Close Combat Series :: View topic - OT Split (S.A.S 3.5 mod)

OT Split (S.A.S 3.5 mod)

through

Forum FAQ

[^/[Print]\]
Goto page : Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next :| |:
Close Combat Series -> The Mess

#61: Author: schrecken, Location: Sydney, Australia

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:47 am
—

Quote:

From Matrix Games' page on CoI:
"Includes "Command Center" linking you to new maps, campaigns, mods,and player forums."

Well, it does work, just 1 extra link to click on.

Volunteer/Fan sites... can't live with 'em , can't live without 'em.

I know of 3 mods in progress for CCMT...maybe a 4th...I'm need to get an update.

Quote:

It's always easy to critics, but more difficult to be constructive.

So , is that an admission?... probably the closest I'll get to an apology from the MAN.

#62: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:49 am
—
open your eyes and by the way use your brain Wink

#63: Author: squadleader_id, Location: Soerabaja

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:13 am
—

schrecken wrote:

Quote:

From Matrix Games' page on CoI:
"Includes "Command Center" linking you to new maps, campaigns, mods,and player forums."

Well, it does work, just 1 extra link to click on.

Volunteer/Fan sites... can't live with 'em , can't live without 'em.

Dunno about you...but last time I loaded CoI and the Com Center...it points to CSO...and some nonexistent files Smile

Quote:

I know of 3 mods in progress for CCMT...maybe a 4th...I'm need to get an update.

Hmm...if these awesome CCMT mods are not finished and still works in progress...no wonder the CCMT downloads section is empty...you can't blame the CCS Admins for that, Shreckie Wink

#64: Author: schrecken, Location: Sydney, Australia

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:43 am
—
Aha The Surabaya xtal ball at work eh?

I have no idea how awesome they will be , a bit like BoS could be kewl could be a yawn.... starwars rules for CC5.

Still plenty of other maps mods tools and scenarios to fill the empty void.

How many CC4 mods were available after 4 months?... how many after 5 years... get real and don't make excuses.

Quote:

it points to CSO...and some nonexistent files

CSO works for no man when it is down... a bit like CCS.

It's back up, so we can all rejoice.... non-existent files exist... your cup runneth over with goodwill and plenty...

but remember the golden rule

"Download today for tomorrow may bring a dead link"

#65: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:07 pm
—
You are so helpfull Schrecken than when i check all your message posted
for reply at this post than i can see many many help for us.
Thx for that. You contribuing to reenforce CCS community.
When 1 men tell you than you are drunk, u can smile
When 2 men tell you than u are drunk, u can still smile...
When everyone telling you than u are drunk, u have to go to sleep Wink

#66: Author: platoon_michael, Location: Right behind you

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:02 pm
—

Quote:

How many CC4 mods were available after 4 months?... how many after 5 years

If you count all the mods that have been totally edited from the ground up like a GJS/Meuse or B.O. for CCIV and made available for download.

The answer is none

Sad

#67: Author: Polemarchos, Location: Polemarchopolis

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:32 pm
—

LiveFree wrote:

Just ban the guy and get it over with. Schreken's motives are clear, and he's nothing but a cancer to the cc community.

we should not adopt the same methods of authoritarian moderation... You cant cure cancer by implementing a counter-cancer. What we need is a reactive immune system and the posts in this forum are a clear indicator that mitigation works.

Democracy, hooray! And the thing is that in a democracy like CCS, although classified as bad type of government by Socrates has one important benefit.

IT ALLOWS SYSTEMCRITIQUE (in this case by schrecken*), no other form of gov. can do that.

This means that we can fight cancer by mitigation, but we should not fight its existence, that would be undemocratic.

* Here I must add an “ethical disclaimer”: Evaluation of empirical data strongly suggests that application of extreme and inhumane practices in dialogue (barbarism, ad personam argument) helps the weaker position to gain attention. Promotion of barbarism/ad personam argument to achieve positive outcome in a debate, is based on cruel rhethorical reality in empirical data and does not correspond with the author’s personal opinions about ethics in dialogue.

Last edited by Polemarchos on Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:38 pm; edited 2 times in total

#68: Author: schrecken, Location: Sydney, Australia

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:33 pm
—

Quote:

with such start...
Zappi You're a fool
...what did u expect?

I expect civility and respect for trying to help someone with a problem.

NOT A THREAT TO BE BANNED by da fool.

#69: Author: Dima,

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:54 pm
—

Quote:

I expect civility and respect for trying to help someone with a problem.
NOT A THREAT TO BE BANNED by da fool.

IIRC u were warned about that by Zappi some time ago in another thread.

#70: Author: Polemarchos, Location: Polemarchopolis

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:00 pm
—
I still think its appropriate to apologize to you for resisting your takeover....

so here is an inofficial apology to schrecken, by the supporters of democracy.

Last edited by Polemarchos on Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:04 am; edited 2 times in total

#71: Author: schrecken, Location: Sydney, Australia

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:18 pm
—

Quote:

IIRC u were warned about that by Zappi some time ago in another thread.

yes , seems to be a policy of this board to threaten to ban someone when they help a fellow gamer

or

You are threatened with banning when you are the subject of abuse by a board member.

Both cases can be discounted as irrational behaviour by the zappmaster.

If you can explain in reasonable terms why either case was justified or even worthy of attention, please do.

You can't, because.

1. A post answering a question is reasonable (even if zap posted a more informative post later, while poking his tongue out and going nah nah nah)

2. When someone else makes rude and disparaging remarks the finger can't be pointed at me.

.

#72: Author: Digs, Location: Ontario, Canada

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:59 pm
—
Give it a rest!... someone lock this thread already.
:hurt8

#73: Author: Dima,

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:28 pm
—

Quote:

yes , seems to be a policy of this board to threaten to ban someone when they help a fellow gamer
or
You are threatened with banning when you are the subject of abuse by a board member.

Once again, somehow only u of 22199 registered users by this min (http://www.closecombatseries.net/CCS/modules.php?name=Statistics) have such problem...prolly time to check whats wrong in u?

Quote:

Both cases can be discounted as irrational behaviour by the zappmaster.

that's yer subjective opinion, somehow noone here shares it.

Quote:

You can't, because.
1. A post answering a question is reasonable (even if zap posted a more informative post later, while poking his tongue out and going nah nah nah)

u didn't answer the question.
what u did was giving link for outdated info that wasn't connected to SAS 3.5.

so u r wrong here.

Quote:

2. When someone else makes rude and disparaging remarks the finger can't be pointed at me.

u were the first that started to be rude in this thread.

so u r wrong here

looks like yer logic (vision of things) is flawed ( like the product u r the part of) as yer idea is ok, but realisation sux big cock.

if u want to chnge things, start with yerself Smile

#74: Author: schrecken, Location: Sydney, Australia

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:47 pm
—

Quote:

but realisation sux big cock.

You guys just can't help yourselves.

RUDE, obnoxious, uncouth etc

Quote:

u didn't answer the question.

And for not giving 100% correct and up to date info a THREAT to be Banned... you're nuts.

You need to ban half the posters here under that criteria!

Quote:

( like the product u r the part of

Then don't play it.. you are not being forced to.

Still laughing at you here.... childish rants, ego's out on parade.

#75: Author: schrecken, Location: Sydney, Australia

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:55 pm
—

Quote:

like the product u r the part of

Both products you have seen that I have been involved with are unqualified improvements over their original incarnations.

If you can't see that......

#76: Author: Dima,

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:28 pm
—

Quote:

You guys just can't help yourselves.
RUDE, obnoxious, uncouth etc

prove iam wrong Wink

.
i've already mentioned that u know so many cool words...

Quote:

And for not giving 100% correct and up to date info a THREAT to be Banned... you're nuts.

lol, yer logic has monster flaw Laughing

thing is that u have been warned to not do something u made again w/o reasonable purpose as it didn't help anyone....
...and still u r here with us, friend Smile

Quote:

You need to ban half the posters here under that criteria!

schrecken, friend, could u plz read the thread more carefully?
answer me plz - why u r the only one person here that was warned?

Quote:

Then don't play it.. you are not being forced to.

i don't, friend, i don't Smile

Quote:

Still laughing at you here.... childish rants, ego's out on parade.

lol, thnx u have raised my mood Very Happy

.

well u know there r special places for the individuals who r still laughing at everybody here and there...
but the normal ppl r just pity for them as when the God wants to punish individual he damages his brain ...

Quote:

Both products you have seen that I have been involved with are unqualified improvements over their original incarnations.

u r wrong here.
when i c camo'ed PzIII in 1941 in CoI some v interesting things come to my mind Smile

.
when i c Abrams having HE shell in CCMT or RPK having slower RoF than AK i realize that ppl who did the product (commercial one! not the mod) just don't understand what they r doing...500.000 psi lol

plz, tell me about the improvements, maybe i can chnge my mind Laughing

#77: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:05 pm
—

schrecken wrote:

Quote:

IIRC u were warned about that by Zappi some time ago in another thread.

U been abused by member? who did, when where?... Wasnt your dog tonight?
sorry joking ... so

u didnt been warning for posted unhelped link ...

U know exactly why u been warned one more time...

If not, i ll explain again to you...
You be warned to post link to CSo ( and anywhere the link would pointed)
without adding any text or explain ...
It was the third time i warning you about that...
I dont speak about your language or insult my friend. what i warning you too
somedays ago, isnt it?
for information, in belgium,( and that's the case in many other country)
the only case to insult nazi anyone in public is enought to be followed by the laws.
Now as i see u cannot calm yourself and waiting, i dunno what u waiting exactly...
Tell me what do you excepcted now?
Apparently you dont have many friend here ... Why dont you?
MMMh i guess i know the answer. I let you found why

#78: Author: ZAPPI4, Location: Belgium Liege

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:10 pm
—
You are turning in circle amigo...

Schrecken, i take your agressivity like a try to discredit anyone who arent
right with your mind.
Force to be i must repeat, it'snt CSO, u dont get any part here
u are user like anyother.
Anytime u reply here u let people feeling bad to you.
Any reply put those guys one more step against you.
I dont know you, i dont want to know you because as i guess than finally
i know you now.
Finally, to be sure u understood, u are welcome here amigo. even if no one like you.

#79: Author: schrecken, Location: Sydney, Australia

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:51 am
—
it is you going in circles and inflaming things by making more and more outlandish statements.

You have not warned me 3 times for posting links to CSO without ext.,

Please show me the links to the 3 warnings..... nope you can't.

Quote:

I didn't buy that waste. And I am not obliged to say anything but 'fuck off'. Your just another CSO butt chum that sticks up for their, and apparently your, shaddy business practices. You have all successfully ripped off the community that you hailed from, congrats.

That's ok here...but a relevant link is taboo.

Polemarchos keeps insinuation that I am gay, but that's ok here.

You talk about sucking cock, but that''s ok here.

But posting a link is worthy of a THREAT TO BE BANNED

Quote:

the only case to insult nazi anyone in public is enought to be followed by the laws.

I haven't called any one a NAZI... so stop saying I have!!!

This is what I'm saying and you are too thick to understand...

Other people make abusive posts, including moderators... I get the warning.

If you would put aside your predjudices, fear, and isolationism you would stop these ridiculous posts.

#80: Author: Polemarchos, Location: Polemarchopolis

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:53 am
—

schrecken wrote:

Polemarchos keeps insinuation that I am gay, but that's ok here.

I did? cool, where?

i am pretty sure I called you "moron" once... the rest is fiction..

Close Combat Series -> The Mess

output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT

Goto page : Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next :| |: Page 4 of 7