ArmeeGruppeSud wrote (View Post): |
OH! WOW! HMMM, AT_Stalky notices CC players playing in European time zone more than AT_Stalky sees people playing in US Time zone AT_Stalky lives in Sweden Conclusion = AT_Stalky notices more players in Euro time zone because, being in Europe, AT_Stalky spends most of his online CC time in European time zone because most US players wont come online until AT_Stalky is well asleep as they are 6-9 hours behind Swedish time. Its no surprise that AT_Stalky does not play US people online often as AT_Stalky would have to either stay up till dawn playing or get up extremely early to play during US evening playtime |
ArmeeGruppeSud wrote (View Post): |
@ Stalky My response was entirely logical. ,. |
ArmeeGruppeSud wrote (View Post): |
AT_Stalky loves to sparr with me |
Quote: |
CC5 rocks
1) it is ahistorical so wannabes can try to rewrite history with different outcomes |
Quote: |
2) it had such a huge success that Atomic died! |
Quote: |
3) you play same maps over and over again and again as there is no way to play more than 44 maps in a campaign. |
Quote: |
It is more likely that you will play on less than 40 maps and may play one single maps 20 plus time zzzzzzz |
Quote: |
4) it has awesome soldier history system - so successful that at end of campaign only mortar teams have any real history |
Quote: |
5) it doesn't represent a real command at all, because it is a fantasy world where you are a Fieldmarshall commanding several regiments |
Quote: |
and you are also several battalion commanders and dozens of company commanders as well. You are not at all in touch with your men because you are sufferring with multiple identity disorder, so realistic |
Quote: |
CC5 rox |
Quote: |
2) it had such a huge success that Atomic died!
yes! as it had released CC3 2 years before that was a huge success after CC2! |
Quote: |
there are 44 maps in 1 operation making it highly detailed - of cause that's much worse than 3-4 maps per operation in CC3! |
Quote: |
wannabes try to capture Kremlin in CC3!
CC5 players try their skill to win historical operation as all the historical operations had at least 3 possible outcomes Wink. |
Quote: |
yeah, it is realistic, don't be jelous Wink. |
acebars wrote (View Post): |
yes! as it had released CC3 2 years before that was a huge success after CC2!
|
acebars wrote (View Post): |
CC3 was a huge success after CC2 and it was made by MICROSOFT |
acebars wrote (View Post): |
Matrix games has only produced shite. |
acebars wrote (View Post): |
CC5 is anything but a realistic strategy game, and it ruins the tactical element. Anyone who has played Hearts of Iron 2 will know exactly what a real WW2 strategy game should look like that or CC2. |
acebars wrote (View Post): |
Still waiting to hear a coherent argument for why CC5 is better than CC3 |
acebars wrote (View Post): |
and would also like posters to describe their experiences with both games (AT_Stalky for example) have you just tried CC3 or played it for a month at least? |
Quote: |
Well, Matrix has not produced any Close Combat game… Matrix is the DISTRIBUTOR.
SCO-Simtec developed COI, Blackhand developed LSA, and now PITF, and Strategy 3 Tacics developed WAR & TLD. CCMT was developed by S3T? if I don’t remember wrong. |
Quote: |
In any case it is certain CC4 and CC5 had something to do with killing Atomic. |
Quote: |
More proof that staunch CC5 defenders have not been in touch with the previous versions and have no real idea about CC3. |
Quote: |
CC3 was a huge success after CC2 and it was made by MICROSOFT |
Quote: |
Matrix games has only produced shite |
Quote: |
Yep and all the battles take place over and over again on maybe 10 maps. ZZZZ |
Quote: |
Anyone who has played Hearts of Iron 2 will know exactly what a real WW2 strategy game should look like that or CC2 |
Quote: |
Yep and even if you do capture the Kremlin you are pushed off, which I would say is realistic. |
Quote: |
Many operational commanders had success but if the overall strategic situation is bad a pull back is necessary anyhow. |
Quote: |
This is completely ommitted in the bullcrap CC5 system. How can one battalion expect to change the course of history |
Quote: |
CC5 is anything but a realistic strategy game, and it ruins the tactical element. |
Quote: |
Still waiting to hear a coherent argument for why CC5 is better than CC3, and would also like posters to describe their experiences with both games (AT_Stalky for example) have you just tried CC3 or played it for a month at least? |
Quote: |
This is completely ommitted in the bullcrap CC5 system. How can one battalion expect to change the course of history
1 battalion - sure you've tried CC5? |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
haha, acebar, i used to play all the versions since 1996.
used to win Pz_Clan Tournament in CC3 back in 2002 (or 3?). Show me your stats |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
mate, as i mentioned above, i used to play CC3 alot, and only vs human so yes, i can judge. Can you? |
Quote: |
Dima can you read english or just laugh all the time? |
Quote: |
One battalian cannot change the course of history in CC3, it retreats and moves forward with the overall movement of the frontline. |
Quote: |
The bullshit system in CC5 doesn't even allow battalions to retreat they just vanish into thin air |
Quote: |
I only have been able to play multi since gameranger, never done stats in my life, happy to meet online I want actual battle proof of your CC3 claims |
Quote: |
I'm looking for my copy of CCV, maybe you can show me what I missed? I played it extensively before putting it away for good, and I was disappointed. |
Dima wrote: |
mate, i don't need to proove anything to you - there are enough players in community who know me.
Can you say the same? llol i will not as i don't play with noobs, sorry mate. |
Quote: |
of cause awesome system of CC3 does allow your teams to retreat, but some teams that were close to enemy do vanich in thin air, don;t they? |
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post): |
Acebars, you just entered this commity less than 2 weeks ago. You come with some strong language and some bold agressive arguments. Consider that people will respond accordingly. Some ppl almost feel this is there waterhole, and has been for a long time.
Perhaps you should consider that many of us here go back 12-15 years. That means we have played H2H for one and a half decade.. And formed rather strong social bands. Yeha, we though CC3 was cool back in 1998. But if one feel a bit trapped just playing the same 3 platoons time after time, then CC5 came as a fresh breath, with its 25? German BGs, and 54 allied BGs. And FYI, we did not as you, got stuck on 10 maps vs the AI… Those time back then… So crowded. Many of us have arranged public GCs, as well as being apart of making tournaments, and participated in the same others has arranged. Not to mention the ladder era, where most of us formed the relation in the first place. If I don’t remember wrong, Dima was No1 in the CC5 ladder, cant remember what place he got to in the CC3… Many of us are also moding the games, and or are participating in the making of em, and many even are a part of the making of the Matrix CC games…. But of coarse, if you just started playing H2H with GR, and became a member of the community some 10 days ago, we must take that into account. Welcome aboard this awesome community |
acebars wrote (View Post): |
I want actual battle proof of your CC3 claims |
acebars wrote (View Post): |
and would also like posters to describe their experiences with both games (AT_Stalky for example) have you just tried CC3 or played it for a month at least? |
acebars wrote (View Post): |
I don't give much respect to any time seasoned community in any field of life, there is nothing like new blood to flush out "old cronyism" so forgive me if I don't back down and no I don't give a damn how many tournaments you've won or how many internet people you know or how long you've been part of a community, never have never will. |
Quote: |
Mate your the one who keep pushing us to show you our cards, remember? Read above again. You’re the one that wanted to know from what experience we came from… Your looking more like a troll for each post. If your not, consider how to reply now. |
acebars wrote (View Post): |
I don't give much respect to any time seasoned community in any field of life, there is nothing like new blood to flush out "old cronyism" so forgive me if I don't back down and no I don't give a damn how many tournaments you've won or how many internet people you know or how long you've been part of a community, never have never will. |
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post): |
I have not met you with arrogance. I have not slashed CC3, I have respect for every preference of this game. I have answered many of your questions and statements and elaborated as much as the time allows..
I have also made a “declaration of my and others CC history” as demanded by you.. And now it seem that it was more than you asked for, and then one get this through in the faces: |
zoober wrote (View Post): |
Doesn't strat map of CC4/CC5 offer more choices for the players? I think it does. |
AT_Stalky wrote (View Post): |
Sad low form of argumentation. Childish at best… |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
wannabes try to capture Kremlin in CC3! |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
CC5 players try their skill to win historical operation as all the historical operations had at least 3 possible outcomes |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
CC5 players try their skill to win historical operation as all the historical operations had at least 3 possible outcomes |
Quote: |
2) it had such a huge success that Atomic died! |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
yes! as it had released CC3 2 years before that was a huge success |
Quote: |
3) you play same maps over and over again and again as there is no way to play more than 44 maps in a campaign. |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
there are 44 maps in 1 operation making it highly detailed - of cause that's much worse than 3-4 maps per operation in CC3!
Actually, CC3 has up to 5 maps to represent the company level CLOSE COMBAT sector where CC5 has just one single solitary map, so much better ;) [quote]It is more likely that you will play on less than 40 maps and may play one single maps 20 plus time zzzzzzz |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
same as CC3 that offers 3-4 maps for operation! |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
you talk about CC3, why do you say that in CC5 thread? |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
CC3 rox |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
CC5 is the evolution of CC2 . |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
CC3 was just an dead-end . |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
CC3 is linear and that player doesn't affect the campaign |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
unlike CC5 GC where player's skill can be the difference between loss and victory ............ CC3 doesn't give you chance to win as the germans unlike CC5 |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT