JFFulcrum wrote (View Post): |
Cui prodest?
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/15/uk-set-up-48m-chemical-weapons-defence-centre-gavin-williamson |
mooxe wrote (View Post): |
Its nothing more than a blog site. The owner seems to have a beef with the Guardian, and the users to. I wouldn't say its a good source for anything.
"Cherry pick your articles just like the facts that you use." I don't know what facts I am using to warrant that statement. All I know is this blog site that carries a massive slant is in your eyes, a good source. |
sod98 wrote (View Post): |
not all of their stories meet good journalism |
mooxe wrote (View Post): | ||
The sites standard in journalism reflects on the accuracy of the article. |
mooxe wrote (View Post): |
Off-guardian.com is as associated with theguardian.com as any random blog is quoting BBC articles. What does theguardian.com say about its association with off-guardian.com? You're seemingly trying to lend credence to off-guardian.com by stating its associated with theguardian.com which is a trusted news source in order to validate your point of view while at the same time bashing MSM for poor journalism. This is a paradox. |
Quote: |
The site is our own work, and is not supported by any governments, institutions or pressure groups. |
Quote: |
OffGuardian is the creation of people from different parts of the world committed to the original vision which drew us together on The Guardian‘s CiF pages. We followed with dismay and disappointment the increasingly distorted and tendentious news reporting on Libya, the proxy-war in Syria, and the Ukraine Crisis. Tired of being censored by our beloved, once-upon-a-time left-of-centre newspaper, in February 2015 we decided to create our own platform for airing our unacceptable opinions. |
Quote: |
And we’ll be doing our little best to remind our mainstream media, including The Guardian itself, that this is supposed to be their duty. They probably won’t listen, but we’ll keep saying it anyway. |
sod98 wrote (View Post): | ||||
mooxe that's right. The standard of that article was accurate and by a investigative journalist something most MSM don't have anymore. Well done and you even recognized that they have journalists. DJ - where do I begin. First you say I'm indulging in far right web sites and now calling this socialist website wonky without any checking. You have stated that I must be a Russian troll and that I'm not from NZ. You are more confused that Bradley Manning. I do believe this posting was one of the first from a non MSM site. Does that worry you guys more than the truth. As that's what they have published. I guess you and mooxe have had issues with the truth and not being able to admit your mistakes in the past. Valery Morozov - who cares what he is. Has he proof or is evidence enough that they make these baseless claims for you to believe. mooxe and Dj - once again looking forward to you guys saying that you were wrong. The article is accurate and by a investigative journalist. Off Guardian is associated through supply of articles. Man up or DJ just admit. |
JFFulcrum wrote (View Post): |
Cui prodest?
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/15/uk-set-up-48m-chemical-weapons-defence-centre-gavin-williamson |
mooxe wrote (View Post): |
I absolutely doubt the article. William Craddick's reputation has been called into question previously in the link I posted. Since you label him as an investigative journalist, where did he travel to and who did he speak with to form any facts in this article? Nowhere and nobody! Apply the same questions to his Haiti article. This is a stitched together opinion article. The fact is, his article is an opinion. |
sod98 wrote (View Post): |
What happened to your attack on the " pretty good " that's right i stared you into another trap.....................lol. And do I see - sorry sod I was wrong........no. If you want that info send him a email like you can to all medias. And here we are once again you are questioning his Haiti article. Go back to being the janitor mooxe. I trying to stop you making a bigger fool of yourself but you keep digging that hole. Calm down and pour yourself a warm milk drink. Take a few deep breaths. You believe WAPO and sorts who report what these moderate rebels are saying through the SOFHR. They have been discredited as being a one man band out of a little house in Britain..............lol. And that was several years ago and they are still being used. How many times over the years have I had to show links and info to mooxe and DJ just to get - no reply. Do your own donkey work. You are pathetic. Get back on topic and stop embarrassing yourself further. At least as the janitor you didn't appear stupid, naive and gullible. Where is Citrus. |
JFFulcrum wrote (View Post): |
Strange things in media continues:
Farther of poisoned in 2006 Litvinenko made statement on TV, that his son was poisoned by CIA agent, and make friendship with suspected (by Britain) killer: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=ru&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gazeta.ru%2Fsocial%2F2018%2F03%2F21%2F11690293.shtml&edit-text= Russian state media back-edited interview with another 'father' of 'Novichok' weaponry: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=ru&sl=ru&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fruposters.ru%2Fnews%2F20-03-2018%2Fotredaktirovalo-intervyu-razrabotchikom One of Rink statements was that is impossible to transfer armed Novichok in luggage. Now, due to back-editing, all information provided by him should be treatened with caution. |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT