Close Combat Series :: View topic - RD clan versus CCS Mercenary

through

[^/[Print]\]

Close Combat Series -> Close Combat 5: Invasion Normandy

#1: RD clan versus CCS Mercenary Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:21 pm
—
Hi all ...
Some weeks ago i posted a topic about Mercenary VS mercenary war...

while i receved message from RD clan... They was looking for opponents to play clan War in the newest Afrika Mod who is coming very soon..

We dont settled setting yet but for sure setting will be fine for all...

if you care to play this operation Versus RD clan please just reply to this post...

as many we are as fun it will be

#2: Author: Polemarchos, Location: Polemarchopolis

Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:01 pm
—
I am in

#3: Author: ronson, Location: England

Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:52 pm
—
This sounds interesting:).......I'd like to join in if there is room...

I will dig out my baggy shorts and Solar Topee, and be available to fight in the midday sun Very Happy

.

Cheers
Ronson

#4: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:32 pm
—
I beleive Zappi will be making a post about the mod.

But you can go here to get the mod and reply with questions/comments/bugs.

http://www.reddevilscc.com/forum/default.asp?CAT_ID=23

We can discuss the which Op looks the best and start the weekend of Feb 17th if everyone is ok with that?

I have asked the RD that they post before next weekend if they are going to play. We already have 11 signed up. I have asked that anyone who sign up from RD commit to 2 games per week.

#5: Author: dacman82, Location: Perth, Australia

Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:23 pm
—
i AM INTERESTED IN PLAYING IN THE WAR THO IT WILLL HAVE TO BE AROUND WORK COMMITMENTS. ARE THER ANY AUSSIE RD PLAYERS? IT WILL MAKE THINGS MUCH EASIER

#6: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:57 am
—
We have one Aussie RD player right now.

#7: Author: Wabuu, Location: Darwin, Australia

Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:59 am
—
Do I have to be part of a clan already? If not, then count me in, although I only get a few hours each weekday morning in which I could play. I'll be able to organise weekend net use if nessecary.

Oh, and I'm also an Aussie.

#8: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:17 pm
—
Anyone who sign up here will join the Mercenary side...
You dont have to be in a clan to join us Wink

This is a Mercenary group Smile

#9: Author: JohnDee,

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:31 pm
—
yo, i've played the mod the last couple of days and believe i'm rdy for my first team-op. so if you guys are still looking for a well motivated mercenary, then count me in : Cool

Ps. live near london (gmt 0)

#10: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:34 am
—
Looks like you got 6 Mercs (with yourself) Zappi. I would love to see 6 more. We can kick this thing off as early as Feb 17th if we get more signed up.

Lets monitor over the next 5-6 days and see what happends. Then we can discuss the Op itself if needed.

#11: Author: BRNJSC,

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 8:02 pm
—
Hi there.If you need some help im in .You can talk to me by the email njsc00 [at] hotmail [dot] com

#12: Author: SAS_SnaKe,

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:49 am
—
I'm looking for some action. Gamespy isn't working well for me. Also got a teammate who has this game as well.

count me in. contact/msn:

johndoe3367 [at] hotmail [dot] com

website: http://www.sasunit.com (not for this game tho, but you can find our forum there, etc incase you need to contact us.)

#13: ye Author: AT_Stalky,

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:39 pm
—
Oki

Sounds grate

#14: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:01 pm
—
There is the list of Mercenary who sign up to join the clan War...

Polermarchos : macGod [at] genion [dot] de

Ronson : s.benfield [at] ntlworld [dot] com

Dacman : dacman82 [at] yahoo [dot] com

Wabuu : Lt_capt [at] hotmail [dot] com

JohnDee : amarugiles [at] yahoo [dot] com

D6H : njsc00 [at] hotmail [dot] com

SAS snake : johndoe3367 [at] hotmail [dot] com

Stalky : at_stalky [at] hotmail [dot] com

Wruff : wruffcc [at] yahoo [dot] com

Pzt_kevin_dtn : kevin_dtn [at] yahoo [dot] com

MarkIVG : moodymark2 [at] btopenworld [dot] com

Zappi : at_zappi [at] hotmail [dot] com

Malarkey : svaap86 [at] hotmail [dot] com

MOOXE: mooxe [at] hotmail [dot] com

Pzt_Mac : bigbouyhoss [at] hotmail [dot] com

if u still waiting some day for sure some more ppl will join

Last edited by ZAPPI4 on Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:04 pm; edited 4 times in total

#15: Author: Pzt_Malarkey,

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:23 pm
—
Hey Zappi I would like to join too if possible.

Cheers Malark

email: svaap86 [at] hotmail [dot] com

#16: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:03 pm
—
SOunds good.

Thanks for the summary of MSN addresses Zappi, I will post mine early this week.

Shall we have a signup cutoff of this Wednesday of everyone who will participate?

We can start the Op next Friday. Now all we need to do is a pick an operation.

#17: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:07 pm
—
Yes i will send email to every mercenary asking for them to confirm for wednesday.

Maybe we can already trying to settle the rules...

15 min?
moral off?
no act on ini?
Line/line?
tank limits?
Broken deploy rules?
replaying battle after crashing by same player?
3 game in a row by same player on the same week's operation?

#18: Author: RD_Trolljoss,

Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:56 pm
—
Yes, sounds good.

IMO:

15 min
moral off
never act on initiative
Max 2 tanks, no limit for the armored cars, jeeps...
No reinforce
all victory locations and 2 mins warning.
VL deploy rule ( ie areas not connected to friendly VL are off limits)
Crashed battles will be replayed by two other players.

Joss

#19: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:00 pm
—
just if i can ...
replaying crashed battle by other player will maybe be a prblm if no one else is online to play...

Well about the tank, if u limit tank u should limit AT gun too. Cos in those open map AT gun look like same as a tank. Just maybe 2 tanks maxi for 3 AT gun maxi...
And what about forward observer ... maybe good to limit them too

About the broken deploy rule, just add than cornered connection is ok

... tell me what

#20: Author: RD_Trolljoss,

Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:21 pm
—
Yes, you're right Zappi.

Let's see what the others players thinks about the unit limits rules, personnaly i havent got enought experience with this mod.

Sorry, i haven't thought an Fo teams, of course we should set limits!

#21: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 8:10 pm
—
Im fine with those, but why limit anything?

If you can win a map with 10 Vehicles, all the more power to you.

Also, I know we have a few members that dont like to play with the Never act on initiative. I personally dont care, and in a 15 min game I dont think it matters as most troops stay still for 15 min.

#22: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:42 pm
—
About the limits well i dont care about with or without that's either for me...

Well about the no act on ini, your troops will move themself if they dont receve order after 10 min. That's means you can see a strong defend position breaking their wall some min before the end just cos they havent receved any order ... the Game is settled like that. I see this like a intolerable things Mad

but if u prefer to play with act on ini, it's ok for me. Just i have dificulty to understood why any team or soldier will move out of position cos they have no new order since 10 min... It look like refuse to follow order for me, and punished by martial court isnt it? But like i said, if u care to play with act on ini, this is ok : Cool

#23: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 11:49 pm
—
This came from Oddball, when I asked him which op to play?

- '60 miles' and 'Border Raids' might play more balanced h2h.

and do not have any map connection "issues" reported as of yet.

YOu can pick it Zappi, doesnt matter to us.

Lets have some fun.

#24: Author: dacman82, Location: Perth, Australia

Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:22 am
—
Whatever limits you guys want to set is fine by me. Will you be having a second in command( i presume you are commander ZAPPI) so pppl area ble to recieve orders if the CO is not around. Also i think there should be a limit on how many maps a player can do per day

#25: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:55 pm
—
Ok, let take Mercenary feeling...
Plz for any Mercenary whop check out the forum ... select your prefered op

#26: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:31 am
—
Dacman, if you look at previous post, it was said that no one will play more than 3 battles in a row.

One more thing:

I have never played in any Op or GC where I practiced games in advance or hosted the opposite side of the file with others to see where units are on a strat map, but it is my understanding that some people actually do this. I and the RD feel this is not the way the game was meant to be played (take surprise element out & the fun). We do not play this way, I would hope the MERCS would not either.

As a rebuttel to this I have been asked in past - that there is no way to monitor this. Well, YOu have my word and the honor that our clan is built on that no one will do so.

Looking forward to hearing which Op you all want to play.

I will post my list of players on Wednesday. I will try to create an MSN file of all the RD players that will play, so that anyone can DL it into their MSN.

If you want we can create this for the MERCS if I am given a final list by Wednesday.

#27: Author: Pzt_Wruff, Location: Pzt Befehl Hauptsitz

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:45 pm
—
I think I'm supposed to post here...

Zappi.

We're nearing completion of Pzt War III, so that's 1st priority. Though shouldn't interfere as it will be over soon.
Also. I'm moving my residence very soon so will probably be offline for a few weeks until I get settled.

I'll try to fight for the mercs whenever possible. Just wanted to give you my stat.

GO MERCS!

-------------------

Regarding that "no peek" rule about looking at the others file. That rule is real nice for allies in CC as they have great recon and see more enemy BG's in strat screen than the axis. So having such a "no peek" rule favors one side over the other which imo isn't fair and balanced.
I don't know if it's a CC bug, or if it's for historical reasons as allies had better air recon late in the war, but the allies have a definite advantage knowing where enemy BG's are located. So having a "no peek" rule isn't balanced in team play.

Just the facts. That's all I'll say on the matter. For your consideration.

Wruff

#28: Author: dacman82, Location: Perth, Australia

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:58 pm
—
Excuse my ignorance Zappi but Are we going to play one of the standard OPs or have you made some up which we are to pick from

#29: Author: dacman82, Location: Perth, Australia

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:27 pm
—
BTW I confirm for mercenary team. I have no problem with rules and am happy with the inclusion of the broken deploy available. Ilike the idea of some of my forces being "cut off"

#30: Author: mooxe,

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:35 am
—
Count me in for Mercs.

I cannot join the battles untill March 10th'ish. I am sure it will still be going by then.

#31: Author: dacman82, Location: Perth, Australia

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:14 am
—
In regards to your email Wruff, If the experience your talking about is in relation to GJS then the allies would have better recon as they had air superiority. I don't know if the better recon applies to all mods. But depending on allied air support in African campaign I believe the peek rule should apply to the historical circumstance. ie allied air superiority no to peek. axis a/s or even, yes to peek rule. If that makes sense...

#32: mmm Author: ANZAC_Lord4war, Location: Sydney Australia

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:01 am
—
should be both sides can peek.
so both sides r not in doubt about the other activities.
if one side fails to peek,it is bad recon on their part.

#33: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 1:36 pm
—
With all due respect, I disagree with you.

I know half of the MERCS that have signed up and if they give me their word that they will not look at both sides of a file, that is good enough for me.

If anyone is not comfortable with this please let me know. You have my word that no player in RD will look at both sides of the file, nor practice battles in advance.

It was not the way the game is meant to be played. Its so much more fun when guessing of units is involved, not to mention realistic.

I never met someone who lost and laughed that I like. We are all competitive (i appreciate that) but we are playing a new mod and trying to have fun, not playing for cash.

Still waiting for the Op you gentlemen wish to play and a final list of MERCS signed up to play.

#34: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:30 pm
—
Np mate, Mercenary can play in blind way ...

I played some battle with Afrika and used the Req to build scenario ....
fought with 25 Pdr AT gun and i saw than this gun refuse to fire any target and keep a black circle whatever the targets are. I saw too some units are in
i didnt tryed the 2 / 6 / 17 / Pdr AT gun ..

Something else now ...
I saw too in via the Req than some place are listed "OPEN" it will be maybe good to add those "OPEN" in a Tiger, Panther, etc ... troops than wasnt evolving in Afrika in this date... But those units would be hidden for a regular game and will bring only if they are selected via the Req, then it will be good cos Ladder's game will luv those units to make ladder's battle....

#35: Author: Wabuu, Location: Darwin, Australia

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:07 pm
—
I'm posting to confirm my entry.
I shall come in on Saturday and play some games.
This is my first time so if I ask you all a trillion questions about things that might seem obvious to you, remember I never really play online games at all.
Don't worry, though, I'm good at CC.

#36: Author: dacman82, Location: Perth, Australia

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:34 pm
—
I used to think i was good till i played online....

#37: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 1:00 am
—
Here are the guys that signed up to play this Op for RD. Might have one more, I think he was busy trying to slay Valentines Day.

Just need to unzip the folder and export into MSN messenger

Still waiting on which Op you'd like to play.

RD_Clan_MSN_addresses.zip

Description:

Just unzip and Import into MSN

Download

Filename:

RD_Clan_MSN_addresses.zip

Filesize:

388 Bytes

Downloaded:

336 Time(s)

#38: Author: Pzt_Mac, Location: Oregon

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:50 am
—
If it's not too late, I would like to throw my hat in on the Mercs side.

Cheers,
Mac

#39: Author: SAS_SnaKe,

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 1:05 pm
—
alright, i added the RD guys to MSN.

by 15 min u mean 15 min for total time? haha by judging from my last few fights, im not sure, but won't there be a lot of draws? ^^

#40: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:26 am
—
Still waiting to hear which Op the MERCS would like to play. I mentioned 2 above that have no bugs reported yet.

Zappi or someone please pick one. I was hoping you would have this yesterday.
If we dont have it by tonite (Thurs) we wont have enough time to strategize to start the thing on Friday. We'll most likely have to push till Sunday or next week.

May I recommend the op called 60 Miles, in an attempt to jump start this thing?
Oddball recommmends playing the Ops on Vet/Vet.

If you like this Op, please pick a side.

#41: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:39 pm
—
Sorry for delay

Well personnaly i 'm ok for 60 Miles

but first plesae let's replay the rules :

Operation in VV ( both "clan" will play both side. Combined PC result will determine winner. In case of tie, we calculate the casualties, the one with less losses gains.)

22 Min
moral on
No act on ini
Line/line ( u asked for veteran/veteran it's either)
Broken deploy rule avaiable
Maximum 3 game in a row on the same week(morning and evening round) by the same player.
in case of crash both player replay, or they can change player.

No limits.

that's it i guess.
Good luck to all of us. Let's take some fun.

:hurt10

#42: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:40 pm
—
Oh well i forgot to say ...

Sorry for delay ... real live you know ... Embarassed

#43: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:44 pm
—
Ho yes i forgot one more things Wink

Anyside, Mercenary is ready when u are Wink

#44: Afrika mod and RD against Mercenary Author: uomodellospazio,

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:29 pm
—
I'm interested

#45: RD clan versus CC5 mercenaries Author: uomodellospazio,

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:47 pm
—
I'm interested in playing
Paolo

#46: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:45 pm
—
hi uomodellospazio

Hi mate, sorry but registering is closed...

Anyways i keep you for a possible reserve team

#47: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 11:45 pm
—
@ RD leader

Sorry but i m online since 15.00 and it's 01.00 now ... time for me to sleep ...

llook to your strategy.. .select yr starting side and let's start tomorrow ( i'm online around 09.00 this morning GMT+1

#48: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:23 am
—
Zappi,

When did these new rules come in?

Why 22 minutes? That is a bizarre time? Why not just 20 minutes (supply runs out after about 15)? Have you dont some research we all should know about to make the mod/game better?

Furthermore, if your going to play a game with 20 or 22 minutes, someone needs to edit a saved game file to change this.

And why morale? THe maps are too big to have morale on.

I wouldnt replay any battles with same players unless it crashes in begining and both players thinks nothing was given away.

I dont have any problems with the others. And I suggested Vet/Vet to limit the force pools, it is also what Oddball suggested might make it a very even Op.

As far as playing both sides, I have no problem playing both sides if we all enjoyed the Op and found it to be balanced.

You can even pick which side you want, I dont care.

As far as starting Saturday morning, you have not left us (MERCS or RD) with much time to digest this and come up with some team strategy. Gen Jack will be commanding the Op for RD and he is not around until Wednesday.

I recommend holding off until next week. Id like some time to further discuss the new rules you presented.

#49: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:20 am
—
Heres what I posted in our forum and what I thought to be the rules:

Rules:
-15 min battles
-Moral off
-Never act on initiative
-No limits
-No reinforce
-All victory locations and 2 mins warning.
-VL deploy rule (ie areas not connected to friendly VL are off limits)
-Crashed battles will be replayed by two other players.

We do NOT practice battles or look at the other side of an Op (for any reason).

Let me know if you have problems with them.

Then please tell me which side you would like.

#50: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:25 am
—
-15 min battles
-Moral off
-Never act on initiative
-No limits
-No reinforce
-All victory locations and 2 mins warning.
-VL deploy rule (ie areas not connected to friendly VL are off limits)
-Crashed battles will be replayed by two other players.

We do NOT practice battles or look at the other side of an Op (for any reason).

this is the rules that we settled with RD_Helmut

Apparently if no one is against those rules is avaiable...

Mercenary will start as Italian on the 60 Miles operation if eveyone is ok with that

#51: Author: Wabuu, Location: Darwin, Australia

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 1:00 pm
—
Me happy plenty good.

#52: Author: Pzt_Wruff, Location: Pzt Befehl Hauptsitz

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:24 pm
—

ZAPPI4 wrote:

-15 min battles
-Moral off
-Never act on initiative
-No limits
-No reinforce
-All victory locations and 2 mins warning.
-VL deploy rule (ie areas not connected to friendly VL are off limits)
-Crashed battles will be replayed by two other players.

We do NOT practice battles or look at the other side of an Op (for any reason).

this is the rules that we settled with RD_Helmut

Apparently if no one is against those rules is avaiable...

Mercenary will start as Italian on the 60 Miles operation if eveyone is ok with that

Okay, and sounds like Vet/Vet setting from what's posted here previously.

Merc orders are posted and we're ready to roll.

#53: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 1:07 am
—
Ok great, I am hoping Jack has enough time to pop in to post some moves.

There are already some thoughts in forums.

#54: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:26 pm
—
One other thing, I think the Italians (attacking) should host the file, unless someone is having problems hosting.

I want to wish everyone good luck and have fun.

I really appreciate MOOXE in making this thing happen in the first place, as I have discussed it with him for months now. And a special thanks to Zappi for organizing it in MOOXE's absence.

#55: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:28 pm
—
Thx to you and of course to RD to make this possible Wink

Good hunting all

#56: Author: Pzt_Kevin_dtn, Location: USA

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:33 pm
—
Thanks to RD_Oddball for the awsone Africa mod to play this war on!! :ok1 :ok2

#57: Author: Pzt_Coyote, Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands

Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:53 pm
—
If you still need someone ... I'm ready to roll Razz

#58: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:39 am
—
Zappi, you might want to help SAS Snake out with the rules of Team Op play (MERC).

He couldnt log into the CC Series website (not sure about the MERC side) and wanted to play a game in the Op. I refused to play him unless he could read up on the War and the MERC strategy.

I didnt think it was fair to play a new player who hasnt been involved yet and have not read anything.

Hope no one has a problem with that.

#59: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:48 pm
—
Well, it will be good if he can contact me. I tryed ... emailed hilm since the start but never had any reply from him

#60: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:01 pm
—
Well I was hoping to finish the Op this weekend, but Zappi was only Merc around willing to play a game.

We have fought the same 4-5 Merc players the whole Op.

I want to thank, Zappi, Kevin, Polemarchos and Mac for being the ones to carry this Op for the Mercs.

WHERE ARE THE OTHERS???

#61: Author: bambam887, Location: Belgium

Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:09 pm
—
I think mooxe will be back soon Wink

#62: Author: dacman82, Location: Perth, Australia

Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:50 pm
—
There are never any RD players on at the same time as me. I spent hours waiting at my comp for many nights and eventually gave up. The time zones just don't match up for me Sad

I would really like to be involved but wat with only having three or four hours free at night always at the same time there is nothing i can really do.

#63: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:27 pm
—
DacMan, I see you are in Australia. Unfortuantely both of our Australian members did not sign up for this Op because they were away on business. I do think they will sign up for the next Op when we flip sides.

However, I find it extremely hard to believe that you cannot find any RD players on during the weekend. We have maniacs that stay up all hours during the weekend (including myself -and I never seen you on MSN).

#64: Author: dacman82, Location: Perth, Australia

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:26 am
—
I do not play on the weekends Helmut, I play on weeknights, So I don't find it very hard to believe either. Also I do not use MSN i use yahoo on which i have seen you and requested games though I receive no answer. The same with RD trolljoss who has put his account on " out to lunch" everytime I see it. I mentioned in my original post on this forum that I would endeavour to play around work commitments. Regardless I still wish to play and view every AAR posted on Merc forum. Anyway, if there are goin to be australians playin in next stage of the op it should make it easier for me and hope to be more involved as you, and I, would like.

#65: Author: RD_Helmut,

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:01 am
—
I want to thank everyone who contributed in the first half of the Op.

I thought the everyone that played for the MERCS side did a really good job and played almost error free. Congrats on the Major victory.

I look forward to playing as the Italians next Friday.

#66: Author: RD_Trolljoss,

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 12:11 pm
—
Thx to everbody

Dacman , i dont understand you, i never use "out to lunch" tag Question

.
I dont remeber having seen you on MSN, but that's true that i'm quiet alaway set as away because i use to work with my computer switched on .
I apologize if you havent played because of my fault.

#67: Author: Pzt_Kevin_dtn, Location: USA

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 2:34 pm
—
Thanks to all of RD and the Mercenaries who fought so hard and kept each side in contention through to the end. I think we all learned a lot about the Africa mod and hopefully had fun playing it together. It sure beats playing the AI.

I look forward to the next round. Good Luck to all.

Kevin

#68: oops Author: buuface, Location: Thailand

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 9:32 am
—
oops

Close Combat Series -> Close Combat 5: Invasion Normandy

output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT

Page 1 of 1