Quote: |
88 Flak 37 was a superb and versatile gun. Still too high profile and weak HE shell (or not... comparing with the D-25T for example). Even though these, there were too few, they were widely spread and their crews weren't top class in most cases. |
Fiestita wrote (View Post): |
Pak 40 pierces at 500m:
+ 132mm with AP + 154mm with APCR Flak 37 pierces at 500m: + 110mm with AP + 156mm with APCR And this is my source: http://www.fprado.com/armorsite/tiger1.htm |
Quote: |
Well in that case Flak 37 is clearly superior to Pak 40, because I've just read in "Germany's Tiger Tanks - Tiger I and II: Combat Tactics" by Jentz, Thomas L. that Flak 36 and KwK 36, had these specs with AP and APCR respectively: 110mm@500m@0º and 156mm@500m@0º. |
Fiestita wrote (View Post): |
Well in that case Flak 37 is clearly superior to Pak 40, because I've just read in "Germany's Tiger Tanks - Tiger I and II: Combat Tactics" by Jentz, Thomas L. that Flak 36 and KwK 36, had these specs with AP and APCR respectively: 110mm@500m@0º and 156mm@500m@0º. |
Quote: |
So did Flak 37 have APCR at all? |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT