Quote: |
boo hoo....stuart loses HE and canister ....that was fun, but if they didnt have them in june 1944,then ok. |
Quote: |
maybe we should incorporate a few? |
Quote: |
Why the difference between the RA/AT regts. in the 3rd and 50th Infantry divisions? |
Quote: |
Just in case you wish to include some Sextons |
Quote: |
The 50th also had attached to it prior to the invasion (from Feburary '44)the 86 Army Field Regt., a Herfordshire yeomanary TA formation containing the 341 (St. Albans) and 342 (Hertford) batteries, among others. At this time these batteries were equipped with the Sexton 25pdr SP gun, which replaced the original M7 Priest at the beginning of the year. |
Quote: |
There was in February 1944 a specialised battery organisation WE II/190/2 approved for use of assault units (meaning amphibious assault), this gave a battery 2 troops of 6pdrs and 1 of M10's, sometimes this is known as the 'assault' organisation.The justification for this mentions the crossing of open beaches, is this the organisation that you refer to? |
Quote: |
However I can find no evidence that the battery ever exceded 3 troops. |
Quote: |
The Sextons of the Hertfordshire Yeomanary were actually trained to fire the guns during the run in to the beaches from the landing craft, |
Quote: |
As to upgrading equipment, it would be very unusual for a British unit to undertake any form of re-organisation or re-equipping while they were engaged, this was normally done in quite periods out of the line. Both 3rd & 50th divisions in question were heavily engaged during June/July. |
Quote: |
I wonder where this 4th troop and the men to operate it came from?, and what date it was introduced?. |
Quote: |
I believe the fire during 'run in' was something practised by more than one artillery unit during the invasion |
Quote: |
In the bottom half of this is shown a Canadian 17 pdr in June. |
Quote: |
these BG dont really have any offensive teeth now. |
Quote: |
sometimes historic realalities have to be sacrificed for some game play. |
Quote: |
the allied BG's have tank support attached.... |
Quote: |
why couldnt some of the germans for the game??? |
Quote: |
well i disagree again it seems....... |
Quote: |
German Panzer Grenadier Div's were used primarily for offensive as was all german doctrine....attack... |
Quote: |
they were not used as defensive divisions......thats what line div are for ....you know that |
Quote: |
so imho it would be better for trsm and play balance to take some of the 30 odd tanks and 28 shreaks from the SS tank BG's and give some to the Pz Gd BG's |
Quote: |
also.....whats with the deal with something like ...i believe its 28 shreak teams in the 12SS mk4 BG??? |
Quote: |
theres two diff types of teams and the both have shreaks!? is that a mistake........god i hope so...... |
Quote: |
The Command Tigers in the Abt 101 do not have officers in the force pool to choose from. |
Quote: |
Waiting for Mooxe ( ) or someone else to adjust install/uninstall txts. If someone wants to help with it, PM me. |
Chym wrote: |
Hi Dima,
Thanks for releasing this 0.97vs But after a fine download and install, I first went to the Create a Scenario section to see right away the composition of the new BG and : when I clicked on the PzAbt101 icon, it showed on top of screen the name of the I./726 716ID and clicking on Battlegroup info showed the composition of that infanterie BG also same for the 20/9SS which is taken for the 857/346 ID also the 22/10SS which is taken for the 858/346 ID for the Allied : the 214 BDE/43Rd is taken for the 159BDE / 11th. and the 5/GDS is taken for the 152nd BDE/51 Have anyone got this also ? ( I only had GJS44 installed so far ) Thanks in advance for checking Chym |
Quote: |
Did the panzergrenadiers really have that many mg42s cause almost every inf team has one. |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT