(RegXtra) playing with maps
Select messages from
# through # Forum FAQ
[/[Print]\]

Close Combat Series -> Close Combat 5: Invasion Normandy

#1: (RegXtra) playing with maps Author: ANZAC_Lord4warLocation: Sydney Australia PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 8:58 am
    —
check this out and feel free to criticise or suggest


and the original below


Last edited by ANZAC_Lord4war on Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:10 am; edited 2 times in total

#2: Re: playing with maps Author: hwoarang77 PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:00 pm
    —
What is it different to origianal map??

#3:  Author: Nembo PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:51 pm
    —
He made the map bigger.

The parachutes you added seem to be out of place.

#4: mmm Author: ANZAC_Lord4warLocation: Sydney Australia PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 9:48 pm
    —
parachutes? u must be seeing things.

#5:  Author: platoon_michaelLocation: Right behind you PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:44 pm
    —
I like it

Only seems natural that the Germans would block a few points of entry once things got bad for them.

The sandbag pill box.....
If it was for a MG I dont think it would be that big
If it was for a PAK 40 I think it would be more sloped with the visual that more than one bag was present

#6: Yep Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:57 pm
    —
I must say the extention is muth usefull and will give the map better game play, the extention is of such quality, that I cant tell Atomics work from L4W, cant be better than that.

V.Good

Stalk

#7: mmm Author: ANZAC_Lord4warLocation: Sydney Australia PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 4:13 pm
    —
finally i got my dusty maps folder out and finished this fugger!

#8:  Author: HistoryTeachesLocation: Germany PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 7:01 pm
    —
sorry im a little thick,there is still the question

why sandbags in the left upper corner and not a tree ?

#9: mmm Author: ANZAC_Lord4warLocation: Sydney Australia PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 1:09 am
    —
i put them there Smile

#10:  Author: HistoryTeachesLocation: Germany PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 11:53 am
    —
yes thought so Wink

no what i meant where is the realistic aspect about it ?

yea i know regx is not realistic Razz

but im a viagra addict!

#11: mmm Author: ANZAC_Lord4warLocation: Sydney Australia PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:31 pm
    —
maybe as ur name suggests u could enlighten me?

#12: HEy Lord.... Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:37 pm
    —
Thanx for let me in on gametested it,

Vierville is my favourite map in Utah

Finaly one can have 2 possible aproshes as the right/north path was to narrow and dead end before. This is far more realistic game play, as the wider aria give a freedom of two flanking options.

Well Done,

Stalky!

#13:  Author: HistoryTeachesLocation: Germany PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:11 pm
    —
nobody would put sandbags in a field as long as it is not an "entrenched" position

and entrenched positions were made to stop the enemy which they expected to advance in this region or to protect artillary positions,airfields,bunkers etc. from partisan attacks

but why would a normal field in the middle of normandy be so vital for the occupating force ?

see what i´m aiming at ?

#14: mmm Author: ANZAC_Lord4warLocation: Sydney Australia PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 12:15 am
    —
yes i see
have u seen the map coding?
yes why would germans use anything to block the roads?
it might actually slow an allied advance down.
or cause them to approach with caution.
or use ammo on it.
sheesh sand bags deployed a map behind a beach.
where would they have got the sand from?
exiting german forces werent trained to delay an advance?
why did the allies land so much towing equipment?

these r even better questions.
i liked ur view on subject and how u explained.
maybe i should remove the beach obstacles,blocking some of the easy exits in the fields from the roadway system.

what do u think about CC5 engine being able to deploy a gun pit?
as it is an entrenchment gun pit? no sandbags.
sorry ill stop there or i will go on for hours.

#15:  Author: HistoryTeachesLocation: Germany PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 9:36 am
    —
no hard feelings dude but seriously

about your beachpart, it´s called Atlantikwall , they knew the allies would come sooner or later and they fortified the beaches at the channelcoast

but your sandbags are a bit misplaced (edge of a map, the only ones around)

the sandbags don´t block the road, they just "block" the entrance to a field

i have something against improvment of maps

it might be nice with playability

#16: mmm Author: ANZAC_Lord4warLocation: Sydney Australia PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 11:28 am
    —
lol non taken.

#17:  Author: Luft_Karabiner PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:49 pm
    —
A bleedin spot the difference thing Very Happy
I liked the original one more.

#18: mmm Author: ANZAC_Lord4warLocation: Sydney Australia PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:22 pm
    —
yer the original 1 is easier.



Close Combat Series -> Close Combat 5: Invasion Normandy


output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT

Page 1 of 1