AT_Stalky wrote: |
Do the work your self. Start prioritize what the consumer think is important, either continue to waste time by interfere in the consumer debates about your product or make a shange and use that time to research weapon data so badly needed in CCMT.. That you should have done long ago… Fix it, it’s your broken product that YOU HAVE SOLD FOR MONEY. |
schrecken wrote: | ||
Please send money, it greases the the gears of industry. or like everyone else, volunteer your time and and much can be achieved. |
schrecken wrote: | ||
Please send money, it greases the the gears of industry. or like everyone else, volunteer your time and and much can be achieved. |
schrecken wrote: |
Please send money, it greases the the gears of industry. |
ANZAC_Tack wrote: |
CCMT was a fizzer for me,as it had NO ops or GC,i said so before release,and after. yes its a fun single game, and i enjoyed it. |
AT_Stalky wrote: |
OK. Lets see here if i can sum this up,
1) First we buy the CCMT game that is sold for “max dollars” 2) and then we complain about the weapon data and other defects in the game, 3) as we do the developer are bitching at us for point out flaws in the game, 4) now the developer start ask us to send him more money to fix the defects in the game, 5) then we the consumers are also asked to fix the game weapon data for the developer and send it to him! Hmmmmmmmmm? |
Quote: |
I don't get it stalky. |
Quote: |
No one is contradicting your posts... except when you go off the rails |
Quote: |
some of your posts make sense when you stick to factual arguments instead of heading off into flights of fancy. |
Quote: |
You cannot ask for any more, surely? |
Quote: |
When questions are asked I give honest answers eg 30mm cannon cannot defeat an Abrams etc. |
Quote: |
It's you, stalky, doing the badmouthing, read your own posts. |
Quote: |
The game plays very well as is... there may be a few anomilies within the data but these , generally, aren't born out in game play. |
Quote: |
If you played the game you would see that. |
schrecken wrote: |
When questions are asked I give honest answers eg 30mm cannon cannot defeat an Abrams etc. |
schrecken wrote: |
Lucky for all the happy owners your opinion doesn't carry much weight..
But your concerns have been noted with thanks. |
Quote: |
how about Bushmaster MkII 30mm? Wink
i know that in CCMT it can pen T72 frontal armor at at least 1240m Smile. |
Quote: |
Useless thread as seems noone from the developers gonna reply here becoz: |
schrecken wrote: |
The game plays very well as is... there may be a few anomilies within the data but these , generally, aren't born out in game play.
If you played the game you would see that. |
schrecken wrote: | ||
stalk
I was invited in
|
ANZAC_Tack wrote: |
has it been misconstruded by my comments that nobody was ever paid in simtek? I know there was problems with future's,and another from cso who went,but im not aware of any others. to my current knowledge they got paid, i'd like to be corrected.
I'd also like to know some day what the f*&^ happened to simtek,and its people before S3T.all i know is i got this email one day...rest is history |
squadleader_id wrote: |
Can't really blame Shreckie and the rest of the Simtek "workers" for releasing crap...they weren't getting paid for their work...they were working on this commercial game with max dollar price for free...so blame the system I guess |
Therion wrote: | ||
It has nothing to do with lack of payment. The CCM data was already fucked up before Simtek took over. The problem is that no one bothered to correct it. More, they added more data from space. |
Quote: |
Umm...CCM was produced by Simtek |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT