.

#231: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:26 am
    —
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
Dima wrote (View Post):
mooxe wrote (View Post):
I am glad the Ukraine has started cleaning house. They are going to have to be careful though. No doubt the Russians will be trying very hard to manipulate and steer the Ukrainian forces into larger "actions" in order to have a reason to deploy the Russian military inside the Ukraine.

ahha, looks the brainwashing machine is working at full speed at your places Smile.
why when the Ukraine tried to clean their house in Kiev 3-4 months ago using riot police against protesters all the West was against it and even forced the cabinet and president to flee? What has changed and why the new Ukranian goverment is allowed to use deadly forces against protesters in the South East?
Why hasn't Russia deployed military in the Ukraine before even when the legal president was asking for that? Why would the RF willing to do that now?


Yup.

There are links or references to factual sources in this thread that demonstrate-

1. The US spent $5 billion in the Ukraine since the 1990s creating and cultivating friendly political forces.
2. The aim of this cultivation was regime change and the installation of a compliant puppet regime.
3. The US/EU knowingly employed neo-Nazi forces which the latter had only in 2012 asked other political parties in Ukraine not to ally or associate with, to spearhead their putsch in Kiev.

This known and verifiable information is seldom mentioned in the western media and never investigated, in favour of publicising as good coin, the belligerent, hypocritical and utterly false utterances of western and Kiev putsch politicians and diplomats.

Further, there are links to evidence that strongly suggest that western backed fascists were responsible for killing protesters in Kiev to justify regime change.

From this we can deduce that the western media, state and privately owned, is acting in concert to deceive its populations in the run up to a western provoked war with the Russian federation. That the Russian Federation media and its politicians are no less corrupt is irrelevant to this situation. This situation is clearly not of their making.


Siet what is your definition of "fascist"?  Why would the west create a conspiracy to start war with Russian Federation.  Because ethnic Russians are being oppressed in Crimea or Eastern Ukraine?
Sounds like a nice conspiracy theory but is just not credible.  Political and Economic factions for centuries have used puppets and purchased the influence of leaders, regardless of ideology or religion.
Where is your alleged evidence?  A Partisan website or blog?

#232: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:07 am
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
I believe a reasonable person would agree with my previous post.


To add to it, I am predicting the Ukraine will be further split up. Not necessarily ceded to Russia, but maybe made a country or state on its own, ripe for the picking years down the road.

I guess we can just agree that everything I say, you say and what everyone else says is propaganda. You literally cannot form an opinion on anything without the influence of something.


What is a "reasonable person" if not an agglomeration of your own, western propaganda derived  prejudices? There certainly aren't many in Russia. though certainly plenty scared of getting their sorry selves evaporated in a nuclear holocaust.

What you form the opinion on will play a large part in determining the extent to which it approximates truth. If you base it on fact it has a larger chance of doing so than if you base it on lies, selective and dis information. To equate fact based opinions with those based on disinformation and lies is clearly sceptical nonsense. It's an argument akin to the escape clause of the religious minded who, when confronted with an insoluble contradiction in their doctrine, answer "god moves in mysterious ways."

#233: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:38 am
    —
dj wrote (View Post):


Siet what is your definition of "fascist"?
 

Fascism is a far right political phenomenon that takes hold, in the first place, of sections of the middle class when society has come to an impasse; When social contradictions are acute yet the progressive class, the working class, is unable to resolve them. The volatile middle class, seeing no way forward, backs up, regurgitating all the barbarism of the old society in its most naked and virulent form.

Fascism has a populist front and will inevitably have a left as well as right wing. This causes confusion amongst those unable to cut to the social essence of the movement and lacking understanding of the political impotence of the middle class. Battered both by big capital and the working class in struggle against it, the middle class mass is hostile to both. Lacking an independent basis in productive social relations, it can offer no way forward and must surrender power to, or act in the interests of, another social class, the big bourgeoisie.

Fascism, then, becomes the most ardent defender of big capital, in spite of itself. Its socialist pretensions are dropped at the first opportunity leaving the working class atomised and violently restrained. "The nation," the economic and political basis of capitalism, becomes the sole beneficiary of its violence.

dj wrote (View Post):
Why would the west create a conspiracy to start war with Russian Federation.  Because ethnic Russians are being oppressed in Crimea or Eastern Ukraine?
Sounds like a nice conspiracy theory but is just not credible.  Political and Economic factions for centuries have used puppets and purchased the influence of leaders, regardless of ideology or religion.
Where is your alleged evidence?  A Partisan website or blog?


Clearly you have not followed the links I provided for you to Zbigniew Brzezinski's The Grand Chessboard. This is the geo-strategic aim of the US through all administrations. No conspiracy theory, just conspiracy in black and white and from the horses mouth. If you want to understand motive for what's going on, and no analysis of a situation is complete without it, it's all there. On the other hand, if you want to read books for overgrown kids, there are plenty of suggestions in the "What are you reading" thread.

#234: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:01 am
    —
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/16/pro-russian-separatists-seize-ukrainian-armoured-vehicles
 
Some accounts of interaction between soldiers and civilians recall the November revolution. How long before this predominantly working class revolt rejects the Kremlin and its oligarchs too?

#235: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 11:07 am
    —
From BBC...

Quote:
He (Putin) also admitted for the first time that Russian troops had been "behind the backs of self-defence forces in Crimea" to ensure that last month's referendum there could be held and that weapons stores were not seized by Ukrainian forces.

#236: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:59 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
From BBC...

Quote:
He (Putin) also admitted for the first time that Russian troops had been "behind the backs of self-defence forces in Crimea" to ensure that last month's referendum there could be held and that weapons stores were not seized by Ukrainian forces.


Wow! What an irrelevant revelation! Before you get back to reading The Grand Chessboard, here, again, are-

Victoria Newland boasting the US has spent $5 billion on political subversion in the Ukraine since 1991.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=861DJLR4Cek#t=21    7:26 - 7:48, but for the stench of illegal regime change shit veneered in democratic verbiage, listen to the entire speech.

Victoria Newland now tells Geoffrey Pyatt how the Ukrainians are to independently and democratically, without foreign influence or intervention, organise their politics after their putsch-

Nuland: Good. I don't think Klitsch should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary, I don't think it's a good idea.

Pyatt: Yeah. I guess... in terms of him not going into the government, just let him stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I'm just thinking in terms of sort of the process moving ahead we want to keep the moderate democrats together. The problem is going to be Tyahnybok [Oleh Tyahnybok, leader of neo-Nazi Svoboda Party] and his guys and I'm sure that's part of what [President Viktor] Yanukovych is calculating on all this.

Nuland: [Breaks in] I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. He's the... what he needs is Klitsch and Tyahnybok on the outside. He needs to be talking to them four times a week, you know. I just think Klitsch going in... he's going to be at that level working for Yatseniuk, it's just not going to work.

Pyatt: Yeah, no, I think that's right. OK. Good. Do you want us to set up a call with him as the next step?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-26079957

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CL_GShyGv3o

That's a neo-Nazi led putsch made in Washington.

So why isn't this and investigations into its meaning in the front pages and editorials of every paper every day and lead story on the TV news? Everything else is irrelevant. This is the essence of what's going on and what Putin admits to or doesn't in the defence of Russian interests is of an entirely secondary character. Russia did not create this crisis, and is incapable of defending the interests of the working class, Russian or Ukrainian.

Putin is running scared and the working class revolt in the Donbas in an awkward embarrassment to him. He positions himself as a hard man for Russian nationalism but does not want to defend a working class rebellion with revolutionary implications and in a territory which brings him face to face with NATO. NATO are backing Putin into a corner, each way he loses. The only question is, will they give him room to retreat this time, or are they going to force Russia into a war?

#237: Re: The Ukraine Author: Tippi-SimoLocation: Helsinki PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 3:58 pm
    —
I really have no idea wtf is going on..
but I hope that I´m not being killed on 25th of April when I cross the border from Finland to Rodina..

Peace out bros!

#238: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:11 pm
    —
Tippi-Simo wrote (View Post):
I really have no idea wtf is going on..
but I hope that I´m not being killed on 25th of April when I cross the border from Finland to Rodina..
Peace out bros!

You know better than other that Russia is very different from what they show in the brainwashing machine Smile.

#239: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:13 pm
    —
Thing is that Crimea has already cost Russia USD 7-8blns and that's alot for us, so we really can't afford the SE of Ukraine financially.

#240: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:21 am
    —
Crimea seizure was a shrewd maneuver by Putin well worth the cost.  Now Putin seems to be getting too greedy and is tempted to stomp on Ukraine to get another land grab especially with some loyalists instigating rebellion.  Ukraine unfortunately stands very little chance against the Russian war machine and will get bitch slapped.  I think that is why some Ukrainian forces have "switched sides" allegedly because they know they will get annihilated.

The War Hawk American conservatives are desperate to get involved and that will get dicey.  McCain as usual is the #1 advocate of war and asking American govt to finance the arming of Ukraine.
Thank God McCain or Romney did not get elected President of US because they would have already pushed the Nuke strike button by now.

#241: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:39 am
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Crimea seizure was a shrewd maneuver by Putin well worth the cost.  Now Putin seems to be getting too greedy and is tempted to stomp on Ukraine to get another land grab especially with some loyalists instigating rebellion.  Ukraine unfortunately stands very little chance against the Russian war machine and will get bitch slapped.  I think that is why some Ukrainian forces have "switched sides" allegedly because they know they will get annihilated.

The War Hawk American conservatives are desperate to get involved and that will get dicey.  McCain as usual is the #1 advocate of war and asking American govt to finance the arming of Ukraine.
Thank God McCain or Romney did not get elected President of US because they would have already pushed the Nuke strike button by now.


No.

All is in the context of a Russophobic neo-Nazi led putsch to take Ukraine out of RF's orbit and towards US/EU, a US manoeuvre on the Grand Chessboard.

What does that mean for Putin?

He postures as a hard line nationalist who will defend "Russian"(in reality oligarchic) interests. The putsch represents a massive loss of economic and political influence and a virulently hostile state, a launchpad for future provocations, right next to European and Caucasus Russia's vitals. This is as much why the US supports the Ukrainian extreme nationalists and fascists as why Putin must oppose them.

There was nothing "shrewd" about seizing the Crimea, it was worst case scenario damage limitation. Not to annex Crimea would have meant, in one stroke, that Putin went down in history as the President that peacefully opened the door to RF dissolution. He was forced to act. As much as the west use killings by fascist Right Sector snipers as justification for their putsch, protecting Russian speakers in Ukraine is a pretext for Putin to attempt to protect the Russian oligarch's interests.

That done, he is caught between his nationalist posturing and the reality that NATO technical superiority sold to Russophobe ex-Soviet bloc states will do enormous damage to RF in a land war for which, regardless of the facts, the world's media can be depended upon to blame Russia. Russia has nothing to win from a nuclear war, either, and the brazenness of the West's aggression suggests the US may now feel immune to Russia's nuclear arsenal. Putin is not calling the shots but responding to western aggression as best he sees fit. "Putin the aggressor" is, in this case at least, a creation of the same western media that has buried the real causes of this crisis as well as mention of the political forces used to effect the putsch (we could go on at length on the western media's previous "form" in promoting illegal aggressive wars over the last 20 years).

The Donbas, is another question. Of course, Russia does not want to lose it, but in a balance of considerations, it has more to lose than gain by attempting its annexation. There are doubtless token Russian military forces amongst and helping the insurgents. There have to be, because Putin has to be able to tell the Russian people later, that he did something to help them. It is, more than anything else, a working class revolt against the fascists in Kiev and the sociocidal destruction of industry that EU membership will precipitate.

Putin is, in reality, more fearful of the working class in Donbas than he is of NATO. A revolt against EU "austerity" rammed through with a neo-Nazi National Guard with a raft of "anti-terrorist" laws under a Kiev government, or essentially the same with Cossack militia in place of Right Sector thugs, perhaps, deferred a few years, by Moscow? What a choice.

Putin will not risk war with NATO to take responsibility for the Donbas situation. The insurgency there can just as well spread to other working class centres in RF and throughout Eastern Europe, where workers have been pauperised and tens of millions driven into permanent unemployment. Putin must draw on the traditions of Stalinism to feign support for the Donbas workers while, in reality, cutting them loose and stabbing them in the back. Putin would see them crushed. How much better for him to have this done by the EU/Ukraine and then feign outrage? The Donbas workers have nobody to turn to in governmental places, only their class brothers and sisters throughout the world.

Putin's failure to protect the oligarchs interests can and may be spun as a reason to install a less bellicose president in Moscow, one more amenable to doing the US bidding. The oligarchs may choose to subordinate themselves to US imperialism rather than go up in smoke. In such a scenario, the RF becomes a semi colony like Ukraine, its population reduced to semi-slave status as in much of the third world. Otherwise, the conflict begins anew and from new starting blocks.

This situation has fundamentally shifted the game in Eurasia. If, IF this bout dies down, it will only be a pause to prepare the next provocation from, for the US, a greatly enhanced position, politically, geographically and economically. Politically, we see how the media presents the big lie to us, that Russia is the aggressor in a Ukrainian struggle for independence and democracy, selflessly supported by the US/EU. The European ruling class see this as an opportunity to unite the fragmenting EU and channel the enormous class tensions outwards, against a common enemy. The US doubtless considers this an added benefit to its strategy. While the rise of the far right  in countries such as France, including within the working class, indicate potentially fatal confusions, the European working class as a whole remains unconvinced, deeply distrustful of a media which has sold it war after war after war on the basis of lies.

Sanctions against Russia will remain in place and pretext be found to tighten the stranglehold. Impoverishment and loss of profit for Russian workers and oligarchs respectively, will be used to turn the screw on nationalist sentiment in Russia.

Even if there is now a lull, and this is in no way a forgone conclusion, there are new provocations around the corner. Perhaps Belarus will be "regime changed" in a chip, chip, chip away at Russia's allies, or perhaps the US will judge the FR sufficiently weakened to go for the knock out. Such fine details one can not predict, only the general course of events.

The wild card is the world's working class. Unorganised and unled, the revolt in Donbas nevertheless demonstrates the potential power of the class and the attractive power it wields as a counter to the prospects of fascism and austerity offered by capitalism. As throughout the last century, to realise that potential and not leave it to be misdirected, dispersed and destroyed by hostile class forces, depends upon the creation of a scientific socialist leadership based upon the principles of internationalism and equality as well as the lessons of 100 years plus of imperialist war, and social democratic and Stalinist betrayal.

#242: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 9:10 am
    —
Latest provocation.

Having pretended the shock troops of their putsch were not anti-Semitic Russophobe neo-Nazis, Kerry and his various amplifiers of the media have seized upon upon a forged leaflet circulating in Donetsk calling on local Jews to register with the insurgent authorities and pay a substantial sum to avoid deportation, to demonstrate the anti-semitism of the anti-fascist revolt. Analyse the paper and ink you'll probably find they're produced in the USA.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/18/antisemitic-donetsk-peoples-republic-ukraine-hoax

#243: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:56 pm
    —
Siet you are completely delusional to accuse the US of launching that anti-Semitic flyer.  Really you have lost all credibility.

#244: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 4:27 pm
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Siet you are completely delusional to accuse the US of launching that anti-Semitic flyer.  Really you have lost all credibility.


Is it so absurd that a country that has spent $5 billion fostering illegal regime change in Ukraine, putting its chosen puppets in positions of its choosing, letting or having them kill their own protesters for media consumption to provide pretext for regime change, sponsoring neo-Nazis and calling it all democracy, would shirk from attempting to smear its opponents as anti-Semites? Israel, which is always champing at the bit to label its opponents anti-semites and neo-Nazis on this occasion, has endorsed the real Kiev neo-Nazi anti-semites. Incredible!

Clearly you learn nothing, either from history or from what is dished up right in front of your eyes.

#245: Re: The Ukraine Author: southern_land PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 10:25 pm
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Siet you are completely delusional to accuse the US of launching that anti-Semitic flyer.  Really you have lost all credibility.


there is "the US"  then there is "factions within the US" that are more than capable and willing especially when they think they can use the "Jew stick" with impunity

#246: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:30 am
    —
The Right Sector has broke the Easter cease-fire at Slavyansk killing 3 and incapacitated 1 unarmed militia memebers on one of the blockposts. In following counterattack by armed militia 2 Right Sector guerillas were also killed and other fled. Note the Yugoslavian clone of MG.42 used by Right Setor guerillas.
http://lifenews.ru/news/131635  

Militant with dug out PPSh Wink
http://im.kommersant.ru/Issues.photo/CORP/2014/04/20/KMO_140946_00220_1_t218_111557.jpg
 
I'm confused, can anyone help me? (c) Neil Clark
The anti-government protestors in Ukraine during the winter received visits from several prominent Western politicians, including US Senator John McCain, and Victoria Nuland, from the US State Department, who handed out cookies. But there have been very large anti-government protests in many Western European countries in recent weeks, which have received no such support, either from such figures or from elite Western media commentators. Nor have protestors received free cookies from officials at the US State Department.
http://rt.com/op-edge/west-leaders-ukraine-democracy-600/

#247: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:58 pm
    —
Ultra-Nationalism = Fascism especially when the Government claims "oppression" of ethnic minorities in neighboring nations.  How quick we are to forget the past.  Neo-Nazism, Right-Wing Partisans, Ultra-Nationalists & "Anti-Government" militia groups are a WORLDWIDE problem.  That's rich everyone is blaming America.  As far as the anti-Jewish propaganda, that too was probably the work of ultra-nationalists aka fascists.  Yet they blame America for being the fascist.  

Enough of the blame game.  There is a growing threat of right-wing extremist groups that are in solidarity with Neo-Nazis.  America has lots of problems with these groups but they are famous for having a hatred of Europe because they see European nations as liberal Socialist states.  America Right-Wing extremist and neo-nazi groups are on steroids now since a half-black man is President and was re-elected.  Here is how they arrive to "protest" federal police with armed militias using sniper rifles aimed at police:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/17/us-usa-ranchers-nevada-militia-insight-idUSBREA3G26620140417?feedType=RSS
 
I do agree however with many of Clark's points especially what he said about Syria.

#248: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:51 pm
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Ultra-Nationalism = Fascism especially when the Government claims "oppression" of ethnic minorities in neighboring nations.  How quick we are to forget the past.  Neo-Nazism, Right-Wing Partisans, Ultra-Nationalists & "Anti-Government" militia groups are a WORLDWIDE problem.  That's rich everyone is blaming America.  As far as the anti-Jewish propaganda, that too was probably the work of ultra-nationalists aka fascists.  Yet they blame America for being the fascist.  
If ultra-nationalism really = fascism, it does not need any qualification, "especially" or otherwise. But ultra-nationalism is not fascism, but a feature of numerous political and social phenomena, including fascism. What exactly he has forgotten from "the past" is unclear given the royal we, are not entirely sure what he knew in the first place. What the royal we is sure of, is that neo-Nazi militia in Ukraine, forget the rest of the world for a minute, are as influential as they are to day, in large part due to US funding and other support.

dj wrote (View Post):
Enough of the blame game
Someone tell that to Secretary of State John Kerry, he had blamed the insurgents for the forged anti-Semitic leaflets almost before they were off the printing press. But let's not say of which country Kerry is Secretary of State, that's just beneath us. In our naive yet morally superior wisdom, we all know that the world's just a bad place, but it will be better for a good dose of Liberty and Democracy forced upon it by neo-Nazi militia, illegal regime changes and putsches designed and funded by the free world. Every little bit helps!

#249: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:09 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
I'm confused, can anyone help me? (c) Neil Clark
The anti-government protestors in Ukraine during the winter received visits from several prominent Western politicians, including US Senator John McCain, and Victoria Nuland, from the US State Department, who handed out cookies. But there have been very large anti-government protests in many Western European countries in recent weeks, which have received no such support, either from such figures or from elite Western media commentators. Nor have protestors received free cookies from officials at the US State Department.


Food for thoughts..
Taking that a step further… What if Russia or China would do the same thing, handing out "free cookies"…. to protesters in western countries…?

#250: Re: The Ukraine Author: dgfredLocation: N.C., USA PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2014 7:10 pm
    —
You think they don't?

#251: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:20 am
    —
Do you know?

#252: Re: The Ukraine Author: dgfredLocation: N.C., USA PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:42 pm
    —
Heck no... never claimed to.

#253: Re: The Ukraine Author: pvt_GruntLocation: Melbourne, Australia PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:36 pm
    —
"As we know, there are known knowns; there are things that we know that we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, the ones we don't know we don't know."

#254: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:20 am
    —
Finally the truth is revealed how Russia has sent people to instigate trouble in Ukraine.  Now Russia is detaining reporters after investigative journalists exposed the fraud of government:

SLAVYANSK, Ukraine, April 22 (UPI) -- An American journalist was one of six detained by unidentified authorities in the city of Slavyansk, in eastern Ukraine.  The five other journalists were released after they were detained Monday night, but Simon Ostrovsky, a writer and producer for Vice News Network, remained in custody. No details of his condition were available.

Vice News is headquartered in Brooklyn, N.Y., and has about 25 offices worldwide.  Ostrovsky has been in Ukraine throughout the crisis there, reporting on Russia's annexation of Crimea. He was born in Ukraine.


www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2014/04/22/American-journalist-detained-in-eastern-Ukraine/2421398187780/#ixzz2zgCNCggG

#255: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:32 pm
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Finally the truth is revealed how Russia has sent people to instigate trouble in Ukraine.  Now Russia is detaining reporters after investigative journalists exposed the fraud of government:

SLAVYANSK, Ukraine, April 22 (UPI) -- An American journalist was one of six detained by unidentified authorities in the city of Slavyansk, in eastern Ukraine.  The five other journalists were released after they were detained Monday night, but Simon Ostrovsky, a writer and producer for Vice News Network, remained in custody. No details of his condition were available.

Vice News is headquartered in Brooklyn, N.Y., and has about 25 offices worldwide.  Ostrovsky has been in Ukraine throughout the crisis there, reporting on Russia's annexation of Crimea. He was born in Ukraine.


www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2014/04/22/American-journalist-detained-in-eastern-Ukraine/2421398187780/#ixzz2zgCNCggG  


I don't think dj is entirely serious. Nobody could be that stupid?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-27104904

I would be surprised if there weren't both Russian and US special forces in Ukraine, we know the CIA director visited Kiev last week. Who's driving the Crisis? The US and its puppets.

Anyone taken in by the photos "endorsed" by the White House is a thick as poo.

#256: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:21 pm
    —
Quote:
Russia will respond if its interests in Ukraine are attacked, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has said, drawing a parallel with the 2008 Georgian war.


And these interests would be.........


Anything Russia is interested in!

#257: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:30 pm
    —
Does Russia have any interest in keeping the Ukraine whole?

#258: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:35 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Quote:
Russia will respond if its interests in Ukraine are attacked, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has said, drawing a parallel with the 2008 Georgian war.


And these interests would be.........


Anything Russia is interested in!


What's stands out in your posts is your absolute fixation on alleged aggressive Russian interests and complete lack of interest in what the US/EU are doing. This is the agenda of the pro-imperialist media as I pointed out in my first post here. It is part of a thread in which the criminal machinations of the US/EU and their neo-Nazi proxies have been documented and evidenced. You have a no point attempted to address let alone refute this evidence but continue casting aspersions as to Russia's expansionist aims. In fact, you dismiss incontrovertible fact as "conspiracy theory" naturally without evidencing your assertion.

Clearly, then,you only have eyes for what you want to see and the agenda you choose to follow. Such people are impossible to engage with in a logical argument.

#259: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:29 pm
    —
Code:
alleged aggressive Russian interests


Seriously?

#260: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:56 am
    —
Siet you're making no sense man.  Just admit that Putin has an imperialist regime of his own - not even remotely close to the Socialist utopia you desire.

So you think the journalists were detained because they are fascist spies?  Or let me guess it was a conspiracy by the media to make believe journalists were detained.

Now Putin is offering citizenship to anyone in former USSR.  Much like what the Imperial Romans did.

#261: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 11:01 am
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Siet you're making no sense man.  Just admit that Putin has an imperialist regime of his own - not even remotely close to the Socialist utopia you desire.

So you think the journalists were detained because they are fascist spies?  Or let me guess it was a conspiracy by the media to make believe journalists were detained.

Now Putin is offering citizenship to anyone in former USSR.  Much like what the Imperial Romans did.


Your head is scrambled with imperialist propaganda.

Just admit that Putin has an imperialist regime of his own
No, Putin is a capitalist leader of a country which is too economically retarded to have arrived at imperialism in the Marxist sense of the term, that is, one in which finance capital has achieved primacy over all other forms of capital, has saturated the domestic economy at the current productive technology, and is driven therefore to invest abroad in the search for profit. This process puts the competing capital of imperialist nations at odds with one another and led to the last century's world war part 1 and 2.

