Pzt_Crackwise wrote (View Post): |
With that said, I seriously believe that CC needs to be developed by other people. It needs to be acquired by some more competent company, with a more ethical approach.
Even making a similar open-source community game would be better than this mess they have currently. I just wish the source code of some very old CC games would be accessible. Like CC1 or CC2, so that the coders would have a chance to see how things work in the engine. |
Tejszd wrote (View Post): |
Microsoft had the resources ($) to make the core of the game and would have allowed it to progress farther. But unfortunately the market for a simulator is small and MS went on to invest in HALO and XBOX as there was more money in action games.
Close Combat is a game but one that tries to be more of a simulator. As shown by both the British (Close Combat: RAF Regiment) and US (Close Combat: Marines) using the game as a training tool. |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT