Blitzkaiser wrote: |
As long as the 15 squad limits per round is removed, I would return to the CCV: Stalingrad mod.
DO u believe that in Grain Lev, such impoirtant point form stopping German from advancing, the Russians will only send 15*(what 7 or guys max. 190men to defend? On Fallen Fighter's Square such open space, sad not having Russian massive infrantry charging............ Question: I sthe 15 squad limit hard-coded? |
Quote: |
Question: I sthe 15 squad limit hard-coded? |
Quote: |
The german teams are all maxed out on numbers, morale and attributes, while the russians get smaller numbers (why???) poor morale and attributes. |
Quote: |
IMHO since you cannot change the number of teams the Russians should get bigger teams, mortar sections (2 tubes per section) machinegun sections etc. |
Quote: |
yeah this is why i lost interest in this mod, that and how weak T-34s are, |
Quote: |
i mean if they can ram tiger tanks and damage them and come out ok how come they can't take a shell. |
Quote: |
Quote:
i mean if they can ram tiger tanks and damage them and come out ok how come they can't take a shell. urban legend. |
Quote: |
During the battle of Kursk It is known that Russian tanks with useless guns or turrets due to battle damage or partially killed crew would ram german tanks in an effort to block the traverse of their turrets/barrel. |
Quote: |
well, theoretically it is possible to damage tank that is of same or lesser weight than yers.
Practically that's virtually impossible to ram mobile tank. Imo T-34 wouldnt really be able to do significant damage i.e. jam turret, immobilize PzVI as it was almost 2 times lighter. Plus most of germans tanx could avoid collision as they were faster offroad than T-34. Btw do u have any sources that prove mass cases of ramming during the battle of Kursk? As i did't c any realiable proves but soviet propaganda |
Quote: |
I`m talking about ad hoc actions by individual tankers. i never said it was a massively used tactic now did i? |
Quote: |
And you really didn`t just say that German tanks are faster offroad then a T34 now did you? |
Quote: |
just wondered if anyone has any valid info about it. As no report from Kursk i;ve read mentioned it. |
Quote: |
i DO know that most of german tanx were faster offroad (especially in summer time) than T-34. And they DID have greater crusing range than T-34.
Things chnged slightly in mid-late 1943 when T-34 got new gearbox. That allowed it to have pretty same offroad speed as PzIII/IV had. If u take Tiger or Panther in particulary, Panther was faster and Tiger had same offroad speed as T-34 with old gearbox. |
Quote: |
You dont have to believe me mate, just check the facts ok? Take a look here; http://www.onwar.com/tanks/index.htm |
Quote: |
Ramming tanks and a Russian story about it, Recomended reading.. :
http://www.battlefield.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&lang=en&id=173&Itemid=88 |
Quote: |
(Ramming have been a part of war for thousands of years (naval / etc) 31 Ton of steel coming at speed is a mighty mighty mighty projectile... |
Quote: |
"Characteristics of the T34.
The T-34 is faster, more maneuverable, has better cross-country mobility than our Pz.Kpfw.lll and IV. |
Quote: |
The penetrating ability of its 7.62 cm cannon is superior to our 5 cm KwK. and the 7.5 cm KwK40. |
Quote: |
Combating the T-34 with the 5 cm KwK tank gun is possible only at short ranges from the flank or rear, where it is important to achieve a hit as perpendicular to the surface as possible. |
Quote: |
Qoute Dima:
v true. But with even 18km/h speed T-34 couldn't inflict much damage to PzVI. It's like ramming Mercedes G-klasse with Mercedes E-klasse on 18km/h speed. End Qoute |
Quote: |
Ramming…
Basic Human Reaktions… |
Quote: |
Answer: Simple equation and mathematics really, a less mass may have more “weight” as it’s moving, and in this case at this speed the T34 “weight” is much much more then a VI… |
Quote: |
At 7.5 km/h a T34 have the same "weight" as a Tiger 2 that stand still..... |
Quote: |
PS: Wonder how that Merceds woud look when hit in side btw, by 1 ton at 18 km/h. No Damage u say?? Really? |
Quote: |
ok impulses r 232.5kN vs 231kN |
Quote: |
DIMA: Imo T-34 wouldnt really be able to do significant damage i.e. jam turret, immobilize PzVI as it was almost 2 times lighter. |
Quote: |
Quote:
DIMA: During the battle of Kursk It is known that Russian tanks with useless guns or turrets due to battle damage or partially killed crew would ram german tanks in an effort to block the traverse of their turrets/barrel. DIMA: well, theoretically it is possible to damage tank that is of same or lesser weight than yers. |
Quote: |
Quote:
Answer: Simple equation and mathematics really, a less mass may have more “weight” as it’s moving, and in this case at this speed the T34 “weight” is much much more then a VI… Dima: That's physics actually. But yes from elementary course. And I guess u've meant 'impulse' by 'weight'. |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT