Badger-Bag wrote: |
If you can't restrain your language towards me, as I do towards you, it's better if you don't address me at all, don't you think?.
|
Badger-Bag wrote: |
I mean, I don't come here for the pleasure of arguing with some stranger, I have family and friends available for arguments sake. It just looks so bad, for you to tee off on me and speak rudely and bring in extranneous issues, it makes you look as if your side of the argument is so weak that it can't stand on it's own merits. Which is the case in my opinion. |
Badger-Bag wrote: |
I didn't correct his sentences' english to be insulting, merely to be clear of my COUNTER point. If I had answered his point as he had phrased it, thats two wrongs. (a) I would be answering something other than his INTENT. And (b) I would be perpetuating his mistake. "Survivours of Hiroshima and Nagasaki had there dna wiped from the gene pool" I survived Hiroshima, anyone that has visited the city and walked away alive, can claim to have survived it. So I clarified that he, ( and I ) were speaking of the ATOMIC event. And "Hiroshima and Nagasaki had there dna" ? Two places and the pronoun there followed by a proper noun. The sentence was too confusing, so I corrected it, without any insult implied other than the phrasing of my explaination, which maybe HE could take offence with. No glare , no rolled eyes. He didn't, so you afforded yourself the pleasure to take up arms for him?. |
Badger-Bag wrote: |
Just don't, ok?. I haven't launched into you, so why would you do so to me?. And you can't afford an apology simply for the sake of peace?. In my experience, people that rate their "pride" too highly for normal courtesies, usually haven't anything to BE proud of. |
Badger-Bag wrote: |
I will try one more time to make my point, which has nothing at all to do with the following. "I guess that's why after some American tests in the bikini atols, scientists couldn't come near to the testsite for 2 weeks after the "perfectly normal explosion" .... I guess that's why so many of the US soldier, that were forced to march over testsites, hours after an nuclear explosion, mostly died of weird cancers at a terrible young age ...heck radiation is so overrated I guess that's why some of the leading nuclear scientist perished when 2 uranium spheres were put together and fell just abit to hard on top of eachother (talking about a 1 mm drop here). I guess that's why all the countries started testing their nuclear bombs underground. I guess that's why we can still measure all the radiation all over the world from the outdoor tests conducted in the 50's and 60's... " |
Badger-Bag wrote: |
The vast majority of survivors of the atomic bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, had no teratogenic damage, had no damage to their genetic material, and simply DID NOT have "their dna wiped from the gene pool". Even the memorial museum at Hiroshima, that bends over backwards to overstate the case of damage done, only claims that another 30 000 lives were signifigantly shortened due to effect of the bomb there. |
Blackstump wrote: |
as far as caps an rolling eyes go... isnt that part of the haka ?? :"} |
Blackstump wrote: |
... as far as caps an rolling eyes go... isnt that part of the haka ?? :"} |
Blackstump wrote: |
Ok Badger you can have a go at me as much as you like, but having a go at the Wallabies and the Kangaroos is a bit "underarm" dont you think? besides all that dancing and eye rolling didnt stop the poms from kickin the Maroi's arse from one end of the Island to the other did it now ? and please dont go asking me for a simple apology for that... |
Blackstump wrote: |
The American decision to drop an A bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Must have make Bomber Harris's dilema, pale by comparison. With Japan's navy defeated , thousands of experienced troops traped without supply on numerous islands, the American Airforce freely able to cover Japan. The decision was made to save American lives with an invasion by using The Bomb ! now the question is, was it a moral issue or a show of strength once again ?... to my way of thinking... Japan could have been strangle with in 3 months no troops need to attack... the islands, instead of killing many Australians, should have been left to rot... except the prison camps who should have been attacked alot earlier.... |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT