OT Split (S.A.S 3.5 mod)
Select messages from
# through # Forum FAQ
[/[Print]\]

Close Combat Series -> The Mess

#1: OT Split (S.A.S 3.5 mod) Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:00 am
    —
http://www.closecombat.org/CSO/index.php?name=CmodsDownload&file=index&req=viewsdownload&sid=64&orderby=dateD

#2:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:35 pm
    —
schrecken wrote:
http://www.closecombat.org/CSO/index.php?name=CmodsDownload&file=index&req=viewsdownload&sid=64&orderby=dateD  


Well, schrecken, that's the last time i tell you that, post one more link like u did like this one, and i block all youe profile user at CCS i hope u copied this time

#3: Re: S.A.S 3.5 mod?? Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:38 pm
    —
Thamor81 wrote:
Could someone tell me what this mod is, because I can't find any information about this.

I would appreciate any information that people could give me Smile


look on the CCS home page, Main Menus/ web links...
u ll found direct link there for many mod page

#4: Re: S.A.S 3.5 mod?? Author: pzjagerLocation: Paris PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:33 pm
    —
ZAPPI4 wrote:
Thamor81 wrote:
Could someone tell me what this mod is, because I can't find any information about this.

I would appreciate any information that people could give me Smile


look on the CCS home page, Main Menus/ web links...
u ll found direct link there for many mod page


SAS -an excellent mod- is downloadable on our favorite CC site, called CCS.
Zappi gave the right link.

Thanks to you, Cristian!

For the rest....
My opinion is well known by everybody.
I will continue to support CC just my moding it and trying to be one of the best moderaters of CCS.

All the best for all of you, including..... all the CC fans

Cheers
PJ

#5:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:21 pm
    —
Zappi

You're a fool

CCS downloads has this information about SAS

Mav303s SAS mod for CC5. Contains new gc, 11 new maps, new units, new graphics, new sounds. Current version is 3.5

Almost nothing... the poster above obviously wasn't impressed either.

I post a link to more information as the poster asked, and you wet your pants.

Get real, get a life, get in touch with the community.

This is not about us and them it is about serving the community!

If you can't see that it's time you hung up your boots and retired.


btw... your home page includes a link to CSO... have you threatened to ban the person that created that link?


Does CSO ban users that post links to CCS?

I want an apology.


Last edited by schrecken on Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:48 pm; edited 1 time in total

#6:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:28 pm
    —
with antics like you and your henchmen are displaying it's no wonder visiits are up.

That says total visitors = 3



users.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  17.51 KB
 Viewed:  8624 Time(s)

users.jpg



#7:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:35 pm
    —
I keep clicking on the "HOME" link at the top of this page and I get returned here.

I have reported this earlier.... no one will find the Home page if the links doesn't work.

#8:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:42 pm
    —
After battling I found the Main page....

After a further tussle I found the Main Menu.... there is no way anyone would know that the weblinks would point to information about SAS.

Unless you are a member of the secret society and know the secret handshake.

It's getting to be like the masons here.

Your users are getting completely lost and can't find important and useful information....


Ban me for speaking the truth.

Ban me for posting correct and accessible links.

Ban me for CC related input.

Ban me for making your life easier.

Ban me for assisting the community.

Ban me because you can


or apologise

#9:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:36 pm
    —
Well for me u must have around 10 years old in your mind.

Anyways it s fun to see what difficulties you v got to found the home page
of CCS. And how u get problem to found the Main Menus.

:d

In french we say "Gamin"

#10:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:41 pm
    —
@ schrecken
Like you dont get a big brain to post all in one, i let you
found why i posted multiple too...

The link i posted got all mod detailed when i look at your,
i see the V2.0 well if i dont made mistake, SAS is around V3.5

#11:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:47 pm
    —
schrecken wrote:
Zappi

You're a fool

CCS downloads has this information about SAS

Mav303s SAS mod for CC5. Contains new gc, 11 new maps, new units, new graphics, new sounds. Current version is 3.5

Almost nothing... the poster above obviously wasn't impressed either.

I post a link to more information as the poster asked, and you wet your pants.

Get real, get a life, get in touch with the community.

This is not about us and them it is about serving the community!

If you can't see that it's time you hung up your boots and retired.


btw... your home page includes a link to CSO... have you threatened to ban the person that created that link?


Does CSO ban users that post links to CCS?

I want an apology.


third one ...


Of course u can post any link to CSO here...
As u seen, we get CSO link at home page...
But u cannot simply post a link to CSo in reply to anyone...
That's the problm i hate to see appear here.
U cant understan dthat, no problemo dont log on again.
U have, like anyother, just to follow CCS rules, that's all...
And who made the rules here ...

#12:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:49 pm
    —
To finish ....

Take care amigos

#13:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 2:46 am
    —
Quote:
But u cannot simply post a link to CSo in reply to anyone...



Why not, it answered the question

#14:  Author: Senior_DrillLocation: 22134 PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 3:43 am
    —
ZAPPI4 wrote:
....
U have, like anyother, just to follow CCS rules, that's all...
And who made the rules here ...


And just where is this rule against just posting a link to CSO actually written down? How about if one just posts a link to MSN.com? Or is there really a writen rule about just posting a link to CSO?

Your letting your Nazi slip show again, there, zappi. All kinds of hot air about how liberal CSS is and yet has fascist rules, appearently written down where no one can see.

#15:  Author: mooxe PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:30 am
    —
Setting all the lame rhetoric kindling aside..... The point is if someone is asking for information usually we will use the resources here to answer the question before going elsewhere. Further to that, instead of just posting a link, try to actually help whomever it is asking for help. In this case the link provided was for an outdated version.

The way the downloads are setup here is as follows. The mod catagory contains the description, the actual download contains more of the technical data (in most circumstances). The SAS download here even contains a homepage link which was mentioned earlier in this thread. It also has a readme.txt file inside of it. A little searching by anyone in this thread would of produced everything needed on the 1st reply.

Nobody gets banned because I enjoy people looking like retards and CCS gets paid on the amount of times an advertisement gets shown.

#16:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:34 am
    —
Quote:
The mod catagory contains the description, the actual download contains more of the technical data


And what if you want to know what it is you might decide to download.

The information needs to be before the download.

My link took the interested player directly to some information he was seeking.... a little out of date maybe.... but the player will get the idea and the answer he was after.

I'll say it again

Your link at the top of the page to "HOME" doesn't take you to your home page.

The arcane Main menu / web links / CCV mod pages links doesn't contain any info regarding SAS mod.... even if I or anyone else knew that was where to look.

Please show me the path to follow.



Quote:
he point is if someone is asking for information usually we will use the resources here to answer the question before going elsewhere.


CCMT and CoI???

There are no resources here!



Quote:
Nobody gets banned because I enjoy people looking like retards and CCS gets paid on the amount of times an advertisement gets shown.


Ok, so zappi and his henchmen will never be banned... kewl move.


Also wondering if this is the reason for BAN threats for placing links to outside portals... this needs answering.

#17:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:24 am
    —
Senior_Drill wrote:

Your letting your Nazi slip show again, there, zappi.


One moment... its called people with different political beliefs....
pls stay politically correct

schrecken wrote:

Ok, so zappi and his henchmen will never be banned... kewl move.


hey, it is called tribesmen! And they are organized and structured as the famous schrecken tribe which stood exemplary for all CC-sites out there. It is an open secret that mooxe and zappi payed for the excavations back in australia that unearthed the schrecken secrets. Unfortunately after years of research none of the "lost COI and CCMT support files" were found.

What we witness here is the appearance of the tomb ghost of "schreck-a-bit III."


schrecken wrote:

CCMT and CoI???

There are no resources here!




True. We also lack a thorough tutorial on reading ancient egyptian hieroglyphics, but are working on it.

Remeber my INITIATIVE post? Build in your own support for COI and CCMT, or make it available here on CCS instead of mocking around that there is no support. This is a free site, so it is up to users to ammend the database.

#18:  Author: pzjagerLocation: Paris PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 11:17 am
    —
Senior_Drill wrote:
[quote="ZAPPIYour letting your Nazi slip show again, there, zappi. All kinds of hot air about how liberal CSS is and yet has fascist rules, appearently written down where no one can see.


Mais qui est ce débile?

Drill, fous le camp, pauvre con. Tu n'as vraiment rien compris.
Personne ne te regrettera.

P.S. Zappi: Laisse tomber ce genre de cons. S'il te plait ne réponds pas.

Les crétins sont mieux là d'où ils viennet. Du néant.

Amicalement, Cristian

Frederic

#19: To Mooxe Author: pzjagerLocation: Paris PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 11:37 am
    —
Hi Mooxe,

Just a brief message to tell you that the CC world has become completly mad.

1) I would agree with Zappi, please ban now any enemy CC fromthe CC webside called CCS.
2) Please delete now any message going to the died CSO. For some reasons:
a) This link is dangerous to your PC
b) This is/was/has been a commercial link to what we don't want to go.
c) They have lost a battle, leading to the war: They have ignored what was better than them
d) ILs sont vulgaires, par exemple Schreken, Senior Singe et deaucoup d'autres.... On est vulgaire quand on ne peut pas être autre chose....que vukgaire

Fascism is history. That's an ugluy think that existed, created by Mr Socialist Mussolini in 1922..... A left-right party. SOCIALIST.

Le singe, si tu parles français, viens vite sur le site, abruti, et viens affronter ce qu'il rest aujourd'hui de ceux qui ont combattu les idéologies fascistes,k gauchistes,, etc..... Je t'attends, connard.

Et tous ceux qui veulent en discuter.

The next mod to come is Bir Hakeim. And it will have to be played with the
so-called "ALLIES" (french) .

OK???

Maintanant, que tous ceux qui parlent du fascisme, des nazis....etc.... arretent leur connerie. Ou passez votre temps devant TF1 et lisez Liberation (De qui, De Quoi?)

Bien à vous
Frederic

#20:  Author: pzjagerLocation: Paris PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:21 pm
    —
[quote="Polemarchos"]
Senior_Drill wrote:

Your letting your Nazi slip show again, there, zappi.


One moment... its called people with different political beliefs....
pls stay politically correct

[quote="schrecken"]quote]
Polemahos, I have to agree with you once again.

It is NOT because someone has a different opinion -even 10% split- that this opinion is false:

a) If you continue to believe in it,you are a demcrat
b) If youy don't, tou become an aristocrast
c) If you want to go to a better world, you mix the two...

Cheers, friend
Frédéric

#21: Re: To Mooxe Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:22 pm
    —
pzjager wrote:


The next mod to come is Bir Hakeim. And it will have to be played with the
so-called "ALLIES" (french) .


signing up for that intro video Wink

#22:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:31 pm
    —
schrecken wrote:

And what if you want to know what it is you might decide to download.


epistimology always starts with methodology;

browse combat camera and subforum of respective mod

we can make a turiorial with pictures for you, as well.


Last edited by Polemarchos on Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:34 pm; edited 1 time in total

#23:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:33 pm
    —
That's very strange to see from who the problem comes...

Apparently no one never name nazi anyone...

thta's funny to see who used this name ...

when you are in trouble dig deeply in you to found
a name to deliver to anyone. Nazi, well that's all u v got?

Ok so if i dont made mistake, i guess u didnt follow my advises
and u continued to be sad, stupid and arrogant.

So if i dont make mistake u need sort to be Martyrs .
Then if i ban u, u ll be able to writte everywhere how
i'm a nazi with some evidences like this ban.
Ând apparently you are so stupid than u are able to
found people who follow your stupidity.

Lol, my grandfather battled in Italy against guy like you
Some liars, cheaters. and i'm tired to see than those people still exist
and get only 1 things to do, criticize and denigrate people that u
cannot handle and control.
Please, be fair for all here, dont post anymore at CCS.
Please, be fair for your spirit, dont use word that's u dont know
what that means. Please be fair with the community, jump in a boat
and forgot your laptop to your home, this we will do some hollidays.

#24:  Author: pzjagerLocation: Paris PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 6:58 pm
    —
ZAPPI4 wrote:
That's very strange to see from who the problem comes...

Apparently no one never name nazi anyone...

thta's funny to see who used this name ...

when you are in trouble dig deeply in you to found
a name to deliver to anyone. Nazi, well that's all u v got?

Ok so if i dont made mistake, i guess u didnt follow my advises
and u continued to be sad, stupid and arrogant.

So if i dont make mistake u need sort to be Martyrs .
Then if i ban u, u ll be able to writte everywhere how
i'm a nazi with some evidences like this ban.
Ând apparently you are so stupid than u are able to
found people who follow your stupidity.

Lol, my grandfather battled in Italy against guy like you
Some liars, cheaters. and i'm tired to see than those people still exist
and get only 1 things to do, criticize and denigrate people that u
cannot handle and control.
Please, be fair for all here, dont post anymore at CCS.
Please, be fair for your spirit, dont use word that's u dont know
what that means. Please be fair with the community, jump in a boat
and forgot your laptop to your home, this we will do some hollidays.


Hi Zappi,

Je crois que tu perds ton temps, mon ami. Ce mec est un crétin comme tous ceux qui traitent de nazi, d'extreme-droite etc.... tous ceux qui ne sont pas infectés par laeur connerie et, dans ce cas particulier, dans la connerie qu'on leur a infligé dans la tête.

Cristian, tu sais que je t'aime beaucoup. Ne réponds plus à ces CONS. ILs ont voulu tuer CC, mais grâce à toi, à Mooxe et à beaucoup de gens qui sont restés silencieux jusque là, notre jeu est plus que vivant. Je travaille personellement sur de de nouveaux mods. Des mecs fantastiques comme Squadleader et Polemarchos soutiennent aussi le jeu, et j'oublie ici toux ceux qui n'envoient aucun message mais qui sont ceux qui aiment et jouent CC. Ils sont nombreux. Les PLUS nombreux.

Zappi, Ne desespère pas. Panzerjäger a lu toutes ces histoires dernièrement et va continuer à supportyer CC et SURTOUT CCS.

Bien à toi et à Moowe

Vive CC!

Frédéric

#25:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:50 pm
    —
yeah friends

practice what you preach... if only it made sense.

Hey , you fixed the link to "Home"... congrats!

Main menu/weblinks still doesn't point to SAS mod.

I've forwarded files to CCS months ago... CCS has done nothing with them that's why I set up my own CCMT and CoI support site.


Please include a link on your downloads pages for the respective versions not just on your Main page.


CoI and CCMT downloads

my initiative presaged your mere suggestion of an initiative by months, but keep trying you might catch up.

#26:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 8:31 pm
    —
schrecken, friend,

Quote:
Main menu/weblinks still doesn't point to SAS mod.

go, save CSO - it needs u Smile.
too many dld links r outdated and alot of mods r just not represented in CSO...and u tell that there is no description here...

#27:  Author: mooxe PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 8:54 pm
    —
The "home" issue was a problem with how Firefox interpreted the code. It was working with IE, now it works with both.

"Please include a link on your downloads pages for the respective versions not just on your Main page."

Thank you for the suggestion.

There are many small projects going on by me at this site. Each week sections are combed for spelling/grammar errors, bad or outdated links and generally ways to present resources in the most professional manner. I appreciate any comments and suggestions for improvements on this site, they usually never go unread. Please use the correct forum to express them otherwise they may be missed.

Gentlemen, the thread has run its course on and off topic. These types of threads which are very reminicent of CSO and are exactly what I would prefer to avoid here. I believe it was these types of threads that led to people coming here and not feeling discouraged to post thier thoughts. I do not want anyone too feel unwelcome here ever.


schrecken wrote:
yeah friends

practice what you preach... if only it made sense.

Hey , you fixed the link to "Home"... congrats!

Main menu/weblinks still doesn't point to SAS mod.

I've forwarded files to CCS months ago... CCS has done nothing with them that's why I set up my own CCMT and CoI support site.


Please include a link on your downloads pages for the respective versions not just on your Main page.


CoI and CCMT downloads

my initiative presaged your mere suggestion of an initiative by months, but keep trying you might catch up.

#28:  Author: LiveFree PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:11 pm
    —
Just ban the guy and get it over with. Schreken's motives are clear, and he's nothing but a cancer to the cc community.

#29:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:34 pm
    —
my motives are clearly the free distribution of CC support files and info.

This site is gagging that!

You tell me why.

#30:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:38 pm
    —
Quote:
too many dld links r outdated and alot of mods r just not represented in CSO


I've rebuilt those links and downloads 3 times in the last 6 months..... I don't currently have time to do it a fourth time.

CSO is not mine, although I do contribute... as I do here.

I've also been asked to assist with the downloads here... but time is my (our) enemy.


maybe I should take up the offer?

#31:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:39 pm
    —
schrecken, friend,

somehow this site isn't "gagging that" to anyone else but u/Drill Smile.
somehow noone mentions "Nazi slip show" but Drill/u.

try to think, maybe when everybody is mad around u is time to look at yerself...

#32:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:43 pm
    —
schrecken, friend,

Quote:
I've rebuilt those links and downloads 3 times in the last 6 months..... I don't currently have time to do it a fourth time

ye rite, that's why u have mods that r outdated by 1-2 years Smile.

Quote:
CSO is not mine, although I do contribute... as I do here.

u do good job! feedback is always great Wink.

Quote:
I've also been asked to assist with the downloads here... but time is my (our) enemy.

can we take it serious? if yes say who has asked u.

Quote:
maybe I should take up the offer?

sure, bring CCS to the state of CSO, we r all waiting for that !!!

friend, u r awesome Laughing

#33:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:44 pm
    —
People get mad when their flaws are revealed... that's life.

And we're living it!

#34:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:46 pm
    —
schrecken, friend,

Quote:
People get mad when their flaws are revealed... that's life.

rite...can u plz stop to show yer madness?

Quote:
And we're living it!

i've already figured that u live in yer own reality Smile.

#35:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:03 pm
    —
CSO has been reloaded from an old backup... hence the old links.

That should be easy to understand.

Ask PJ.. his mods were linked in twice and each time CSO crashed. As were the other mods.

I did what i could at the time...and at the moment I have no time.


A bit of a mob mentality around here , ever read "Lord of the Flies" it certainly goes a long way to explaining the current condition of CCS.

#36:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:04 pm
    —
Quote:
somehow this site isn't "gagging that" to anyone else but u/Drill


because everyone else is afraid to post because of the abominable moderator behaviour... look at the low post count.

#37:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:10 pm
    —
lol, u speak as if u get all the CCS infos. .. ..

Who asked you to assist the download? Strange i never heard about that
and i'm currently on download assit at CCS :d

#38:  Author: mooxe PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:10 pm
    —
schrecken wrote:

I've also been asked to assist with the downloads here... but time is my (our) enemy.


maybe I should take up the offer?



I dont remember who asked you that. If it was me I don't remember. Or even it was at the administrative level? Anyone can add a download here. Upload it to the uploads account and add the link here http://www.closecombatseries.net/CCS//modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=AddDownload.

I'v told you before that I am pretty much fully responsible for how the website looks and whats offered here. I am the lead on most things that are CCS and my nickname has become synonymous with CCS. I dont think I have insulted you personally here but it seems to be your trying to provoke me by insulting my work, which represents what many people here respect.

Nobody here will be banned by me or have a post edited or deleted. I believe that a forum is like a breakroom at work. Everyone sitting around a table talking, nobody can close anyone elses mouth except physically. But there are socially accepted limits in this forum and you are beginning to break them.

The message should be very clear by now. Stop provoking. For everyone else, be professional and let your last post previous to this be your last.

#39:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:11 pm
    —
schrecken, friend,


b
Quote:
ecause everyone else is afraid to post because of the nutty admins... look at the low post count

r u serious?
ever tried to compare to CSO?

Quote:
CSO has been reloaded from an old backup... hence the old links.
That should be easy to understand.
Ask PJ.. his mods were linked in twice and each time CSO crashed. As were the other mods
.
friend, u have so much work to do on CSO...go, plz, we don't hold u Smile

Quote:
Ask PJ.. his mods were linked in twice and each time CSO crashed. As were the other mods

u won't belive me, i've been chatting with him rite before u'd posted. he says u don't bring anything good in community....

Quote:
I did what i could at the time...and at the moment I have no time.

of coz u don't, as yer time is spended on CCS...
forget it, friend, help CSO - it needs u

Quote:
A bit of a mob mentality around here , ever read "Lord of the Flies" it certainly goes a long way to explaining the current condition of CCS.

well, i will tell u, there is the word, means prosperity - that's "the current condition of CCS".

#40:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:11 pm
    —
schrecken wrote:
Quote:
somehow this site isn't "gagging that" to anyone else but u/Drill


because everyone else is afraid to post because of the abominable moderator behaviour... look at the low post count.



MMMh, call anyone to post here if they get any problm with moderator
before and we will see who is the liar

#41:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:27 pm
    —
schrecken, friend,

why everywhere when u post it smells so bad ? not the first time...

u r good man, u r trying to help CCS (hmm, with something that no one knows)...u've tried to help CSO with DLS (as u told) and didn't succed...maybe one should finish what u have started to make (CSO) operational site(?)...that's a men feature...hope u understand Smile.

#42:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:45 pm
    —
If moderators target individuals and drive them off... then there is no one to complain.

My posts smell...why?


Because I answer back and fight repression?


Don't run with the pack?


Don't toe the Party line?


I post helpful suggestions links to support files and answer questions... then I get jumped on by moderators and their henchmen.


Show mw where this is not the case.

#43:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:54 pm
    —
schrecken wrote:



I post helpful suggestions links to support files and answer questions... then I get jumped on by moderators and their henchmen.
.


MMMh show me where your link was more informatif as mine?

Yr post : http://www.closecombat.org/CSO/index.php?name=CmodsDownload&file=index&req=viewsdownload&sid=64&orderby=dateD

my post : http://www.closecombatseries.net/SAS/


as i see your post point a V2.0 while i posted SAS main page mod
So anyways u just try to put discredit on CCS and all the job made around.
Now i keep teling you, show me a guy except you and your firend
who can blame CCS and about moderator and let's count how many will do for your job on CSO.
Anyway, i understand where you trying to go. But you are going alone there.

Be fair, become polite and correct
one more, please reply, who asked to assist us for CCS downld?
It's look like another liar

#44:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:39 am
    —
I didn't say my link was better.

It's not a competition.

Mine was the only reply until you chimed in with your threats of banning.


You caused the whole thread to be filled with off topic rubbish.

I am polite, you are rude and objectionable.

Don't you get it????


Stop trolling my posts!!!!

Mooxe asked me to handle cc3 downloads at ccs.

#45:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:52 am
    —
Choke on this

Shrecken,

Thought I'd email you since word has it that your a CC3 know-it-all type.
At closecombatseries.net none of us are really CC3 players.
We've beenbashing through it so far and have a few CC3 mods up.
It is hard for us toknow if the mod works tho since most of us dont have CC3. Anyways.. to makemy long story short, we are looking for help gathering up the mods and adding them to the website.

Not temporary help either... permanent help.
Letme know if your interested, we'd like to bring you aboard the team.

MOOXE

#46:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 4:01 am
    —
Still can't cough up an apology?


weak as water!

#47:  Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:01 am
    —
Sounds like that was in 2004. Like I said, I dont remember. Whats your point?

#48:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:32 am
    —
Quote:
one more, please reply, who asked to assist us for CCS downld?


simple answer to a simple and direct question, yes?

#49:  Author: squadleader_idLocation: Soerabaja PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 6:57 am
    —
Wow...is that really an e-mail from 2004??? Amazing!
Why do you archive those things, Shreckie?
Don't you have anything better to do with your time? Very Happy

How long did it take for you to dig that piece of evidence out?
Rolling Eyes

#50:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:02 am
    —
hotmail keeps everything, so watch out.
I've got mail going back to 1989, takes 5 seconds to search.

but I expected a weak response of that sort from the zapster.

Trumped and trumped again.

lay down mazair.

I'll tie one hand behind my back.

c'mon make a fight of it.

pathetic!

#51:  Author: squadleader_idLocation: Soerabaja PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:15 am
    —
schrecken wrote:
hotmail keeps everything, so watch out.

but I expected a weak response of that sort from the zapster.

Trumped and trumped again.

lay down mazair.

I'll tie one hand behind my back.

c'mon make a fight of it.

pathetic!


It's amazing that you still remember that e-mail though.
And now you're getting carried away a bit, Shreckie...calm down...take your pills...then carefully search through your hotmail archives again for more fun stuff hidden down there Rolling Eyes Very Happy

#52:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:36 am
    —
you're right

I'll go have a little nap while zappi drafts an apology

#53:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:54 am
    —
an apology lol, you are too stupid to receve any

Mhhh, that's strange as all admin here settled who will handle wich CC
for download section. and i took CC3 Wink
Then i cannot imagine Mooxe asking you about that.

Anyway, if u looking for an apology, i letyou drive back and check the
whole message to see who need to apology.

But maybe what u want isnt my apology, but maybe more my place.
Be an CCS admin ... lol, everyone is hating you my friend. Because
like u didnt wrote, u are unpolite, rude and stupid.
Maybe it was good good for CSO, itsnt the case for CCS

#54:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:28 am
    —
It's not a popularity contest Zap.

I'm right , you're wrong

take it like a man.

#55:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:41 am
    —
You are in charge of CC3 downloads...congrats.

Maybe it's time to look for a new job.



There is nothing there for a game that has been re-released over a year a go.

Now do you see why I'm laughing?

#56:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:43 am
    —
I know I don't need to ask Zapmeister.

But, who is in charge of CCMT downloads...ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!

#57:  Author: squadleader_idLocation: Soerabaja PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:06 am
    —
Hmm...still at it, Gents? :zzz

Isn't mod downloads for CoI supposed to be handled by the 'intuitive' Command Center module? Why bother hosting the mods here at CCS if the Command Center points to mods that are supposed to hosted somewhere else? Or was that feature of the Command Center fu**ed up? Wink

From Matrix Games' page on CoI:
"Includes "Command Center" linking you to new maps, campaigns, mods,and player forums."

As for CCMT...besides the patch that should have been part of the original release...how many mods are available? Half a mod? A third of a mod? Rolling Eyes

Just my 2 cents...
Back to you, Gents!

#58:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:11 am
    —
hehe you are too funny

As i said, i took CC3 .... dont you said u were approched to assist CC3 downld in 2004?
So in 2004 i was CC3 dedicated uploader.... And i never call you anytime
to help me and dont see why Mooxe would do as it was my section...
Now, sorry but since we locked and uploaded the base of CC downld
we all managed any CC downld section because as you, and u can trust
anyone, you arent alone to get a real life with tons to do.
So we all manage each CC downld section when we v got the time to do.


Last edited by ZAPPI4 on Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:13 am; edited 1 time in total

#59:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:12 am
    —
It's always easy to critics, but more difficult to be constructive.

#60:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:43 am
    —
schrecken, friend,

Quote:
If moderators target individuals and drive them off... then there is no one to complain.

what i can c is individual(s) who trying to drive moderators off Laughing .

Quote:
My posts smell...why?

guess yerself Wink.

Quote:
Because I answer back and fight repression?

with such start...
Zappi You're a fool
...what did u expect?

Quote:
Don't run with the pack?

u would like to do that but "pack" has just rejected u, atho still allows u to come sometimes Smile.

Quote:
Don't toe the Party line?

i believe u r strictly follows the Party line...

Quote:
I post helpful suggestions links to support files and answer questions... then I get jumped on by moderators and their henchmen
.
no matter what u think about yer actions, only what ppl think of that - matters...

Quote:
Show mw where this is not the case.

...and somehow the vast majority of ppl think that yer answers and suggestions r neither helpful nor good <------ that's the case Smile.

#61:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:47 am
    —
Quote:
From Matrix Games' page on CoI:
"Includes "Command Center" linking you to new maps, campaigns, mods,and player forums."


Well, it does work, just 1 extra link to click on.

Volunteer/Fan sites... can't live with 'em , can't live without 'em.

I know of 3 mods in progress for CCMT...maybe a 4th...I'm need to get an update.

Quote:
It's always easy to critics, but more difficult to be constructive.


So , is that an admission?... probably the closest I'll get to an apology from the MAN.

#62:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:49 am
    —
open your eyes and by the way use your brain Wink

#63:  Author: squadleader_idLocation: Soerabaja PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:13 am
    —
schrecken wrote:
Quote:
From Matrix Games' page on CoI:
"Includes "Command Center" linking you to new maps, campaigns, mods,and player forums."


Well, it does work, just 1 extra link to click on.

Volunteer/Fan sites... can't live with 'em , can't live without 'em.


Dunno about you...but last time I loaded CoI and the Com Center...it points to CSO...and some nonexistent files Smile

Quote:
I know of 3 mods in progress for CCMT...maybe a 4th...I'm need to get an update.


Hmm...if these awesome CCMT mods are not finished and still works in progress...no wonder the CCMT downloads section is empty...you can't blame the CCS Admins for that, Shreckie Wink Rolling Eyes

#64:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:43 am
    —
Aha The Surabaya xtal ball at work eh?

I have no idea how awesome they will be , a bit like BoS could be kewl could be a yawn.... starwars rules for CC5.

Still plenty of other maps mods tools and scenarios to fill the empty void.

How many CC4 mods were available after 4 months?... how many after 5 years... get real and don't make excuses.

Quote:
it points to CSO...and some nonexistent files


CSO works for no man when it is down... a bit like CCS.

It's back up, so we can all rejoice.... non-existent files exist... your cup runneth over with goodwill and plenty...

but remember the golden rule

"Download today for tomorrow may bring a dead link"

#65:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:07 pm
    —
You are so helpfull Schrecken than when i check all your message posted
for reply at this post than i can see many many help for us.
Thx for that. You contribuing to reenforce CCS community.
When 1 men tell you than you are drunk, u can smile
When 2 men tell you than u are drunk, u can still smile...
When everyone telling you than u are drunk, u have to go to sleep Wink

#66:  Author: platoon_michaelLocation: Right behind you PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:02 pm
    —
Quote:
How many CC4 mods were available after 4 months?... how many after 5 years



If you count all the mods that have been totally edited from the ground up like a GJS/Meuse or B.O. for CCIV and made available for download.

The answer is none

Sad

#67:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:32 pm
    —
LiveFree wrote:
Just ban the guy and get it over with. Schreken's motives are clear, and he's nothing but a cancer to the cc community.


we should not adopt the same methods of authoritarian moderation... You cant cure cancer by implementing a counter-cancer. What we need is a reactive immune system and the posts in this forum are a clear indicator that mitigation works.

Democracy, hooray! And the thing is that in a democracy like CCS, although classified as bad type of government by Socrates has one important benefit.

IT ALLOWS SYSTEMCRITIQUE (in this case by schrecken*), no other form of gov. can do that.

This means that we can fight cancer by mitigation, but we should not fight its existence, that would be undemocratic.


* Here I must add an “ethical disclaimer”: Evaluation of empirical data strongly suggests that application of extreme and inhumane practices in dialogue (barbarism, ad personam argument) helps the weaker position to gain attention. Promotion of barbarism/ad personam argument to achieve positive outcome in a debate, is based on cruel rhethorical reality in empirical data and does not correspond with the author’s personal opinions about ethics in dialogue.


Last edited by Polemarchos on Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:38 pm; edited 2 times in total

#68:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:33 pm
    —
Quote:

with such start...
Zappi You're a fool
...what did u expect?


I expect civility and respect for trying to help someone with a problem.

NOT A THREAT TO BE BANNED by da fool.

#69:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:54 pm
    —
Quote:
I expect civility and respect for trying to help someone with a problem.
NOT A THREAT TO BE BANNED by da fool.

IIRC u were warned about that by Zappi some time ago in another thread.

#70:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:00 pm
    —
I still think its appropriate to apologize to you for resisting your takeover....

so here is an inofficial apology to schrecken, by the supporters of democracy.


Last edited by Polemarchos on Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:04 am; edited 2 times in total

#71:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:18 pm
    —
Quote:
IIRC u were warned about that by Zappi some time ago in another thread.


yes , seems to be a policy of this board to threaten to ban someone when they help a fellow gamer

or

You are threatened with banning when you are the subject of abuse by a board member.


Both cases can be discounted as irrational behaviour by the zappmaster.

If you can explain in reasonable terms why either case was justified or even worthy of attention, please do.


You can't, because.

1. A post answering a question is reasonable (even if zap posted a more informative post later, while poking his tongue out and going nah nah nah)

2. When someone else makes rude and disparaging remarks the finger can't be pointed at me.




.

#72:  Author: DigsLocation: Ontario, Canada PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:59 pm
    —
Give it a rest!... someone lock this thread already.
:hurt8

#73:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:28 pm
    —
Quote:
yes , seems to be a policy of this board to threaten to ban someone when they help a fellow gamer
or
You are threatened with banning when you are the subject of abuse by a board member.

Once again, somehow only u of 22199 registered users by this min (http://www.closecombatseries.net/CCS/modules.php?name=Statistics)   have such problem...prolly time to check whats wrong in u?

Quote:
Both cases can be discounted as irrational behaviour by the zappmaster.

that's yer subjective opinion, somehow noone here shares it.

Quote:
You can't, because.
1. A post answering a question is reasonable (even if zap posted a more informative post later, while poking his tongue out and going nah nah nah)

u didn't answer the question.
what u did was giving link for outdated info that wasn't connected to SAS 3.5.

so u r wrong here.

Quote:
2. When someone else makes rude and disparaging remarks the finger can't be pointed at me.

u were the first that started to be rude in this thread.

so u r wrong here

looks like yer logic (vision of things) is flawed ( like the product u r the part of) as yer idea is ok, but realisation sux big cock.

if u want to chnge things, start with yerself Smile.

#74:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:47 pm
    —
Quote:
but realisation sux big cock.


You guys just can't help yourselves.

RUDE, obnoxious, uncouth etc




Quote:
u didn't answer the question.


And for not giving 100% correct and up to date info a THREAT to be Banned... you're nuts.

You need to ban half the posters here under that criteria!



Quote:
( like the product u r the part of


Then don't play it.. you are not being forced to.


Still laughing at you here.... childish rants, ego's out on parade.

#75:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:55 pm
    —
Quote:
like the product u r the part of



Both products you have seen that I have been involved with are unqualified improvements over their original incarnations.


If you can't see that......

#76:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:28 pm
    —
Quote:
You guys just can't help yourselves.
RUDE, obnoxious, uncouth etc

prove iam wrong Wink.
i've already mentioned that u know so many cool words...

Quote:
And for not giving 100% correct and up to date info a THREAT to be Banned... you're nuts.

lol, yer logic has monster flaw Laughing

thing is that u have been warned to not do something u made again w/o reasonable purpose as it didn't help anyone....
...and still u r here with us, friend Smile

Quote:
You need to ban half the posters here under that criteria!

schrecken, friend, could u plz read the thread more carefully?
answer me plz - why u r the only one person here that was warned?

Quote:
Then don't play it.. you are not being forced to.

i don't, friend, i don't Smile.

Quote:
Still laughing at you here.... childish rants, ego's out on parade.

lol, thnx u have raised my mood Very Happy.

well u know there r special places for the individuals who r still laughing at everybody here and there...
but the normal ppl r just pity for them as when the God wants to punish individual he damages his brain ...

Quote:
Both products you have seen that I have been involved with are unqualified improvements over their original incarnations.

u r wrong here.
when i c camo'ed PzIII in 1941 in CoI some v interesting things come to my mind Smile.
when i c Abrams having HE shell in CCMT or RPK having slower RoF than AK i realize that ppl who did the product (commercial one! not the mod) just don't understand what they r doing...500.000 psi lol

plz, tell me about the improvements, maybe i can chnge my mind Laughing .

#77:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:05 pm
    —
schrecken wrote:
Quote:
IIRC u were warned about that by Zappi some time ago in another thread.


yes , seems to be a policy of this board to threaten to ban someone when they help a fellow gamer

or

You are threatened with banning when you are the subject of abuse by a board member.


Both cases can be discounted as irrational behaviour by the zappmaster.

If you can explain in reasonable terms why either case was justified or even worthy of attention, please do.


You can't, because.

1. A post answering a question is reasonable (even if zap posted a more informative post later, while poking his tongue out and going nah nah nah)

2. When someone else makes rude and disparaging remarks the finger can't be pointed at me.




.


U been abused by member? who did, when where?... Wasnt your dog tonight?
sorry joking ... so

u didnt been warning for posted unhelped link ...

U know exactly why u been warned one more time...

If not, i ll explain again to you...
You be warned to post link to CSo ( and anywhere the link would pointed)
without adding any text or explain ...
It was the third time i warning you about that...
I dont speak about your language or insult my friend. what i warning you too
somedays ago, isnt it?
for information, in belgium,( and that's the case in many other country)
the only case to insult nazi anyone in public is enought to be followed by the laws.
Now as i see u cannot calm yourself and waiting, i dunno what u waiting exactly...
Tell me what do you excepcted now?
Apparently you dont have many friend here ... Why dont you?
MMMh i guess i know the answer. I let you found why

#78:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:10 pm
    —
You are turning in circle amigo...

Schrecken, i take your agressivity like a try to discredit anyone who arent
right with your mind.
Force to be i must repeat, it'snt CSO, u dont get any part here
u are user like anyother.
Anytime u reply here u let people feeling bad to you.
Any reply put those guys one more step against you.
I dont know you, i dont want to know you because as i guess than finally
i know you now.
Finally, to be sure u understood, u are welcome here amigo. even if no one like you.

#79:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:51 am
    —
it is you going in circles and inflaming things by making more and more outlandish statements.

You have not warned me 3 times for posting links to CSO without ext.,

Please show me the links to the 3 warnings..... nope you can't.

Quote:
I didn't buy that waste. And I am not obliged to say anything but 'fuck off'. Your just another CSO butt chum that sticks up for their, and apparently your, shaddy business practices. You have all successfully ripped off the community that you hailed from, congrats.


That's ok here...but a relevant link is taboo.

Polemarchos keeps insinuation that I am gay, but that's ok here.

You talk about sucking cock, but that''s ok here.

But posting a link is worthy of a THREAT TO BE BANNED

Quote:
the only case to insult nazi anyone in public is enought to be followed by the laws.


I haven't called any one a NAZI... so stop saying I have!!!

This is what I'm saying and you are too thick to understand...

Other people make abusive posts, including moderators... I get the warning.


If you would put aside your predjudices, fear, and isolationism you would stop these ridiculous posts.

#80:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:53 am
    —
schrecken wrote:


Polemarchos keeps insinuation that I am gay, but that's ok here.



I did? cool, where?

i am pretty sure I called you "moron" once... the rest is fiction..

#81:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:04 am
    —
looks like it was Dima

You just posted your photos of naked men... which is also ok here.

#82:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:08 am
    —
Quote:
Well for me u must have around 10 years old in your mind.

Anyways it s fun to see what difficulties you v got to found the home page
of CCS. And how u get problem to found the Main Menus.


You attack on me is worthless, based on false assumptions and prejudice.

Mooxe has now fixed the link as you were incapable it seems.

Thank you Mooxe

#83:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:12 am
    —
schrecken wrote:
You just posted your photos of naked men... which is also ok here.


no i posted my advertise for my personal "pimpupmyCC" re-release... the guy wore trousers. sry, but you are wrong again, cause if you check the syntax and logic it was an ironic reply about our differences regarding advertises and you can clearly see a women on the banner too.

how is that qualifying for an insinuation of homosexuality, explain pls?

One could say i insulted you cosmologically, not sexually.

#84:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:30 am
    —
Quote:
how is that qualifying for an insinuation of homosexuality, explain pls?

One could say i insulted you cosmologically, not sexually.


Or one could say you were a liar



1REB0071.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  438.91 KB
 Viewed:  5856 Time(s)

1REB0071.jpg



#85:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:47 am
    —
evidently here we discussed ethnological and cultural archivements of the famous schrecken tribe that invented Close Combat back in the stone age.

"Lairs are liars", said the liar... Have fun with the Epimenides paradox.

(Original: all Cretans are liars, said Epimenides the Cretan)


Last edited by Polemarchos on Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:31 am; edited 3 times in total

#86:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:54 am
    —
The decalogue of problems:


Time for a katharsis schrecken:

1) You post one liners here for weeks now.

2) By that pace you will jump from NCO to 5 Star General in no time.

3) You obviously do not offer your support files to the download section as long as you dont get admin rights, is that understood correct by me?

4) You are inherently pessimistic and negative about different opinions and views.

5) We all told you plenty times that the world of Close Combat wont change without ppl offering voluntary works etc... Create a Tutorial, write a review, upload files on ftp and ask admins to implement them if sth misses.

6) You think we critizise COI and CCMT because its made by a company u have contacts with, instead of understanding it as "free" customer survey.

7) It's like you wanna create a fuzz here, thats what everybody is mocking about.

Cool You have critique for the site and forget that is done by voluntary work and payed by voluntary money and people have sometimes not the same understading of prefectionism as you might think you have.

9) Nobody gets banned on CCS. They usually ban themselves by disqualification that excedes a bearable average.

10) You twist reality like Einstein are resentful and incite negative reponses, probably by intent, arguably by accident.

#87:  Author: squadleader_idLocation: Soerabaja PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:22 am
    —
Yeah...Polemarchos summed it up perfectly.
Let's move on! Smile

#88:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:50 am
    —
Again a litany of lies, half truths, misplaced assumptions.

You are trying to concoct a story that does not exist.

You have hounded me for weeks.

9 pages of rubbish here when all zappi needed do was make apost

"Here is a more up to date link for SAS 3.5"

But no

Threats of banning and pages of abuse is all we see.

#89:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:51 am
    —
Quote:
evidently here we discussed ethnological and cultural archivements of the famous schrecken tribe that invented Close Combat back in the stone age.


No , it was just you being absurdly provocative and ridiculous

#90:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:53 am
    —
schrecken wrote:
all we see.


who's we?

schrecken wrote:

No , it was just you being absurdly provocative and ridiculous


for a stone-thrower u are pretty sensible if someone throws back pebble...

#91:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:03 am
    —
And who threw the first stone?

#92:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:21 am
    —
temporally:

schrecken wrote:
Nothing more embarrassing than a dead link?


we didnt ever talked up to this date. this was the first time...

then i called u moron (amongst other things) for your rude attitude...
it was not polite, but you provoked it.

#93:  Author: platoon_michaelLocation: Right behind you PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:00 am
    —
It doesn't take much for an avid reader to see that CCS is nothing more than a piece of shit in terms of supporting CC.And does nothing more than create shit .

Bashing an individual who is doing nothing more than promoting a game that you so called people love is the utmost example.

CCS will never be nothing more than a temporary site for CC because of the people who are directing it no matter how many years it lasts.
]
And PzJager can take his mod and shove them up his ass,just because you can create a mod does not make you the king of mods.

Anyone here who participates in bashing Schrecken for his posts/response is hands down without a doubt the worst piece of SHIT you will ever see here in CC and everyone who truly know CC knows that to be true

So FUCK OF CCS AND SHUT YOUR FUCKING PIE HOLE


I AM A STRATEGY 3 TACTICS BETA TESTER, I AM CURRENTLY PROVIDING ALMOST NO INPUT TO THE PROJECT ASIDE FROM MEANINGLESS SUGGESTIONS THAT ARE PAINFULLY OBVIOUS. I AM JUST A LAME CC4 FANBOY WHO HAS MULTIPLE PERSONALITIES AND HATES EVERY SITE I VISIT.


Last edited by platoon_michael on Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:09 am; edited 4 times in total

#94:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:02 am
    —
No

You made a commitment to drive people out.

Stated categorically and with out any ambiguity.

You, my Golden Greek, are the root of most problems.

You are lacking in morals and are untrustworthy.

Quote:
It is fun and i got a little protective, when it comes to endangering this fabulous site and CC5! So seeing CSO die, made me think about commitment!

It pretty easy. A hoplite alone cannot survive in battle. But a lot of hoplites organized in phalanx can kick some ass on the field of battle.

Therefore give CCS a tribute and post an oath to keep that great site alive by presence, commitment and support in any possible way!

#95:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:05 am
    —
ye lets go all to CSO and hand eachother bad reputation...

how about we solve it like men and play a "pro CCS suport is cool mercs vs. anti-CCS support is crap mercs" war?

#96:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:06 am
    —
plt Michael

thank you , sir.

You are a scholar and a gentleman.

But don't let yourself be pulled down into this morass of putrified dung.


EDIT: Posted before the edits..LOL


Last edited by schrecken on Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:17 am; edited 1 time in total

#97:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:08 am
    —
Quote:
ye lets go all to CSO and hand eachother bad reputation...


I don't care where the site(s) is, as long as they are run by reasonable people.

Not run by people with prejudices and spinning out on a power trip.

#98:  Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:09 am
    —
Ill reply as soon as platoon_michael stops editing his post.

#99:  Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:12 am
    —
Are you done yet? You cant figure out what to say in 5 tries? Jesus...........

#100:  Author: mooxe PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:23 am
    —
There is only one man in this thread strong enough to post the truth. You are truly a gentlemen and a scholar. I salute you.

platoon_michael wrote:
It doesn't take much for an avid reader to see that CCS is nothing more than a piece of shit in terms of supporting CC.And does nothing more than create shit .

Bashing an individual who is doing nothing more than promoting a game that you so called people love is the utmost example.

CCS will never be nothing more than a temporary site for CC because of the people who are directing it no matter how many years it lasts.
]
And PzJager can take his mod and shove them up his ass,just because you can create a mod does not make you the king of mods.

Anyone here who participates in bashing Schrecken for his posts/response is hands down without a doubt the worst piece of SHIT you will ever see here in CC and everyone who truly know CC knows that to be true

So FUCK OF CCS AND SHUT YOUR FUCKING PIE HOLE


I AM A STRATEGY 3 TACTICS BETA TESTER, I AM CURRENTLY PROVIDING ALMOST NO INPUT TO THE PROJECT ASIDE FROM MEANINGLESS SUGGESTIONS THAT ARE PAINFULLY OBVIOUS. I AM JUST A LAME CC4 FANBOY WHO HAS MULTIPLE PERSONALITIES AND HATES EVERY SITE I VISIT.

#101:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:27 am
    —
schrecken wrote:
No


you keep reproducing yourself

schrecken wrote:

You made a commitment to drive people out.


Häh? can u pls cite again. btw. its paranoia when noone chases you...

schrecken wrote:

You, my Golden Greek, are the root of most problems.


i know, problems fascinate me. thats why i like you.
In fact u are like an overthrown king. Cant compensate the loss in virtual power? well u can still hand out bad reputation on youtube.

schrecken wrote:

You are lacking in morals and are untrustworthy.


based on what? you cyber-psychology? or your overarching ethical standards making you accuse others of bad morals during one of the major christian days of worship. Thats an example to follow, dude well done.
this implies that it would be utilitarianism for you then?

#102:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:29 am
    —
schrecken wrote:

But don't let yourself be pulled down into this morass of putrified dung.


But schreck, he already spoke to you so its too late

#103:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:32 am
    —
Your post makes no sense.

It seems to be based on a bunch of totally off base assumptions.

Which nearly all your posts are.

#104:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:46 am
    —
schrecken wrote:
Your post makes no sense.


they have! it's the 6th. You need the nightgoogles from CCMT to see the sense.

schrecken wrote:

It seems to be based on a bunch of totally off base assumptions.


Let's see, based on off base basic fundations.
Wow you created the ultimate paradox just like that. You must be divine schrecken.

schrecken wrote:
Which nearly all your posts are.


I've never heard the words "all" and "posts" in the same sentece before.
Congrats, my cyberpsychology test prog marked u as one-dimensional, simplicistic thinker.


btw. you never seem to answer direct questions. are you shy?

p.s. cool man, talking to you made me major in no time. You carry success in your veins, pal.

#105:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:00 am
    —
you just ignore my direct answers... or can't comprehend them or are too embarrassed to respond to them.


All the rest you just make up in your own mind and then make posts using your self created assumptions.

#106:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:23 am
    —
schrecken wrote:
you just ignore my direct answers... or can't comprehend them or are too embarrassed to respond to them.


ok look, mathematics will give the answer:

105 replies

41 by schrecken

makes 39,7% by you

according to the script, just today you became Major, congrats for the promotion.

now back to the argument.

in 39,7% of 105 posts you answered:

None of 11 direct questions and probably few of the billions rhethorical questions

schrecken wrote:

All the rest you just make up in your own mind and then make posts using your self created assumptions.


ye its called slippery slope argument and I learned it from you...

#107:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:24 am
    —
Quote:
Time for a katharsis schrecken:

1) You post one liners here for weeks now.


Quote:
Ef13 wrote:

What make matters worse is that the internet archive does not have any history of the forums. A lot of good info may be lost forever.


some stuff is still around:

the rank mod was the problem... always uninstall everything fro CFg 1.3 before applying new mods...

song is called Katyusha! actually a pre-WW2 song

http://rkkaww2.armchairgeneral.com/Multimedia/preww2.htm#Katyusha

yes indeed. the face looks like a photography...

try "hamachi", i managed to overide firewalls with it, as long as the admin does not take measures against that


My oneliners are a problem are they.

All your quotes above are one lines... one with a link outside the site

Seems it's ok for you to post oneliners and not anyone else... or just me?

#108:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:26 am
    —
Please list the 11 direct questions

#109:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:50 am
    —
I found a bunch for you

Mostly stupid questions though

Q hope u copied this time

A copied

Q And who made the rules here ...

A The rule maker

Q Who asked you to assist the download?

A Mooxe

Q r u serious?
ever tried to compare to CSO?

A (double banger) yes, and why would I.


Q why everywhere when u post it smells so bad ? not the first time...


A because your nose is too close to your arse.

Q one more, please reply, who asked to assist us for CCS downld?
It's look like another liar

A Mooxe , so again you look like a goose.

Q Isn't mod downloads for CoI supposed to be handled by the 'intuitive' Command Center module? Why bother hosting the mods here at CCS if the Command Center points to mods that are supposed to hosted somewhere else? Or was that feature of the Command Center fu**ed up?

A. Link works for me...check again

Q answer me plz - why u r the only one person here that was warned?

A because you are paranoid and warped

#110:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:19 am
    —
always easy to show separate sentence and say, it's stupid to ask this isnt it?

Lol, of course by this way, those sentence look like stupid.
But read each post where the sentence was take and the stupidity fly away.

As i said many time in this post, u cannot calm yourself and foolow the
rules that CCS admin want to see.
I told you, u still user like anyother here.
So why do you continue to be so sad here and why dont u try to publish
your sadly away, around CSO or anywhere else?
As i see, no one post in this thread maded by you seems to be constructive.
You just use your vanity to flame anyone.
I know exactly what i said, i never speak for nothing.
I warning you 3 time for posting link alone
i warning you 2 time for you bad language and agressivity.
It would be enought to be out of any other forum.
But u still here. SO tell me something, dont u feel it like to take a small
hole and made it big big big??
Dont u realize that u still on forum CCS and be not banned?
U know if CCS and their moderator are so sad,(and partuculary me)
why do you come back and post here?
Is it to warning anyone about that? Ok so trust me it's done
u can now stop this stupidity and get something else to do.

#111:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:21 am
    —
And again, i dont see why MOOXE would ask you to help on CC3 download
When i was leading this section of download

#112:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:50 am
    —
schrecken wrote:
Please list the 11 direct questions


that post is a oneliner for instance

oneliner = posting one sentence as reply.

You miss the question for real men, here:

1) how about we solve it like men and play a "pro CCS suport is cool mercs vs. anti-CCS support is crap mercs" war?

2) who's we?

3) based on what? you cyber-psychology?

4) this implies that it would be utilitarianism for you then?

...

and now the best part of your magnificent logic:

schrecken wrote:

9 pages of rubbish here when all zappi needed do was make apost


9 (12) pages of rubbish of which you posted 44 replies making up for aprox. 40% of trash

now thats a self-reflective argument about yerself, man.

#113:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:11 pm
    —
btw. you have been ostracized now officially to Nowheristan...

http://www.nowheristan.org/

#114:  Author: platoon_michaelLocation: Right behind you PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:27 pm
    —
Maybe I was a little too harsh last night.
But the people who post such crap about others just pisses one off after awhile.

Love my new banner too.
Thanks

#115:  Author: kwp PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:59 pm
    —
Quote:
But the people who post such crap about others just pisses one off after awhile.


I totally agree.

Over the years I have watched this site and have not posted much of anything largely because of the BS some moderators throw at those who do try to help others. This thread is a prime example of what I have observed over the past 4 years.

#116:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:32 pm
    —
hi kwp,

Quote:
Over the years I have watched this site and have not posted much of anything largely because of the BS some moderators throw at those who do try to help others.

show the example of moderators throw BS to those who trty to help, plz.

Quote:
This thread is a prime example of what I have observed over the past 4 years.

the thread is a prime example of how single individual can piss off both moderators and commoners with his empty replies that do nothing but insult and abuse the friendly attitude.

#117:  Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:51 pm
    —
God dame it, this is getting tiresome

Thats good kwp,

This is Schrecks reply to Zapp (page 1):
schrecken wrote:
Zappi You're a fool
I post a link to more information as the poster asked, and you wet your pants.

Get real, get a life, get in touch with the community.
This is not about us and them it is about serving the community!
If you can't see that it's time you hung up your boots and retired..

Hmmm….

schrecken wrote:
Ban me for speaking the truth.

What truth was it in that link with no text? He asked him to stop post links and no explaining text its as simple as that, how did it transform into “truth”

schrecken wrote:
Ban me for posting correct and accessible links.

What correct? Outdated mod… but that was not the issue, it was missing a explaining text that he aske him to stop posting..
schrecken wrote:
Ban me for CC related input.

What, it was about a missing explaining text, don’t just post links

schrecken wrote:
Ban me for making your life easier.

Yeh, we seen how you want to do that… If you cared you would Stop this nonsense

schrecken wrote:
Ban me for assisting the community.

If Schrecken really wanted to help community, he shall fix CSO broken links and outdated mods. Not to say, fix CCMT…

schrecken wrote:
Ban me because you can

He has not banned you, so stop play the martyr.


What did Schrecken expect after this?


Senior Drill wrote:
Your letting your Nazi slip show again, there, zappi. All kinds of hot air about how liberal CSS is and yet has fascist rules,

Hmm.. Do one even need to comment on this…

Question to shrecki : “too many dld links r outdated and alot of mods r just not represented in CSO”
Schreckn answers:
schrecken wrote:
I've rebuilt those links and downloads 3 times in the last 6 months..... I don't currently have time to do it a fourth time.

CSO is not mine, although I do contribute... as I do here.

I've also been asked to assist with the downloads here... but time is my (our) enemy.

maybe I should take up the offer?

Hehe, hmmm wow Schrecken is so concerned with community.. So helpful, and now he wants to be an administrator here at CCS and do for CCS what he done for CSO… Wow…

schrecken wrote:
You are in charge of CC3 downloads...congrats.
Maybe it's time to look for a new job.


Hmm, if Schrecken applied his standard and how he take care of CSO download, I think Screcken shall get a new job, but that not for me to say, as im not the owner of CSO, and I really don’t care.. But that want he meant was, “get a new job here at CCS” but, what’s the demand for it?

schrecken wrote:
Ok, so zappi and his henchmen will never be banned... kewl move.

So, seem Schrecken been keen on banning Zappi and some more… Its so easy to uptake the old habits, its just like a pare of old slippers.

PLEAS PLEASE PLEASE THINK BEFORE YOU POST.

PPL please drop this now...

#118:  Author: kwp PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:57 pm
    —
Just merely stating what I have observed over the years and I would not consider a certain moderator's reply in this thread to be a friendly attitude. I'm just fed up with the BS and what it has done to the CC community as a whole.

Nothing else follows.
Over and out.

#119:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:01 pm
    —
kwp wrote:
Just merely stating what I have observed over the years and I would not consider a certain moderator's reply in this thread to be a friendly attitude. I'm just fed up with the BS and what it has done to the CC community as a whole.

Nothing else follows.
Over and out.


Hey KWP, can you be more specific please ...
Which moderator was so sad?

#120:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:40 pm
    —
I don't care bout you or other moderatores.

You have proved you (moderators) aren't a reasonable person.

1. Calling me a liar.

2. Claiming I called you a Nazi

3. Spamming my posts

4. Using rude and aggressive language.

5. Double standards because you are prejudiced.

6. Threats of banning because a link wasn't as good as yours...LOL

7. Using Foul abhorrent language

8. Posting pictures of naked men.


and you say I'm aggressive... again LoL

This site is about CC not your inflated ego.

Apologise to me...

#121:  Author: Pzt_Kevin_dtnLocation: USA PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:59 am
    —
Call for a Ceasefire

DO NOT RESPOND IN THIS THREAD FOR 72 HOURS PLEASE!
Resist the temptation to respond and counter-respond. It's NOT worth it.

I am going to make an attempt at impartial mediation here. I am a neutral party who has particpated in CC for some years and I believe I have established a reputation of being reasonable and fair. I am not a moderator here in CCS nor in CSO. I am a CC fan and player and do my best to be an ambassador to this game.

I am a father of 5 kids, the oldest being teenagers and quite frankly you ALL sound like my kids at their worst.

After a while is doesn't matter who started what and who did what to whom.
"...stop touching me"
"No, you stop touching me..."
Sound familiar? It's getting real petty now.

It just has to stop! NOW!

Can you all start acting like adults or reasonably mature people and just drop it? It appears that you are just going to have to agree to disagree on this one.

There is TOO MUCH misunderstanding, misinterpretation, misrepresentation, misleading. It's just a whole bunch of misses.

I'll say it again
DO NOT RESPOND IN THIS THREAD FOR 72 HOURS PLEASE!
Resist the temptation to respond and counter-respond. It's NOT worth it.

Be a true ambassador to this game and just walk away from this one. Take a deep breath, count to ten, whatever it takes. Let's move on to more constructive stuff because this topic has been nothing but destructive.

Note - If someone takes exception to this post, please note that I will not be responding because I do not want to get drawn into this beyond my attempt at this ceasefire.

Thank You.

#122:  Author: platoon_michaelLocation: Right behind you PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:02 pm
    —
It's been 24 hours.....................


Can I cuss someone out now?

Smile



Close Combat Series -> The Mess


output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT

Page 1 of 1