Close Combat Series :: View topic - Close Combat 5 Re-Release Debate

through

[^/[Print]\]
Goto page : Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Next :| |:
Close Combat Series -> Close Combat The Longest Day

#41: Author: Pz_Meyer,

Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:51 pm
—
It may be that the re-release of CCV will be the direct path to CC6, re-releases are a way of funding the newer projects. Hollywood plays old movies to generate income to make sequels. But personally I wouldn't mind if it was much better than the original as far as game play and better graphics.

#42: What make Close Combat so good -- Author: swallone,

Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:53 pm
—
What makes the Close Combat Series is it's scale, and unit strategy. The 2d is enjoyable and more importantly simpler to play and enjoy. Also, it has far more realistic war results, and realistic war simulation then any other game I've played in many years, which is why I keep coming back to it. When you play the mods Close Combat lovers work so hard on you see a dediction and love of realism - the vehicle models, the fire effects, the uniforms! This is what all of us want more of - scale, realism, effect, and history. It would be great to have CC re-released with more of what we love. Then new players would flock to the new game. Come on Matrix, go for it! Take us one level, hell - even two levels higher!

#43: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:20 pm
—
Like Stalky said, it would be very great to let the community of Close combat taking care of any update on re-release about older opus of CC.

Question in 2 part for the actual developer:

1: Dont you think than the community, who made so many mod, unofficial patch etc did a great job?
2: If yes, why not let the community "developping" officially any re-release while developper working on newest opus?
For The game and the community it will be a gift from the developper. From the developper it will be less money to spend in those sort of mod what you named re-release and focusing all the money and the time in the things than THE community is waiting for. CC6

#44: Author: DAK_Von_Manteuffel, Location: Zaragoza (España)

Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 11:59 am
—
I, am one of the affected ones, that have bought the C O I , that so great deception caused. Not even I have used it. I think that they would have to concentrate all its energies, about the CC6, adding all the advantages of the CCM and the Royal Air Force, without bugs and to a reasonable price. I want to comment, that in my opinion, the success of the CC5, is because it is easy to obtain, I I have the original one, but many of the CC5 players have obtained a copy, that favors the distribution, single I want to put like example the used operating system more, Windows XP, 70% of the programs, are copies.

#45: Author: mooxe,

Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 1:14 am
—
Howdy,

This is the only thread I have actually moderated in this forum. Please keep your replies inline with the 1st post, or inline with the idea of this thread while replying to someone elses reply. Any off topic posts will simply be moved the OT version of this thread. Thank you.

#46: Author: 7A_Ghoa10, Location: Spain

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 11:48 am
—
i think the only way to save and increase cc comunity is CC6 , i am waiting this game for years and i cant understand why this companies are making re-released of old cc games instead put all the efforts to develop the new CC6,which must be in my opinion more than 1vs1,because if only make new maps, teams ..... will be like other mod of cc

#47: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 1:09 pm
—
I would like to say more..

First things, i dont want to attack anyone. developper, tester etc...
My word can seems to be agressif, and i'm sorry about that. But
u may change side and look all this from gamer eyes.
We took care of any CC ( when i say we, i means the entier community)
We maded mod, unofficial patch cos we were waiting for this from developper
and as it didnt came we did it ourself.
Why did we do that? simply cos we saw the CC capacity
and wanted to add more fun in it. Also we tryed to fix bug
who maded game unplayable sometime.
The community took the place of the developper while
the delopper didnt send us any hand, any effort on it.
So i know actual developper wasnt the developer who put CC in sleep for so long.
But actual developper should heard us and look than what we waiting is:
- a new Opus with all CC feeling all in new socket.
- Some recognition of the power and capacity to made a nice game
to the community by, for exemple, let us making any patch or mod
( like it was as now) for any older CC.
- Keep the community active by adding any new opus in line of our community ( and not trying to split it by making re-release uncompatible with other older CC game)
- Using the entier community evolving in CC6 or any re-release.
As we v got so many player, moder who work or play at CC since 10 years now.
Do you know than someone else will know better the game than thos older CC gamer?
Anyways, i'm happy for CC to see than we had right to still on this game and than our deeper dream will, apparently, bring early. I have nothing more to say than:
Viva CC, Viva the community, Viva us

#48: Author: CSO_Linebacker,

Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 8:56 pm
—

ZAPPI4 wrote:

1: Dont you think than the community, who made so many mod, unofficial patch etc did a great job?
2: If yes, why not let the community "developping" officially any re-release while developper working on newest opus?

Basically, everybody who is working on it, testing it, etc. are all longtime members of the modding community.

#49: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 9:42 pm
—
Yeah for sure, you arent stupid enought to use rookie i guess.
But where are the real veteran, i means the one who play CC for long time
but the one who played many battle.

I know each one of your tester, and a good part of your developer.
But excuse me i dont see any real veteran. Well dont let me say what i
dont say.
i means i dont see those real veteran in your team, of course many of them are veteran of CC but for sure they arent veteran of CC gameplay.
If u care i can made a list with all those Real veteran than who waiting for any call from u Wink

But i know u ll dont need it, cos u think u got a good team, and u got a
good team but not the better one.
Anyways good luck and trust me u ll pass side of many things by not using our real CC veteran cos u know the mens who made the game arent the mens who play with it. After 10 years of CC online, i never seen any moder around constantly to play Wink

#50: ? Author: ANZAC_Tack, Location: Australia

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 8:00 am
—
zappi, is the translation correct? 'real veterans'?

'edited original'

bad to answer when drunk....

burp...

cc nutz 11th year...

#51: Author: king_tiger_tank, Location: the Band and State of Kansas

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 11:22 am
—
If they're going to make a re-release of another Close Combat game, they should do CC4, since it has many problems.

#52: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 1:05 pm
—
real veteran yes, well i means true veteran

True veteran = men who been around CC for long time
who played many, many, many time

#53: Author: Pzt_Mac, Location: Oregon

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 5:54 pm
—
There are plenty of veterans involved.

We all have our dream team of who we would want to be working on this, but it's not always possible. But personally I feel that the people involved are all experienced CCers.

Also, as far as I know, anyone could have tested who wanted to as long as they contacted the powers that be and signed an NDA.

I might draw an analogy here between mechanics and drivers - they both love cars - but not everyone can race Wink

#54: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 6:00 pm
—
Yeah Mac; they v got plenty of veteran

But they are just Modder veteran.
The most critical point is why they dont use The true veteran player.

For exemple, i never been contacted by them. But i'm the professionel CC
racer Wink

and i'm not alone to get this experience .
So dont tell me they v got the better team as they dont call the true CC veteran

#55: Author: Pzt_Mac, Location: Oregon

Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 8:00 pm
—
I wasn't suggesting that they had the better team, only a team.

If you're interested in testing, you should contact them. They put out a general call to the public some time ago, so I'm not sure if it's still open, but I'm sure they could use your veteran skillz.

#56: Author: schrecken, Location: Sydney, Australia

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 4:22 am
—
another "newbie" heard from

I've only been playing h2h since 1999.... real veterans laugh at me when I ask for a game.

"You need to earn your stripes"... "we've been playing since 1997"

#57: mmm Author: ANZAC_Lord4war, Location: Sydney Australia

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 4:27 am
—
i believe he is talking about the game at the title of the debate ``CC5``,u were probably playing it in 1997 with Mr Smith.

#58: thats the bit i dont get... Author: ANZAC_Tack, Location: Australia

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 5:33 am
—
started cc1 when it came out, what, 11 years ago lol...

thousands of games H2H,never made 1 map, naver made 1 mod, cant do graphics, or sounds...just play!

#59: Fooood Author: AT_Stalky,

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 9:01 am
—
Maybe Z mean, "generalist or specialist"!

Generalist eat any CC,
Specialist only have CC5 on there food menu,

Its not about who know CC best in general.

Food for thoughts...

#60: ... Author: ANZAC_Tack, Location: Australia

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 11:41 am
—
....i think thems fightin words...

Close Combat Series -> Close Combat The Longest Day

output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT

Goto page : Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Next :| |: Page 3 of 10