Close Combat Series :: View topic - Trainwrecks & The Off Topic Hijackers Graveyard

Trainwrecks & The Off Topic Hijackers Graveyard

through

Forum FAQ

[^/[Print]\]
Goto page : Previous 1, 2, 3, ... 31, 32, 33 Next :| |:
Close Combat Series -> The Mess

#37: Author: schrecken, Location: Sydney, Australia

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:32 am
—
Pretty bad form for a site mod to post links to private forums.

#38: Author: mooxe,

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:32 am
—

schrecken wrote:

Pretty bad form for a site mod to post links to private forums.

Its just a link. Only members can access it. Dont get too paranoid. Webalizer and Google Stats automatically churn all this stuff out. Occaisionally I go and visit the referrers to see why CCS is mentioned.

If this forums going to be any use to anyone we should atleast stay on topic. I am trying my best.

#39: Author: schrecken, Location: Sydney, Australia

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:06 pm
—
I know you have access to the data... I don't think you should make it public though.

#40: Author: Therion,

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:53 pm
—
Taking in account the mysterious leak in the last year, your concerns are understandable.

#41: Author: schrecken, Location: Sydney, Australia

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:58 pm
—
I suppose I could post everyones personal home address.

It's just an address

#42: Author: platoon_michael, Location: Right behind you

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:34 pm
—
That information was givin under the assumption it would never be made available or shared with others.
Are you seriusly considering breaking that trust?

#43: Author: platoon_michael, Location: Right behind you

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:01 pm
—
I honestly now wish I had givin more thought to giving out my personal information.
I may not have the means to prevent it being disclosed,emailed,shared or whatever.
But your statement alone Schrecken leaves me totally disgusted that I ever participated
And really makes me wonder if it hasent already been shared,or will someday be shared.

#44: Author: schrecken, Location: Sydney, Australia

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:47 pm
—
You sound more stupid every day!

#45: Author: schrecken, Location: Sydney, Australia

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:56 pm
—
The point is

Mooxe is in a privileged position of trust as administrator of this site.

he is abusing that trust by posting private addresses.

If the owners of the private addresses wanted them made public they would publish the addresses them selves.

It sounds like in your own weird distorted way you would agree with that plt_michael.

#46: Author: Therion,

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:59 am
—

platoon_michael wrote:

That information was givin under the assumption it would never be made available or shared with others.
Are you seriusly considering breaking that trust?

Main Entry:
met·a·phor Listen to the pronunciation of metaphor
Pronunciation:
\ˈme-tə-ˌfȯr also -fər\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English methaphor, from Middle French or Latin; Middle French metaphore, from Latin metaphora, from Greek, from metapherein to transfer, from meta- + pherein to bear — more at bear
Date:
15th century

1: a figure of speech in which a word or phrase literally denoting one kind of object or idea is used in place of another to suggest a likeness or analogy between them (as in drowning in money) ; broadly : figurative language — compare simile2: an object, activity, or idea treated as a metaphor : symbol 2
— met·a·phor·ic Listen to the pronunciation of metaphoric \ˌme-tə-ˈfȯr-ik, -ˈfär-\ or met·a·phor·i·cal Listen to the pronunciation of metaphorical \-i-kəl\ adjective
— met·a·phor·i·cal·ly Listen to the pronunciation of metaphorically \-i-k(ə-)lē\ adverb

#47: Author: mooxe,

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:05 am
—
ANYTHING that is listed on a http referrer is not private. A referrer tells me where you came from (bookmark or other site), what OS you use, your screen resolution, screen colours, web browser, flash version and whether or not you have java support and more. You are all broadcasting this unencrypted across the net every day you use the www. The URL is private not secret so therefore I can't see any harm done.

#48: Author: platoon_michael, Location: Right behind you

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 5:29 pm
—

Quote:

he is abusing that trust by posting private addresses.

Show me where,
I read this entire thread and maybe I interrupted in a conversation but your post Schreken was the only one I seen about posting private address.And I know you have that information (probably from my signing of the whole privacy thing when Beta testing)
As for getting more stupid everyday?
I have often wondered as I get older "Am I the only one who doesnt get it"?
"Or am I the only one who does get it"?

#49: Author: mooxe,

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:19 pm
—
Battlegroup shown to be out of supply in strategic phase. Once I went into force selection the supply bars at the top showed two yellow.

#50: Author: Tejszd, Location: Canada

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:31 pm
—
Hey Mooxe,

It turns out that when viewing a battle group the supply bar graph actually does not represent supplies (as in ammo, fuel) but actually visually represents the reserve squads in the BG forcepool. If there is another patch hopefully that label will be corrected....

In CC4 that bar graph was created as you couldn't see or change teams in a battle group. It was left in CC5 and WAR with the original label/name which is what is causing the confusion....

#51: Author: Therion,

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:54 pm
—
Yes Very Happy

! Jump to each other's throats Very Happy

#52: Author: mooxe,

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:58 pm
—
So for instance I lose a few men from a squad, thier replacements come from that reserve pool. Is it possible that the reserve pool will no longer give replacements?

#53: Author: Tejszd, Location: Canada

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:30 pm
—
Probably shouldn't have used the word "reserve".... In CC4 you could not see the forcepool squad list so I believe that the supply bar graph actually represents the remaining squads in the BG forcepool not the "reserve/replacement" pool based on what was explained to me....

#54: yo Author: Flamethrower,

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:10 pm
—
I'm thinkin right here is linked directly to where they don't listen...

so whatcha think?

or do you need a link......to think?

#55: Author: Flamethrower,

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:36 pm
—

mooxe wrote:

My stats indicate that this thread is linked into the Matrix Private Forums @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2088390

Atleast they are listening...

my stats indicate...... boneheads abound.... here

do you dudes actually care about CC moving forward?

or would you rather, as malcontents, piss-n-moan about days-gone-by and the powers-that-be?...(and FYI, those powers-that-be are so very obviously well beyond you-n-yer-ilk)

#56: Author: Therion,

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:38 pm
—

Flamethrower wrote:

do you dudes actually care about CC moving forward?

If they did, they would probably demand CCMT 2, because it's the only way we could see a big move forward now. But, alas...

Close Combat Series -> The Mess

output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT

Goto page : Previous 1, 2, 3, ... 31, 32, 33 Next :| |: Page 2 of 33