OT Split (S.A.S 3.5 mod)
Select messages from
# through # Forum FAQ
[/[Print]\]
Goto page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next  :| |:
Close Combat Series -> The Mess

#101:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:27 am
    —
schrecken wrote:
No


you keep reproducing yourself

schrecken wrote:

You made a commitment to drive people out.


Häh? can u pls cite again. btw. its paranoia when noone chases you...

schrecken wrote:

You, my Golden Greek, are the root of most problems.


i know, problems fascinate me. thats why i like you.
In fact u are like an overthrown king. Cant compensate the loss in virtual power? well u can still hand out bad reputation on youtube.

schrecken wrote:

You are lacking in morals and are untrustworthy.


based on what? you cyber-psychology? or your overarching ethical standards making you accuse others of bad morals during one of the major christian days of worship. Thats an example to follow, dude well done.
this implies that it would be utilitarianism for you then?

#102:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:29 am
    —
schrecken wrote:

But don't let yourself be pulled down into this morass of putrified dung.


But schreck, he already spoke to you so its too late

#103:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:32 am
    —
Your post makes no sense.

It seems to be based on a bunch of totally off base assumptions.

Which nearly all your posts are.

#104:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:46 am
    —
schrecken wrote:
Your post makes no sense.


they have! it's the 6th. You need the nightgoogles from CCMT to see the sense.

schrecken wrote:

It seems to be based on a bunch of totally off base assumptions.


Let's see, based on off base basic fundations.
Wow you created the ultimate paradox just like that. You must be divine schrecken.

schrecken wrote:
Which nearly all your posts are.


I've never heard the words "all" and "posts" in the same sentece before.
Congrats, my cyberpsychology test prog marked u as one-dimensional, simplicistic thinker.


btw. you never seem to answer direct questions. are you shy?

p.s. cool man, talking to you made me major in no time. You carry success in your veins, pal.

#105:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:00 am
    —
you just ignore my direct answers... or can't comprehend them or are too embarrassed to respond to them.


All the rest you just make up in your own mind and then make posts using your self created assumptions.

#106:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:23 am
    —
schrecken wrote:
you just ignore my direct answers... or can't comprehend them or are too embarrassed to respond to them.


ok look, mathematics will give the answer:

105 replies

41 by schrecken

makes 39,7% by you

according to the script, just today you became Major, congrats for the promotion.

now back to the argument.

in 39,7% of 105 posts you answered:

None of 11 direct questions and probably few of the billions rhethorical questions

schrecken wrote:

All the rest you just make up in your own mind and then make posts using your self created assumptions.


ye its called slippery slope argument and I learned it from you...

#107:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:24 am
    —
Quote:
Time for a katharsis schrecken:

1) You post one liners here for weeks now.


Quote:
Ef13 wrote:

What make matters worse is that the internet archive does not have any history of the forums. A lot of good info may be lost forever.


some stuff is still around:

the rank mod was the problem... always uninstall everything fro CFg 1.3 before applying new mods...

song is called Katyusha! actually a pre-WW2 song

http://rkkaww2.armchairgeneral.com/Multimedia/preww2.htm#Katyusha

yes indeed. the face looks like a photography...

try "hamachi", i managed to overide firewalls with it, as long as the admin does not take measures against that


My oneliners are a problem are they.

All your quotes above are one lines... one with a link outside the site

Seems it's ok for you to post oneliners and not anyone else... or just me?

#108:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:26 am
    —
Please list the 11 direct questions

#109:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:50 am
    —
I found a bunch for you

Mostly stupid questions though

Q hope u copied this time

A copied

Q And who made the rules here ...

A The rule maker

Q Who asked you to assist the download?

A Mooxe

Q r u serious?
ever tried to compare to CSO?

A (double banger) yes, and why would I.


Q why everywhere when u post it smells so bad ? not the first time...


A because your nose is too close to your arse.

Q one more, please reply, who asked to assist us for CCS downld?
It's look like another liar

A Mooxe , so again you look like a goose.

Q Isn't mod downloads for CoI supposed to be handled by the 'intuitive' Command Center module? Why bother hosting the mods here at CCS if the Command Center points to mods that are supposed to hosted somewhere else? Or was that feature of the Command Center fu**ed up?

A. Link works for me...check again

Q answer me plz - why u r the only one person here that was warned?

A because you are paranoid and warped

#110:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:19 am
    —
always easy to show separate sentence and say, it's stupid to ask this isnt it?

Lol, of course by this way, those sentence look like stupid.
But read each post where the sentence was take and the stupidity fly away.

As i said many time in this post, u cannot calm yourself and foolow the
rules that CCS admin want to see.
I told you, u still user like anyother here.
So why do you continue to be so sad here and why dont u try to publish
your sadly away, around CSO or anywhere else?
As i see, no one post in this thread maded by you seems to be constructive.
You just use your vanity to flame anyone.
I know exactly what i said, i never speak for nothing.
I warning you 3 time for posting link alone
i warning you 2 time for you bad language and agressivity.
It would be enought to be out of any other forum.
But u still here. SO tell me something, dont u feel it like to take a small
hole and made it big big big??
Dont u realize that u still on forum CCS and be not banned?
U know if CCS and their moderator are so sad,(and partuculary me)
why do you come back and post here?
Is it to warning anyone about that? Ok so trust me it's done
u can now stop this stupidity and get something else to do.

#111:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:21 am
    —
And again, i dont see why MOOXE would ask you to help on CC3 download
When i was leading this section of download

#112:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:50 am
    —
schrecken wrote:
Please list the 11 direct questions


that post is a oneliner for instance

oneliner = posting one sentence as reply.

You miss the question for real men, here:

1) how about we solve it like men and play a "pro CCS suport is cool mercs vs. anti-CCS support is crap mercs" war?

2) who's we?

3) based on what? you cyber-psychology?

4) this implies that it would be utilitarianism for you then?

...

and now the best part of your magnificent logic:

schrecken wrote:

9 pages of rubbish here when all zappi needed do was make apost


9 (12) pages of rubbish of which you posted 44 replies making up for aprox. 40% of trash

now thats a self-reflective argument about yerself, man.

#113:  Author: PolemarchosLocation: Polemarchopolis PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:11 pm
    —
btw. you have been ostracized now officially to Nowheristan...

http://www.nowheristan.org/

#114:  Author: platoon_michaelLocation: Right behind you PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:27 pm
    —
Maybe I was a little too harsh last night.
But the people who post such crap about others just pisses one off after awhile.

Love my new banner too.
Thanks

#115:  Author: kwp PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:59 pm
    —
Quote:
But the people who post such crap about others just pisses one off after awhile.


I totally agree.

Over the years I have watched this site and have not posted much of anything largely because of the BS some moderators throw at those who do try to help others. This thread is a prime example of what I have observed over the past 4 years.

#116:  Author: Dima PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:32 pm
    —
hi kwp,

Quote:
Over the years I have watched this site and have not posted much of anything largely because of the BS some moderators throw at those who do try to help others.

show the example of moderators throw BS to those who trty to help, plz.

Quote:
This thread is a prime example of what I have observed over the past 4 years.

the thread is a prime example of how single individual can piss off both moderators and commoners with his empty replies that do nothing but insult and abuse the friendly attitude.

#117:  Author: AT_Stalky PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:51 pm
    —
God dame it, this is getting tiresome

Thats good kwp,

This is Schrecks reply to Zapp (page 1):
schrecken wrote:
Zappi You're a fool
I post a link to more information as the poster asked, and you wet your pants.

Get real, get a life, get in touch with the community.
This is not about us and them it is about serving the community!
If you can't see that it's time you hung up your boots and retired..

Hmmm….

schrecken wrote:
Ban me for speaking the truth.

What truth was it in that link with no text? He asked him to stop post links and no explaining text its as simple as that, how did it transform into “truth”

schrecken wrote:
Ban me for posting correct and accessible links.

What correct? Outdated mod… but that was not the issue, it was missing a explaining text that he aske him to stop posting..
schrecken wrote:
Ban me for CC related input.

What, it was about a missing explaining text, don’t just post links

schrecken wrote:
Ban me for making your life easier.

Yeh, we seen how you want to do that… If you cared you would Stop this nonsense

schrecken wrote:
Ban me for assisting the community.

If Schrecken really wanted to help community, he shall fix CSO broken links and outdated mods. Not to say, fix CCMT…

schrecken wrote:
Ban me because you can

He has not banned you, so stop play the martyr.


What did Schrecken expect after this?


Senior Drill wrote:
Your letting your Nazi slip show again, there, zappi. All kinds of hot air about how liberal CSS is and yet has fascist rules,

Hmm.. Do one even need to comment on this…

Question to shrecki : “too many dld links r outdated and alot of mods r just not represented in CSO”
Schreckn answers:
schrecken wrote:
I've rebuilt those links and downloads 3 times in the last 6 months..... I don't currently have time to do it a fourth time.

CSO is not mine, although I do contribute... as I do here.

I've also been asked to assist with the downloads here... but time is my (our) enemy.

maybe I should take up the offer?

Hehe, hmmm wow Schrecken is so concerned with community.. So helpful, and now he wants to be an administrator here at CCS and do for CCS what he done for CSO… Wow…

schrecken wrote:
You are in charge of CC3 downloads...congrats.
Maybe it's time to look for a new job.


Hmm, if Schrecken applied his standard and how he take care of CSO download, I think Screcken shall get a new job, but that not for me to say, as im not the owner of CSO, and I really don’t care.. But that want he meant was, “get a new job here at CCS” but, what’s the demand for it?

schrecken wrote:
Ok, so zappi and his henchmen will never be banned... kewl move.

So, seem Schrecken been keen on banning Zappi and some more… Its so easy to uptake the old habits, its just like a pare of old slippers.

PLEAS PLEASE PLEASE THINK BEFORE YOU POST.

PPL please drop this now...

#118:  Author: kwp PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:57 pm
    —
Just merely stating what I have observed over the years and I would not consider a certain moderator's reply in this thread to be a friendly attitude. I'm just fed up with the BS and what it has done to the CC community as a whole.

Nothing else follows.
Over and out.

#119:  Author: ZAPPI4Location: Belgium Liege PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:01 pm
    —
kwp wrote:
Just merely stating what I have observed over the years and I would not consider a certain moderator's reply in this thread to be a friendly attitude. I'm just fed up with the BS and what it has done to the CC community as a whole.

Nothing else follows.
Over and out.


Hey KWP, can you be more specific please ...
Which moderator was so sad?

#120:  Author: schreckenLocation: Sydney, Australia PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:40 pm
    —
I don't care bout you or other moderatores.

You have proved you (moderators) aren't a reasonable person.

1. Calling me a liar.

2. Claiming I called you a Nazi

3. Spamming my posts

4. Using rude and aggressive language.

5. Double standards because you are prejudiced.

6. Threats of banning because a link wasn't as good as yours...LOL

7. Using Foul abhorrent language

8. Posting pictures of naked men.


and you say I'm aggressive... again LoL

This site is about CC not your inflated ego.

Apologise to me...



Close Combat Series -> The Mess


output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT

Goto page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next  :| |:
Page 6 of 7