Therefore,

[and is] not even remotely close to the Socialis[m] you desire

Show me anywhere in the text of my posts where I say, imply or insinuate in any way that Putin and the Russian Federation are socialist? No you can't, and you say I do either because you don't bother to read them or you are too stupid to understand them. But please, be my guest and read them to verify my assertion. I haven't a pro RF of Putin cell in my body.

So you think the journalists were detained because they are fascist spies?

I don't know why the journalists were detained but in the current situation I can certainly think of a number of reasons why they might by strung up or shot. The crap you and your kind come out with is just one. Detention seems quite restrained, really, when you see how Goebbels Inc. is burying the truth and distorting what is happening in Ukraine.

 Or let me guess it was a conspiracy by the media to make believe journalists were detained.

One possibility, but not high on my list.

Now Putin is offering citizenship to anyone in former USSR.  Much like what the Imperial Romans did.

Another load of horse. Putin is making it easier for Russian speaking citizens and stateless people from places like Ukraine to live in the Russian Federation and become citizens. In other words, he's telling them "don't drag us into the war the US/EU is provoking, if you fear persecution come and live in RF." He's desperately looking for a way out.

#262: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 11:04 am
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Code:
alleged aggressive Russian interests


Seriously?


Once again, evading mention of the overt aggression of US/EU imperialism which has created and continues to drive this situation..

#263: Re: The Ukraine Author: pt11070 PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 9:36 pm
    —
I would be very surprised if Russia stays out of Ukraine. The question is the whole thing or just some parts. But judging by the experience from Georgia it will be parts.

I hope and pray it doesn't happen, but the world and it's ways are always based on power and lack of trust.

#264: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 9:50 pm
    —
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Code:
alleged aggressive Russian interests


Seriously?


Once again, evading mention of the overt aggression of US/EU imperialism which has created and continues to drive this situation..


Why would I need to mention it? The reality now is the Ukraine is getting pieced up and added to Russia.

#265: Re: The Ukraine Author: sample PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:27 pm
    —
some elements in this developing story:
- it is reported by a polish newspaper (http://nie.com.pl/13-2014/tajemnica-stanu-tajemnica-majdanu) training was given to the most violent of the EuroMaidan activists. According to this source, in September 2013, Polish Foreign Minister Rados?aw Sikorski invited 86 members of the Right Sector (Sector Pravy), allegedly in the context of a university exchange program. In reality, the guests were not students, and many were over 40. Contrary to their official schedule, they did not go to the Warsaw University of Technology, but headed instead for the police training center in Legionowo, an hour’s drive from the capital. There, they received four weeks of intensive training in crowd management, person recognition, combat tactics, command skills, behavior in crisis situations, protection against gases used by police, erecting barricades, and especially shooting, including the handling of sniper rifles. Such training took place in September 2013, while the Maidan Square protests were allegedly triggered by a decree suspending preparations for the signing of the Ukraine-European Union Association Agreement, which was issued by Prime Minister Mykola Azarov on November 21, i.e. two months later.
- right from the outset, the "peaceful" protesters used slingshots (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a94mNfmZ1gc ) to combat the police in very similar as the syrian insurgency used similar makeshift weapons (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOll9QS7z_w); it is now widely accepted that fsa insurgents, and the other rebel factions are openly supported by western powers via Qatar and Saudi Arabia secret services (even TOW AT rockets surfaced in the hands of rebels in recent weeks - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_I7Z7Zkei6E)
- moreover, there is no doubt that the coup was sponsored by the United States, as evidenced by the telephone conversation between Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and Ambassador Geoffrey R. Pyatt, see the infamous "fuck the UE" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QxZ8t3V_bk)
- further more, Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet (http://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/05/world/europe/ukraine-leaked-audio-recording/) raised question about the identity of maidan snipers, after a visit in Ukraine, when it was told that opponents of Ukraine's ousted President may have been responsible for deadly sniper fire.

so, the "peaceful" revolt was planed long time ago, and the consequences were predictable: Putin would not stand still and will act to protect the russian peoples;

on a bigger picture the same scenario applied in Syria which is now entering in the fourth year of civil war is put in practice in Ukraine, and today's events are only further proof of this; in Syria, an ally of Iran, the small anti Assad protests were transformed with the help of qatari and saudi intelligence into an open armed conflict with Damascus and in similar fashion, the Ukraine, a potential ally for Russia under Yanukovych is slowly dragged into a civil war.

regards,
m.

#266: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 11:16 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Code:
alleged aggressive Russian interests


Seriously?


Once again, evading mention of the overt aggression of US/EU imperialism which has created and continues to drive this situation..


Why would I need to mention it? The reality now is the Ukraine is getting pieced up and added to Russia.


No, the reality is that a neo-Nazi led coup has been prepared and executed by US/EU imperialism as part of a strategic aim to dismember and destroy the Russian Federation. You wouldn't want to mention US/EU aggression because it doesn't suit your false narrative.

#267: Re: The Ukraine Author: dgfredLocation: N.C., USA PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 3:55 pm
    —
Of course each power/country will try to influence groups that oppose the opposite power/country.

Why would the US try to 'destroy/dismember' the Russian Federation? Maybe weaken.

A solid Russian Federation is much better than a volitile situation throughout the country IMO.

#268: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 4:50 pm
    —
The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives

http://www.amazon.com/The-Grand-Chessboard-Geostrategic-Imperatives/dp/0465027261
 
Project for the new American Century

"The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was an American think tank based in Washington, D.C. established in 1997 as a non-profit educational organization founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

Robert Kagan

"He been a foreign policy advisor to several U.S. Republican presidential candidates as well as to Hillary Clinton, when she was Secretary of State under President Obama."

"Kagan is married to long-time career diplomat Victoria Nuland, who is currently serving as Assistant Secretary of European and Eurasian Affairs in the Barack Obama administration."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kagan

Victoria Nuland

""We’ve invested over $5 billion to assist Ukraine in these and other goals that will ensure a secure and prosperous and democratic Ukraine.""

"Nuland was discussing with Pyatt her plans for the role of the Ukrainian opposition leaders in the country’s coming government and the crises in Ukraine. Nuland said Vitali Klitschko should not be allowed into the government because he was too inexperienced, but that the coming PM should talk to him and to Svoboda "four times per week""

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Nuland

#269: Re: The Ukraine Author: Siwy899 PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:11 pm
    —
It all depends. For my country (Poland) it will be the best to dissolve as much Russian power as can be done, just like  fall of the Soviet Union. Russian politicians will be finding more and more excuses for regeining influences they have lost since 1991. No hard feelings to users from Russian Federation- it's just politics.

#270: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:27 pm
    —
Siwy899 wrote (View Post):
It all depends. For my country (Poland) it will be the best to dissolve as much Russian power as can be done, just like  fall of the Soviet Union. Russian politicians will be finding more and more excuses for regeining influences they have lost since 1991. No hard feelings to users from Russian Federation- it's just politics.


Out of the frying pan and into the fire. You are now slaves to the EU and will doubtless be counted upon to provide the cannon fodder in the coming war 'cos not enough people in the West will fight. Very few I'd bet.

Enjoy Smile

#271: Re: The Ukraine Author: Siwy899 PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:02 pm
    —
I'm not saying EU is super great, my country holds minor position (but growing because of the latest events) in oposition to Germany or France. Poland is no more amongst leading powers, as it were in XVI ct., we have to join bigger political body to survive. You know, if I had to choose I choose West- at least our economy is growing because of UE dotations, in times of soviet occupation (1945-1991) my countryman suffered horrid poverty, people were dying because they were singing religious songs, I'm happy that time is gone and hope it will never come again. So, we have two points of view, but I'm not the one who swings the saber and eagerly wants to crush with foreign powers. I'm not saying either  that USA actions on the whole world are great, but I'd rather live under the influence of USA/EU than East.

#272: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 8:37 pm
    —
Thanx Siet and others for the posts.

I’m very critical to US/West/NATO actions in Arab world as well as the Ukraine..  

But, I fear the Russians and what have stated to move now. I understand what Siwy say here, because for the last 300+ years, Sweden has the same experience….  If there is a problem, we just have to scratch the surface and there’s a Russian tsar [et al] popping out…

But, I do understand the Russians actions up to now, as being reactions rather than actions… But what will follow, does putin think we are to accept Baltic States to be russified to, then he will make a mistake that may take the world to WW3…?

#273: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 8:45 pm
    —
And BTW, EU sux, and EURO sux even more…

I have no idea what we are trying to spread to the world here, more “suck” to the world?

Who will leave the EURO first, the weaker, Greece or any of the PIGS? History tells us it’s the stronger that leaves the currency union first, that would suggest Germany…

Then what…?

EU as a project… costs for ppl that don’t really contribute to any progress… What’s is it good for?


Nothing…

Absolutley nothing

#274: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:24 pm
    —
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post):
Thanx Siet and others for the posts.

I’m very critical to US/West/NATO actions in Arab world as well as the Ukraine..  

But, I fear the Russians and what have stated to move now. I understand what Siwy say here, because for the last 300+ years, Sweden has the same experience….  If there is a problem, we just have to scratch the surface and there’s a Russian tsar [et al] popping out…

But, I do understand the Russians actions up to now, as being reactions rather than actions… But what will follow, does putin think we are to accept Baltic States to be russified to, then he will make a mistake that may take the world to WW3…?

Yes, I'm also sympathetic to Siwy989, I'd only wish Stalinist Great Russian nationalism on my worst enemies. The US/EU is exploiting half a century of "good will" it has generated in the ex-Soviet bloc but my enemy's enemy is not always my friend. This is the fate of small countries. As he also points out small nations can seldom take an independent road. That said, while a doubt many workers who backed Solidarnosc are anything less than disillusioned, the bill for NATO/EU protection has still to be paid in full.

I suspect that Poland is kept afloat more by money sent home by emigrant workers than by EU donations. In so far as its domestic economy is expanding it is because it has a relatively skilled workforce which works for much less and accepts much worse conditions than Western workers. Its growth is at the expense of higher paid workers in Germany particularly, and its taking work from countries where workers are used to better conditions represents part of the global "race to the bottom," the destruction of working class living standards won over generations of struggle in the period of nationally regulated economies.

This dynamic is mirrored here in the UK, where not just the traditional far right blame Polish workers for the need of capitalism to destroy workers pay and conditions. This need to blame a "foreign" section of workers for the systemic failure of capitalism is leading to worse conditions for immigrant workers here, including reduced access to health care and other benefits. As the "race to the bottom" continues, immigrant workers here will increasingly face victimisation and a squeeze on their already very poor pay. EU membership offers no long term solution to the problems of ex Soviet bloc workers.

Poland is in the front line of the war the US is now provoking. The US is doubtless counting on countries like Poland and the Baltic States to provide the cannon fodder in a war of attrition with the RF which will doubtless escalate to the use of tactical if not also strategic nuclear weapons.

Neither Moscow nor Washington offer the world's population a way forward. Russian nationalism in the Ukraine, however working class its social base, is no solution either. The Donbas workers can only move society forward by uniting with Ukrainian speaking workers against all the oligarchs in Kiev and Moscow and for a united socialist future based upon the equality of nations. The enemy of the working class is capitalism, whatever national costume it wears or language it speaks.

#275: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 3:17 pm
    —
I would be interested in any software tool that could count the occurance of a single word in all the posts of a thread.

Perhaps, we could count words, like fascist, neo-nazi, socialist, communist, oligarch, etc. It generally happens when there is more than 1 European posting in a thread.  Laughing

Well, no matter what Ukraine becomes in the future, me thinks Russia is doomed anyway.  Arrow  


Link

#276: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 4:29 pm
    —
I have no idea what we are trying to spread to the world here, more “suck” to the world? -AT_Stalky

I'm clueless.  Question  Arrow


Link
[/quote]

#277: Re: The Ukraine Author: Siwy899 PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:33 pm
    —
My friend's mother was born in USSR, now she lives in Silesia province, all do the repatriation process, shown in the map (she was moved from territory near Lwow- in Poland's border befaure World War II to proximity of Wroclaw- new gained lands after the war). We all laugh that Putin should send her Russian passport and then bring troops to protect Russian minority Wink


repatriation.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  9.48 KB
 Viewed:  14390 Time(s)

repatriation.png



#278: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:02 pm
    —
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives

http://www.amazon.com/The-Grand-Chessboard-Geostrategic-Imperatives/dp/0465027261
 
Project for the new American Century

"The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was an American think tank based in Washington, D.C. established in 1997 as a non-profit educational organization founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

Robert Kagan

"He been a foreign policy advisor to several U.S. Republican presidential candidates as well as to Hillary Clinton, when she was Secretary of State under President Obama."

"Kagan is married to long-time career diplomat Victoria Nuland, who is currently serving as Assistant Secretary of European and Eurasian Affairs in the Barack Obama administration."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kagan

Victoria Nuland

""We’ve invested over $5 billion to assist Ukraine in these and other goals that will ensure a secure and prosperous and democratic Ukraine.""

"Nuland was discussing with Pyatt her plans for the role of the Ukrainian opposition leaders in the country’s coming government and the crises in Ukraine. Nuland said Vitali Klitschko should not be allowed into the government because he was too inexperienced, but that the coming PM should talk to him and to Svoboda "four times per week""

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Nuland


You keep repeating the same BOGUS conspiracy theory accusations that don't have a single shred of actual facts or real evidence.  Where is the actual proof that US/EU is starting to provoke Russia?  Complete rubbish.  President Obama was a university student of the very same author of the book you cite as your sacred "evidence".

By the way - Neither true Capitalism nor Socialism exist any where in the world.  Not a single nation has this as their exclusive form of ideology.  Every nation has a hybrid.  If any nation tried to have a purity test by eliminating one of the other, it would cease to exist.  Some form of capitalism and socialism must co-exist.  All the Partisan fringes love to accuse either of other of being puppets for Nazi's or Commies...then our Politicians love to label Social Programmes as Socialism or Communism is just Partisan grandstanding.

#279: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:05 pm
    —
Stwa for you:

Hidden: 
This thread has run for 19 pages without troll and derailing, unto now.

You’re perhaps trying to be funny…. But none is laughing… As usual.

Taking serious things as child pornography and using it for your rant or troll in this debate (or any debate for that matter)… This is so low.

Shame on you.


This thread:

The situation at the moment is the most serious since the end of the cold war, maybe even since the Cuban crisis.
People here at CCS, share there thoughts and angles of what happens. We can get a better idea how this crisis is presented in different parts of the world. Not only through our own often “bias” media.  Thus perhaps getting a better picture of what’s going on.
 
but...

Not that you actually cares.

#280: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:22 pm
    —
Siwy899 wrote (View Post):
We all laugh that Putin should send her Russian passport and then bring troops to protect Russian minority Wink


Yeh, its absurd.

However…. I doubt the Baltic states laugh at Putins Russian passports, given there Russian populations.. And the history of the Russian and Balts..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russians_in_the_Baltic_states

#281: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:29 pm
    —
Well, it seems to me there is alot of moral high ground being traversed in this thead by its participants, as YOU demonstrate.

There is NOT going to be WWIII. Whatever happens to Ukraine is hardly an issue, except perhaps to some (but not all) Ukrainians.

But there might be another genoicide. I thought McDonalds could save the Ukraine, but look.  Arrow


Link

#282: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 10:01 pm
    —
And if anyone is really, really, scared. Then short Euro stocks and hope for a limited thermonuclear exchange in Eastern Europe and Russia. After it occurs, sell your position. BTW, this strategy is NOT recommended by moi.

Remember, Europe will rotate into any fallout that occurs over Russia. Or is it the other way around. Question  Shocked

#283: Re: The Ukraine Author: FMJ PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:32 am
    —
dj wrote (View Post):

You keep repeating the same BOGUS conspiracy theory accusations that don't have a single shred of actual facts or real evidence.  Where is the actual proof that US/EU is starting to provoke Russia?  Complete rubbish.  President Obama was a university student of the very same author of the book you cite as your sacred "evidence".

By the way - Neither true Capitalism nor Socialism exist any where in the world.  Not a single nation has this as their exclusive form of ideology.  Every nation has a hybrid.  If any nation tried to have a purity test by eliminating one of the other, it would cease to exist.  Some form of capitalism and socialism must co-exist.  All the Partisan fringes love to accuse either of other of being puppets for Nazi's or Commies...then our Politicians love to label Social Programmes as Socialism or Communism is just Partisan grandstanding.


And what sort of "Made in Amurika" crack are you smoking? Suck down much Fox "News" propaganda lately dj?

Remind me which Nation has been dropping random bombs weekly on at least 5 other Countries? Which nation has over 1,000 military bases spread around the planet, sells the most weapons to the rest of the world, spends more than 60% of its govt.'s discretionary spending on "defense" (wars of aggression), alone spends nearly as much as the REST OF THE WORLD COMBINED on its military? Which nation illegally invaded 2 other countries in illegal wars of aggression and has built permanent military bases there in the last 10 yrs? Which Nation has imprisoned more of IT'S OWN CITIZENS than ANY other country in history with a privatized "for profit" prison system? Which Nation spies on every aspect of its own citizens and blatantly lies to its own citizens consistently? Which Nation has sponsored more coups and overthrows of Democratically elected leaders than any other? I can go on and on with examples, but if you're still sucking on the USA!!! USA!!! propaganda flag, then you're just lost and delusional.

#284: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 4:24 pm
    —
Your post is completely off-topic.  What does this have to do with Ukraine or anything related to this thread?  America has bases in nations that actually want us there and by the way we actually give them lots of $$$ to lease them.  Nice try buddy...you are the one smoking crack if you have to resort to childish name calling and throwing out a bunch of off-topic ramblings.  If some jihadi gangster gets bombed by drone then GOOD!  I'll drop the bomb myself.

Just fyi - not everybody in America listens to Fox News or is right-wing nut.  And not every State has a for profit prison system or supports a Militant War Hawk agenda.  Did McCain get elected? NOPE.
Did Romeny get elected? NOPE.  Quit your hating.

#285: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 5:25 pm
    —
Yeah arguments like FMJs are out of place. If we were to take the history of any country we could go round and round in circles forever.

#286: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 5:52 pm
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
sieterayos wrote (View Post):
The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives

http://www.amazon.com/The-Grand-Chessboard-Geostrategic-Imperatives/dp/0465027261
 
Project for the new American Century

"The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was an American think tank based in Washington, D.C. established in 1997 as a non-profit educational organization founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

Robert Kagan

"He been a foreign policy advisor to several U.S. Republican presidential candidates as well as to Hillary Clinton, when she was Secretary of State under President Obama."

"Kagan is married to long-time career diplomat Victoria Nuland, who is currently serving as Assistant Secretary of European and Eurasian Affairs in the Barack Obama administration."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kagan

Victoria Nuland

""We’ve invested over $5 billion to assist Ukraine in these and other goals that will ensure a secure and prosperous and democratic Ukraine.""

"Nuland was discussing with Pyatt her plans for the role of the Ukrainian opposition leaders in the country’s coming government and the crises in Ukraine. Nuland said Vitali Klitschko should not be allowed into the government because he was too inexperienced, but that the coming PM should talk to him and to Svoboda "four times per week""

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Nuland


You keep repeating the same [b] BOGUS conspiracy theory accusations that don't have a single shred of actual facts or real evidence.  Where is the actual proof that US/EU is starting to provoke Russia?  Complete rubbish.  President Obama was a university student of the very same author of the book you cite as your sacred "evidence".[/b]

By the way - Neither true Capitalism nor Socialism exist any where in the world.  Not a single nation has this as their exclusive form of ideology.  Every nation has a hybrid.  If any nation tried to have a purity test by eliminating one of the other, it would cease to exist.  Some form of capitalism and socialism must co-exist.  All the Partisan fringes love to accuse either of other of being puppets for Nazi's or Commies...then our Politicians love to label Social Programmes as Socialism or Communism is just Partisan grandstanding.


Lenin emphasised the need to explain patiently to the working class, but although dj is not working class, I'll try to follow Lenin's example.

You keep repeating the same BOGUS conspiracy theory accusations that don't have a single shred of actual facts or real evidence.  Where is the actual proof that US/EU is starting to provoke Russia?  Complete rubbish.  President Obama was a university student of the very same author of the book you cite as your sacred "evidence".

Thank you, in your efforts to rubbish my "conspiracy theory" you only furnish another strand of information to confirm it. Your assertion that Obama was a student of Zbigniew Brzezinski is most probably true, didn't know that, I didn't know the connection was so direct. The interviewee in this article even asserts he was "recruited" by him while studying politics at Columbia. http://www.deepjournal.com/p/7/a/en/1497.html

Now, if you do not understand the significance of Victoria Newland's statements I refer you to,  if you do not understand that these provide conclusive proof of illegal regime change efforts down to directly determining who will occupy which position, also that neo-Nazis were to be included in the new framework of power, you really are beyond help. Perhaps you are confused by the connection of Newland to Robert Kagan. Let me explain. The detail of her "intimate" connection to the "Project for the New American Century" (PfaNAC), is, like Obama studying under Brzezinski, just icing on a cake which would be almost as tasty without it. Just as the crimes of the Nazis can be traced to Mein Kampf and the Zweites Buch, current US policy can be traced to the Grand Chessboard and the PfaNAC document; the current incumbents of the Kiev parliament can be traced to Nulands conspiracies.

In passing, I seem to recall that back in CSO days, when PftNAC was a Bush issue, rather like Michael Moore, you were all over it. Now it's Obama continuing the same policies and at a higher level, puff, the issue doesn't exist for either of you, it's a "conspiracy theory" it's aaaaaall gone away. In other words, if my memory is serving me well, like your ducu-trash idol, your objection to conspiracy to wage aggressive war was never principled but party political. Some "independent" that would make you!

By the way - Neither true Capitalism nor Socialism exist any where in the world.  Not a single nation has this as their exclusive form of ideology.  Every nation has a hybrid.  If any nation tried to have a purity test by eliminating one of the other, it would cease to exist.  Some form of capitalism and socialism must co-exist.  All the Partisan fringes love to accuse either of other of being puppets for Nazi's or Commies...then our Politicians love to label Social Programmes as Socialism or Communism is just Partisan grandstanding.

You have not even found a starting point from which to approach the question. Ideology begins in the real world and in its social relations. What you regard as "socialist ideology" in capitalist economy is nothing more than a few crumbs from the table of the super rich to pacify dissent and preserve the very exploitative social relations of production that keep the poor ever poorer. You can keep it.

Any ideology that rejects the overthrow of the capitalist class and exploitation, their replacement with the democratic control of the working class over society's productive forces, is not socialist. Period.

#287: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 5:54 pm
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
 If some jihadi gangster gets bombed by drone then GOOD!  I'll drop the bomb myself.

Just fyi - not everybody in America listens to Fox News or is right-wing nut.  


LOL

#288: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 5:56 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Yeah arguments like FMJs are out of place. If we were to take the history of any country we could go round and round in circles forever.


Yar, I guess Stwa's posts are more your thing, really on topic, eh?

#289: Re: The Ukraine Author: FMJ PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 6:32 pm
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Your post is completely off-topic.  What does this have to do with Ukraine or anything related to this thread?  


My post is right on topic. Your propagandized mind can't see clearly. The U.S. has been in the "business" of overthrows consistently since post WW2. You "believe" in the fairy tale that the U.S. are the force of good in the world and the rest of the world is lucky to have the good Amerikan cops saving them...sorry to burst your bubble. The U.S. is once again sticking its dick where it doesn't belong, at the cost of others bloodshed, and the Ukraine is no exception.

Are you a proud Amerikan? Enjoying the thousands of children and innocent civilians getting blown apart by U.S. drones? Does that get your National bloodlust pumping? Has Russia dropped a bomb or invaded any other Nation in the last 10 yrs? If the perpetual U.S. GLOBAL WAR (on) OF TERROR gets your support, then you are lost.

A quote on the U.S. Empire I recently came across-
"The malignant cancer of US Fourth Reich militarism and ecomonic hegemony has metastasized around the world. Any people with the guts and skill to curb it, or do a Fourth Reichectomy on it gets kudos in my book.

The Fourth Reich has become the most hated and feared regime on the planet. Even its alleged allies don't trust it. It is dedicated to ruling and controlling every nation on earth, and debasing their people.

It appears to finally be succumbing to the dry rot inherent in all fascist and totalitarian empires that have infested the world, but usually the cost of finally getting rid of them is enormous.

Unfortunately, they are like the hydra. When you have cut off its head and assumed you have killed it, two more heads grow.

In 1945, most of us assumed that the Nazi/Fascist Axis had been destroyed.

Then, it was decided that the CCCP was the new enemy, and billions of dollars were spent and brushfire wars begun all over the world, to eliminate the "Red Menace".

The CCCP collapsed and it appeared that peace was upon us. The Military-Industrial-Congressional-Complex was suddenly aware of the difference between war machine profits and peaceful manufacturing profits, so yet another war had to be generated and propagandized.

What many did not realize was that the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America had been hijacked and slowly transformed by the wealthy Oligarchy referred to as the 0.01%.

The Oligarchy has used a small portion of its enormous wealth to purchase all three branches of the government, which now exists to protect the Oligarchy and its profits and extend its control of the world by military and economic means. This, in essence, was the Neocon's "Project for the New American Century".

In other words, they have created the Fourth Reich, having learned from the Third Reich's mistakes and profited by modern technology. It has been killing and expanding its bases around the world. It will probably take worldwide action to curb it, but meanwhile, the Fourth Reich is courting another nuclear war with Russia.

My hat is off to any people who can resist the takeover of their nation. If enough object, perhaps the Fourth Reich can be thrown on the dung heap of history and the world will enjoy another time of peace."

#290: Re: The Ukraine Author: FMJ PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 6:40 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Yeah arguments like FMJs are out of place. If we were to take the history of any country we could go round and round in circles forever.


Rubbish. The "history" AND current events of U.S. Foreign policy are completely applicable. If reality doesn't fit your "belief" system, then lala land is your "reality".

Smedley Butler on Interventionism
-- Excerpt from a speech delivered in 1933, by Major General Smedley Butler, USMC.

War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses.
I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we'll fight. The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent over here, then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag.
I wouldn't go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.
There isn't a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its "finger men" to point out enemies, its "muscle men" to destroy enemies, its "brain men" to plan war preparations, and a "Big Boss" Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.
It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty- three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country's most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.
I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service.
I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.
During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.

#291: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 6:51 pm
    —
You keep saying "10 years" but quote and speak of history that goes back 100 years. So it just doesn't make sense that you choose only to make a point about the wars the USA spearheaded in the last 10 years. I am sure you realize Russia is not innocent either but it seems your taking an overwhelmingly anti American side for your own agenda. Even by spelling it "Amerika" people will just dismiss your points as ignorant and troll bait. Your response to DJ is probably the most Fox News worthy post I have seen in years.

#292: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 7:09 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
You keep saying "10 years" but quote and speak of history that goes back 100 years. So it just doesn't make sense that you choose only to make a point about the wars the USA spearheaded in the last 10 years. I am sure you realize Russia is not innocent either but it seems your taking an overwhelmingly anti American side for your own agenda. Even by spelling it "Amerika" people will just dismiss your points as ignorant and troll bait. Your response to DJ is probably the most Fox News worthy post I have seen in years.


Not everybody who objects to US (and other) militarism has studied it to the extent of yours truly, let alone in relation to the development of economy and forms of rule. In fact, though the consistent examination of such relationships is pretty much the preserve of Marxists, opposition to capitalism and its expressions has at no point in my life been so crude and uneducated. But are your own contributions here "out of place" here because, in your own words, you "look at this situation in very simple terms"?  

The contributions of Stwa, against which you raise not a murmur, are nothing but mindless provocations in a serious discussion.

What you object to or don't is telling of where you stand.

#293: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 7:31 pm
    —
I too, took 300+ years of Swedish - Russian relation into the present Ukraine context. Most Ukraine or Baltic state, Georgian or Finland would most likely do that too. Knowing the history is important to understand the present and making guesses or "predictions" about the future..

Oh, I forgot...
Does anyone really believe Putin isn’t looking at the US/West and its “foreign policy” history since 1945, and especially since early 1990th...?  And, does anyone really believe that his current actions is independent of history...?

#294: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 8:56 pm
    —
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post):
I too, took 300+ years of Swedish - Russian relation into the Ukraine context. Any Ukraine or Baltic state, Georgian or Finland would most definitely do the same as for what unfolds now. Knowing the historical context is important to understand the present, and making guesses or "predictions" about the future..

Oh, I forgot...
Does anyone really believe Putin isn’t looking at the US/West and its foreign policy history since 1945, and especially since early 1990th...?  And, that his current actions is independent of history...?


It often happens that the past persists as a ghost in new, changed situations. Here too.

While the history of the great Russian bear persists in the minds of those whose countries have endured its predations, today Russia is on the defensive against a coalition of far greater nominal strength, militarily, economically and politically. Putin knows it, everyone knows it. Yet this leader who dj insists is "shrewd" is purportedly planning an aggressive war of Russian expansion against a world that will crush Russia economically if it can't find the pretext to do so militarily. This is reality turned on its head.

Wake up from the past, this is a new situation. It does not demand support for Russian Federation but for turning our countries' planned war of aggression into revolutionary wars to overthrow capitalism.

Never has the slogan been more pertinent than in this age of mutually assured destruction.

Workers of all countries, unite!

#295: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:07 pm
    —
@ FMJ

Nice quote, I've heard of him. Snowden is the continuity of establishment people who still hold dear the Bill of Rights, the great triumph of capitalism in its progressive phase of development. Look how he is treated.

#296: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:27 pm
    —
I suppose you too remember the speech by Putin, (10? years ago?) where he expressed his fears about US/Nato, saying US/Nato was like a hungry wolf.. That’s how Putin sees it, from where he stands. Thus Putin feels cornered (or as you say, on the "defensive"), economically* and military… The cornered bear, does now as it has done in the past in similar situations… So, is it really new, isn’t it the same as we seen before..?

(*Though, I see that Russian economy has had many good years. World bank data)


Last edited by AT_Stalky on Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:43 pm; edited 1 time in total

#297: Re: The Ukraine Author: Drizzt PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:35 pm
    —
To sieterayos: many years ago I have read (and learnt as possible) about marxism as philosophy and economic doctrine: often it  was very technical (I was not at university, too young) and obliged me to read and to study other things to understand many of the concepts in a decent way. This premise means that I really don’t consider myself a marxist expert and I want to discuss to you a personal opinion that I have matured during that years: Marx has developed a real scientific doctrine about the capital and its mechanisms in all the economical contexts a nation can to reach/ to realize/to find itself in a specific situation/period. Even if “right area economists” continue to repeat that his ideas are dead, they seem to do this like an “exorcism”, because many of the very technical aspects of his economical analysis are completely true also today. The only thing that I don’t have found in his words, and it’s a key point, it’s the following: after the collapse of capitalism what we all will do? It can seem maybe a bit stupid to say in this way but for me it’s the point. I don’t have found nothing of really concrete about “the day after” (it can be my fault, even if old marxists I knew never given me a “solution”, just a generic useless reply.).
You say “democratic control of working class”. I ask you: how? With the elections of representatives? Elections every how many years? Who decide and how decide this kind of things? Constitutions will be written? If yes from who? Who decide what to produce? Who decide who can go to university and who must do “heavy jobs”? Who decide about the merit? Who assure me that who decide is not a populist elected by all only for his charisma like now? Who assure me that the elected will not became corrupted like now? What about the role of justice courts and their neutrality?  What about the free to think? What about the "state-violence" and its use? Etc. Etc. I can continue for hours but I think that my position and my question is clear. Finally, all these questions have a common factor: human brain desires, also the human brain of the “working class future leaders” will desire.
Social democracies (that unfortunately or are dying, or exist no more) were not perfect, they were far to be perfect, just, in my opinion, good enough considering the natural “aberration” of the human race. Anyway, I’m really curious about the mechanisms of the “day after capitalism”. Thanks for your attention.
Sorry to all for the off-topic.

About Ukraine: my opinion already expressed is not changed. I’m sorry only for all the democratic people in Ukraine (they are many, of course there aren’t only the right extremists) that have believed in this kind of “revolution”: in my opinion USA and EU have only used them. And, I repeat, I don’t like oligarchs (eastern and western), of course russian president included.

Drizzt

#298: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:19 pm
    —
Yup,

We have had endless pages of socialist diatribe from the forum's Europeans, while they attempt to prove to themselves they are literate. It's all in the past, and not relevant to today's issues, and therefore off topic.

These people are the future of Ukraine and the Russian Federation and will make better use of their institutions. Arrow  


Link

#299: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:55 pm
    —
There is still hope for the West, a more powerful agenda that supersedes all the senseless class warfare and proletariat dogma being spewed by the Euro forumites that insist on living in the past. The West will bring to Ukraine and the world the confluence of Islam, homosexuality, and fast food.  Arrow


Link

#300: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 1:44 am
    —
On January 12, 2010, the court of appeals in Kiev opened hearings into the "fact of genocide-famine Holodomor in Ukraine in 1932–33", in May 2009 the Security Service of Ukraine had started a criminal case "in relation to the genocide in Ukraine in 1932–33". In a ruling on January 13, 2010 the court found Stalin and other Bolshevik leaders guilty of genocide against the Ukrainians. -wiki

Burger King to the rescue, allays genocide fear.  Idea  Arrow  


Link

#301: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 8:21 am
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
On January 12, 2010, the court of appeals in Kiev opened hearings into the "fact of genocide-famine Holodomor in Ukraine in 1932–33", in May 2009 the Security Service of Ukraine had started a criminal case "in relation to the genocide in Ukraine in 1932–33". In a ruling on January 13, 2010 the court found Stalin and other Bolshevik leaders guilty of genocide against the Ukrainians. -wiki




YUSHCHENKOISM
As president, Yushchenko initiated substantial government propaganda initiatives. In July 2005, he established an Institute of National Memory,assigned the archives of the former KGB (now the SBU,
Sluzhba Bez- peki Ukrainy, the Ukrainian Security Service) formal propagandistic duties and supported the creation of a “Museum of Soviet Occupation”in Kyiv (Jilge, 2008: 174). Yushchenko appointed the young activist Volodymyr V’’iatrovych (b. 1977) director of the SBU archives. V’’iatrovych combined his position as government-appointed memory manager with ultra-nationalist activism; he was simultaneously director of an OUN(b) front organization, the Center for the Study for the Liberation Movement. State institutions disseminated a sanitized, edifyingly patriotic version of the history of the “Ukrainian national liberation movement,” the leaders of which were presented in iconographic form as heroic and saintly ?gures, martyrs of the nation (Rasevych, 2010; Rudling, 2011c: 26–33, 2012b).Yushchenko’s myth making had two central components. The ?rst was the presentation of the 1932–1933 famine as “the genocide of the Ukrainian nation,” a deliberate attempt to exterminate the Ukrainians which, his myth-makers claimed, resulted in the death of 10 million people in the republic.4
The other component was a heroic cult of the OUN(b), the UPA and their leaders. The “memory managers” juxtaposed the genocidal Soviet rule with the self-sacri?cial heroism of the OUN-UPA, producing a teleological narrative of suffering (the famine) and resistance (the OUN-UPA) leading to redemption (independence, 1991). Curiously, Yushchenko’s legitimizing historians presented their instrumentalized use of history as “truth,” which they juxtaposed to “Soviet myths.” Wilfried Jilge, a historian at the University of Leipzig, writes that “[i]t takes place by means of discourse, rituals, and symbols and uses the past to provide legitimization and to mobilize the population for political purposes. . . . A reconstructed historical memory is created as ‘true memory’ and then contrasted with ‘false Soviet history’ ”(Jilge, 2007:104–105). Thus, Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, SBU director under Yushchenko, described the task of his agency as being to disseminate “the historical truth of the past of the Ukrainian people,” to “liberate Ukrainian history from lies and falsi?cations and to work with truthful documents only” (Jilge, 2008:179). Ignoring the OUN’s antisemitism, denying its participation in anti- Jewish violence, and overlooking its fascist ideology, Nalyvaichenko and his agency presented the OUN as democrats, pluralists, even righteous rescuers of Jews during the Holocaust (Rudling, 2011c: 26–33).

http://www.academia.edu/2481420/_The_Return_of_the_Ukrainian_Far_Right_The_Case_of_VO_Svoboda_in_Ruth_Wodak_and_John_E._Richardson_eds._Analyzing_Fascist_Discourse_European_Fascism_in_Talk_and_Text_London_and_New_York_Routledge_2013_228-255
 
An instructive study in how "democrats" create the ideological compost for the growth of fascism. The same is true in the west Where immigrants "steal our jobs" the unemployed "steal our taxes" Roma "steal our possessions" counter-posed to "our armed forces protect us from tyranny."

#302: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 8:28 am
    —
The only thing that I don’t have found in his words, and it’s a key point, it’s the following: after the collapse of capitalism what we all will do? I don’t have found nothing of really concrete about “the day after” (it can be my fault, even if old marxists I knew never given me a “solution”, just a generic useless reply.).  

That's right, there is no prescription in Marx's writing for "the day after" which is never concrete until it arrives. The more precise the prediction, the more specific the situation it refers to. His materialist approach  precluded making prophesies for particular situations he had no way of anticipating.  As you know, he analysed what was and showed how it became what is. From that, he identified the laws of of social development and that in capitalism there are insurmountable contradictions which require revolution to permit further evolution. By identifying the nature of the contradictions he was able to propose a general solution. More than that he could not do. Science is not religion.


You say “democratic control of working class”. I ask you: how? With the elections of representatives? Elections every how many years? Who decide and how decide this kind of things? Constitutions will be written? If yes from who?

Again, we cannot anticipate the exact form democratic control will take in situations we cannot anticipate, only that it is necessary to make property work for society and to regulate an economy. What we know from history is that in the moments of intense class struggle, the working class creates organs of control and organisation which can become the basis of a revolutionary government. It really would be pedantic, even counter-revolutionary should the form of democracy not conform to our preconceptions,  to impose a schema of how things must be on a situation that does not yet exist.

Who decide what to produce?
Again, the structure cannot be predetermined and many should be tried, to find the most efficient for the various levels of economy and local circumstances. In general, decision making must be accountable to producers and consumers and involve the broadest possible consultation.

Who assure me that the elected will not became corrupted like now? What about the role of justice courts and their neutrality? What about the "state-violence" and its use?

There are no guarantees. History doesn't give them, least of all revolutions. The historical rule is that corruption and inequality flow from generalised want. To control corruption until basic needs and a substantial number of material desires can be easily satisfied for all, representatives of a workers' state must in general be subject to recall and replacement.

No courts are neutral. So long as they are required, they enforce the laws and morality of the empowered class. So long as there are crises and emergencies, there will be a tendency towards corruption which must be countered with oversight by workers' representatives.

The state, including a workers's state, is organised violence to protect the ruling class. In so far as a workers state exists to oversee inequality it is also bourgeois and the working class needs protection and safeguards from its own state. A solution to this dilemma has not been found in the limited historical experience.

What about the free to think?  Etc. Etc. I can continue for hours but I think that my position and my question is clear. Finally, all these questions have a common factor: human brain desires, also the human brain of the “working class future leaders” will desire.

Freedom to think what? Any state allows only the freedoms it can safely afford. If counter-revolutionary thought risks becoming counter-revolutionary action, it may require repression depending on the situation. If thought is repressed to the point that it stifles initiative and creativity, society becomes moribund and decays.

Material desires of individuals become anti-social where there is insufficient wealth to satisfy needs and substantial "wants". As above, the danger of corruption persists until society's productive forces alleviate its root and a socialist culture negates the individualism of bourgeois culture. I use the term negate in the Hegelian/Marxist sense of destroying form to preserve content. Marxism is not opposed to the individual and its rights, but views the individual in their relation to society.

Social democracies (that unfortunately or are dying, or exist no more) were not perfect, they were far to be perfect, just, in my opinion, good enough considering the natural “aberration” of the human race. Anyway, I’m really curious about the mechanisms of the “day after capitalism”. Thanks for your attention.

Social Democracies flourished in the post war period of nationally regulated economies. With capital locked in the nation state, it could not look abroad for higher returns when the workers went on strike for better conditions and pay. The consequent reduction of profit on capital investment, together with trade imbalances which undermined the gold backed US$ and therefore the framework of the entire arrangement, made the Thatcher/Reagan era deregulation inevitable under capitalism.

I will not go into the role of Social Democracy in maintaining capitalist social relations, that it was a form of capitalist rule based on class compromise. It is enough to point out that it could only be made to appear viable for workers in the conditions described above. Remove that and, as you say, social democracy is dead. I do not mourn its demise or that of Stalinism, another bourgeois current in the workers' movement.

That's my understanding.

#303: Re: The Ukraine Author: Drizzt PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 8:55 pm
    —
To Sieterayos: thanks for your exhaustive reply. As you maybe can imagine, with some things you say I agree, with some others not (or only partially). Speaking in general, I doubt that a system like this can be maintained without constant repression and leaders reasonably fixed to manage “the chaos” (chaos = instances of the new ruling class, millions of people). Anyway, it can be I’m too pessimist about human nature, who knows? History will see it.

Drizzt

#304: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2014 10:03 pm
    —
Sorry, at sea so can't post much due to bad connection.

Stalk,

Don't worries, no danger for the Baltic states unless presidents flees to the RF and NATO dissapears.

As for Ukraine - there will be no war Wink.

#305: Re: The Ukraine Author: MajorFrank PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:52 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):


As for Ukraine - there will be no war Wink.


Good to hear.  :)

Peace, bro, and Close Combat.  Wink

#306: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 4:14 am
    —
Ukrainian-American Simon Ostrovsky was just released by pro-Russian factions.  He said Ukrainian town thugs with machetes, shotguns, AK-47's had a bounty on him to capture.  They blindfolded him, moved to cellar, beaten for 10 minutes, and threatened that they would kill him.  Ostrovsky exposed how he found Russian Cossack soldier in Ukraine.  In Crimea he said troops were professional Russian  army forces with Russian license plates on trucks.  East Ukraine is lawless with no professional military organization...lots of armed gangsters roaming.

Simon Ostrovsky was lucky not to be killed by the gangsters that captured him.

#307: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 7:38 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
Sorry, at sea so can't post much due to bad connection


You probably meant FSB…

#308: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 8:08 am
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Ukrainian-American Simon Ostrovsky was just released by pro-Russian factions.  He said Ukrainian town thugs with machetes, shotguns, AK-47's had a bounty on him to capture.  They blindfolded him, moved to cellar, beaten for 10 minutes, and threatened that they would kill him.  Ostrovsky exposed how he found Russian Cossack soldier in Ukraine.  In Crimea he said troops were professional Russian  army forces with Russian license plates on trucks.  East Ukraine is lawless with no professional military organization...lots of armed gangsters roaming.

Simon Ostrovsky was lucky not to be killed by the gangsters that captured him.


Oh! Oh! Isn't it just appalling? It must be stopped! Look, I'm sure these charming young girls and boys with traditional values will stop them!

http://rt.com/news/155364-ukraine-nazi-division-march/

"The noble acts of courage performed by liberators, rescuers, and the Righteous Among Nations remind us that we are never powerless," Obama said. "In our lives, we always have choices. In our time, this means choosing to confront bigotry and hatred in all of its forms, especially anti-Semitism."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2014/01/27/obama-holocaust-remembrance-day/4943077/
 
And here are your leaders, including Obama's secretary of state, exercising their "choices."

https://www.kyivpost.com/content/politics/svoboda-party-leader-calls-for-tough-penalties-to-stop-corruption-342876.html
 
http://www.channel4.com/news/ukraine-mccain-far-right-svoboda-anti-semitic-protests
 
While dj was always quick to defend US coalition forces in their sociocidal criminal thuggery in Iraq, when people take up arms to defend themselves against fascism, they are "gangsters."

This didn't even make him blush

dj wrote (View Post):
 If some jihadi gangster gets bombed by drone then GOOD!  I'll drop the bomb myself.

Just fyi - not everybody in America listens to Fox News or is right-wing nut.

#309: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 9:07 am
    —
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post):
Dima wrote (View Post):
Sorry, at sea so can't post much due to bad connection

You probably meant FSB…

Yeah the Icelandic branch of FSB Smile.

Russia is under sanctions -

former German cancellor G.Schreder was celebrating his 70s anniversary in StPetersburg last night with Mr.Putin, Mr.Sechin, Mr.Miller and other Russian top officials who is now under sanctions Smile.
http://avmalgin.livejournal.com/4548927.html

Also an official delegation from Bundesland Mecklenburg-Vorpommern is in StPetersburg now negotiationing to expand business relations.
And seems Siemens and Exxon Mobil don't know about sanctions...

#310: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 9:52 am
    —
German are hooked on Russian gas…  Addicts knows to have good relations with there dealers.

#311: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 10:09 am
    —
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post):
German are hooked on Russian gas…  Addicts knows to have good relations with there dealers.

and Americans are hooked on extra profits - 2 hours before 3rd wave of sanctions Exxon Mobil was approved to do oil mining with Rosneft which is under sanctions along with its president Mr.Sechin Smile
same for Siemens, Shell and other free World companies Smile

#312: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 10:37 am
    —
Smile

#313: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 2:10 pm
    —
https://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101211042824AAU2lFf


 ...here are a few that contributed up to and including 1945

SKF of Philadelphia

Standard Oil refuelling U Boats caught by the US coast Guard in 1943

IG Farben Owned By standard oil which was owned By prescott Bush and the Rockerfellers

Du Pont

IBM

ITT owned 51% of Fokker Wolf up to 1945

Coco Cola they developed Fanta in Germany

Ford Opel in Germany owned and controlled fully by ford

Chrysler

Westrick,

Texaco

Standard Gas & Electric

The International Harvester Company

Herman Metz, a director of the Bank of Manhattan, controlled by the Warburgs.

the Rockefeller Chase Bank remained Open in Paris up to 1944 doing Business with the Nazis

Moreover, American assistance to Nazi war efforts extended into other areas.

The largest tank producers in Hitler's Germany were General Motors (controlled by the J.P. Morgan firm),Opel a wholly owned subsidiary of Ford built his Trucks up to and including 1945

the Ford A. G. subsidiary of the Ford Motor Company of Detroit. The Nazis granted tax-exempt status to Opel in 1936, to enable General Motors to expand its production facilities.

General Motors obligingly reinvested the resulting profits into German industry.

Henry Ford was decorated by the Nazis for his services to Nazism. with the "Grand cross of the German Eagle" which was never handed Back

Alcoa and Dow Chemical worked closely with Nazi industry with numerous transfers of their domestic U.S. technology. Bendix Aviation, in which the J.P. Morgan-controlled General Motors firm had a major stock interest, supplied Siemens & Halske A. G. in Germany with data on automatic pilots and aircraft instruments. As late as 1940, in the "unofficial war," Bendix Aviation supplied complete technical data to Robert Bosch for aircraft and diesel engine starters and received royalty payments in return.

all this is proven facts in any document when you reaserch trading with the Enemy WW2

but here a couple of Links that have been around since about since 1939
Source:
http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-hitle...

http://www.american-buddha.com/hig.tradi...

http://www.threeworldwars.com/world-war-...

http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2...

http://www.american-buddha.com/hig.tradi...

EDIT: The source links above are bad, but I know some of the above is true, and suspect most.

Trading with the "enemy" didn't stop the war.

#314: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 2:39 pm
    —
Hi Siet

sieterayos wrote (View Post):
Trading with the "enemy" didn't stop the war.


I think we meant that the sanctions are just words, as the business as well as relations continues. And that Germany can’t agree on trade sanctions vs Russia as they are hooked on Russian gas pipes. If Russia gets irritated, they may get “technical” problems with there pipes.. ..or bluntly make there own sanctions on gas bound for EU. Then we better hope for global warming, or it will be v cold winters..

/Mats

#315: Re: The Ukraine Author: sieterayos PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 5:41 pm
    —
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post):
Hi Siet

sieterayos wrote (View Post):
Trading with the "enemy" didn't stop the war.


I think we meant that the sanctions are just words, as the business as well as relations continues. And that Germany can’t agree on trade sanctions vs Russia as they are hooked on Russian gas pipes. If Russia gets irritated, they may get “technical” problems with there pipes.. ..or bluntly make there own sanctions on gas bound for EU. Then we better hope for global warming, or it will be v cold winters..

/Mats
Not sure it will work like that at all. US want Russia to do its bidding so whatever it does, it will lose.

US is threatening to replace Russian supplies and cut them out. Not sure if they can, but it's a lot of revenue for US business if they do, and a crippling loss of revenue for Russia. Alternately, if Russia successfully starves Europe of energy, that's "economic/energy blackmail" and another pretext for war.

Sanctions are not just words, don't be fooled. The US is out to destroy the RF. It will ratchet up pressure until Russia obeys its will or is weak enough to attack and dismember.

#316: Re: The Ukraine Author: dgfredLocation: N.C., USA PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 7:25 pm
    —
Yeah... the US is going to attack and dismember the Russian Federation.

The US may not want Russia to be a mega-powerful bully on the block... but a solid Russia makes for a much better world order IMO.

#317: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 9:08 pm
    —
Probably not many knows here but the RF has officially applied to be a member of NATO at least 2 times last one in 1999.
Both time was refused as without Russia as the enemy noone needs NATO.

#318: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 10:13 pm
    —
There will be NO WW3. Exclamation   Arrow


Link

#319: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 4:03 am
    —
dgfred wrote (View Post):
Yeah... the US is going to attack and dismember the Russian Federation.

