The T-35 and T-28
Select messages from
# through # Forum FAQ
[/[Print]\]

Close Combat Series -> CC5 Stalingrad

#1: The T-35 and T-28 Author: king_tiger_tankLocation: the Band and State of Kansas PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:11 am
    —
how come the russian army does not have the T-35 or T-28 multi-turret tanks?

#2:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 4:25 am
    —
Quote:
how come the russian army does not have the T-35 or T-28 multi-turret tanks?

why should it have?

#3:  Author: SearryLocation: Finland PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 8:55 am
    —
T-35 was a useless tank, due to it's design flaws, so it was only used in propaganda.
Every T-28 was destroyed or captured early in the barbarossa.

#4:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:13 pm
    —
Quote:
T-35 was a useless tank, due to it's design flaws, so it was only used in propaganda.

how interesting Smile.

Quote:
Every T-28 was destroyed or captured early in the barbarossa.

220th TkBr - 8 T-28 on 27th of September 1942.
By 20th July 1944 90th Tk Regiment had 3 T-28 Smile.

Try to guess what (and why) germans took from T-35 for a Panther tank Wink.

#5:  Author: SearryLocation: Finland PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:36 pm
    —
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-35 Nice information about it.

Dima wrote:
Quote:
T-35 was a useless tank, due to it's design flaws, so it was only used in propaganda.

how interesting Smile.

Quote:
Every T-28 was destroyed or captured early in the barbarossa.

220th TkBr - 8 T-28 on 27th of September 1942.
By 20th July 1944 90th Tk Regiment had 3 T-28 Smile.

Try to guess what (and why) germans took from T-35 for a Panther tank Wink.


Well that is nitpicking. You don't do much with 11 obsolete tanks.

#6:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:21 pm
    —
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-35 Nice information about it.

so, T-35s were used not only for propaganda?

Quote:
Well that is nitpicking. You don't do much with 11 obsolete tanks.

u told that: Every T-28 was destroyed or captured early in the barbarossa.
That statement is wrong. Nothing to do with 11 obsolete tanx.

#7:  Author: SearryLocation: Finland PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:12 pm
    —
Dima wrote:
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-35 Nice information about it.

so, T-35s were used not only for propaganda?

Quote:
Well that is nitpicking. You don't do much with 11 obsolete tanks.

u told that: Every T-28 was destroyed or captured early in the barbarossa.
That statement is wrong. Nothing to do with 11 obsolete tanx.


I'm a realist, and you can consider everything destroyed, because 11 T-28:s are useless.

And, by saying "it was only used in progapand" i mean it was mostly used for propaganda.

Way to tell things depend where you have born.

#8:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 8:08 pm
    —
Quote:
I'm a realist, and you can consider everything destroyed, because 11 T-28:s are useless.

By 19th Nov 1941 150th Tk Bde had 10 T-28.
On 19th Nov 1941 51st Ind Tk Bat received 9 T-28.

so we already have 30 T-28 beyond early stage of Barbarossa Smile. And that's more than 10% if we take all the combat rdy/in short-time repairs T-28 that were available in June 1941.

Quote:
And, by saying "it was only used in progapand" i mean it was mostly used for propaganda.

Smile

Quote:
Way to tell things depend where you have born.

rite, that's why it was useless to have 11 T-28 in RKKA but it was useful to have 10 T-28 in Finnish army Wink.



Close Combat Series -> CC5 Stalingrad


output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT

Page 1 of 1