Close Combat Series :: View topic - US Airstrikes on ISIS

through

[^/[Print]\]

Close Combat Series -> The Mess

#1: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: mooxe,

Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:51 pm
—
Specifically they are to eliminate possible threats to US installations or to prevent genocide. I just hope they go after extremely specific targets and completely avoid all civilian casualties.

#2: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Dima,

Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:53 pm
—

mooxe wrote (View Post):

Specifically they are to eliminate possible threats to US installations or to prevent genocide. I just hope they go after extremely specific targets and completely avoid all civilian casualties.

how come ISIS is bad in Iraq but is good in Syria?
what happens to ISIS when they cross the border?

#3: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: HogansHeros,

Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2014 8:20 pm
—

Dima wrote (View Post):

mooxe wrote (View Post):

Specifically they are to eliminate possible threats to US installations or to prevent genocide. I just hope they go after extremely specific targets and completely avoid all civilian casualties.

how come ISIS is bad in Iraq but is good in Syria?
what happens to ISIS when they cross the border?

They become the enemy of my enemy; the world's most short sighted foreign policy.

#4: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Stwa,

Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2014 9:34 pm
—

mooxe wrote (View Post):

Specifically they are to eliminate possible threats to US installations or to prevent genocide. I just hope they go after extremely specific targets and completely avoid all civilian casualties.

So, insane McCain got his way. But before long (if not already) the stated reason will be to take out terrorists (i.e. the exact same rationale that GW Bush used to get us into Iraq before).

Remember, to this administration, terrorists can be war veterans, Christians, anyone who wears a turban, and whites that disagree with the current pace of immigration.

#5: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Dima,

Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2014 10:20 pm
—

Quote:

Remember, to this administration, terrorists can be war veterans, Christians, anyone who wears a turban, and whites that disagree with the current pace of immigration.

bah! you forgot Russians!

#6: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: mooxe,

Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2014 10:44 pm
—
They are dropping humanitarian aid also.

#7: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Dima,

Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2014 11:08 pm
—

mooxe wrote (View Post):

They are dropping humanitarian aid also.

that's actually good as ISIS needs some civilian stuff Wink

#8: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: sod98,

Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 6:29 am
—

Dima wrote (View Post):

mooxe wrote (View Post):

They are dropping humanitarian aid also.

that's actually good as ISIS needs some civilian stuff Wink

Yes it's called a resupply drop for ISIS.

#9: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: dj,

Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 4:14 pm
—
Fuk those ISIS gangsters - I'm glad Obama did this. They are the most ruthless, violent, and criminal fighting force witnessed in decades. Threatening to kill civilians if they don't convert to Islam and executing POW's. I hope they had a slow agonizing death from the bombs.

#10: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: dj,

Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 5:33 pm
—

Dima wrote (View Post):

mooxe wrote (View Post):

Specifically they are to eliminate possible threats to US installations or to prevent genocide. I just hope they go after extremely specific targets and completely avoid all civilian casualties.

how come ISIS is bad in Iraq but is good in Syria?
what happens to ISIS when they cross the border?

So true...the one good deed Putin has done was saving America from falling flat on our faces again with another botched mid-east plan. I trust none of those insurgent groups in Syria - there are other gangster clans in Syria as bad as ISIS. McCain has no clue, he should just retire already. It's bad enough ISIS has overran Iraq positions and captured tanks and other U.S. supplied equipment. I thought just in the past year alone we spent several billion in military aid to Iraq, much of it was captured.

#11: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: johnsilver, Location: Florida

Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 5:38 pm
—

Stwa wrote (View Post):

mooxe wrote (View Post):

Specifically they are to eliminate possible threats to US installations or to prevent genocide. I just hope they go after extremely specific targets and completely avoid all civilian casualties.

McCain needs to be given an M-16 and dropped off in to some "hot" zone, then forgotten about.

He's just dangerous, nothing else to be said about him. Maybe take McCain with an M-16, then Biden and his looney Shotgun TV add piece, so they can send him on the same mission with McCain and give 'em a double barrel shotgun.. Get rid of both of them. Both drag down both parties and every time they open up their mouths, the press wastes time on them, front pages fill up, people wince..

Neither will wander off and retire.. This will get rid of them.. Send them to Gaza, Syria, Iraq.. One last hurrah for McCain, or one at all for Biden, other than his big mouth.

#12: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: dj,

Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 5:47 pm
—

Stwa wrote (View Post):

mooxe wrote (View Post):

Specifically they are to eliminate possible threats to US installations or to prevent genocide. I just hope they go after extremely specific targets and completely avoid all civilian casualties.

So how about Bush's famous quote, "You're either with us (Bush Administration) or the terrorists". When has Obama or his spokespeople ever said such a pompous statement? Remember this was the President himself making that statement.

Off-topic yet again...the immigration debate is a huge clusterfk. Your statement is laughable...it's the whites own fault for making their anti-immigrant agenda look racist because their own signs or comments to the media. Obviously not all of them are racists but all it takes are a few kooks to make the whole lot look like Racist Nuts. I think the whole issue is a bunch of bullshit...wealthy multi-millionaires hire the illegals and big business loves the endless supply of cheap labor. They play dumb and pretend they had no idea they had illegals working for them. It's complete hypocrisy to cry about illegals yet the very same party takes big $ from special interest lobbyists that wants the slave labor with no benefits & endless supply. Dem's too are playing games with his-pandering for votes.

#13: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Stwa,

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 3:11 pm
—

dj wrote (View Post):

It's complete hypocrisy to cry about illegals yet the very same party takes big $ from special interest lobbyists that wants the slave labor with no benefits & endless supply. Dem's too are playing games with his-pandering for votes.

DJ, I have been observing your BS posts for years. You need to move to a state where pot is legal, get yourself a card and some jane and kick back and relax.

I don't cry about illegals. I live with em. Idea

#14: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Stwa,

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 3:18 pm
—

johnsilver wrote (View Post):

Maybe take McCain with an M-16, then Biden and his looney Shotgun TV add piece, so they can send him on the same mission with McCain and give 'em a double barrel shotgun.

Ya, that sounds like a winner. Biden is a libtard, so he thinks dems are so stupid they will do whatever he says. Obama thinks that too. Look at DJ, he is a WAR MONGER now. Laughing

#15: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Stwa,

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 4:08 pm
—

dj wrote (View Post):

Fuk those ISIS gangsters - I'm glad Obama did this. They are the most ruthless, violent, and criminal fighting force witnessed in decades. Threatening to kill civilians if they don't convert to Islam and executing POW's. I hope they had a slow agonizing death from the bombs.

Now DJ, calm down, take a deep breath. It wont be the first or the last time someone gets beheaded in the Middle East. Read about the fall of Acre in 1293, or the Siege of Malta in 1565. At Malta, after the beheadings, the heads were placed into cannons and fired over the walls into the city, a precursor to biological weapons.

This stuff is getting to you so bad, you have completely forgotton that you are a libtard, and therefore should be tolerant to other customs and religions. Wink

#16: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: dj,

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 5:34 pm
—
Stwa, has anyone told you that you repeat yourself waaaay too often? I'm quite calm thank you for your concern. You just confirmed what I already knew that FoxNews clones resort to slogans & swimming in the soup of political indoctrination. I love how you assume you know everything about me, my politics and have to educate me on world history. You're forgetting the part that the Europeans went over to the Mid-East first to slaughter the Arabs on the Crusades. Many Muslim still use that as a rallying cry to fight Western influence and to promote jihadis. No try to see what the actual issues are instead of trying to come up with cutesy name calling and assuming you even know what someone believes.

#17: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Stwa,

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:27 pm
—

dj wrote (View Post):

You're forgetting the part that the Europeans went over to the Mid-East first to slaughter the Arabs on the Crusades.

You're forgetting the part where the Sunnis and Shi'ites are busy slaughtering each other just prior to the arrival of the 1st Crusaders. The 1st Crusade was also a defensive response to the Seljug [Sunni] invasion of Greek Byzantium.

Egypt and much of Palestine were controlled by the Arab Shi'ite Fatimid Caliphate, which was significantly smaller since the arrival of the Seljuqs. Warfare between the Fatimids [Shi'ite] and Seljuqs [Sunni] caused great disruption for the local Christians and for western pilgrims. The Fatimids, under the nominal rule of caliph al-Musta'li but actually controlled by vizier al-Afdal Shahanshah, had lost Jerusalem to the Seljuqs in 1073 (although some older accounts say 1076); they recaptured it in 1098 from the Artuqids, a smaller Turkish tribe associated with the Seljuqs, just before the arrival of the crusaders.

But DJ, the good news is you snapped out of your trance quickly, and returned defending and tolerating the Muslims. For a moment there, I thought your condition was terminal. But now, you can carry on with your libtard agenda. You should be very happy.

Oh BTW, here is a link, so you may continue your own crusade. Be careful!

The First Crusade

#18: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Stwa,

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 7:10 pm
—

dj wrote (View Post):

I hope they had a slow agonizing death from the bombs.

From your last post, I know you have been cured. But I forget one last detail that I wanted to share with you.

If someone did die from the bombs they were probably blown to bits instantaneously. And now, they are in paradise with all those virgins. Meanwhile you are still with us, crawling around in the dirt, and until the day that you totally convert to Islam, you will always be regarded (by Muslims) as an Infidel. Idea

So you see, you and I have something in common. Just thought I would mention that.

#19: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: dj,

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 7:31 pm
—
So much for the Rightie-Tea Klan and their selective defense of the U.S. Constitution. I love how yet again you assume you know all my political beliefs and how you like to lump all Muslims together as the same, when only a small minority are these fundamentalist fukwads that terrorize even their own people.

Additionally, there was no ISIS until your pals fabricated a fake crisis in Iraq and peddled a litany of lies to justify invasion. Only after we invaded to depose Saddam, was ISIS created in response. The needless assault on sovereign Arab nation only worsens the War on Hearts and Minds. You can't win an ideological war when you try to go to their level and attack an entire religious ideology. There are something like 1 billion Muslims in the potential recruitment pool for jihadi's to try to indoctrinate.

Here's a little reminder of U.S. History straight from the Constitution. By the way, despite all of Sarah Palin's pep rallies and Conservative Religion Talibans in the GOP ranks...the "Founding Fathers" including George Washington were mostly Freemasons, not Puritan Christian fundamentalists. Gotta love how the FoxNews clones invent their own facts and their own history. We are a society that was founded by Europeans that sought to flee from religious oppression, not endorse it.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

#20: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Stwa,

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:03 pm
—

dj wrote (View Post):

The needless assault on sovereign Arab nation only worsens the War on Hearts and Minds. You can't win an ideological war when you try to go to their level and attack an entire religious ideology.

Well, why don't you tell that to Al Baghdadi and ISIS, you brainless libtard. They have been going at it for almost 1400 years. Exclamation

The historic background of the Sunni–Shia split lies in the schism that occurred when the Islamic prophet Muhammad died in the year 632, leading to a dispute over succession to Muhammad as a caliph of the Islamic community spread across various parts of the world, which led to the Battle of Siffin. The dispute intensified greatly after the Battle of Karbala, in which Hussein ibn Ali and his household were killed by the ruling Umayyad Caliph Yazid I, and the outcry for his revenge divided the early Islamic community... Sectarian violence persists to this day from Pakistan to Yemen and is a major element of friction throughout the Middle East. Tensions between communities have intensified during power struggles, such as the Bahraini uprising, the Iraq War, and most recently the Syrian Civil War and the formation of the self-styled Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant and its advancement on Syria and Northern Iraq. -wiki

Shia-Sunni Relations

#21: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: johnsilver, Location: Florida

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:35 pm
—
I am having a difficult time understanding how O-Idiot finally made an intelligent foreign policy decision for the 1st time ever. Possibly because he doesn't want to look like the biggest idiot ever in the history of US presidents ever after losing a won war (Irag) and by announcing in advance an out date(Aphganistan) to give your enemy a great go get started and chase your opponent all over the place before hand..

Well.. Here is the fine thing he figured out to do to save his bacon.. his "hail mary" in Iraq:

Obama directly arming Kurds

Short of directly sending in boots on the ground? Arm the ONLY people in that God for saken place who actually have an agenda/will to fight for what is right.. Their own land they can call their own when it's all said and done and the Kurds have always been known as fighters.

The only hope is that the rest of the world doesn't sell them out if they can manage to stop the bleeding going on in Iraq.

Now also they have to hope 0-0-bama will continue to send them military supplies to continue the fight against those Isis thugs and not just long enough to put a dent in them since we know he's gutless and dislikes offending anyone, regardless of whether or not they are terrorists.

#22: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Stwa,

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:16 pm
—

dj wrote (View Post):

By the way, despite all of Sarah Palin's pep rallies and Conservative Religion Talibans in the GOP ranks...

I have been meaning to ask you, what is up with you and Sarah Palin. What has she ever done to you?

It always starts with petty remarks, but leads to complete objectification. Remember David Letterman, he had to pretend she was a Flight Attendant.

So maybe you will pretend she is a Moose Hunter. Just remember, she is married and a mother.

Link

#23: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: dj,

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 5:00 am
—

Stwa wrote (View Post):

dj wrote (View Post):

The needless assault on sovereign Arab nation only worsens the War on Hearts and Minds. You can't win an ideological war when you try to go to their level and attack an entire religious ideology.

Well, why don't you tell that to Al Baghdadi and ISIS, you brainless libtard. They have been going at it for almost 1400 years. Exclamation

Such an ironic statement from you...NO CLUE. It's pointless to even bother with you. Who do you think the enemy is?

Last edited by dj on Wed Aug 13, 2014 5:12 am; edited 1 time in total

#24: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: dj,

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 5:12 am
—

johnsilver wrote (View Post):

I am having a difficult time understanding how O-Idiot finally made an intelligent foreign policy decision for the 1st time ever. Possibly because he doesn't want to look like the biggest idiot ever in the history of US presidents ever after losing a won war (Irag) and by announcing in advance an out date(Aphganistan) to give your enemy a great go get started and chase your opponent all over the place before hand..

Well.. Here is the fine thing he figured out to do to save his bacon.. his "hail mary" in Iraq:

Obama directly arming Kurds

Short of directly sending in boots on the ground? Arm the ONLY people in that God for saken place who actually have an agenda/will to fight for what is right.. Their own land they can call their own when it's all said and done and the Kurds have always been known as fighters.

The only hope is that the rest of the world doesn't sell them out if they can manage to stop the bleeding going on in Iraq.

Now also they have to hope 0-0-bama will continue to send them military supplies to continue the fight against those Isis thugs and not just long enough to put a dent in them since we know he's gutless and dislikes offending anyone, regardless of whether or not they are terrorists.

John - you really are overthinking this way too hard, I know Limbaugh and friends are slamming Obama 24 x 7...planning impeachments or lawsuits or what not. Did Bush Sr. or Sec. Cheney help the Kurds in first Gulf War? Did Reagan withdraw troops from Lebanon? Not that this would ever be mentioned in the Conservative media machine. Nor how Obama has deported more illegals than any other President in history despite pressure from militant special interest groups. Now Obama is getting a lot of pushback from some in the left about intervening in Iraq. Maliki is getting pressure to leave.

#25: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Stwa,

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 8:24 am
—

dj wrote (View Post):

Such an ironic statement from you...NO CLUE. It's pointless to even bother with you. Who do you think the enemy is?

OK dood, but you are messin up beeg time. Exclamation

Sunnis believe that Abu Bakr, the father of Muhammad's wife Aisha, was Muhammad's rightful successor and that the method of choosing or electing leaders (Shura) endorsed by the Quran is the consensus of the Ummah (the Muslim community).

Shias believe that Muhammad divinely ordained his cousin and son-in-law Ali (the father of his grandsons Hasan ibn Ali and Hussein ibn Ali) in accordance with the command of God to be the next caliph, making Ali and his direct descendants Muhammad's successors. Ali was married to Fatimah, Muhammad's daughter from his wife Khadijah bint Khuwaylid. -wiki

So, hence the name

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

You should travel to Iraq, meet with Al Baghdadi, and tell him Muhammad is not a true prophet. Remind him of Ali and Fatimah. Do NOT tell him you are from the USA (remember Guantanamo). Tell him you are from Sweden. That should protect you. Laughing

By (you) having us side with the Shi'ites, it is entirely possible that you (and the rest of us) will never enter paradise. No virgins, no nothing. We will remain here to crawl in the dirt, perhaps forever.

Shia-Sunni Relations

#26: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: johnsilver, Location: Florida

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 10:11 pm
—
The "plan" was always for a unified Iraq, not a split up one as anyone SHOULD know who pays any attention to the middle east, then wouldn't expect that of you and the Desert Storm Saddam was left in power anyway...

The Kurds control the oil, or some of it. Since Obama firgures nobody else is going to fight for what is left of Iraq and the Kurds have wanted an independent state within Iraq for decades (bordering Turkey, where Turkey doesn't care for them anyway), the US seems amendable now to supporting them for the time being with military supplies.

For *those of you* who are ignorant of the situation, the Israeli's have been arming them, through clandestine means for some time now and even getting oil from them. They both have forged a somewhat underground alliance between them.

What/why you keep bringing up Reagan, a man with backbone and would act on his convictions, had one of the strongest economies in the 20th centuries is beyond me. Bush Sr also, another man who was not afraid to act on his convictions and with back bone, something SORELY lacking among our current dear leader and his chosen close group of lackeys he surrounds himself with.

He has 2 years in an attempt at correcting the last 6y of abysmal policy of ignoring the obvious, getting involved in places he had no business (Libya), supporting terrorists where they should have been over thrown (muslim brother hood in egypt), or getting in the way of Israel while they are in the midst of crushing hamas with demands for cease fires, that Hamas continually brok and Hamas was killing soldiers during each and every one. Obama /kerry is directly responsible for ALL of those deaths

Notice that both Kerry/obama not in egypt for the last ceasefire? Persona non grata...

Edit:

Decided to go back and see how long the Isralei's had been arming the Kurds exactly. Was thinking at least as long as Desert Storm, but turns out as far as the Six Day War (45y):

Pretty far, longer than the US by 30Y.

Quote:

For decades, Israel has been a silent stakeholder in northern Iraq, training and arming its restive Kurds. Massimiliano Fiore, a fellow at the Department of War Studies at King’s College London, cites a CIA document found in the US Embassy in Tehran and subsequently published, which reportedly attested that the Kurds aided Israel’s military in the June 1967 (Six Day) War by launching a major offensive against the Iraqi Army. This kept Iraq from joining the other Arab armies in Israel, in return for which, “after the war, massive quantities of Soviet equipment captured from the Egyptians and Syrians were transferred to the Kurds.”

And here is what they have been sending recently:

Quote:

Tons of equipment, including motorcycles, tractors, sniffer dogs, systems to upgrade Kalashnikov rifles, bulletproof vests, and first-aid items have been shipped to Iraq’s northern region, with most products stamped “Made in Israel.”The Kurds had insisted that the cooperation be kept secret, fearing that exposure of the projects would motivate terror groups to target their Jewish guests. Recent warnings that Al-Qaeda might be planning an attack on Kurdish training camps prompted a hasty exit of all Israeli trainers from the northern region. In response to the report, the Defense Ministry said: “We haven’t allowed Israelis to work in Iraq, and each activity, if performed, was a private initiative, without our authorization, and is under the responsibility of the employers and the employees involved.”

Kurd Independence

#27: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Stwa,

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 10:57 am
—
HEY DJ Exclamation

I hate to break it to ya, but Obama is NOT the Antichrist, so you can take a break from worshiping him 24x7.

Link

#28: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Dima,

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:12 pm
—
Here is a picture of a meeting of good friends/allies Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Bakr_al-Baghdadi) and John McCain (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain )

no wonder ISIS got TOW-2 in numbers that they successfully use against both Syrian army and Iraqi army.

#29: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: DAK_Legion,

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:06 pm
—
Good pic dima;)

#30: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Dima,

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 8:05 pm
—
And I think our goverment is stupid, they should have supplied ISIS with AA/AT missiles on par with US earning money and avoiding sanctions (along with checking how will they work against US/NATO jets and helis) but what they do are supplying the modern weapons to Iraqi army to fight ISIS...
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/iraqs-first-mi-28-havoc-attack-chopper-has-taken-to-the-1634427850

#31: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: dj,

Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:11 am
—

Stwa wrote (View Post):

HEY DJ

I hate to break it to ya, but Obama is NOT the Antichrist, so you can take a break from worshiping him 24x7.

Do you not have anything else to do with your time other than annoy people with Youtube video spamming. Nobody gives a shit.

#32: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: dj,

Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:16 am
—

Dima wrote (View Post):

Here is a picture of a meeting of good friends/allies Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Bakr_al-Baghdadi) and John McCain (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain )

no wonder ISIS got TOW-2 in numbers that they successfully use against both Syrian army and Iraqi army.

WOW...Dima where did you get that or find that? It must be censored here in the US. McCain even duped Kerry/Obama into the trap of aligning and arming these thugs. Again it was thanks to Putin that we saved ourselves from our own stupidity.

I can't believe McCain actually met face to face with that thug. And to think we were seriously debating at the highest levels giving them many millions of aid. And weapons that ultimately be used against us and our allies?

What a clusterfuk. Putin literally saved McCain or Obama from such a stupid ass idea. Probably would have been the biggest blunder in post Cold-War history.

#33: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: HogansHeros,

Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 6:42 am
—
Personally, I think the man in the picture's nose looks very different from Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi's

#34: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Stwa,

Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 12:47 pm
—

dj wrote (View Post):

Do you not have anything else to do with your time other than annoy people with Youtube video spamming. Nobody gives a shit.

Gee DJ! Looks like I hit a nerve when I told you Obama is not the Antichrist. I will make it up to you with a video I know you will enjoy.

Link

#35: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: Dima,

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 12:15 am
—
ISIL used 'chlorine gas' to kill 300 Iraqi soldiers
http://www.worldbulletin.net/news/144922/isil-used-chlorine-gas-to-kill-300-iraqi-soldiers

#36: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: mooxe,

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:32 am
—
US hitting ISIS in Syria now.

#37: Re: US Airstrikes on ISIS Author: dj,

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:31 am
—
Sounds like it's about that time to drop some conventional nukes on these fukwads. Using Gas on their fellow Muslims? Not we are up to 40 allies that want revenge, including several Arab nations. Maybe even Iran will volunteer, they are already sending small numbers of reinforcements into Baghdad.

Close Combat Series -> The Mess

output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT

Page 1 of 1