The US may not want Russia to be a mega-powerful bully on the block... but a solid Russia makes for a much better world order IMO.


McCain and his pals just get upset when their old rival Russia gets the big arms deals with other nations. It's all about the $$$.  That's why the sanctions were not that serious and Exxon Mobil and the other Big $ players are still ready to do business with Putin.  No doubt that if Russia imploded (again) it would wreak havoc on the world.  Now if Putin makes mistake it could be the end of his own new imperial Russia.  He so far has been brilliant in averting war in Syria to keep his arms deal intact and seized Crimea without much resistance.

@ Siet and your clone FMJ - don't put words in my mouth...I never said I endorse endless war on terror.  I never said I supported the invasion of Iraq.  Get over your petty hatred of US and blaming America for all of the world issues.  Don't try to say that it's okay to torture Ukrainian journalist because America tortured some people in Iraq.  Dick Cheney had his own agenda which I never endorsed, nor does even McCain or others in his own party.  Iraq was fraud but we're not talking about Iraq or what American companies did business with Germany in the 30's.  Just because war hawk Bill Crystal wants to lobby for the war profiteers doesn't mean that all Americans or Obama endorse that view.  What war has Obama started?  Please enlighten me on your self-invented facts.

#320: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:24 am
    —
There will be NO WW3. Exclamation   Arrow


Link

#321: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:47 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
Probably not many knows here but the RF has officially applied to be a member of NATO at least 2 times last one in 1999.
Both time was refused as without Russia as the enemy noone needs NATO.


That was seen as the wolf applying for the job as shepherd.

#322: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:30 pm
    —
There will be NO WW3. Exclamation   Arrow


Link

#323: Re: The Ukraine Author: MajorFrank PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2014 9:10 pm
    —
Things are under control in the Ukraine. The riot police is using the turtle defence - strategy. The guy on the right is not very popular and thus offered as a sacrificial lamb to the rioters.


#324: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2014 9:27 pm
    —
Meanwhile NASA decided to keep on cooperation with the Russian Space agency despite sanctions imposed on it.

#325: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2014 12:27 am
    —
There will be NO WW3. Exclamation   Arrow


Link

#326: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2014 2:19 am
    —
Are you boarding the train Stwa?

#327: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2014 3:05 am
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Are you boarding the train Stwa?


NO WAIT  Exclamation

Poland* has Patriots  Idea  Exclamation  Arrow

* - Poland is next to Ukraine.


Link

#328: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2014 9:45 am
    —
The Ukranian army tried to attack Salvyansk this night.
In results 2xMi-24 and 1xMi-8 helicopters were shot down (probably Federalists got MPADS in captured BMDs - launch video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOPpvn_56zE), numerous wounded and killed.
http://instagram.com/p/nfHyb8RW8X/
http://instagram.com/p/nfHTZDxW8C/
http://instagram.com/p/nfFgjNRW6t/

Slavaynks inhabitants were stopping the Ukranian army columns peacefully
http://instagram.com/p/nfHif9RW8K/


Last edited by Dima on Fri May 02, 2014 12:01 pm; edited 1 time in total

#329: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2014 11:10 am
    —
This  Question  Arrow


Link

#330: Re: The Ukraine Author: Pzt_KanovLocation: México PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2014 5:44 pm
    —
The news said the Mi's were carrying medics....

really?

#331: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2014 5:51 pm
    —
Pzt_Kanov wrote (View Post):
The news said the Mi's were carrying medics....
really?

what do you think? Smile
that's a video of that Mi-8 and you can notice it has an armament under small wings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSsOFwvuZUU
but they didn't shoot it down, only damaged and some soldiers wounded inside so appears that only 2xMi-24 were lost.
http://www.mil.gov.ua/images/event/2014-05-02-13881-64260.jpg
http://www.mil.gov.ua/images/event/2014-05-02-13881-64261.jpg
http://www.mil.gov.ua/images/event/2014-05-02-13881-64262.jpg
http://www.mil.gov.ua/images/event/2014-05-02-13881-64263.jpg
according to the Federalists it landed to deliver some troops and then flew away.

#332: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2014 10:28 pm
    —
Brother Nathanael   Arrow


Link

#333: Re: The Ukraine Author: MajorFrank PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2014 3:21 pm
    —
40 pro-Russians dead in the burnt out trade union house - conflict. I don't know about you but these pro-Kiev folks are starting to look more and more like a murderous mob.

And also, trade unions are not something 'commie', they are a part of a civilized society.

#334: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 7:21 pm
    —
Another Mi-24 was shot down today by Federalists using either HMG or 23mm guns from captured BMD.

#335: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2014 7:09 am
    —
Arrow   


Link

#336: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 10:07 pm
    —
Arrow


Link

#337: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 10:01 pm
    —
Maybe wars of the future will be fought exclusively on YouTube.  Arrow


Link

#338: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 9:26 pm
    —
Ukrainian, Anastasia Robtsova, performs popular Western Culture anthem.  Arrow


Link

#339: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 7:25 am
    —
the National Guards shooting at legs of unarmed citizens in Mariupol on May 9th:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXD45Kuoin0

The stream of lie coming from Ukranian Mass media and Facebook of Arsen Avakov (internal affairs minister) is shocking :(

And abandoned Ukranian military base in Mariupol after May 9th massacre - they fled leaving APCs and weapons behind as they were too afraid of people revenge for massacre.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=pWkDj5dMchw

#340: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 8:12 am
    —
NO WAIT  Exclamation

Washington says those guys are terrorists. To Washington, ALL citizens are terrorists, Ukraine, Nevada, no difference.


Link


Last edited by Stwa on Thu May 15, 2014 4:15 pm; edited 1 time in total

#341: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 1:42 pm
    —
the German Spiegel reports 400 american PMCs fighting for the Ukranian army.
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/ukraine-krise-400-us-soeldner-von-academi-kaempfen-gegen-separatisten-a-968745.html

#342: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2014 1:38 am
    —
East Ukraine referendums declared NULL and VOID. Exclamation

German shoppers jubilant.  Arrow


Link



Link

#343: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2014 10:29 am
    —
OOPS  Arrow


Link

#344: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2014 1:36 am
    —
Russia needs a hero.  Idea

Obama rallies his troops.  Arrow  


Link



Link

#345: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2014 3:30 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
the German Spiegel reports 400 american PMCs fighting for the Ukranian army.
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/ukraine-krise-400-us-soeldner-von-academi-kaempfen-gegen-separatisten-a-968745.html  


Yes this is probably true.  US Military has been using PMC's more and more in recent years.  However Russian Federation soldiers have also been identified on Ukrainian territory (not including Crimea).

@Stwa - you need to post more YouTubes, you haven't posted quite enough yet.   Rolling Eyes

#346: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2014 2:25 am
    —
@Stwa - you need to post more YouTubes, you haven't posted quite enough yet. -dj

No problem.  Idea

Ukranian pageant bans brunettes, redheads.  Shocked

Norwegians remain defiant.  Arrow  


Link



Link

#347: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2014 4:59 pm
    —
How about Pravda for reliable info on mercs.  Question   Arrow


Link

#348: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2014 7:14 am
    —
There just isn't that much action in Ukraine as far as revolutions go. It is hard to imagine the Russian Doomsday Device activating based on recent events.  

I wonder if these State Department types were hired by Hillary.  Question  Arrow


Link

#349: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2014 9:38 pm
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
There just isn't that much action in Ukraine as far as revolutions go. It is hard to imagine the Russian Doomsday Device activating based on recent events.  

I wonder if these State Department types were hired by Hillary.  Question  Arrow


Link

lol he's just called her idiot Smile

#350: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2014 9:50 pm
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
There just isn't that much action in Ukraine as far as revolutions go. It is hard to imagine the Russian Doomsday Device activating based on recent events.

well Ukranians lost at least 108 KIA, dozens of WIA and 2 BTRs with 2-3 trucks and a couple of mortars in those days following referendum.
Interesting is that 102 KIA lost by ammunition dump explosion hit by 120mm bombon Karachun hill were recorded as deserters by the Ukranians according to the intercepts.

#351: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2014 11:45 pm
    —
... Ukranians lost at least 108 KIA, dozens of WIA and 2 BTRs with 2-3 trucks and a couple of mortars in those days following referendum. Interesting is that 102 KIA lost by ammunition dump explosion hit by 120mm bombon Karachun hill were recorded as deserters by the Ukranians according to the intercepts. -Dima

Right, but if you recall, the Russian Doomsday device activates (detonates) when it detects high levels of radiation over Russia (or Soviet Union), that signifies to the device that there has been a Nuclear Apocolypse.


Link

#352: Re: The Ukraine Author: Tippi-SimoLocation: Helsinki PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2014 12:17 am
    —
Russians are evil as the newspaper tells you!
Never trust a Russian!

P.S. A picture from my friend´s friend birthday party on the Gulf of Finland (I called it Finlandskiy Mor:P ) Good times.

P.P.S. Me and my brat Andrey (we might have been stoned to oblivion)



[img][/img]

Nice pic Wink

#353: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2014 11:10 am
    —
Muhajireen commander calls for Jihad in Ukraine.  Laughing   Arrow

In Ukraine, the West will balance the confluence of Islam, homosexuality, and fast food. Muslims will supply Islam and Sharia. Christians that don't convert to Islam will supply the homosexuals, and Burger King and McDonalds will supply the fast food (GMOs and edible plastics).

At present, there are just way too many infidels in Ukraine.  Arrow


Link

#354: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2014 4:57 pm
    —
So, me thinks it is time for an intermission. But ...  Arrow

Will Ukraine go Bosnia? War May Come At Any Time

Will FIFA force the Ukraine football team to use African players?

Will the Russians move a Doomsday Device to Chernobyl?

Are the Cosmo NOTS and the International Space Station fake?


Link

#355: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 9:50 pm
    —
http://time.com/3042640/satellite-russian-ukraine-shelling/

More obviously Photoshopped imagery showing rocket artillery firing from Russia to Ukraine. Even if it was true, Russians would deny it and make sure that the public never heard of this and/or show these images as proof of a conspiracy.

#356: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:32 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
http://time.com/3042640/satellite-russian-ukraine-shelling/
More obviously Photoshopped imagery showing rocket artillery firing from Russia to Ukraine. Even if it was true, Russians would deny it and make sure that the public never heard of this and/or show these images as proof of a conspiracy.

Mooxe, looks like the conspiracy theories are in your head, those photos were in all news here since they were first released in a twitter of US abassador in Kiev.

And do they say about this in your media? http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/07/24/ukraine-unguided-rockets-killing-civilians
The use of indiscriminate rockets in populated areas violates international humanitarian law, or the laws of war, and may amount to war crimes.

And now it's getting more interesting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9-8KvtfjZA#t=22

http://www.breakingnews.com/topic/john-kerry/
US Secretary of State John Kerry says Ukraine is ready for proposals on peace with Russia: 'Not in the future. Now'
http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/jul/29/ukraine-would-accept-mutual-ceasefire-says-john-kerry-video

#357: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:41 pm
    —
That's another thing I'd never need to see proof of to believe. Indiscriminate firing of weapons that hit civilian areas. That's a guarantee of all wars for all sides.

#358: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:59 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
That's another thing I'd never need to see proof of to believe. Indiscriminate firing of weapons that hit civilian areas. That's a guarantee of all wars for all sides.

so do they have a war or trying to free their own people from separatists?

#359: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 8:12 pm
    —
Are we tip toeing around the word war? That's a new one.

#360: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 4:36 am
    —
Russia got caught by satellites:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/27/russia-ukraine-satellite_n_5625253.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
 

"...The memo said one image provides evidence that Russian forces have "fired across the border at Ukrainian military forces and that Russian-backed separatists have used heavy artillery provided by Russia in attacks on Ukrainian forces from inside Ukraine."

Another satellite image depicted in the memo shows "ground scarring at multiple rocket launch sites on the Russian side of the border oriented in the direction of Ukraine military units within Ukraine."

"The wide areas of impact near the Ukrainian military units indicates fire from multiple rocket launchers," the memo said."

#361: Re: The Ukraine Author: southern_land PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 7:34 am
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Russia got caught by satellites:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/27/russia-ukraine-satellite_n_5625253.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
 

"...The memo said one image provides evidence that Russian forces have "fired across the border at Ukrainian military forces and that Russian-backed separatists have used heavy artillery provided by Russia in attacks on Ukrainian forces from inside Ukraine."

Another satellite image depicted in the memo shows "ground scarring at multiple rocket launch sites on the Russian side of the border oriented in the direction of Ukraine military units within Ukraine."

"The wide areas of impact near the Ukrainian military units indicates fire from multiple rocket launchers," the memo said."


And tomorrow they'll probably say the same missile launchers knocked down MH17, day after that they were on the grassy knoll... lets face it the US is pouring ammo in to Israel to blow up kids, the US moral high ground has become the Mariannas trench

#362: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 3:54 pm
    —
You can give a hundred examples of how they lost moral high ground. Do we really want to look at which countries sells arm and ammunition to other countries who used them to kill innocent people?

#363: Re: The Ukraine Author: TrogerLocation: L4W's place, Australia PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 1:26 am
    —
southern_land wrote (View Post):
dj wrote (View Post):
Russia got caught by satellites:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/27/russia-ukraine-satellite_n_5625253.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
 

"...The memo said one image provides evidence that Russian forces have "fired across the border at Ukrainian military forces and that Russian-backed separatists have used heavy artillery provided by Russia in attacks on Ukrainian forces from inside Ukraine."

Another satellite image depicted in the memo shows "ground scarring at multiple rocket launch sites on the Russian side of the border oriented in the direction of Ukraine military units within Ukraine."

"The wide areas of impact near the Ukrainian military units indicates fire from multiple rocket launchers," the memo said."


And tomorrow they'll probably say the same missile launchers knocked down MH17, day after that they were on the grassy knoll... lets face it the US is pouring ammo in to Israel to blow up kids, the US moral high ground has become the Mariannas trench


You're right in one respect Southern, but these type of comments don't seem to serve any purpose but to derail the conversation.  It's also a pretty common tactic that Russians use in their misinformation campaign (you a closet commie!? I heard Stalin is looking for a map maker! Very Happy ).  

We are talking about the Ukraine.  We are talking about Russia's interference in Ukrainian affairs.  We are talking about the Russians giving a highly sophisticated weapon system to a bunch of Cossack dogs who were sent there by Russia--they then accidentally shot down a civilian airliner with that weapon system.  

The U.S. has made some bad foreign policy decisions, but I don't think they really on Russia's level.  Russia, the place that has been ruled by a former KGB dictator for the last 15 years, is a practical one-party state, censors its news and replaces it with pure bullshit, and on and on.  Nah, the U.S. is bad, but not that bad.  Not to mention, the U.S., every once in a while (or at least a part of its population), can admit when it's wrong--accounting for their actions is something that the Russian government or most "mainstream" Russians seem to be utterly incapable of doing.

#364: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 12:44 pm
    —
Hey Southernland,

Here is one for you, but you should probably dry out for a few days before you watch.  Arrow


Link

#365: Re: The Ukraine Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2014 9:42 pm
    —
Map from 27 th of July:


8 Days later:

Map 4th of August:


#366: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:08 pm
    —
The Sourthern group of Ukranian Armed forces encircled in the south has surrendered their vehicles and heavy weapons to escape.
http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/1719357.html?page=1#comments

#367: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 4:26 pm
    —
Dima, did you see the satellite imagery evidence of rocket launchers inside Russian border fired against Ukrainian forces?  Probably was censored.  Also we hear reports of Russian advisors having to train the separatists whom probably have no clue how to use SA high altitude rockets.  Ukrainian-American journalist whom was detained, punched and beaten already by separatists had proof that one of the Russian soldiers he previously filmed in Georgia was caught on camera inside Ukrainian territory.

Putin is being very cautious but evidence is mounting that Russia is providing much more assistance to rebel forces than it may appear to the Russian people.  It's just common sense, if Russia stands to gain, territory beyond Crimea...of course they would want to do everything they can to help their comrades.

#368: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 8:08 am
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Dima, did you see the satellite imagery evidence of rocket launchers inside Russian border fired against Ukrainian forces?  Probably was censored.

why would you think those images were censored?! they don't show anything but speculations for Ukranian and US grunts - just populizm.  

Quote:
Also we hear reports of Russian advisors having to train the separatists whom probably have no clue how to use SA high altitude rockets.
 
again, such technics as Buk is operated by 1-2 years drafted soldiers. So there are millions of Buk operators in ex-USSR.

Quote:
Ukrainian-American journalist whom was detained, punched and beaten already by separatists had proof that one of the Russian soldiers he previously filmed in Georgia was caught on camera inside Ukrainian territory.

ahha among those 1mln servicemen currently in the Russian army he had spotted the right guy....don't you think it's kind of?

Quote:
Putin is being very cautious but evidence is mounting that Russia is providing much more assistance to rebel forces than it may appear to the Russian people.  It's just common sense, if Russia stands to gain, territory beyond Crimea...of course they would want to do everything they can to help their comrades.

there is a webpage http://icorpus.ru/ where militiia GHQ posts reports each day.
and they all cry for ATGMs and fresh RPGs from Russia...and say that Russia betrayed them not sending good weapons and not coming with troops.

#369: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 5:22 pm
    —
Dima, Simon Ostrovsky is the journalists name.  He caught the Russian soldier on camera.  He has numerous video posted on his experience in the Ukrainian war zone:

https://news.vice.com/show/russian-roulette-the-invasion-of-ukraine

I personally saw the photographic evidence that Simon presented on television.  Why would he fabricate this story and jeopardize his career?

Ok I cede the point about Russian military advisors required to train separatists on how to use SA rocket launchers.  I think you are right and I am wrong.  Indeed are something like over 1 million veterans in former USSR states that can easily train local militias how to use these mobile launchers.

#370: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:20 pm
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Dima, Simon Ostrovsky is the journalists name.  He caught the Russian soldier on camera.  He has numerous video posted on his experience in the Ukrainian war zone:

https://news.vice.com/show/russian-roulette-the-invasion-of-ukraine

I personally saw the photographic evidence that Simon presented on television.  Why would he fabricate this story and jeopardize his career?

Ok I cede the point about Russian military advisors required to train separatists on how to use SA rocket launchers.  I think you are right and I am wrong.  Indeed are something like over 1 million veterans in former USSR states that can easily train local militias how to use these mobile launchers.

there were a number of fake photos from Georgia (2008) and Crimea (2014) shown by the Western journalists so I'd not be surprised.
do you have a direct link to that photo you mentioned above?

#371: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:21 pm
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Ok I cede the point about Russian military advisors required to train separatists on how to use SA rocket launchers.  I think you are right and I am wrong.  Indeed are something like over 1 million veterans in former USSR states that can easily train local militias how to use these mobile launchers.

IIRC a couple of DNR/LNR military officials are ex-AA launchers operators.

#372: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 5:18 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
dj wrote (View Post):
Dima, Simon Ostrovsky is the journalists name.  He caught the Russian soldier on camera.  He has numerous video posted on his experience in the Ukrainian war zone:

https://news.vice.com/show/russian-roulette-the-invasion-of-ukraine

I personally saw the photographic evidence that Simon presented on television.  Why would he fabricate this story and jeopardize his career?

Ok I cede the point about Russian military advisors required to train separatists on how to use SA rocket launchers.  I think you are right and I am wrong.  Indeed are something like over 1 million veterans in former USSR states that can easily train local militias how to use these mobile launchers.

there were a number of fake photos from Georgia (2008) and Crimea (2014) shown by the Western journalists so I'd not be surprised.
do you have a direct link to that photo you mentioned above?


Dima - I knew you were going to ask that.  I could not find it because it was on live television, Simon showed the photographs and explained the evidence.  Wonder if he got pressured to back off when he was captured by the Separatists.  Simon has some balls...very lucky the militia didn't kill him for being too aggressive with his reporting.   What did you think of the videos?  He seems to get respect by the local Ukrainians, I think he speaks Russian too.  Let me see if I can find link for the evidence he mentioned.

#373: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 9:04 am
    —
[quote="dj";p="76951"][quote="Dima";p="76927"]
dj wrote (View Post):
Dima - I knew you were going to ask that.  I could not find it because it was on live television, Simon showed the photographs and explained the evidence.  Wonder if he got pressured to back off when he was captured by the Separatists.  Simon has some balls...very lucky the militia didn't kill him for being too aggressive with his reporting.   What did you think of the videos?  He seems to get respect by the local Ukrainians, I think he speaks Russian too.  Let me see if I can find link for the evidence he mentioned.

facts:
there was not a single case of any side journalist killed by militia during the conflict.
there are number of journalists killed by the Ukranian armed forces during the conflict and many more abducted, beaten, asked to say something on camera and then released.

he obviously has a Russian-jews surname so no wonder he speaks Russian.

if that was on the TV and wasn't a fake it should have been spread all over...

#374: Re: The Ukraine Author: jakebullet70Location: Washington State / Kherson Ukraine PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 10:43 pm
    —
Dima, I live in Ukraine. I see Ukrainian news and you see Russian news... They are different.
I also read the BBC. ooohhh, I am wasting key strokes.

I speak to Ukrainian and Russians every day.  Maybe the difference is I speak to poor Ukrainian and Russian's?
The man and woman on the street. Are you middle class? I think you are. My Ukraine brother works in Moscow because of no work here.
My former fiancee lives in Kazan? You are speaking middle class talk. I see it. I know, come down to the poor people.
That's 90% or Russia and Ukraine. My former fiancee says if people are making money they love Putin. but everyone in the villages
hates him. Is this true?

All I know is men can be crappy to each other. In a nutshell Politics sucks!!! We should not have boarders.
Nuff said.

Oh wait, a Russian-jews surname... really? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Sorry to all, sorry, I find that SO funny.

Sorry Moxxie.

#375: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 8:45 pm
    —
jakebullet70 wrote (View Post):
.
That's 90% or Russia and Ukraine. My former fiancee says if people are making money they love Putin. but everyone in the villages
hates him. Is this true?

No, Putin's electorate is mainly old and poor people.

Quote:
Oh wait, a Russian-jews surname... really? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Sorry to all, sorry, I find that SO funny.

yes like Khadorkovskiy, Berezovskiy, Zhirinovskiy, Pavlovskiy, etc.

#376: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 4:38 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
jakebullet70 wrote (View Post):
.
That's 90% or Russia and Ukraine. My former fiancee says if people are making money they love Putin. but everyone in the villages
hates him. Is this true?

No, Putin's electorate is mainly old and poor people.

Quote:
Oh wait, a Russian-jews surname... really? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Sorry to all, sorry, I find that SO funny.

yes like Khadorkovskiy, Berezovskiy, Zhirinovskiy, Pavlovskiy, etc.


Sounds exactly like the American Conservative right-wing base of voters, old and what we call "poor white trash" voters.  Minority voters have only been allowed to vote for 40 years or so in the former rebel Confederate States, so they never vote for the party of old establishment.

#377: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 4:48 am
    —
southern_land wrote (View Post):
dj wrote (View Post):
Russia got caught by satellites:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/27/russia-ukraine-satellite_n_5625253.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
 

"...The memo said one image provides evidence that Russian forces have "fired across the border at Ukrainian military forces and that Russian-backed separatists have used heavy artillery provided by Russia in attacks on Ukrainian forces from inside Ukraine."

Another satellite image depicted in the memo shows "ground scarring at multiple rocket launch sites on the Russian side of the border oriented in the direction of Ukraine military units within Ukraine."

"The wide areas of impact near the Ukrainian military units indicates fire from multiple rocket launchers," the memo said."


And tomorrow they'll probably say the same missile launchers knocked down MH17, day after that they were on the grassy knoll... lets face it the US is pouring ammo in to Israel to blow up kids, the US moral high ground has become the Mariannas trench


Not a fair comment SL.  Obviously we lost the moral high ground when Stwa, John, Fox & their Friends advocated war in Iraq.  The right-wing like Johnsilver say that America is "getting in the way of Israel". Then you claim we are helping them bomb kids.  Neither of you are right.  We give aid to both sides...probably more aid to Arab states vs Israel.

The truth is that Sec. Kerry got caught on open mic complaining & mocking Israel's alleged pinprick assaults on Gaza, after they bombed hospital.  Hell of pinprick he said.  That hardly is an indication that the current administration is biased against the Palestinians.  The Administration is bullied by right-wing extremists that are desperate to start more wars in Mid-East or think that it's okay to choose sides.

#378: Re: The Ukraine Author: jakebullet70Location: Washington State / Kherson Ukraine PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:30 am
    —
Right wing, left wing, middle wing... Russians, Americans, Germans, Ukrainians and lets toss in some Chinese and Japan.

Again
All I know is men can be crappy to each other. In a nutshell Politics sucks!!! Boarders?  Really?
Nationalism is a religion. Your are born into it. You have no choice.

The Jews, Christians and Muslims claim the same God?  Really? War? Really? Come on!!!! Same God?
Men can be crappy to each other. This world order is not working. It sucks.

Again. Sorry Moxxie.

But it does make for a great Close Combat game!!!  Smile

#379: Re: The Ukraine Author: jakebullet70Location: Washington State / Kherson Ukraine PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:59 am
    —
http://www.unian.net/

Ukraine news web site. If you use Google Chrome it should auto translate.
See what the Ukrainians are saying.

#380: Re: The Ukraine Author: jakebullet70Location: Washington State / Kherson Ukraine PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 1:10 am
    —
Dima

Is there a Russian news web site that auto translates in Google Chrome?
Thanks

#381: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:10 am
    —
jakebullet70 wrote (View Post):
Dima

Is there a Russian news web site that auto translates in Google Chrome?
Thanks

I don't know, I only use www.bfm.ru and www.rbc.ru for news.

#382: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:26 pm
    —
jakebullet70 wrote (View Post):
Right wing, left wing, middle wing... Russians, Americans, Germans, Ukrainians and lets toss in some Chinese and Japan.

Again
All I know is men can be crappy to each other. In a nutshell Politics sucks!!! Boarders?  Really?
Nationalism is a religion. Your are born into it. You have no choice.

The Jews, Christians and Muslims claim the same God?  Really? War? Really? Come on!!!! Same God?
Men can be crappy to each other. This world order is not working. It sucks.

Again. Sorry Moxxie.

But it does make for a great Close Combat game!!!  Smile


Agreed ultra-nationalism is dangerous and has been used countless times to justify wars, aggression, genocide, many other injustices.  Now I think both America and Russia have been duped into this.  America is too divided though politically, the worst in our history, at least since the Civil War era.  Whereas Russia is under the firm centralized control of Putin ever since the Yeltin era.

Politics is all mind-control and indoctrination.  I trust no politician, usually they are bribed or under the control of special interest.  They Political system is used to control people under certain factions and divide/conquer opponents.  

Ukraine is really in desperate shape.  Virtually no jobs to speak of...which directly contributed towards the unraveling of the government.  America is not far behind, the future job market for the youth and new generation is looking grim.  You have to "know somebody" or be connected to the right people to get decent job.  

Partisanship will be the demise of America too...we will fall if this level of toxic divisiveness continues much longer.  I wish for a day when politicians make decisions based on common sense instead of political agendas.  Ditto for religious fundamentalists...I trust no religion either.  Like you said look at the history, the hatred, the persecution.  Islam a religion of peace?  Hardly.  Christians that preach hatred or burn Korans?  Or support murder of gays or non-believers?  Total fraud...Jesus or Mohammend would not approve of these impostors.

#383: Re: The Ukraine Author: pvt_GruntLocation: Melbourne, Australia PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:16 pm
    —
Thanks for those Russian language news links.

You dont need Chome to view, Google toolbar has the translate feature as well for IE, though it does give some unusual translations sometimes...

#384: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:22 pm
    —
pvt_Grunt wrote (View Post):
Thanks for those Russian language news links.

these are both not state controlled though belong to the oligarchs that are close to Putin.

#385: Re: The Ukraine Author: TrogerLocation: L4W's place, Australia PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:03 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
pvt_Grunt wrote (View Post):
Thanks for those Russian language news links.

these are both not state controlled though belong to the oligarchs that are close to Putin.


Which is basically the same as state-controlled.  Very Happy

Ukrainian news sources also suffer from oligarch-ownership.

#386: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:30 am
    —
Troger wrote (View Post):
Dima wrote (View Post):
pvt_Grunt wrote (View Post):
Thanks for those Russian language news links.

these are both not state controlled though belong to the oligarchs that are close to Putin.


Which is basically the same as state-controlled.  Very Happy

Ukrainian news sources also suffer from oligarch-ownership.

lol American sources don;t?

#387: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 1:15 am
    —
All Western media lampoons the US President and politicians when they do something wrong, that's the biggest difference.

#388: Re: The Ukraine Author: TrogerLocation: L4W's place, Australia PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 5:30 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
Troger wrote (View Post):
Dima wrote (View Post):
pvt_Grunt wrote (View Post):
Thanks for those Russian language news links.

these are both not state controlled though belong to the oligarchs that are close to Putin.


Which is basically the same as state-controlled.  Very Happy

Ukrainian news sources also suffer from oligarch-ownership.

lol American sources don;t?


The U.S. has three major television news stations, Fox, CNN, and NBC.  Fox is probably the most biased news service in the U.S., and yes it's owned by a media mogul.  Most informed people are probably getting their news from print and online sources, not television--and print and online news services are typically independently-owned, or at the very least independently-operated.

Either way, the situations are not analogous. While many western news services (TV, print, online) have political leanings, they ultimately answer to their viewers/readers, not a government.   Very Happy

#389: Re: The Ukraine Author: pvt_GruntLocation: Melbourne, Australia PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 7:37 am
    —
In Australia the best (to me) news channel is government owned - the ABC. Ironically the government dislikes them as they are too critical and is reducing their funding now.
I also trust BBC as they tend to give news, not opinions.
News sites I dont trust give opinions or worse, entertainment trivia dressed up as news.
I cant think of any US based news sites I really trust, though I read CNN and Huffington.

#390: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 2:41 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
All Western media lampoons the US President and politicians when they do something wrong, that's the biggest difference.

our president and PM are flawles you know ;)

Do they say about the ultimatum to Poroshenko by the Right Sector in your media?
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=daa_1408226790

#391: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 7:11 pm
    —
The Ukranian army seems to be totally demoralized.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o77lO7KmftI

#392: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 10:02 pm
    —
Lost vehicles that were identified by photos:
http://lostarmour.info/armour/

#393: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 11:51 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
The Ukranian army seems to be totally demoralized.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o77lO7KmftI


Obviously a made up video with actors. They are saying the Russians are trashing them, and the Russians are not in the Ukraine. The Russians are also not firing across the border or supplying arms to the separatists.

#394: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:05 am
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Dima wrote (View Post):
The Ukranian army seems to be totally demoralized.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o77lO7KmftI

Obviously a made up video with actors. They are saying the Russians are trashing them, and the Russians are not in the Ukraine. The Russians are also not firing across the border or supplying arms to the separatists.

it's common there to call militia as Russians...don't forget the Ukranian propaganda keep saying that they are in war with Russia.

#395: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2014 4:26 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Dima wrote (View Post):
The Ukranian army seems to be totally demoralized.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o77lO7KmftI

Obviously a made up video with actors. They are saying the Russians are trashing them, and the Russians are not in the Ukraine. The Russians are also not firing across the border or supplying arms to the separatists.

it's common there to call militia as Russians...don't forget the Ukranian propaganda keep saying that they are in war with Russia.


Well at the minimum, they literally will be Russians assuming the Separatists succeed in their efforts.  Obviously Russia has everything to gain.  I think Russia probably has advisors in Ukraine territory.  It would not take much effort to arm or assist the rebels.

Not sure about the media coverage in Russia, but here in the west, video footage is seldom if ever of the battles between Separatists and Ukrainian Govt forces.

#396: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2014 8:48 am
    —
dj wrote (View Post):

Well at the minimum, they literally will be Russians assuming the Separatists succeed in their efforts.  Obviously Russia has everything to gain.  I think Russia probably has advisors in Ukraine territory.  It would not take much effort to arm or assist the rebels.

most likely there are Russian advisors with militia as well as the US/NATO with Kiev - they don't really make a secret out of it.

Quote:
Not sure about the media coverage in Russia, but here in the west, video footage is seldom if ever of the battles between Separatists and Ukrainian Govt forces.

there are literally tons (hundreds) of videos of actions and aftermaths.

#397: Re: The Ukraine Author: pvt_GruntLocation: Melbourne, Australia PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2014 9:52 am
    —
To me, time is on the separatists side. Russia can trickle in enough arms and support to keep the conflict going, while not overtly invading.
Ukraine is broke financially, they will need Western support (money and arms) to continue and this will play into Russia's hands.
Ukraine needs to finish this quickly, but I'm not sure they're capable of doing it without massive civilian casualties.

#398: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:00 am
    —
pvt_Grunt wrote (View Post):
To me, time is on the separatists side. Russia can trickle in enough arms and support to keep the conflict going, while not overtly invading.
Ukraine is broke financially, they will need Western support (money and arms) to continue and this will play into Russia's hands.
Ukraine needs to finish this quickly, but I'm not sure they're capable of doing it without massive civilian casualties.

There is the OSCE mission monitoring Russian-Ukranian border now - they post daily reports http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm/daily-updates.
No proves of any military help crossing the border from Russia.

#399: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 4:10 am
    —
pvt_Grunt wrote (View Post):
To me, time is on the separatists side. Russia can trickle in enough arms and support to keep the conflict going, while not overtly invading.
Ukraine is broke financially, they will need Western support (money and arms) to continue and this will play into Russia's hands.
Ukraine needs to finish this quickly, but I'm not sure they're capable of doing it without massive civilian casualties.


Exactly...thus the whole reason for the unraveling of Ukraine.  They are in desperate shape, virtually no jobs.  I think unemployment rate is over 20%.  Whereas Russia has deep pockets in comparison and nothing but time on their side and endless supply of military surplus equipment left over from Cold War era.  They can give that away for free...no sweat off Putin's back.

#400: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 7:56 am
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Exactly...thus the whole reason for the unraveling of Ukraine.  They are in desperate shape, virtually no jobs.  I think unemployment rate is over 20%.  Whereas Russia has deep pockets in comparison and nothing but time on their side and endless supply of military surplus equipment left over from Cold War era.  They can give that away for free...no sweat off Putin's back.

Officially there was less that 8% of unemployments in 2013 and 9,3% for 2014 (by now):
http://index.minfin.com.ua/people/unemploy.php

DJ, what you don't understand is that the South East Ukraine beeing the industrical capital of Ukraine (and Ukranian SSR during USSR) has huge stocks of conserved AVF, vehicles, weapons, etc. The Ukranians tried to defend them badly, especially AVF conservation places, but only in Artemovsk tank conservation area militia has stolen at least 14 T-64 MBT (according to the official Ukraine and 21 according to militia).

F.e. in Russia we have right now more than 50K MBT (T54/55/62/72) and more APC/IFV in conservation areas.

#401: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 5:25 am
    —
Dima - I believe those unemployment numbers for Ukraine are lies.  Even here in America, it is well-known that unemployment rates are exaggerated.  It does not take into account people that are under-employed, gave up trying to find work or otherwise do not have a real job.  So I think double easily whatever the government claims it is.

Yes I think the Separatists already captured huge stockpiles of Ukraine equipment.  Some of it I am sure was originally from Russia anyway back in Soviet era.  I think that is good point.  Russia does not need to give the Separatists much since plenty was already captured.

#402: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:07 am
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
Dima - I believe those unemployment numbers for Ukraine are lies.  Even here in America, it is well-known that unemployment rates are exaggerated.  It does not take into account people that are under-employed, gave up trying to find work or otherwise do not have a real job.  So I think double easily whatever the government claims it is.

yes, most likely they count only persons that are registered as unemployment. If they work in Russia or Poland they are not part of that statistics.


Quote:
Yes I think the Separatists already captured huge stockpiles of Ukraine equipment.  Some of it I am sure was originally from Russia anyway back in Soviet era.  I think that is good point.  Russia does not need to give the Separatists much since plenty was already captured.

haha, every PK or AK is originally from Russia - there was no factories for them in Ukraine Wink.

#403: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:05 am
    —
I'm talking about the heavy equipment, tanks, APC's, etc.  I wonder what happened when Yeltsin took power.  Did Soviet army take equipment back to HQ in Russia after fall of govt? I can't imagine all of it was salvaged.  My guess is that former Soviet states that broke away from Russia after fall of Soviet Union, must have inherited a large arsenal of abandoned military equipment.  The biggest fear here in the West is 100% accounting of chemical weapons and of course nukes.

#404: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:20 am
    —
DJ,

I don't think Ukraine took very good care of it at all.

Look at this link here. There must be 100's of rusting russian tanks in this tank graveyard in the Ukraine:

tank graveyard

#405: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 7:17 am
    —
dj wrote (View Post):
I'm talking about the heavy equipment, tanks, APC's, etc.  I wonder what happened when Yeltsin took power.  Did Soviet army take equipment back to HQ in Russia after fall of govt? I can't imagine all of it was salvaged.  My guess is that former Soviet states that broke away from Russia after fall of Soviet Union, must have inherited a large arsenal of abandoned military equipment.  The biggest fear here in the West is 100% accounting of chemical weapons and of course nukes.

After signing CFE in 1987 USSR withdrew huge numbers of APC/IFVs to Ural and that's why on the eve of the USSR collapse there wasn't many of them left with Ukraine.
But as there was Kharkov tank factory in Ukraine a number of tank conservation areas remained in Ukraine. But they didn't really take any care of them for the last 23 years so the rule of thumb that only around 1% of these conserved tanks could be pressed to service within a 2 weeks time by cannibilizing other vehicles. Then they will need alot of spare parts like engines, radios, transmission, optics, etc to get other ready.
AFAIK Russia took all nuklear, biological and chemical weapons from all the former republics.


Last edited by Dima on Sat Aug 23, 2014 7:23 am; edited 1 time in total

#406: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 7:22 am
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
DJ,
I don't think Ukraine took very good care of it at all.
Look at this link here. There must be 100's of rusting russian tanks in this tank graveyard in the Ukraine:
tank graveyard

Actually that's a good example of tank conservation area that was not cared of.
Although Kharkov was producing only T-64 tanks, this conservation area has a number of T-72B (photo 6) as well that was left there since USSR.

#407: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:59 pm
    —
Poor beggar
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/08/22/us-army-veteran-west-point-grad-killed-fighting-for-ukraine/

#408: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:17 pm
    —
US Nationals (or former in his case now that he became a citizen of Ukr) entering skirmishes around the world. We see them in Iraq, we see them in Israel (dual citizenship there) we saw them before in the Croat-Serb war, Have seen in Syria. On all sides of the moral compass, whichever side you are looking at it from.

It has been going on for decades, even over a century with US merc's. That's what they are. Government armies or soldiers for hire. They (mostly) expect to be able to return to the US after fighting for some cause.

Is it right? Can the ones leaving to fight for IS be condemned any more than the ones leaving to fight for causes many see no problems with, like Ukraine and Israel, though one is evil?

Point is it will be tough drafting US laws stopping those draftees of IS recruits from leaving/stopping when those same said others are welcomed back and cheered over their sacrifices like that story Dima posted.

#409: Re: The Ukraine Author: pvt_GruntLocation: Melbourne, Australia PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:13 pm
    —
I see the white truck convoy has crossed the border now, this is a clever political move by Russia to provoke Ukraine into calling it an invasion.
I hope the people who need the food/water/supplies get it, I am sure we'll see some footage.

#410: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 4:57 am
    —
Thanks for the heads up Grunt. I see news feeds, of all sorts of "sources" coming out from both sides and a few videos who knows how correct they are. Have you seen any of the convoy moving yet over the border? I haven't.

Obama has condemned it made another of his empty threats, that got stale when he has a tissy years ago.. I don't see why kerry is not headed there. He'll keep his high ranking people far away from there. Knows he has no pull, but read on Arutz Sheva that Kerry is about to stick his nose back into the Israeli-Hamas negotiations, even tho neither Abbas, or Netanyahu, even Egypt want him there! Trying to look important somewhere, while the east burns.

Ukraine convoy

#411: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 7:42 am
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Thanks for the heads up Grunt. I see news feeds, of all sorts of "sources" coming out from both sides and a few videos who knows how correct they are. Have you seen any of the convoy moving yet over the border? I haven't.

Yes, the convoy reached Lugansk by 17:30 local time yesterday
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0oQVz1L8Oc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spjnWRiCmEE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_U2eyJY8TU

#412: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:54 am
    —
First trucks have actually returned back to the RF territory.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHSHC6G7zk8

#413: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 12:03 pm
    —
Ok, all 260 trucks are back to Russia by now.

#414: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 6:09 pm
    —
According to the official Ukranian statistics (Center of freeing POWs https://www.facebook.com/CentrZvilnennya?ref=bookmarks%FF) there are 250 missed and captured Ukranian soldiers in Donbas by now:
http://artofwar.ru/z/zhirohow_m_a/text_0220.shtml

and that indirectly proves that official casualty rate is greatly diminished.

And this statistics doesn't include missed and captured of territorial battalions (national activists) that mainly belong to MVD (home affairs) or SBU (security agency).

#415: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 6:13 pm
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Thanks for the heads up Grunt. I see news feeds, of all sorts of "sources" coming out from both sides and a few videos who knows how correct they are. Have you seen any of the convoy moving yet over the border? I haven't.

Obama has condemned it made another of his empty threats, that got stale when he has a tissy years ago.. I don't see why kerry is not headed there. He'll keep his high ranking people far away from there. Knows he has no pull, but read on Arutz Sheva that Kerry is about to stick his nose back into the Israeli-Hamas negotiations, even tho neither Abbas, or Netanyahu, even Egypt want him there! Trying to look important somewhere, while the east burns.

Ukraine convoy


Everything always has to be a Partisan issue with you John.  You can't survive a single day without having to turn every issue into something Partisan...and then what a surprise you cite a Conservative media website for news article.  

Let's hear about those "empty threats" John.  So what are you trying to say...we should bomb Dima and the rest of Russia?  What specifically do you think USA should do to stop Putin?  I love how you Partisans always like to complain 24 x 7 in the Conservative media, yet offer no actual alternatives.  All this talk about Israel-Gaza is a bunch of bullshit too.  All talk no solutions.  There is no peace in Israel until they have a real legitimate solution to make a fair deal with the Palestinians...and that will never happen with Netanyahu in power because he doesn't want to.  The last time an Israeli PM attempted a real lasting peace deal he was murdered by right-wing extremists in his own country.

#416: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 6:21 pm
    —
Quote:
So what are you trying to say...we should bomb Dima and the rest of Russia?

noone will bomb Russia until he has a working Missile Defence Wink.

#417: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:24 pm
    —
Quote:
All talk no solutions.  There is no peace in Israel until they have a real legitimate solution to make a fair deal with the Palestinians...and that will never happen with Netanyahu in power because he doesn't want to.


Possibly because one side (the conservative in Israel) understands that the Palestinians want ALL of Israel for the future Palestine and not just part of it? I guess you do not pay attention to Palestinian maps, where ALL of Israel (currently) is made up of the future Palestinian land.. PLO media makes fun of Israeli's.. cartoons mock them and it's indoctrinated into children from an early age? School books? Many from UN agencies even?

Look no further than the last land giveaway (Gaza) to the PLO and see what lies ahead DJ. Netanyahu is no fool, however he realizes that Abbas  and Obama are. 2 more years and 1 is out of his hair after 6 years of giving him lice.



Quote:
noone will bomb Russia until he has a working Missile Defence Wink.


Very well put Dima. Nobody messes with a super power that is armed to the teeth without having a counter measure in place. It's why they build defensive measures, NOT tear them down. Correct?

Edit:

I tell you how far US credibility has fallen in the middle east..

The US was thrown out of the Israeli-Hamas-PL-Egyptian negotiations the last round and Putin was invited in...

Russia is the newest invitee, along with the Saudis, Israel, UAE and Egypt in a burgeoning, in the  making power from the middle East. We'll have to see how it plays out, with the Arabs/Israeli having to keep everything under the table of course diplomatically, but the hellfire missile holdup (temporarily) seemed to stick in the craw of the Israeli's, even though they were finally released.

The US is making a big mistake playing with Israel these last half dozen years. They have already lost Egypt and the Saudi's and can't afford to lose Israel.

#418: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:07 pm
    —
Quote:
Very well put Dima. Nobody messes with a super power that is armed to the teeth without having a counter measure in place. It's why they build defensive measures, NOT tear them down. Correct?

well, you most likely don't know but even in 90s when everything was collapsing here, the only article of budget that wasn't sequestered was like we call them RVSN (you can google). Actually they were puting (Put-In?!) more and more money in it and we have developed some new rocket systems that time with unpredictable trajectory.
And now they all are working to make it more advanced to deal with any possible Missile Defence System in the following 10-20 years. They are not that accurate as the US ones, but way faster, having unpredicatble ballistic trajectory and more powerful overal.

#419: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:30 am
    —
Thanks Dima, wasn't aware. Even allies never fully trust each other, much less adversaries.

Oldies here remember the days of people building fallout shelters in their back yard out of cement blocks. My dad built one, though in Florida it couldn't be very deep. There were drills during school some times at the height of the cold war of the 60's. Having a protective shield is a good idea, not only vs a possible opponent in a super power case, but in current times a rogue state which is my beef.

Possibly if relations can ever be repaired between the US-USSR a joint shield can be built. Feelings there are as always.. Europe is still a 20 headed monster going in 20 different directions. How to get anything accomplished anyplace without offending another over without starting a petty squabble.

#420: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:50 pm
    —
Found this interesting in today's news:



Ukraine Marks Independence Day

Also this bit inside the story... Does anyone abide by the Geneva convention any longer?



Quote:
The BBC also reported that separatists in the rebel stronghold of Donetsk had planned to hold their own parade that would showcase destroyed Ukrainian armored personnel carriers and captured Ukraine soldiers. However, it could not be immediately confirmed that such an event had taken place.


The article is one sided, as is everything coming out of that area, just shows another fuse the current government is trying(?) to light on a keg of gunpowder the continent of Europe has been sitting on top of over the last 25 years. This needs to get calmed down, not heated up further. Merkel.. IMO is the one who should have taken charge long ago in the situation developing.

#421: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 8:14 pm
    —
Looks like the parade did take place.

POWS http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a87_1408887989

Equipment http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=616_1408888475

#422: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 8:21 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Looks like the parade did take place.
POWS http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a87_1408887989
Equipment http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=616_1408888475

they promised 1000 POWs but paraded only around 50 Sad

#423: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 8:25 pm
    —
Quote:
Also this bit inside the story... Does anyone abide by the Geneva convention any longer?

refer to Geneve Convention circa 1949 part I article 3 for this conflict.
Yes, the Ukranian army doesn't follow it unfortunately:
http://uploads.so/i/sqkfegyvpsvog.jpg
http://infokava.com/uploads/posts/2014-07/thumbs/1406140414_plennyy-dnrovec.jpg
http://cs614730.vk.me/v614730186/197b9/rUxjJTHd02M.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gDfOxaEzt8

#424: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 8:36 pm
    —
There is a difference between soldiers taking their own trophy photos and an event planned and organized on a large scale intended for the media. I am not saying anyone is innocent either.

#425: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 8:42 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
There is a difference between soldiers taking their own trophy photos and an event planned and organized on a large scale intended for the media. I am not saying anyone is innocent either.

well, you need to check how it all started, in April-May all the Ukranian POWs were let go to families (even pilots of downed jets and helis). Now they don't do that any more. Can't judge them.

#426: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:25 pm
    —
Quote:
There is a difference between soldiers taking their own trophy photos and an event planned and organized on a large scale intended for the media. I am not saying anyone is innocent either.


My point.

There is nobody currently in the world to slap Putin's wrist, or able to tell him to stop in the world that he respects. The separatists are going to do what they are going to do and the Ukrainian government is going to do what it thinks it has to do.

If Europe has any plans of keeping the other former East block countries they allowed in the Zone, Latvia, Estonia. Then there is Poland. Lithuania just close by.

2y with a free reign is a long time. Will the Euros come up with someone to talk like a leader amongst them with Putin? Will 1 (or more) of the breakaway former countries be sacrificed to appease him?

It sounds hard/harsh,though think it's where everything is headed. Foment unrest, move in with forces. Has happened throughout history, only can give in for so long before has to be confronted. Putin is a strong man is my taking and wants what was "his" the former blocs. Europe isn't close to powerful enough to stop anyone. Time to start putting money in military instead of nearly all into social like have been the last several decades or there will be worse than another Chamberlain moment staring Europe in the face.

Can't blame Putin. Seems to read weakness well and he has, all around the globe.

#427: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:46 pm
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Quote:
There is a difference between soldiers taking their own trophy photos and an event planned and organized on a large scale intended for the media. I am not saying anyone is innocent either.

My point.
There is nobody currently in the world to slap Putin's wrist, or able to tell him to stop in the world that he respects. The separatists are going to do what they are going to do and the Ukrainian government is going to do what it thinks it has to do.
If Europe has any plans of keeping the other former East block countries they allowed in the Zone, Latvia, Estonia. Then there is Poland. Lithuania just close by.
2y with a free reign is a long time. Will the Euros come up with someone to talk like a leader amongst them with Putin? Will 1 (or more) of the breakaway former countries be sacrificed to appease him?
It sounds hard/harsh,though think it's where everything is headed. Foment unrest, move in with forces. Has happened throughout history, only can give in for so long before has to be confronted. Putin is a strong man is my taking and wants what was "his" the former blocs. Europe isn't close to powerful enough to stop anyone. Time to start putting money in military instead of nearly all into social like have been the last several decades or there will be worse than another Chamberlain moment staring Europe in the face.
Can't blame Putin. Seems to read weakness well and he has, all around the globe.

Don't you think you are either too scared or too brainwashed?
Did Putin invade Ukraine? The only thing he does is supporting the separatists. But in same time treat the wounded Ukranian soldiers and let them go back...
Why didn't Putin "invade" Ukraine before that Maidan shit?
But haven't the US/EU did the same in Lybia, Syria supporting the separatists? Didn't you guys support Chechna in 90s?
And don't you think you are on the eve of a new ground operation in Iraq and that will be against the enemy you can't bribe?

#428: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:51 pm
    —
Funny I just read a piece about "whataboutism" and I read Dima's post afterwards...

http://www.economist.com/node/10598774

#429: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:55 pm
    —
A summary of the crisis.

http://www.vox.com/cards/ukraine-everything-you-need-to-know/what-is-the-ukraine-crisis
 
Its informative with lots of outgoing links as refs.

#430: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:59 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Funny I just read a piece about "whataboutism" and I read Dima's post afterwards...
http://www.economist.com/node/10598774

ahha, yes looks good Smile so guess, now we can't defend but lay on the ground and admit defeat Smile.

#431: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:06 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
A summary of the crisis.

http://www.vox.com/cards/ukraine-everything-you-need-to-know/what-is-the-ukraine-crisis
 
Its informative with lots of outgoing links as refs.

Yes it's good actually, but why don't they mention that the number of the Goverment buildings were seized by the Maidan activists before April?
So why it's good for the Western Ukranians to capture the Goverment buildings and throw fire bombs at the police and bad when same happens in the East?

#432: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:07 pm
    —
The interactive live map of what is happening in Donbass (you can google translate it):
http://cassad.net/?do=warmarker

#433: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:33 pm
    —
Quote:
Don't you think you are either too scared or too brainwashed?


Any man who has been in the military and near a combat situation is a liar if they say they weren't scared at some point. Likewise, I will say am scared for future of the free world. Not necessarily from Russian aggression (not really the right word, but will suit without a long explanation). Scared due to the mess that is engulfing the middle east which leads me to...



Quote:
And don't you think you are on the eve of a new ground operation in Iraq and that will be against the enemy you can't bribe?


Russia could step into Iraq if they wanted and fight IS, nobody would stop them. I understand it's the US's fault they are there and that they pulled out that let them get started. Russia has no problems fighting in Syria do they? They also have fighters joining IS from Yes, couldn't remember names) Uzbekistan, Chechnya, Tajekistan, Turkmenistan.. Those might end up invaded by Russia (not saying a bad thing either) long before the US invades with boots on the ground any other M/E country, other than *possibly* Iraq, which wouldn't be in it's current shape if not for irresponsible policies of the current president.

I wasn't attempting to attack Putin above anyway Dima, laying out what i see happening.

Have to ask also (if u don't mind) have you ever been near a "live" area, or something that was close to it? Live zone hear wasn't an actual firefight, but was near Cuba and picking up refugees, many who were career criminals released (thrown out) of Castro's jails.. His punishment for the US taking the legit refugees. Many had somehow acquired weapons.. Knives, machetes.. It was kind of scary for a kid when your turn came around to unload them from whatever they floated over on, then checking them for weapons, vastly outnumbered.

#434: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:06 am
    —
Forgot to post this link earlier. It pertains to numerous reasons Iraq needs to be "invaded" and goes into exquisite detail (like only Caroline Gillick can) as to what the US middle east policy had degraded to, why and what exactly is occurring with it *right now*, with the Israeli/Saudi/UAE/Egyptian front.

Quote:
Effective cooperation between Israel, the Kurds and the Sunnis could contain, and perhaps defeat, Islamic State while reducing Iran’s chances of securing the strategically vital waterway.

Since the emerging partnership between Israel, Egypt and Saudi Arabia is a direct result of the Obama administration’s destruction of US strategic credibility, it is fairly clear that if properly managed, it can last until January 2017. Until then, in all likelihood, the US will be unwilling and unable to rebuild its reputation.


Quote:
At least for the duration of Obama’s presidency the interests that Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Israel share in preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons and defeating the Muslim Brotherhood/Islamic State as military and political threats can only be advanced through joint action.

The Obama administration would have forced Israel to bow to Hamas’s demands weeks ago if the Egyptians and Saudis hadn’t opposed a Hamas victory.



Caroline Glick

#435: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:44 pm
    —
Ukrainian government accused the Russians of sending a column of tanks and other AV's into SE Ukraine:

Russian armored column

In other news. The Kremlin is apparently planing a new humanitarian column into Ukraine:



Humanitarian

#436: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:50 am
    —
Lots more talk from the past two days about Russians being in the Ukraine. Are they or aren't they?

#437: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:02 pm
    —
Trojan Horse?  video showing convoy of the "humanitarian" aid...notice all the military equipment and troops

https://news.vice.com/article/russia-is-bringing-aid-to-ukraines-border-amid-trojan-horse-fears
 

Notice the POW's being marched in public reminiscent of WWII days:

https://news.vice.com/video/russian-roulette-dispatch-71

#438: Re: The Ukraine Author: Siwy89 PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:23 am
    —
Yes, there are regular military forces of Russian Federation in eastern Ukraine. New offensive towards Mariupol in south is the boldest action of these troops. Russian government is constantly lying about their presence, same old talk. UN will convey and do nothing, because Russians are gonna use their veto.

Check this interesting map

http://liveuamap.com/e/2014/27-august-state-dept-a-russiandirected-counteroffensive-likely?ll=38.907192299999984;-77.03687070000002&zoom=8

#439: Re: The Ukraine Author: TejszdLocation: Canada PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 7:38 am
    —
The proof is starting to mount with the photos, videos and satellite images coming out.

The other countries that were part of Soviet Union better start uniting as they could be next as Putin "protects" the minority Russians in them....

#440: Re: The Ukraine Author: Cathartes PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:51 pm
    —
The "secret" Russian invasion of Ukraine.

today's Washington Post, Russian prisoners and more

#441: Re: The Ukraine Author: Siwy89 PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:44 pm
    —
European countries are not united as they should be. Members of Visegrad Group (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_Group) have different approach towards Russia. Poland is most hostile, wanting for more military presence of NATO's forces in the East. Czech Republic and Slovakia dissagrees and Hungary is most pro-Russian country in Europe (energy issues, gas south pipeline). Germans and French will go for diplomatic solutions to the last minute, because of their business associations with Russia and since these two countries have the most real power in European Union, we are doomed for the time being.

#442: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:59 pm
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Have to ask also (if u don't mind) have you ever been near a "live" area, or something that was close to it? Live zone hear wasn't an actual firefight, but was near Cuba and picking up refugees, many who were career criminals released (thrown out) of Castro's jails.. His punishment for the US taking the legit refugees. Many had somehow acquired weapons.. Knives, machetes.. It was kind of scary for a kid when your turn came around to unload them from whatever they floated over on, then checking them for weapons, vastly outnumbered.

now, Iam supply officer in reserve Smile.
my grandad (passed away in 2005) was an intelligent officer aboard a Cuban fishing vessel during the Caribian crisis. His crew was the one to intercept a message from the Americans to engage the Soviet subs if they try to break the blocade. And there were a dozen of subs coming there each with at least 2 nuclear torpedos.
So they passed that intercept to an HQ of the Baltic Fleet in Kaliningrad and they stopped the subs.
He got a Red Star order for that.

#443: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 5:00 pm
    —
Don't understand what's happening these days so out of discussion.

#444: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 8:33 pm
    —
Stayed in The USNR a few years after got out of active duty also Dima, at least until they closed the Pier the Navy was using at St Petersburg (budget cuts) during the mid 80's and moved the last of the sweepers to Jacksonville. Wouldn't have stayed in the Reserves that long, but was close to home and St. Pete had a sweeper like was deployed on in active duty, my favorite ship due to small size and crew that could go out once a month (2 days), 2 weeks a year and any other time they might need us.

Your Grandad had some harrowing stories am sure of that time during the height of the Cuban crisis. Was pretty young then (early 60's). It's when Floridians were building fallout shelters, or what would pass for them, like my own dad did in our back yard. Not that it would have done any good during any kind of war that would have broken out.

#445: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 10:58 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
Don't understand what's happening these days so out of discussion.


You are finally understanding what we have known for months.

#446: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 11:24 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Dima wrote (View Post):
Don't understand what's happening these days so out of discussion.


You are finally understanding what we have known for months.

not really, you don't seem to understand whats's going on in Ukraine at all in your places.

#447: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 2:00 am
    —
What many have expected for so long is happening, the Ukraine will be split up with Russia's intervention. Russia just keeps saying, "we are not in the Ukraine." Foreign minister saying that the latest NATO images published to the media are from computer games. Putin says he has a duty to protect ethic Russians not living in Russia, at the same time he says he is not supporting the separatists in the Ukraine. The end game here is looking more and more like Russia will carve up the Ukraine, and western Ukraine will partner with NATO for protection.

#448: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 2:36 am
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
What many have expected for so long is happening, the Ukraine will be split up with Russia's intervention. Russia just keeps saying, "we are not in the Ukraine." Foreign minister saying that the latest NATO images published to the media are from computer games. Putin says he has a duty to protect ethic Russians not living in Russia, at the same time he says he is not supporting the separatists in the Ukraine. The end game here is looking more and more like Russia will carve up the Ukraine, and western Ukraine will partner with NATO for protection.

Russian intervention? OSCE and UN mission on the Ukranian border can't confirm that.
I don't know if the pictures are from game or not, but that they are not atributed - that's a fact. Where exactly were they taken? Why no coordinates or anything we can take as a frame of reference. Quite the the same as with MH17.
Russia doesn't need any part of Ukraine for now as it's too expensive. Maybe next financial year Wink.

pay more attention to Syria and Iraq plz, I don't want those facoz coming to us. Why everything you touch becomes like that?

#449: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:05 am
    —
I have to wonder what constitutes evidence for anyone still believing Russia is not supporting or has troops in the Ukraine. Even the rebel commanders are saying Russian troops are fighting with him, but they are on "leave" haha... I guess you're not a soldier when on leave. Other Russian soldiers caught in the Ukraine were lost apparently.

Ok so everything the USA touches turns into Iraq or Libya... yeah I seen that on RT News also. If we want to play that game again I suppose whatever Russia touches turns into Afghanistan, Chechnya or Georgia? Bring on the mass artillery bombardment to level towns and cities...

#450: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:28 am
    —
There really is no sense in denying the Russian intervention in Ukraine any long Dima, it's just going to become more obvious as time passes. Let it go please, am asking as someone who isn't looking to pick any argument with you over it.

Is there a reason for it? That's for the 2 sides and maybe the Russians to decide as well, but they are there. Too much has come out now.

#451: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 10:28 am
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
I have to wonder what constitutes evidence for anyone still believing Russia is not supporting or has troops in the Ukraine. Even the rebel commanders are saying Russian troops are fighting with him, but they are on "leave" haha... I guess you're not a soldier when on leave. Other Russian soldiers caught in the Ukraine were lost apparently.

:)

Quote:
Ok so everything the USA touches turns into Iraq or Libya... yeah I seen that on RT News also. If we want to play that game again I suppose whatever Russia touches turns into Afghanistan, Chechnya or Georgia? Bring on the mass artillery bombardment to level towns and cities...

ahha! let's play Smile

1.USSR was in A-stan to fight with the islamic fundamentalists who were taking power in surrounding areas. US and NATO was supporting the islamic fundamentalists in their fight against USSR training and supplying them the most modern weapons. So obviously you guys invested alot of money and time to make A-stan as it is now.

2.Chechna - yes, agree that's what we did to Grozny:


be my guest and compare these photos to Bagdad or Kabul ;)

3.Georgia - yes they the Georgians with a help of their US advisors used MLRS and heavy artillery to level towns, fortunately they didn't have enough time to do that with passion Smile.

#452: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:10 am
    —
Ok, talked to a friend:

1) We have troops there, but they are fired from army on paper and go there as volunteers (that's why passports instead of dog tags).
2) We don't want Donbas to be part of Russia.
3) We want Donbas to stay in Ukraine.
4) We will send as much troops as needed to assure Kiev they can't win this war.
5) Soon it all will be over.

#453: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 1:05 pm
    —
The commander of Azov battalion after breaking through Ilovaisk encircelement:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV0kwVHVKpY

1. That's not counter-insurgency - that's a real war.
2. We went into a mouse trap without any shot.
3. Don't think the enemy is same imbecillus as we are.

Nice shoulder patch he has, eh?
Tip: 2.SS-PzD Wink.

#454: Re: The Ukraine Author: Cathartes PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 1:51 pm
    —
You have to wonder what is Putin's ultimate strategy: regime change in Kiev, buffer around the Crimea, or complete annexation of the Ukraine (with complimentary democratic referendum where everyone votes to be a part of Russia)?  At any rate, the Russian-invasion-denial is the same pattern that occurred in the Crimea earlier. After a few weeks, Russia will stop denying its troops are there.

#455: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:17 pm
    —
Yes I know Russia helped rebuild those cities after they completely destroyed them (except in Afghanistan). Kabul or Baghdad would look the same pre and post invasion. Neither city looked anything like this...

But these are besides the point. My point was nobody can win the what-a-about game.



groz.jpg
 Description:
Grozny after Russian bombardments.
 Filesize:  48.61 KB
 Viewed:  363 Time(s)

groz.jpg



#456: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:18 pm
    —
Cathartes wrote (View Post):
You have to wonder what is Putin's ultimate strategy: regime change in Kiev, buffer around the Crimea, or complete annexation of the Ukraine (with complimentary democratic referendum where everyone votes to be a part of Russia)?

that obviously shows you guys have no clue what is going on in Ukraine:

1. We don't want a regime change as Poroshenko beeing a good friend of Putin and having most candy business with Russia is much better for Russia than Yanukovich for instance who wanted too much money.
2. We don't want Ukraine to be in Russia as it is far beyound our financial capabilities.
3. The EU doesn't want Ukraine as it is a buncrupt and has pretty same amount of population as Greece, Portugal, Ireland and Spain altogether.
4. The main threat is the Ukranian oligarchs like Kolomoiskiy or Timoshenko who can start a new revolution this fall.
  

#457: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:23 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Yes I know Russia helped rebuild those cities after they completely destroyed them (except in Afghanistan). Kabul or Baghdad would look the same pre and post invasion. Neither city looked anything like this...
But these are besides the point. My point was nobody can win the what-a-about game.

War never changes - nice photo of a city after almost 10 years of war and months of close quarter fighting.
Thing is that we won the 2nd Chechen war 13 years ago, pretty same time as NATO won A-stan and Iraq. Now compare Kabul or Bagdad to Grozny. And compare the situations in A-stan, Iraq and Chechna.
So my question remains - why everything you guy touch starts to be worse than it was before you?

And yes, what city did we destroy in A-stan or Georgia?

#458: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:37 pm
    —
I brought this point up only because Putin is saying the shelling in the Ukraine is similar to that of WW2. Afghanistan... I have read a  lot of history on the conflicts there and it seemed to be a widely known fact that towns were shelled before entry by Russian ground troops. How far back do we go with this what-a-about game? WW2? I am pretty sure there were some countries better off afterwards and still today...

#459: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:00 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
I brought this point up only because Putin is saying the shelling in the Ukraine is similar to that of WW2. Afghanistan... I have read a  lot of history on the conflicts there and it seemed to be a widely known fact that towns were shelled before entry by Russian ground troops. How far back do we go with this what-a-about game? WW2? I am pretty sure there were some countries better off afterwards and still today...

you know Mooxe, the one who doesn't remember his past is doomed to repeat same mistakes over again...USSR invested alot of money in A-stan and built many thousands km of roads, hundreds of schools, several hydro stations and factories.

did NATO assault Kabul or Bagdad?
I recall there was an assault of Fallujah

does it look ok for you?

choose any other city that was assaulted by NATO troops and I will find pictures if that's too hard for you Wink.

You would not like to go back to WW2 as you guys are the only ones besides Germans who were leveling cities with alot of population with bombers. And the yanks are the only one in history by now who used A-bombs against the populated cities.

#460: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:18 pm
    —
Ok so back to the main point... Nobody can win the what-a-about game because nobody is innocent, including Russia.

#461: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:22 pm
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
Ok so back to the main point... Nobody can win the what-a-about game because nobody is innocent, including Russia.

I've already said several posts above that I was wrong thinking we wouldn't send troops there.
So despite a flow of lies coming from Ukraine and West Russia is not innocent for sure.

#462: Re: The Ukraine Author: Siwy89 PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 10:16 pm
    —
It is wrong to assume that one country is more moral and ethical than other. This is politics, fight for influence and no one is blameless. We all (Americans, Russians, citizens of UE, etc.) should remember that following propaganda lies is very dangerous to us, normal people.

#463: Re: The Ukraine Author: Schmal_Turm PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:38 pm
    —
Siwy, I agree wholeheartedly. As a US citizen I always look with suspicion at any actions this country takes or has taken in the past. I was surprised to find out the the federal government back in the early part of the 1900s sent bombers to blast strikers out of the Appalachian Mountains because the owners of the mines wanted it done. Money talks very loudly, and usually gets its way.

#464: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:41 pm
    —
Quote:
You would not like to go back to WW2 as you guys are the only ones besides Germans who were leveling cities with alot of population with bombers.


Don't go there. The Russians would have (more than likely) had the the technologically advanced bombers. The western allies denied sending them B-17/B-24 and later on, B-29's on purpose.

Only B-25 and B-26's were sent on the lend lease, or what later became "freebie" plan to Russia as far as support aircraft and the USSR preferred the P-39 Aircobra anyway.

Marshal had feelings the 4 engine, long range technology would end up bad in Russian hands during the early 40's and all long range technology was kicked from delivery, even though the Russians continually pressed for it.

#465: Re: The Ukraine Author: Pzt_KamiLocation: IRAN PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:51 am
    —
@johnsilver
Off topic question ! as far as I know Soviets had heavy bombers ,didn't? Tupolev SB , Il-4 , TB-3 and russian heavy bomber Pe-8 are all Russian bomber- heavy bombers that I can recall

#466: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 7:25 pm
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):

Don't go there. The Russians would have (more than likely) had the the technologically advanced bombers. The western allies denied sending them B-17/B-24 and later on, B-29's on purpose.

The USSR has copied B-29 in 1947.

Quote:
Only B-25 and B-26's were sent on the lend lease, or what later became "freebie" plan to Russia as far as support aircraft and the USSR preferred the P-39 Aircobra anyway.

B-25 and A-20, no B-26 was there.

#467: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 7:26 pm
    —
Pro-Russian forces have said they are fighting against Ukrainian nationalists and "fascists" in the conflict, and in the case of Azov and other battalions, these claims are essentially true.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2014/08/30/preparing_for_war_with_ukraine_s_fascist_defenders_of_freedom

#468: Re: The Ukraine Author: TejszdLocation: Canada PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:33 pm
    —
Not sure when nationalist became a bad thing.

The pro-Russian forces you could say are separatists which usually is considered a bad thing.

The issue, at least to me, is the direct external use of military forces of one country in another. The Russian government to me has no credibility as they denied everything in the Crimea, but later admitted it was their troops, and are saying the same bull about being in the Ukraine. The troops are on leave or left the Russian military but can take artillery/vehicles/weapons???

I have only posted a couple times in this thread as politics can drive people apart when we are all here from all over the world because of CC and hopefully bridging gaps. But it is scary that with all this contact and international sources of news how views seem somewhat predetermined by where you are born....

#469: Re: The Ukraine Author: TrogerLocation: L4W's place, Australia PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:45 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
Pro-Russian forces have said they are fighting against Ukrainian nationalists and "fascists" in the conflict, and in the case of Azov and other battalions, these claims are essentially true.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2014/08/30/preparing_for_war_with_ukraine_s_fascist_defenders_of_freedom  


And?  So what? Are you pointing to the existence of a small Ukrainian nationalist paramilitary unit as justification for Russian aggression? lol.

Dima, this is a waste of keystrokes, but I'll point it out anyways:  a majority of Russians (including probably you) have political leanings that are considered either extremely nationalist, imperialist, communist, or fascist (not to mention there are plenty of neo-Nazis).  You should be more worried about fixing your own backwards, ignorant population.

#470: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:51 am
    —
Quote:
The USSR has copied B-29 in 1947.

Quote:  <Select>
Only B-25 and B-26's were sent on the lend lease, or what later became "freebie" plan to Russia as far as support aircraft and the USSR preferred the P-39 Aircobra anyway.

B-25 and A-20, no B-26 was there.


Correct Dima.

The USSR had made copies of the B-29, albeit after the war, not during it while they were seeking improved (reliable) heavy bomber technology, like the B-17 and B-24 that was currently in use by the western allies with heavy payloads, armament and good speed for that period of time. Those being the only 2 currently in production in the world at that time which offered all *3* in one package.

The B-29 was another leapfrog ahead in technology over the B-17/24 with pressurized compartments, larger payloads, speeds and above all? A HUGE uptick in range.

Yes, I mentioned the B-25/B-26 and Invader, more or less Glorified B-26 as being shipped to Russia. Those were medium range bombers, not long range heavy bombers and not seen as capable of leveling.. Say a city, or laying waste to an area. More of use as a tactical weapon, or turned into Gunships (later on B-25G example, A-20 Invader) and the B-26 was a bear to fly anyway. The main flight school was located in Tampa (near to where I live) Pilots took off from McDill, over Tampa Bay, so they would "crash" soft over the bay and have a better chance of survival there.

The saying then was "one a day in the bay" High take off and landing speed made them very dangerous, nearly as much to their own crews as the enemy, never popular with the US, though think the Russians liked them have read? Same with the P-39 Air cobra's.

Know about the B-26's, my dad, during the war took Bomber gunnery school here at Tampa before deploying overseas during '43. He would tell me stories of the crashes. They also still dive on wrecks out there (the bay) of old Marauders.

#471: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 1:08 am
    —
Pzt_Kami wrote (View Post):
@johnsilver
Off topic question ! as far as I know Soviets had heavy bombers ,didn't? Tupolev SB , Il-4 , TB-3 and russian heavy bomber Pe-8 are all Russian bomber- heavy bombers that I can recall


Lack of armament (Pe8) TB-3 was an antiquated, post WW1 design. IL-4 could have possibly worked as a night bomber. Lack of defensive armament, speed and Russia was putting more production into attack bomber, other areas anyway.

Heavy/strategic bombing was just not an area Stalin saw as an area he felt there was anything currently in production, or close to it at "home" that was suitable, though the IL-4 was probably the best of the lot until '47

#472: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:26 am
    —
The regime has repeatedly carried out artillery and air attacks on city centers, creating a humanitarian catastrophe—which is all but ignored by the US political-media establishment.
http://www.thenation.com/article/180466/silence-american-hawks-about-kievs-atrocities#
 
Ukraine crisis: the neo-Nazi brigade fighting pro-Russian separatists
Kiev throws paramilitaries – some openly neo-Nazi - into the front of the battle with rebels

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/11025137/Ukraine-crisis-the-neo-Nazi-brigade-fighting-pro-Russian-separatists.html
 
Ukraine: This Time, West Sides With Nazis
http://www.globalresearch.ca/ukraine-this-time-west-sides-with-nazis/5395916

#473: Re: The Ukraine Author: TrogerLocation: L4W's place, Australia PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 8:39 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):

Ukraine crisis: the neo-Nazi brigade fighting pro-Russian separatists
Kiev throws paramilitaries – some openly neo-Nazi - into the front of the battle with rebels

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/11025137/Ukraine-crisis-the-neo-Nazi-brigade-fighting-pro-Russian-separatists.html


"Interestingly, many of the men in the (Azov) battalion are Russians from eastern Ukraine who wear masks because they fear their relatives in rebel-controlled areas could be persecuted if their identities are revealed."

Did you read the article you linked to?  That's in the link you provided above.  Most of the guys in Azov, Dneiper, and Donbass battalions are ethnic Russians--says a lot, doesn't it?

Also, no one in the west thinks Ukrainian nationalism is a threat.  Only you Russians hate it because it means the end of your interference in the Ukraine.

#474: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 9:21 am
    —
Troger wrote (View Post):

"Interestingly, many of the men in the (Azov) battalion are Russians from eastern Ukraine who wear masks because they fear their relatives in rebel-controlled areas could be persecuted if their identities are revealed."

Did you read the article you linked to?  That's in the link you provided above.  Most of the guys in Azov, Dneiper, and Donbass battalions are ethnic Russians--says a lot, doesn't it?

Don't you think that many is not equal to most?

Quote:
Also, no one in the west thinks Ukrainian nationalism is a threat.

I even recall that no one in the West was thinking that the German nationalism was a threat in late 30s.
but seems that the most in the East Ukraine is thinking differently.

and you probably know that same Ukranian nationalists that were fighting the riot police in Kiev half a year ago were fighting against the Russian army in Chechna 15-20 years ago.

Quote:
Only you Russians hate it because it means the end of your interference in the Ukraine.

LOL.

#475: Re: The Ukraine Author: TrogerLocation: L4W's place, Australia PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 10:07 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):

I even recall that no one in the West was thinking that the German nationalism was a threat in late 30s.
but seems that the most in the East Ukraine is thinking differently.


Russian imperialism/nationalism/facism/communism (whatever you guys call your little hybrid you got going) and the Chinese are the two biggest threats to this world.  Ukrainian nationalism and German WW2 National Socialists are not analogous groupings.  So no, Ukrainian nationalism isn't a threat, it's actually great, what's not to love about a group of people who are attempting to rid themselves of shitty Russian ways of governance?

Dima wrote (View Post):
and you probably know that same Ukranian nationalists that were fighting the riot police in Kiev half a year ago were fighting against the Russian army in Chechna 15-20 years ago.


Yeah, I know about them.  An miniscule number (~150) of Ukrainians fought against Russia in Chechnya--and that unit was commanded by an ethnic Russian, lol.  Is a 150-man squad that significant to you?  What about the majority (i.e., millions) of your Russian tovarishi who are ignorant stooges, are they significant problem to you? They are a huge problem for us in the west.

#476: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 1:19 pm
    —
Troger wrote (View Post):
Russian imperialism/nationalism/facism/communism (whatever you guys call your little hybrid you got going) and the Chinese are the two biggest threats to this world.

agree about China and that's why we have always more troops next to a Chinese border than in the west part.
but your officials seem to not agree with you:
Islamic State threat 'beyond anything we've seen': Pentagon  
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/21/us-usa-islamicstate-idUSKBN0GL24V20140821
 
Quote:
Ukrainian nationalism and German WW2 National Socialists are not analogous groupings.
 
The Ukrainian nationalism of the 19th and early 20th centuries had been largely liberal or socialist,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organization_of_Ukrainian_Nationalists

Quote:
So no, Ukrainian nationalism isn't a threat, it's actually great, what's not to love about a group of people who are attempting to rid themselves of shitty Russian ways of governance?

haha, probably that's why 3,5mlns of Ukranians work in the RF (3mln of them illegally according to the Ukranian social minister S.Tigibko) which is approximately 40% of a total workpower of Ukraine (according to the forbes.ua).
and btw, most of them are from the western areas of Ukraine Wink.

Quote:
Yeah, I know about them.  An miniscule number (~150) of Ukrainians fought against Russia in Chechnya--and that unit was commanded by an ethnic Russian, lol. Is a 150-man squad that significant to you?

which after returned from Chechna in late 90s formed the neo-Nazi groups around them which were the main muscels during the riots in Kiev.
January 2014 - capturing a goverment building in Lvov:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oPNIM_z_Gc
January 2014 - capturing a goverment building in Zhitomir:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOVuXEwPaM8
February 2014 - fighting police in Kiev with fire bombs:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEmHR4XTT6E
February 2014 - talking to a prosecutor of Rovensk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1NFNFkKuWc
August 2014 - telling how they torture POWs with needles and pliers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwpBCwl60js#t=46

Quote:
What about the majority (i.e., millions) of your Russian tovarishi who are ignorant stooges, are they significant problem to you? They are a huge problem for us in the west.

sux to be you as you have so many problems you can't solve Wink

#477: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 6:03 pm
    —
Schmal_Turm wrote (View Post):
Siwy, I agree wholeheartedly. As a US citizen I always look with suspicion at any actions this country takes or has taken in the past. I was surprised to find out the the federal government back in the early part of the 1900s sent bombers to blast strikers out of the Appalachian Mountains because the owners of the mines wanted it done. Money talks very loudly, and usually gets its way.


Money always gets it way at least in terms of general trade or government policy.  "Citizens United" Supreme Court decision paved the way for unlimited secret political donations including from overseas.  Net neutrality days are numbered...along with anything else the big $ interests want.  There is a long list of lies, deceit, misinformation and manipulation by governments and yes it is usually due to financial interests not partisan interests.

They don't need to bomb workers or unions any more because most of the jobs have been moved to Commie China & third world slave labor sweatshops. Even though unions are labeled as Commies, Corporations eagerly spend many billions to prop-up Communist regimes...in the greatest transfer of wealth in history.  So much for the threat of Communism when we are financing China and Vietnam for cheap slave labor.


Last edited by dj on Tue Sep 02, 2014 6:11 pm; edited 2 times in total

#478: Re: The Ukraine Author: TrogerLocation: L4W's place, Australia PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 6:04 pm
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
Troger wrote (View Post):
Russian imperialism/nationalism/facism/communism (whatever you guys call your little hybrid you got going) and the Chinese are the two biggest threats to this world.

agree about China and that's why we have always more troops next to a Chinese border than in the west part.
but your officials seem to not agree with you:
Islamic State threat 'beyond anything we've seen': Pentagon  
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/21/us-usa-islamicstate-idUSKBN0GL24V20140821  


Ah yes, there is also that threat. That's actually probably the biggest threat to all of us.  

Dima wrote (View Post):
Quote:
Ukrainian nationalism and German WW2 National Socialists are not analogous groupings.
 
The Ukrainian nationalism of the 19th and early 20th centuries had been largely liberal or socialist,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organization_of_Ukrainian_Nationalists  


First, OUN doesn't exist anymore.  Second, they weren't socialist--they condemned German national socialism--and they weren't even really a politically-active group (they existed during the times of German and Russian occupation).  

Most Ukrainians would probably be classified as nationalists in some form.  Again, you, as a Russian, don't like Ukrainian nationalism because it sometimes means anti-Russian (especially now).  You should figure out why Ukrainians (and Poles, Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians, Georgians, and every neighbor you have that isn't in the Kremlin's pockets) dislike Russians so much, why they would bother going to Chechnya simply to kill Russians, and why ethnic Russians living in Ukraine would fight for Ukraine.

Dima wrote (View Post):
Quote:
So no, Ukrainian nationalism isn't a threat, it's actually great, what's not to love about a group of people who are attempting to rid themselves of shitty Russian ways of governance?

haha, probably that's why 3,5mlns of Ukranians work in the RF (3mln of them illegally according to the Ukranian social minister S.Tigibko) which is approximately 40% of a total workpower of Ukraine (according to the forbes.ua).
and btw, most of them are from the western areas of Ukraine Wink.


Got to work to make money to feed your yourself and your family, and Russia is the only place to go for those people.

Ukraine's politics have basically been the same as Russia, mass corruption and power in the possession of a few business elite--so, once you solve that governance problem (which is what the protests were about), Ukrainians won't need to leave their country to go find work in the monster that is the great communist paradise to the east! (of course, it's impossible now with the visa restrictions)

Dima wrote (View Post):
Quote:
Yeah, I know about them.  An miniscule number (~150) of Ukrainians fought against Russia in Chechnya--and that unit was commanded by an ethnic Russian, lol. Is a 150-man squad that significant to you?

which after returned from Chechna in late 90s formed the neo-Nazi groups around them which were the main muscels during the riots in Kiev.


Some of the more fervent nationalists (not necessarily neo-Nazi) were definitely the muscle in the protests.  Someone has to lead.

There are neo-Nazis in the Ukraine but you probably have just as many neo-Nazis in Russia per capita, and what about all the neo-Bolsheviks and neo-imperialists you have?  Don't those people worry you?  Again, you should worry about your own backwards people.

Dima wrote (View Post):
Quote:
What about the majority (i.e., millions) of your Russian tovarishi who are ignorant stooges, are they significant problem to you? They are a huge problem for us in the west.

sux to be you as you have so many problems you can't solve Wink


There are solutions to all problems.

#479: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 8:37 pm
    —
Just for you who is really interested to see the problem from the other side of this conflict - a population of the South East of Ukraine (English subtitels, warning 18+ content)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ozdz7fMdXI#t=920

#480: Re: The Ukraine Author: Siwy89 PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 11:44 pm
    —
Both sides showed cruelty, this is war. Men from "right sector" batalions believs that Ukrainian Uprising Army (rebels from II WW) were great heroes, but in fact, they were murderers. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacres_of_Poles_in_Volhynia_and_Eastern_Galicia  ) I presume that not many amongs you know that part of second world war. I'm not suprised fighters from nationalist batalions are bringing cruelty to people of Donbas.

On the other hand, excavation of mass graves in Sloviansk ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBsEkF_GY0E&index=63&list=PLw613M86o5o5zqF6WJR8zuC7Uwyv76h7R  ) and other known deeds are not making any better for separatists.

There is a third group in this confict- Civilians. People who are innocents, don't understand this conflict and are fed up with this whole war, as usual it is convenient for many to ignore civilian's struggle for survival. I feel for them and what is happening is horrible, so much tragic. Nobody deserves such fate.

War, war never changes.

#481: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 10:36 pm
    —
Quote:
They don't need to bomb workers or unions any more because most of the jobs have been moved to Commie China & third world slave labor sweatshops


Where are you getting this all from? Unions are disapearing on their own from within, own mismanagement and greed from over the years so they exploit politicians and attempt to force politicians to force NEW members into the fold forcefully, without any will at all into.

Some have been able to sue their way out (home health care workers in Wisconsin), other states (Michigan) turned to Right To Work in order to get away from unions and their cronies. Auto factories have been heading South for decades, being a major factor in why Detroit is a ghost town.

Unions played a good part, decades back, fought for many good things, Coal being one. Abolishing company money and stores, but there time has passed and it was gone 50 years ago.

#482: Re: The Ukraine Author: pvt_GruntLocation: Melbourne, Australia PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 11:16 am
    —
A ceasefire is called today - http://rt.com/news/184716-poroshenko-ceasefire-ukraine-putin/
Funny thing is Putin's name is put on the ceasefire in some reports, but according to Russian news he's NOT a combatant. It's an "internal conflict" - nothing to do with Russia. Good old Vlad's just being a helpful international peacemaker!

He probably took his shirt off and shot a bear in between meetings! http://washingtonexaminer.com/15-ways-the-internet-is-reacting-to-vladimir-putin-after-deal-with-obama/article/2535998#!
 
In any case, it's good news for the civilians. Bad news for Ukraine President Poroshenko as the ceasefire comes only after their latest retreat.

Ceasefires tend to lock in the borders - like Korea and Sinai - so it looks like Eastern Ukraine will gain some independence.

This might not be a bad thing long term. After all if it's full of people who want to be part of Russia it's going to be difficult to keep.

Like Africa and middle east, some borders are drawn plain wrong. They dont suit the people, just the colonial masters who divided them up - like Kurd's part of Iraq.

#483: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 1:44 pm
    —
Quote:
Like Africa and middle east, some borders are drawn plain wrong. They dont suit the people, just the colonial masters who divided them up - like Kurd's part of Iraq.


Well.. Those same people who saw fit to draw up maps of the the Middle East, Africa, the Far East and so many areas of the world have fought over the same turf in Europe they drew up and has switched hands multiple times over the last 150 years when they couldn't come to an agreement (still) because an area had/has an area that spoke/speaks the same language of a particular country that thought they should control it instead of another.

#484: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:18 pm
    —
This interesting interview and story today came out:

Quote:
More and more people within Russia, even at the top, are beginning to think that he's slightly mad, that he is not conducting an intelligent effective policy, but is weakening and isolating Russia. And, if push comes to shove, it's eventual fate might be to become a vassal of China


Not particularly inclined to watch MSNBC much (if at all), though sometimes Morning Joe has a bit of sanity and will catch it when they have ex statesman, generals, or people (like Brezinski) who are looked at (and have been) as knowledgeable) on what is going on in Russia, past and possibly present by past leadership of this country and his knowledge has proven to be invaluable to those same ex presidents.

Brezinski story and interview

#485: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2014 11:07 am
    —
Have mentioned Chamberlain moments several times already going on with regards to the Ukraine situation. Here is another nice article by someone who has been calling it that from nearly the very beginning when the supposed leader of the free world speaks with regard to the situation there and getting it calm there.

Chamberlain moment

#486: Re: The Ukraine Author: MajorFrank PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2014 9:06 pm
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Have mentioned Chamberlain moments several times already going on with regards to the Ukraine situation. Here is another nice article by someone who has been calling it that from nearly the very beginning when the supposed leader of the free world speaks with regard to the situation there and getting it calm there.

Chamberlain moment


Krauthammer has always been kind of right-wing with his writings. He wants to fight? Send him.

Over here in Finland we are still enjoying the surplus export products that couldn't make it to Russia because of sanctions. These products are sold at a discount price. Strangely these conflicts may end up benefiting some folks. Average Russians are coming to Finnish towns and cities by the busloads. Before it was 1-2 buses at the parking yards of supermarkets, now it's as many as 16. These old ladies in vans who are called "1 ton grannies" come shopping and leave with large amounts of groceries. Finnish customs is having problems checking all these one ton grannies so they don't go over import quota or something.

Having said that I just hope that this ceasefire would lead to peace. Including all the conflicts connected to this chain of events, quite a few people have already lost their lives. I saw some footage of a civilian who got hit on his balcony with either a mortar shell or artillery. He was dead and mangled with his family crying next to his body.  Sad

#487: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2014 10:58 pm
    —
Actually I love sanctions and low rouble.

1) Sanctions removed my European competitors from Russia Smile.
2) Low rouble helps me to have huge margins exporting Smile.
3) And of course low rouble helps me to be even more competitive Smile.

So it looks like I will pay out all my loans this year and if everything goes like that I will pay out my mortgage for a new apartments I've bought this year in 2 years instead of 5 Smile.

#488: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 2:05 am
    —
Quote:
Krauthammer has always been kind of right-wing with his writings. He wants to fight? Send him.


Hi Major Frank,

Krauthammer falls off the table on he's so far to the right Smile  Am just linking in various articles from a couple of different prospectives on the Ukraine. The 1st (Brezinski) was a major player in national security with the Carter, Reagan and had some input with the 1st Bush admin. Krauthammer is a far right reporter, but does have the respect of many on the left.. Even Clinton I might add.

#489: Re: The Ukraine Author: HetserLocation: rigaud quebec,canada PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 4:23 am
    —
When Russia collectivized the Ukraine before WW2, hundreds of thousands starved to death. Since they were formerly part of the Austrian-Hungarian empire (Germany) there was little sympathy out of Moscow. During the War, many Ukrainians supported the Germans, and after it ended, former premier of the USSR Nikita Khrushchev was called the "butcher of the Ukraine" for allowing another 3 million to die of starvation.   That we have many Ukrainians Russian-speaking may  have been due to a migration dictated by Moscow to attempt a colonization of the area.  

(I doubt whether we will ever have a USSR with the same territory as it did when it won the second world war.)    

Check out my post at Closecombatfanatics.com and link to the lecture by the retired historian and USA colonel about the Ost front; if you want to get a better historical perspective.

#490: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:09 am
    —
Hetser wrote (View Post):
When Russia collectivized the Ukraine before WW2, hundreds of thousands starved to death. Since they were formerly part of the Austrian-Hungarian empire (Germany) there was little sympathy out of Moscow.

what weed do you smoke?

Quote:
During the War, many Ukrainians supported the Germans, and after it ended, former premier of the USSR Nikita Khrushchev was called the "butcher of the Ukraine" for allowing another 3 million to die of starvation.

so cool! Nikita Kruschev was UKRANIAN Smile.

Quote:
That we have many Ukrainians Russian-speaking may  have been due to a migration dictated by Moscow to attempt a colonization of the area.  
(I doubt whether we will ever have a USSR with the same territory as it did when it won the second world war.)

could you share your weed please?
   

#491: Re: The Ukraine Author: TrogerLocation: L4W's place, Australia PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:13 am
    —
Hetser wrote (View Post):
When Russia collectivized the Ukraine before WW2, hundreds of thousands starved to death. Since they were formerly part of the Austrian-Hungarian empire (Germany) there was little sympathy out of Moscow. During the War, many Ukrainians supported the Germans, and after it ended, former premier of the USSR Nikita Khrushchev was called the "butcher of the Ukraine" for allowing another 3 million to die of starvation.   That we have many Ukrainians Russian-speaking may  have been due to a migration dictated by Moscow to attempt a colonization of the area.  


You bring up an important point.  Russians have probably committed atrocities against every country/ethnic group they've basically ever come in contact with.  It's exactly why anyone who isn't a communist-wannabe in Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Georgia (basically every neighbor Russia has that is not in the pockets of the Kremlin) hates Russia.  Russia's atrocities (wholesale murder of millions) in the Ukraine are accepted as fact by pretty much everyone, except of course the Russians (queue Russian troll "where's the proof?" comment).    

The Soviet Communism/"Socialism" was pure Russian imperialism, enabling free movement of Russians all over the Eurasia subcontinent.  I've always wondered how the Lithuanians were able to get rid of the Russians post-USSR, I'm sure Estonia and Latvia were wishing they were able to as well right now.

#492: Re: The Ukraine Author: TrogerLocation: L4W's place, Australia PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:17 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
Hetser wrote (View Post):
When Russia collectivized the Ukraine before WW2, hundreds of thousands starved to death. Since they were formerly part of the Austrian-Hungarian empire (Germany) there was little sympathy out of Moscow.

what weed do you smoke?

Quote:
During the War, many Ukrainians supported the Germans, and after it ended, former premier of the USSR Nikita Khrushchev was called the "butcher of the Ukraine" for allowing another 3 million to die of starvation.

so cool! Nikita Kruschev was UKRANIAN Smile.

Quote:
That we have many Ukrainians Russian-speaking may  have been due to a migration dictated by Moscow to attempt a colonization of the area.  
(I doubt whether we will ever have a USSR with the same territory as it did when it won the second world war.)

could you share your weed please?
   


Thanks for being here to always prove my point Dima!

And just in case your stupid bullshit is believe by anyone: no, Nikita Khruschev was NOT ethnic Ukrainian. He was born in what is now Russia and was ethnically Russian.

#493: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:59 am
    —
Troger wrote (View Post):

You bring up an important point.  Russians have probably committed atrocities against every country/ethnic group they've basically ever come in contact with.  It's exactly why anyone who isn't a communist-wannabe in Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Georgia (basically every neighbor Russia has that is not in the pockets of the Kremlin) hates Russia.

haha,
when I come to Poland, Lithuania, Estonia etc I speak Russian, I pay off police if I violate traffic and everyone loves me as I bring them money and they are really poor - that's the reality.
we don't learn their language but say in Latvia and Lithuania you can't get a good job not knowing Russian - that's the reality.
we have 300sq.km free area with Poland where we can go without visa and they ask to extend it as we are so cool Wink.

So where do they hate Russians? I will go there and check.

Quote:
Russia's atrocities (wholesale murder of millions) in the Ukraine are accepted as fact by pretty much everyone, except of course the Russians (queue Russian troll "where's the proof?" comment)

I know that in your country it's alright to state something without proving it but here we are interesting in proofs. Can you?
 
Quote:
The Soviet Communism/"Socialism" was pure Russian imperialism, enabling free movement of Russians all over the Eurasia subcontinent.  I've always wondered how the Lithuanians were able to get rid of the Russians post-USSR, I'm sure Estonia and Latvia were wishing they were able to as well right now.

of course the Lithuanian could, both of my family houses were build by Lithuanians as they are much better workers than Russians and cost much lower Wink.
hate us as long as you fear us Wink.

#494: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:03 am
    —
Troger wrote (View Post):
Thanks for being here to always prove my point Dima! And just in case your stupid bullshit is believe by anyone: no, Nikita Khruschev was NOT ethnic Ukrainian. He was born in what is now Russia and was ethnically Russian.

I know you are stupid little hating troll but if a person was born in say Russia and come to the US when he was 3-5 yo will he be American or Russian?
btw Kruschev spent all his youth in Donbass and he was the one who gifted the Crimea to Ukraine - such an irony Wink

#495: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 7:59 pm
    —
Quote:
when I come to Poland, Lithuania, Estonia etc I speak Russian, I pay off police if I violate traffic and everyone loves me as I bring them money and they are really poor - that's the reality.
we don't learn their language but say in Latvia and Lithuania you can't get a good job not knowing Russian - that's the reality.


Dima,

Looking at it from the West.. Getting away with everything.. Larceny, theft, police.. It's NOT a positive attribute.

Not a dig at yourself, but towards corruption in general that most in the west understand is massive in scale in the Eastern European states and Russia itself.

#496: Re: The Ukraine Author: TejszdLocation: Canada PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:22 pm
    —
Almost everyone loves money but it doesn't mean the one handing it out is loved.

Economic dependency and or trade does create a relationship but does not mean they approve of Russian actions in its neighbours or do not fear they could get the same treatment (Lithuania, Lativia Estonia were taken over already once in the last 100 years and Finland, Poland attacked).

#497: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:26 pm
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
Dima,
Looking at it from the West.. Getting away with everything.. Larceny, theft, police.. It's NOT a positive attribute.

ah comon, you can pay off policemen in Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Ukraine, Poland, Slovakia, Chezh Republic and all the way down to Italy. Even in East areas of Germany like Berlin it is possible.
it became much harder here like 2 years ago when they started to fight corruption in the police, but still possible.

Quote:
Not a dig at yourself, but towards corruption in general that most in the west understand is massive in scale in the Eastern European states and Russia itself.

me personally doesn't pay bribes in Russia but I think it's ok to pay off the police in other countries as it saves you time and money Smile.


Last edited by Dima on Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:41 pm; edited 1 time in total

#498: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:33 pm
    —
Tejszd wrote (View Post):
Almost everyone loves money but it doesn't mean the one handing it out is loved.

as I live in the center of Europe and have opportunity to talk to the people of other nationality I know what they say about Americans and their puppets.
but it's actually a question is it better to be feared or disrespected?

Quote:
Economic dependency and or trade does create a relationship but does not mean they approve of Russian actions in its neighbours or do not fear they could get the same treatment (Lithuania, Lativia Estonia were taken over already once in the last 100 years and Finland, Poland attacked).

hate us as long as you fear us Wink.

#499: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:13 pm
    —
nice photo showing a nature of the Ukranian army fighting in Donbas now Smile

but of course everyone will blame Putin/Russia for attacking the Red Cross vehicles on march when they will be destroyed for towing those guns...

#500: Re: The Ukraine Author: mooxe PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 12:54 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
nice photo showing a nature of the Ukranian army fighting in Donbas now Smile

but of course everyone will blame Putin/Russia for attacking the Red Cross vehicles on march when they will be destroyed for towing those guns...


Dima this made me laugh...

Quote:
Why no coordinates or anything we can take as a frame of reference.



Anyways... interesting photo. Our ambulances in the Canadian army can have their red crosses covered up. The "covers" are large metal flaps that fold over the red cross. Convenient if we want to use the vehicle for other purposes. In this case I am going to guess the Ukrainians are not using it the red cross for protection for two reasons. One, the crosses are too small to be recognized from a distance, especially from air attack. Second, its obvious they are hauling artillery, there's no effort to cover up that fact. Those covers on the guns are there to protect it from the elements. I bet they are using them because there are were no other means to transport those guns. An effort should of been made to cover up the red crosses.

#501: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 1:52 am
    —
UH-HUH  Exclamation [impersonating Barney the Purple Dinosaur]

I go away for a few weeks, and the CCS "think tank" stops posting in the "Russia" thread and all move over to the "Ukraine" thread.

But, the same BS NATO propaganda is being constantly spewed by the wannabees in the "tank". I am guessing the notion of regular Gay Pride events in Kiev keep these people bashing Russia on a regular basis.

The "think tankers" have gone to new lows mentioning East Bloc corruption. What a laffer. They all got their "Shoot a Pooch" T-shirts from the same website.

If Putin could just expand the nuclear war beyond Ukraine, but multi-cultural Toronto might be Putin's first target.


Link

#502: Re: The Ukraine Author: TrogerLocation: L4W's place, Australia PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:01 am
    —
Dima wrote (View Post):
Troger wrote (View Post):
Thanks for being here to always prove my point Dima! And just in case your stupid bullshit is believe by anyone: no, Nikita Khruschev was NOT ethnic Ukrainian. He was born in what is now Russia and was ethnically Russian.

I know you are stupid little hating troll but if a person was born in say Russia and come to the US when he was 3-5 yo will he be American or Russian?
btw Kruschev spent all his youth in Donbass and he was the one who gifted the Crimea to Ukraine - such an irony Wink


American isn't an ethnic group, it's only a nationality.  Either way, he's still Russian.  

And "gifting" Crimea to Ukraine was a pretty smart political decision by him.  Since it would enable the newly resettled ethnic Russians to vote for pro-Russian corrupt shitheads--and it's exactly what happened.  Best part of Crimea and potentially Luhansk and Donetsk going to Russia?  Those pro-Russian parties (Party of Regions and Communists) will lose all their voters.  Very Happy

And to answer your hypothetical, I wouldn't trust an ethnic Russian whose family has resided in my country for the last three generations with a wooden stick.  Numerous historical examples of ethnic Russians who resided in other countries for generations betraying their host nation (the most recent example is Ukraine).  Look at Latvia and Estonia--no one there likes them there, they refuse to learn the native language, and they are just waiting to take up arms for Moscow.  An ethnic Russian only brings his ignorance and one-ton babushka with him.

#503: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 5:43 pm
    —
Quote:
I wouldn't trust an ethnic Russian whose family has resided in my country for the last three generations with a wooden stick


They said this about the Irish before the turn of the 20th century. They said this about the Italians also during the early 20th century.

Nobody complained during the 1st WW when the irish filled the trenches and nobody complained when the Italians fought bravely during the 2nd either.

The Italian mafia even stopped it's eternal wars against anything and everything deemed "legal" during WW2 and brought the unions into line to increase output of shipping, something that helped keep europe afloat. So much for "non 3rd generational" invaders having to prove themselves.

Same with Russians. As long as a people show themselves willing to adapt, as most Russians do? Forget that 3rd generation horse crap.

#504: Re: The Ukraine Author: TrogerLocation: L4W's place, Australia PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:51 pm
    —
Johnsilver, I don't know what a Russian-American would do, and quite frankly I don't care.  Anyone that moves to the U.S. must assimilate in some form or another to be successful, and so after a few generations your no longer a member of one single ethnic group and those loyalties are lost--so I'm sure at some point those people would be loyal to the U.S.  

Russians in Europe are a whole different story--specifically Russians that reside in countries that border Russia (former countries of the USSR).  There, Russians are wolves in sheeps clothing.  There are some that realize that Russia is a shithole, filled with ignoramuses, under corrupt and idiotic leadership but they are a minority, or at least not vocal.  

It's really not a point to be argued with. The subject of this thread is about a war in the Ukraine that was started by ethnic Russians whose families have lived in the Ukraine for 2 or 3+ generations and still think Russia can do no wrong, that Putin is god, and Soviet Communism "was the good old days"--who wouldn't want this loyal, intelligent bunch of rats in their country, huh?


Last edited by Troger on Wed Sep 10, 2014 6:44 am; edited 1 time in total

#505: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:00 am
    —
I'd be careful before condemning most of an entire population. germans were looked at as warlike and not welcome in some countries for a long time. mainly European ones that overlooked their own warlike leaders barely a century before who had marched from Russia to as far south as Africa.

Dangerous to condemn all for the sins of some.

#506: Re: The Ukraine Author: pvt_GruntLocation: Melbourne, Australia PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:35 am
    —
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
condemn all for the sins of some.


The definition of racism

#507: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 10:14 am
    —
pvt_Grunt wrote (View Post):
johnsilver wrote (View Post):
condemn all for the sins of some.


The definition of racism


That wasn't exactly where was heading on that, but yes. It can in some situations. Problem is that other times, some of the problems are not racist at all, but run in what is barbaric in what the practices they wish to import to a western country. If this one certain ethnic group wishes to head to any western country, don't expect to take genital mutilation, spousal beating, or any one of half dozen other barbaric acts with them.

The groups that have immigrated in large numbers to the US have seen no problems assimilating to the US way in my lifetime. That is, the groups that are fairly new to immigrating in large masses. Except for 1 and that one 1st stuck to themselves, in isolation years back and lately, or a couple decades back became more and more vocal about the rest of the US either treating this sole group differently than every other ethnic group was that emigrated to the US previously, or accepting some of the barbaric customs that this group subscribes to.

#508: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:47 am
    —
mooxe wrote (View Post):
nice photo showing a nature of the Ukranian army fighting in Donbas now Smile

but of course everyone will blame Putin/Russia for attacking the Red Cross vehicles on march when they will be destroyed for towing those guns...
Dima this made me laugh...
Why no coordinates or anything we can take as a frame of reference.

You can laugh further but that's obviously a column of the Ukranian army somewhere in Ukraine.


Quote:
Anyways... interesting photo. Our ambulances in the Canadian army can have their red crosses covered up. The "covers" are large metal flaps that fold over the red cross. Convenient if we want to use the vehicle for other purposes. In this case I am going to guess the Ukrainians are not using it the red cross for protection for two reasons. One, the crosses are too small to be recognized from a distance, especially from air attack. Second, its obvious they are hauling artillery, there's no effort to cover up that fact. Those covers on the guns are there to protect it from the elements. I bet they are using them because there are were no other means to transport those guns. An effort should of been made to cover up the red crosses.

such size and design of Red Cross sign was typical for the Soviet Army and that's why still used in most of ex-USSR countries.

#509: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:02 am
    —
Troger wrote (View Post):
Dima wrote (View Post):

American isn't an ethnic group, it's only a nationality.  Either way, he's still Russian.

Ok, but in N.Kruschev passport circa 1947 it was stated "Ukranian" under natianality.  

[quote]And "gifting" Crimea to Ukraine was a pretty smart political decision by him.  Since it would enable the newly resettled ethnic Russians to vote for pro-Russian corrupt shitheads--and it's exactly what happened.  Best part of Crimea and potentially Luhansk and Donetsk going to Russia?  Those pro-Russian parties (Party of Regions and Communists) will lose all their voters.  Very Happy

Crimea was given to Ukraine SSR because of economical reasons. Same as South Ossetia was given to Georgian SSR.

Quote:
And to answer your hypothetical, I wouldn't trust an ethnic Russian whose family has resided in my country for the last three generations with a wooden stick.
 
ok, but would you trust Brimm, Sikorskiy, Turchaninov, etc?

Quote:
Numerous historical examples of ethnic Russians who resided in other countries for generations betraying their host nation (the most recent example is Ukraine).

examples please, and as for Ukraine, Russians were the host nation to host Ukranians under Russian Empire.  

Quote:
Look at Latvia and Estonia--no one there likes them there, they refuse to learn the native language, and they are just waiting to take up arms for Moscow.  An ethnic Russian only brings his ignorance and one-ton babushka with him.

that's a BS. All the industrial cities of Latvia like Daugaupils are Russian speaking, same for their capital Riga.
yes, old people don't want to learn new language but a young generation normall speaks Latvian.

#510: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:40 am
    —
David Cameron hasn't come out yet. But here he outlines the main goal of all NATO countries.

There are just volumes of this kind of stuff from the UK & CANADIAN governments. It is all propaganda, regarding Russian laws, regarding oddly enough, GAY PROPAGANDA.

So, if Cameron was a Russian citizen, he might be arrested for spewing this.  Arrow


Link

#511: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 2:40 pm
    —
Apart from Gay Rights, NATO countries continue to beg for Gay asylum seekers, or promote "conversion" from heterosexual lifestyles to LGBT lifestyles.

It is strange but NATO countries now actively advise their citizens to convert to Islam as well. Christianity has been removed long ago in the EU, and now Islam will fill the void. Going forward, NATO is not going to tolerate Christians and homophobes in countries like Russia.

Here is another Cameron video. Remember, the men in this video are career politicians, which means virtually every sentence is a lie.  Arrow


Link

#512: Re: The Ukraine Author: johnsilverLocation: Florida PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 9:37 pm
    —
Quote:
Apart from Gay Rights, NATO countries continue to beg for Gay asylum seekers, or promote "conversion" from heterosexual lifestyles to LGBT lifestyles.

It is strange but NATO countries now actively advise their citizens to convert to Islam as well. Christianity has been removed long ago in the EU, and now Islam will fill the void. Going forward, NATO is not going to tolerate Christians and homophobes in countries like Russia.

Here is another Cameron video. Remember, the men in this video are career politicians, which means virtually every sentence is a lie.  Arrow


So.. Are we just to suppose an image of Obama in the video and figure it's him instead STWA? That's the 100% exact of what he says anyway. You saying O stole his ideals? Maybe the US should deport O for plagiarism of ideals? Can we be lucky enough to get rid of him on that alone? Or is that enough of a crime amongst liberals? Who commonly lie, cheat, steal..

#513: Re: The Ukraine Author: HetserLocation: rigaud quebec,canada PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 4:43 am
    —
HI Dima  (This post is for you )

I have read what I said in a few sources. If you could share your written sources to the contrary, or your Russian school experience, I would appreciate the contrary view, so far I have heard only one side. (He who hears one side hears half a story).

Audi Alteram Partem

Anyhow: \"National Post"  7/31/14 :   "...In 1920 Lenin invaded the newly-indpendent Poland. Russia again in 1939, January 1945. In between the depredations on the Vistula, Stalin launched a terror famine in Poland's neighbour, Ukraine, killing MILLIONS (caps mine) in one of the great atrocities of all history, the Holodomor... the ideological and nationalist ambitions that drove Russian tyranny beyond its borders in the Soviet period have never been confronted and renounced...described (as) this "Russian sickness."  A systemic misrepresentation of the past and thence to a falsification of the present."

The Montreal Gazette ran a similar article.

So you will probably agree that we need a balanced discussion in everything.

(and no, I do not share my herb, unless you are female of course)

Which CC series do you favor?

Cheers!

#514: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 10:01 am
    —
Hi Hetser,

Hetser wrote (View Post):
Anyhow: \"National Post"  7/31/14 :   "...In 1920 Lenin invaded the newly-indpendent Poland.

that's a good example of how the history is twisted in the West.

In reality in 1919 following the defeat of the Triple Alliance and retreat of the German and Austro-Hungarian troops Poland has started its expansion to take back the terriotries belonged to it by 1772 (Rzezhpospolita) including areas in Germany, Czechoslovakia, East Prussia, Lithuania, Belorus and Ukraine. And that's where they met the Sovet troops who after defeaet of Germany and denouncation of the Brest-Litovsk peace treaty started to retreieve the lost areas since late 1918. The first combat was on January 28th at Volkovysk (40km east of the modern Belorus-Poland border), by February 13th that the Soviets held the Vilno - Lida - Slonim - Kartuzskaya Bereza - st.Ivanovo (west of Pinsk) line.
But as there was a civil war in Russia and only 80K was available in the West the Polish using numerical superiority started their attack in late February 1919 capturing Slonim (February 2Cool, Pinsk (March 2), Lida, Novogrudsk, Baranovichi, Vilno (by Arpil 19), Grodno (April 2Cool. In May 1919 the line stabilized again.
In July 1919 the Polish launched thei new offence and captured Molodechno (July 4), Slutsk (July 25), Minks (August 9), Bobruisk (August 29). Then a cease fire was announced and peace treaty discussion were started with participation of Poland, ANTANTA and Denikin. The Kerzon line was recommended by ANTANTA in December 1919 but as the Polish forces were already way Eastern Poland refused to follow. Then discussions were held between Soviet Russia and Poland that led to nowhere again.
In January 1920 the Polish forces broke the cease fire and captured Dinaburg.
On March 6 1920 the Polish launched a full attack in Belorus again and captured Mozyr.
On April 25th 1920 still using the advantage of numerical superiority the Polish launched their attack in Ukraine and by April 28th reached Chernobyl - Kozjatin - Vinnitsa - Romanian border line. On May 7th Kiev was captured.
By May the Soviets transferred more troops from South front of civil war and launched a counteroffence on May 14th in Belorus.
On July 26 the Soviet troops crossed the Belorus-Poland border at Byalostok.

So it's a same as to say that the USSR invaded Germany in 1945.

Quote:
Russia again in 1939,

yes. just no need to forget that 1 year before, in October 1938, Poland has invaded Czechoslovakia along with Germany and annexed the industrial Teshin area.

Quote:
January 1945

another great twist!
though it was 1944.

Quote:
In between the depredations on the Vistula, Stalin launched a terror famine in Poland's neighbour, Ukraine, killing MILLIONS (caps mine) in one of the great atrocities of all history, the Holodomor...

that's a BS. Holodomor - is a myth invented by the Ukranian nazis who immigrated to North America in 50s.
Even wiki map shows that the Great Famine of 1932-33 affected the whole South-West of USSR not just Ukraine. And even in Ukraine the Russian areas were more affected than Western (Ukrainians) areas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1932%E2%80%9333#mediaviewer/File:Famine_en_URSS_1933.jpg
try to read this and then we can have a discussion about the Great Famine:
http://www.as.wvu.edu/history/Faculty/Tauger/Tauger,%20'The%201932%20Harvest%20and%20the%20Famine%20of%201933,%20SR%2091.pdf
 
Quote:
The Montreal Gazette ran a similar article.

maybe it's time to start reading historical works instead?


Last edited by Dima on Fri Sep 19, 2014 10:06 am; edited 2 times in total

#515: Re: The Ukraine Author: Siwy89 PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:18 pm
    —
Poland's attack in 1919 and 1920 in Belarus and Ukraine was strategic strike to suprise Soviet's forces, before they can assemble and threaten newly formed polish lands. If we would wait for Soviet attack, they will propably end on Odra river, not Vistula as it was historically. We didn't want to swarm all Europe as Lenin wanted, our goal was to retrieve most lands taken from us by Russian empire and made federation of countries which were once part of Polish-Lithuanian Union (Rzeczpospolita). E.g. Ukraine was supposed to be independent under lidership of ataman Petlura but that didn't work out.  


Quote:
yes. just no need to forget that 1 year before, in October 1938, Poland has invaded Czechoslovakia along with Germany and annexed the industrial Teshin area.


Polish forces do not cooperate with Germans, anexation of Zaolzie and Teshin area has roots in Polish-Czechoslovakia border disputes, which begans shortly after I World War http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Czechoslovak_border_conflicts.
It is funny to compare Polish anexation of Zaolzie with Soviet anexation of eastern Poland. We were not shooting in back of the head  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre

Again, Russan "liberation" offensive in Poland which began in september '44 was more like an invasion. Polish partisans which were cooperating with soviet forces was taken into arrest by the same men they were fighting shoulder to shoulder. Not to mention many rapists among red army.

Polish soldier was fighting with nazi Germany in all theatres of second world war and I will not allow to twist memory of these great men.

#516: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 7:36 pm
    —
Siwy89 wrote (View Post):
Poland's attack in 1919 and 1920 in Belarus and Ukraine was strategic strike to suprise Soviet's forces, before they can assemble and threaten newly formed polish lands. If we would wait for Soviet attack, they will propably end on Odra river, not Vistula as it was historically. We didn't want to swarm all Europe as Lenin wanted, our goal was to retrieve most lands taken from us by Russian empire and made federation of countries which were once part of Polish-Lithuanian Union (Rzeczpospolita). E.g. Ukraine was supposed to be independent under lidership of ataman Petlura but that didn't work out.

Of course, that's what I said above, same as how the Germans attacked the USSR in 1941 to prevent the USSR to threaten the newly German lands Wink.
  
Quote:
Polish forces do not cooperate with Germans, anexation of Zaolzie and Teshin area has roots in Polish-Czechoslovakia border disputes, which begans shortly after I World War http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Czechoslovak_border_conflicts.
It is funny to compare Polish anexation of Zaolzie with Soviet anexation of eastern Poland. We were not shooting in back of the head  
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre

of course it's totally different, as no matter that the Polish troops invaded Teshin area in same time as the Germans invaded Sudet area but this act couldn't be compared with what that bloody Stalin did!

Quote:
Again, Russan "liberation" offensive in Poland which began in september '44 was more like an invasion. Polish partisans which were cooperating with soviet forces was taken into arrest by the same men they were fighting shoulder to shoulder. Not to mention many rapists among red army.

poor fellas, you are always being invaded either from one side or another Smile.

Quote:
Polish soldier was fighting with nazi Germany in all theatres of second world war and I will not allow to twist memory of these great men.

maybe you should start by not allowing to twist a memory with those 200.000+ Polish men of Wojsko Polskie who were helping the Red Army to liberate Poland and then capture Berlin?

#517: Re: The Ukraine Author: Siwy89 PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:33 pm
    —
Stalin was a murderer and bloody tyrant who was responsible for deaths of milions, many of them were citizens of Soviet Union, I am certain that you know that very well so where is the point in beign ironic?  

When Hitler was attacking USSR, soviets were prepering for further invasion. Why allies were so yielding about Germany's actions in Monachium Conference (1938) ? Great Britain and France wanting to make hammer from nazi Germany to stop Stalin.

Quote:
poor fellas, you are always being invaded either from one side or another


Not that poor, no matter who was attacking us and from how many directions, we always manage to restore Poland one way or another. It's not that bad, considering we are doing this for over a 1000 years ;)

"In 1943 the Soviet Union created in Moscow the Union of Polish Patriots (ZPP) as a communist puppet government designed to counter the legitimacy of the Polish government in exile"

That is not what I call Polish army, just fooled, poor fellas which were an instrument of soviet propaganda.
I do not deny they bravery, but they were overthrowing one aggressor to install another.

In Russia they are teaching you only about what great heroic was soviet army? Because in post influenced soviet countries (de facto occupied by red army) they are seen more as an oppressor.

#518: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 12:41 am
    —
Siwy89 wrote (View Post):
Stalin was a murderer and bloody tyrant who was responsible for deaths of milions, many of them were citizens of Soviet Union, I am certain that you know that very well so where is the point in beign ironic?

actually I believe he is responsible for deaths of trillions or was it billions?
what actually strikes me is why noone saved the Russians from that Georgian-jew butcher Sad  

Quote:
When Hitler was attacking USSR, soviets were prepering for further invasion. Why allies were so yielding about Germany's actions in Monachium Conference (1938) ? Great Britain and France wanting to make hammer from nazi Germany to stop Stalin.

ablosultely agree and that's why that Georgian butcher and betrayer of the Slavic people signed a Mobilization Plan 1941 (in 1940) according to which the bunkers on the new border should be ready by July 1942!

Quote:
Not that poor, no matter who was attacking us and from how many directions, we always manage to restore Poland one way or another. It's not that bad, considering we are doing this for over a 1000 years Wink

I really respect this and we all respect the Polish as you were the only one who captured Moscow and sit there for more than a year Wink - no sarcasm here actually

Quote:
"In 1943 the Soviet Union created in Moscow the Union of Polish Patriots (ZPP) as a communist puppet government designed to counter the legitimacy of the Polish government in exile"That is not what I call Polish army, just fooled, poor fellas which were an instrument of soviet propaganda.
I do not deny they bravery, but they were overthrowing one aggressor to install another. In Russia they are teaching you only about what great heroic was soviet army? Because in post influenced soviet countries (de facto occupied by red army) they are seen more as an oppressor.

it's actually pretty same here;
1945 - Stalin is a hero, fascits are killers.
1961 - USSR is a hero, Stalin is not that good, fascits are killers.
1985 - USSR is not that hero, Stalin is bad, fascits are killers but there were some normal guys among them.
1991 - USSR is not a hero, Stalin is a killer, fascits were not that bad but there were killers among them.
2000 - USSR is an occupant, Stalin is a killer, fascits are good and if there wasnt Stalin there would not be killers among them .
2013 - USSR is an occupant and would lost a war without USA, Stalin is a monster, faacits were defending.

well actually a great propaganda and twisting. we should learn.

#519: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 2:29 pm
    —
NUKE it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

What took em so long?


Link

#520: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:55 am
    —
that's a BS. Holodomor - is a myth invented by the Ukranian nazis who immigrated to North America in 50s. Even wiki map shows that the Great Famine of 1932-33 affected the whole South-West of USSR not just Ukraine. And even in Ukraine the Russian areas were more affected than Western (Ukrainians) areas. -Dima

Dima (a Holodomor liar), is spamming away as usual. He just makes it up as he is typing it, and pretends he is some kind of historian.

Even Dima's linked article about the Soviet Famine cites Holodomar and provides a link to its own article. The number of deaths, Ukranian or otherwise is generally a function of the historian. The Holodomor Article mentions Stanislav Kulchytsky who estimated 10 million Ukranians killed, which are a subset of the total deaths. For many years, Stanislav Kulchytsky, was the head of the department of Ukrainian history at the country’s National Academy of Sciences.

Denial of the Holodomor is the assertion that the 1932–1933 Holodomor, a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine, did not occur. This denial and suppression was made in official Soviet propaganda from the very beginning until the 1980s. -wiki

Holodomor
Denial of the Holodomor

#521: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 12:03 am
    —
Stwa wrote (View Post):
Dima (a Holodomor liar), is spamming away as usual. He just makes it up as he is typing it, and pretends he is some kind of historian.

I never pretended to be some kind of historian but yes, it seems I have more historical knowledge (they are little beyond wiki articles) and probably education than most of posting here.

Quote:
Even Dima's linked article about the Soviet Famine cites Holodomar and provides a link to its own article. The number of deaths, Ukranian or otherwise is generally a function of the historian. The Holodomor Article mentions Stanislav Kulchytsky who estimated 10 million Ukranians killed, which are a subset of the total deaths. For many years, Stanislav Kulchytsky, was the head of the department of Ukrainian history at the country’s National Academy of Sciences.

what?! Mark Tauber article I gave a link to says right the contrary:
This situation makes it difficult to accept the interpretation of the famine as the result of the 1932 grain procurements and as a conscisious act of genocide. The harvest of 1932 essentially made a famine inevitable.

#522: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 7:10 am
    —
I never pretended to be some kind of historian but yes, it seems I have more historical knowledge (they are little beyond wiki articles) and probably education than most of posting here. -Dima

Uh-huh ! [impersonating Barney the purple dinosaur]

Doubtful arrogance. For instance the wiki article Holodomor contains a Bibliography with 46 works, some with links, and a Notes and Reference section that provides 145 citations to works contained in its bibliography. The wiki article Denial of the Holodomor contains a Reference seciton with 71 citations that also encapsulate its bibliography.

The neat thing about the Wiki, if you (Dima) has an issue with any article you can become a member of the Wiki and EDIT the article. You are not going to do that becuase you know that you are not qualified. (i.e. YOU DO NOT have the requistite education)

Holodomor
Denial of the Holodomor

#523: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 7:31 am
    —
what?! Mark Tauber article I gave a link to says right the contrary -Dima

try to read this and then we can have a discussion about the Great Famine:
http://www.as.wvu.edu/history/Faculty/Tauger/Tauger,%20'The%201932%20Harvest%20and%20the%20Famine%20of%201933,%20SR%2091.pdf -Dima


If you are so fucking smart, then how come you mispelled the author's name and gomered the link. You gonna blame it on your Rooskie keyboard?

#524: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:03 am
    —
Mark Tauger wrote this article you [Dima] cite in 1991 when he was an associate professor at The University of West Virginia. It was "published" in the Slavic Review produced at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where its editors are located.

This interpretation of famine [genocide] overlooks inconsistencies between offical [Soviet] grain harvest statistics for the early 1930's and the evidence of famine, as well as indications from other sources that these statistics are unreliable. -Mark Tauger

Tauger's main argument is that he thinks the original Ukraine harvest data provided by the Soviet Union in the 1930s is wrong, so his article uses Soviet data produced at a much later date in time to come to the conclusion that perhaps these Ukranians did not die after all, or if they did, it was not due to genocide. So like Dima, he denies Holodomor.

The 1932 Harvest and Famine of 1933 - Mark Tauger
Slavic Review
Denial of the Holodomor

#525: Re: The Ukraine Author: dj PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 5:25 am
    —
Situation is escalating again in Ukraine.  Reminds me of disintegration of Yugoslavia in the 90's with the lawless towns & gangster militias roaming the streets.  "Rebel" commander now claims he wants to raise a militia of 100,000 strong.  Russian economic sanctions and plummeting oil prices are really taking a severe toll on Putin's position.

#526: Re: The Ukraine Author: Stwa PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 7:24 am
    —
Yes! Things are moving quickly in Ukraine. There has been tremendous progress.

NO Army can defeat us  Arrow


Link

#527: Re: The Ukraine Author: Dima PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 8:25 am
    —
Quote:
Russian economic sanctions and plummeting oil prices are really taking a severe toll on Putin's position.

where? In Russia his approval rating is on the highest level ever - 85% (https://twitter.com/levada_ru/status/560476531827703808)

#528: Re: The Ukraine Author: DAK_Legion PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:44 am
    —
Putin over donestk!


IMG-20150127-WA0000.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  26.69 KB
 Viewed:  282 Time(s)

IMG-20150127-WA0000.jpg



#529: Re: The Ukraine Author: DAK_Legion PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:45 am
    —
Putin over donestk!


IMG-20150127-WA0000.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  26.69 KB
 Viewed:  285 Time(s)

IMG-20150127-WA0000.jpg





Close Combat Series -> The Mess


output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT

Page 1 of 1