Why can't we control the vehicle/gun crew?
Select messages from
# through # Forum FAQ
[/[Print]\]
Goto page Previous  1, 2  :| |:
Close Combat Series -> CC5 Gold, Juno, Sword

#21:  Author: ronsonLocation: England PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 4:30 pm
    —
On a slightly more macabre note it should be realised that the reason many tank drivers/crewmen carried sidearms with them had nothing to do with shooting at the enemy Sad

#22:  Author: Luft_Karabiner PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:06 pm
    —
king_tiger_tank wrote:
Zappi is pretty much right on that. The germans, British, etc. did not have weapons small enough to fit into a tank (pistols and grenades only) except the americans which have the "Grease Gun" a small cheap and a good Smg.

The grease gun wasn't good!?!

#23: Hmm Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:34 pm
    —
A: Stay with tank? And defend it..
B: Go back and possible get it towed? (if you would be the only tank there? dont happen often i guess, so other crews ought to report your position and status.)
C: Join the Infantry who you are close to, and fight of a possible attack?
D: Panic and run!

I belive all alternatives is possible and more.

As for Swede Tank training (WW2), they would dismount a Coax MG (done in no time), and with that take a defencive possition and defend the tank. (this is doctrine). So a surviving tank crew, would be much like a Swed MG team, 1 SMG, 3 Pistols and a 8mm MMG...
If the tank is burning, no tank to defend ofcose, and no MG will be removed ofcose...

Stalk

#24:  Author: Luft_Karabiner PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:42 pm
    —
If there was an AA MG on the turret, you could climb up and use it.



Close Combat Series -> CC5 Gold, Juno, Sword


output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT

Goto page Previous  1, 2  :| |:
Page 2 of 2