Pzt_kevin_dtn wrote: |
My question with this CC release is how balanced would h2h play be? Are the insurgent forces sufficiently armed to provide some counterpunch or is it strictly a Marine training op with hunt and kill objectives with the insurgents being more of a nuisance force.
For the moment, I'm not really excited about this one. |
Pzt_Mac wrote: |
Those new commands are strictly to interact with the "Civilian" population which are present in AT scenarios.
The public release version will be different in many respects. |
schrecken wrote: |
http://www.csogroup.org/News.html
|
Pzt_Mac wrote: |
Again, this is a military training tool and will not be released to the general public. There will be a version for public consumption, but it will not be this! |
platoon_michael wrote: |
The web site says:
A commercial version will be available to the public later this year. I don't understand |
Pzt_Coyote wrote: |
Man we have alot of good new CC waiting down the line
First the commercial version of this to keep us busy till CC6 will be released and Sulla also mentioning CC7 with a totally new engine now over at CSO forums. That combined with the rereleases aswell could actually give the CC community a great boost. |
Pzt_Coyote wrote: |
And for computer simulations not working, I seriously doubt it, offcourse you can't simulate bullets and mortars landing around you with a computer, but for teaching tactics it's a great tool. Commanders can see exactely what went wrong or right and why, from a view you will never have in the field. Offcourse the real thing is different when there are mortars coming in and you took casualties, but the tactics/ execution remains the same. The commander will offcourse need other training to remain cool in battle situations and I agree you won't be able to simulate that with a computer, but to say such simulation doesn't work...noway. Just look at flightsims, you can learn a pilot to basicly fly a plane without him ever leaving the ground. You can learn him to do all kinds of manoevres in certain situations. Will this simulate the stress in combat, no hardly, will this make him experienced with the plane and the manoevres, yes offcourse it will.
Same for ground warfare, an officer with the right info, will be way more familiar with tactical situations in the field, even if he only executed them on sims before. He will still know what's important for succes and knows how to act on it. Can you replace training only by sims, no offcourse not, but sims do give the opportunity to learn 100's of different situations at a fraction of the cost and time of when you were to train all of those situations in real exercises. |
mooxe wrote: |
Flight sims cannot be compared to simulating a battlefield with 100s of troops. I am not sure what exacly they use CC for in training, but I believe its very limited and does not substitute the experiences of field exercises. I would like to see some USMC or RAF document stating in detail how its helped. I would also like to know exactly how much time they spend playing CC and under what circumstances. |
pzjager wrote: | ||
I absolutely agrre with independant Comander. CC has NOTHING to do with this propaganda. I just hope that this post is now over Panzerjäger |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT