Radzymin-GC-V2.zip | |||
Description: |
|
Download |
|
Filename: | Radzymin-GC-V2.zip | ||
Filesize: | 2.77 KB | ||
Downloaded: | 281 Time(s) |
Radzymin-OP-V2.zip | |||
Description: |
|
Download |
|
Filename: | Radzymin-OP-V2.zip | ||
Filesize: | 934 Bytes | ||
Downloaded: | 275 Time(s) |
Vehicles.zip | |||
Description: |
|
Download |
|
Filename: | Vehicles.zip | ||
Filesize: | 4.77 KB | ||
Downloaded: | 270 Time(s) |
radzymin44.png | ||
Description: |
|
|
Filesize: | 327.51 KB | |
Viewed: | 5915 Time(s) | |
R44 supply issue.jpg | ||
Description: |
|
|
Filesize: | 163.18 KB | |
Viewed: | 5419 Time(s) | |
Schmal_Turm wrote (View Post): |
Here are the results of my first Radzymin44 campaign, where the Germans counterattack, starting with version 1 and then later after about three days upgrading to version 1.04. At the beginning my Panthers took many kills as the JSIIs and ISUs guns were overpowered. As I played, I restarted the battles a number of times, maybe up to 10 over the course of the campaign which could account for the number of destroyed Russian tanks as opposed to my German losses. I also tend to play pretty conservatively as the Germans generally have smaller force pools. With the settings that Aetius recommended the Russian forces were pretty much more aggressive resulting in more overruns of my forces and generally more losses. I generally would stop the battle after the Russians would sue for a "Truce." But after the decimation and disbanding of one of my units early on and the massive numbers of Russian tanks I decided to not have mercy, so many times Russians units were disbanded. |
Quote: |
Together, these four armoured divisions (HG, 19. Pz, 5. SS-Wiking, 4. Pz) possessed 223 tanks, plus 54 assault guns and tank destroyers |
Quote: |
On the other side, 2nd Armoured Army had around 800 tanks and assault guns, although an unknown number had been lost in the meantime. |
Pzt_Kanov wrote (View Post): |
I thought vehicle battlegroup speed>infantry battlegroup speed. I managed to beat the infantry regiment but now this Tank Brigade is lagging behind. Was it because it had lower cohesion than the attacking germans? or are germans inherently faster than soviets in this mod? or maybe another unknown variable?
It didn't affect me much particularly, I just find it curious that an armored unit was outpaced by a foot unit. |
Pzt_Kanov wrote (View Post): |
According to this site: THE STABILIZATION OF THE FRONT BETWEEN WARSAW AND RIGA UP TO THE END OF AUGUST
|
major soviet victory.PNG | ||
Description: |
|
|
Filesize: | 346.8 KB | |
Viewed: | 3805 Time(s) | |
major victory but lower morale.PNG | ||
Description: |
|
|
Filesize: | 154.18 KB | |
Viewed: | 3805 Time(s) | |
Schmal_Turm wrote (View Post): |
Pzt_Kanov, thanks for a fascinating read! I started your link (THE STABILIZATION OF THE FRONT BETWEEN WARSAW AND RIGA UP TO THE END OF AUGUST) from the beginning and the actual info, as opposed to Soviet and Western propaganda shows that the ratio of German vs. Russian armor lost at Kursk was something like 8 to 1! Even Russian historian, Boris Sokolov, was able to discover the truth when the records were allowed to be seen after the fall of the Soviet Union. There are over 1200 pages of info available and I plan on reading them all. Made it through almost 300 pages so far. |
Stuka_Me262.JPG | ||
Description: |
|
|
Filesize: | 33.95 KB | |
Viewed: | 2727 Time(s) | |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT