1280px-ZSU-23-4_Shilka_01.jpg | ||
Description: |
|
|
Filesize: | 335.46 KB | |
Viewed: | 229 Time(s) | |
Dima wrote (View Post): | ||
that's of course not correct... the main versions basing on damage character are (https://www.flickr.com/photos/jeroenakkermans/sets/72157645790319631/): 1. Air-to-Air missile (http://aviaforum.ru/showpost.php?p=1578720&postcount=899; http://politikus.ru/events/24720-strasti-po-boingu-pervye-priznaki-rakety-vozduh-vozduh-sbival-ne-buk-m1.html). 2. Bomb aboard. 3. Ukraine's Buk's very old missile as new missiles do different type of damage. Some guys have spoted another lie from Ukraine showing their own Buk on trailer (#312) as supplied by Russia. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtAh0dKIUAAx4NN.jpg The first radio intercept released by Ukraine on July 17th (with date of July 16th btw) appeared to be fraud as well. And some unofficial info from USA http://consortiumnews.com/2014/07/20/what-did-us-spy-satellites-see-in-ukraine/ What I’ve been told by one source, who has provided accurate information on similar matters in the past, is that U.S. intelligence agencies do have detailed satellite images of the likely missile battery that launched the fateful missile, but the battery appears to have been under the control of Ukrainian government troops dressed in what look like Ukrainian uniforms. The source said CIA analysts were still not ruling out the possibility that the troops were actually eastern Ukrainian rebels in similar uniforms but the initial assessment was that the troops were Ukrainian soldiers. There also was the suggestion that the soldiers involved were undisciplined and possibly drunk, since the imagery showed what looked like beer bottles scattered around the site, the source said. |
Quote: |
The disrespect shown to the victims of this crash is reason alone to not deal with them, Europe has to get their gas from somewhere else. |
Quote: |
Still 100 bodies unaccounted for. |
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post): |
Russian are to be happy, they only have to deal with the American right wing- religious- war- mongering idiots.
Americans should to be happy too, they only have to deal with the cultural- and tecnologically- always five step behind, agressive -expanding-neo-empire-nationalistic Russians. But we the Europeans, have to deal with both. |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
Troger,
Good that you haven't changed for these 10+ years I know you through CSO/CCS - still the same little brainwashed hater . |
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post): |
Russian are to be happy, they only have to deal with the American right wing- religious- war- mongering idiots.
Americans should be happy too, they only have to deal with the cultural- and tecnologically- always five step behind, agressive -expanding-neo-empire-nationalistic Russians. But we the Europeans, have to deal with both. |
Troger wrote (View Post): |
I'd disagree with you that Europe doesn't have to deal with Russia. |
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post): |
But we the Europeans, have to deal with both. |
Troger wrote (View Post): |
You tell me how a Dutch politician (or any EU politician) with any conscious can continue the import of Russian gas (which only serves to fund a corrupt Russian society)? It's the U.S. that doesn't have to deal with them, and yet the Obama administration has been quicker to condemn and respond to Russian aggression than any European nation. |
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post): |
Hahah!
Mate, here is a list of the world top 500 company brands. Why isn’t there a single Russian brand amongst the world top 100…? http://brandirectory.com/league_tables/table/global-500-2014 We should not really count the companies in natural Resources as they are just considerd "luck", so that make 6 Russian brands amongst world top 500 brands. Rank; Company; type 106 Sper bank 316 Magnit 406 MTS 423 Beeline 457 VTB bank 470 mega 129 gaz (Natural Resources) 306 Lukoil (Natural Resources) 443 Rosnef (Natural Resources) |
Quote: |
Ohh, crap i forgot, Russian Vodka is a world success. I hold Smirnoff as one of the greatest vodka of this planet. |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
Smirnoff is not a Russian vodka |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
I think that's a pretty good result as 23 years ago there was not any of the Russian company in that list, don't you think? |
Quote: |
You think Russia has become better or something since Soviet era? You’re impressed by the performance of Russia under Putin?
So Russia now have 6 companies of the World top 500… And that’s impressive according to you? Of a nation of 150+ mil? Seriously? |
Quote: |
I’m using WHO data of life expectancy in the year 1990 and 2012:
In 1990 Russia had an average life expectancy of 69 years. In 2012 Russia had an average life expectancy of 69 years. Wow, the absolute difference in Russian life expectancy has not changed at all over a 22 year period from the soviet era in 1990, to Putins Russia in 2012. Is that grate performance according to you? ZERO increase, is that grate preformance??? |
Quote: |
The stats is clear, Putins Russia is shit. The development under his rule is outperformed by basically all nations on the planet.
Even though Putins-Russia has won the lottery ticket and found Gas, it still can’t get things going. Putin need to be replaced. |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
When you go berserk you are unstoppable . |
Quote: |
So, no you cant explain Putin Russias poor life expectancy with birth rate changes. |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT