pvt_Grunt wrote (View Post): |
It seems Trump has sniffed the winds from UK and decided to come out with an anti-globalisation pitch. He's quite clever (or else has good advice) about being a populist 'Everything to Everyone' candidate, but in my experience the people who fall for this trick will be dissapointed if he is elected and his true colours come out.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/28/donald-trump-globalization-trade-pennsylvania-ohio/86431376/ |
Schmal_Turm wrote (View Post): |
The way I see it, it goes to what is called the “Hegelian Dialectic.”
What this entails is the idea that the elitists in control employ a manufactured crisis in order to implement the plans that they would want to have in order to control the population. The elitists are well aware that when there is a problem the people generally will clamor for the government to come up with a solution that usually results in more control and more surveillance, such as The Patriot Act after 911, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. After all the measures enacted to make us safer in the US, all we really get is more control over the general population. Boston civil-liberties lawyer Harvey Silverglate authored a book "Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent" referring to the number of crimes he estimates the average American now unwittingly commits because of vague laws. New technology adds its own complexity, making innocent activity potentially criminal. Ultimately, we are not as free as we have been led to believe. |
mooxe wrote (View Post): |
Instead of doing any research some media outlets just throw it out there and let people come to their own conclusion, media's job complete. |
MajorFrank wrote (View Post): |
Over here in Finland we have a whole bunch of presidential candidates from the various parties for the first round of voting. They have group debates and those can be quite interesting to watch since pretty everyone gets to have their say. The top two candidates get to go to the second round. Last elections a candidate from a relatively small party, The Greens, got to the second round but lost to he present day president from the right-wing coalition party. But it seems to me that our system seems more egalitarian then the US system where two big money parties just continue to rule decade after decade. |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT