Tejszd wrote (View Post): |
Of CC re-releases TLD is probably the best bet right now.
COI - is a series of operations on the Eastern Front like CC3 but has limited changes from it WAR - follows a single battle and takes CC4/CC5 improving upon it by fixing bugs and adding a few features; BG can't move without fuel, BG's can be forced to retreat, etc. TLD - follows a single battle and takes WAR improving upon it by adding a few features; random entry VL for paratroopers, night battles, etc. LSA - follows a single battle and takes TLD improving upon it by adding the most new features; blowing bridges, BG stacking, ability for troops to run under a bridge and on a bridge, ability to set specific entry VL's for BG's in the scenario editor for a single battle, etc. . Probably will become the best CC with another patch... |
Tejszd wrote (View Post): |
.LSA-- Probably will become the best CC with another patch... |
tejszd.jpg | ||
Description: |
|
|
Filesize: | 123.55 KB | |
Viewed: | 838929 Time(s) | |
bernd_nowak wrote (View Post): |
I can't see why the re-releases are getting attacked that badly. : |
bernd_nowak wrote (View Post): |
They tried there best to fix some errors and make it better. |
bernd_nowak wrote (View Post): |
For sure they did make money but we're not talking about big money. |
bernd_nowak wrote (View Post): |
Tejszd is also one of the guys behind the mod Meuse which has a version of 3.4. |
bernd_nowak wrote (View Post): |
Sure an open sourced CC would have been great. |
bernd_nowak wrote (View Post): |
I would not have been able to tell the differences like Tejszd and from my understanding he's right with his listing. |
bernd_nowak wrote (View Post): |
It isn't open sourced, still closed and some community members like Tejszd tried to help make it a good product. |
bernd_nowak wrote (View Post): |
For what reason there are still errors in it. |
bernd_nowak wrote (View Post): |
There are some which might know the current schedule. |
bernd_nowak wrote (View Post): |
And I would rather see some member of current CC developer posting progress here then @ Matrix. IMO |
Tejszd wrote (View Post): |
AT_Stalky, you attacked me for answering someone's question. |
Tejszd wrote (View Post): |
I was a CC fan and member of this site long before I did some testing on the re-releases for Matrix thus I can answer as a fan of the game. |
Tejszd wrote (View Post): |
As for pirating you are right I do not think it is right.
|
Tejszd wrote (View Post): |
Probably will become the best CC with another patch |
Quote: |
In Europe for example, your little stunt |
schrecken wrote (View Post): |
. what a waste of time.... |
bernd_nowak wrote (View Post): |
I can't see why the re-releases are getting attacked that badly. They tried there best to fix some errors and make it better. For sure they did make money but we're not talking about big money. Tejszd is also one of the guys behind the mod Meuse which has a version of 3.4.
I would not have been able to tell the differences like Tejszd and from my understanding he's right with his listing. Sure an open sourced CC would have been great. It isn't open sourced, still closed and some community members like Tejszd tried to help make it a good product. For what reason there are still errors in it. There are some which might know the current schedule. And I would rather see some member of current CC developer posting progress here then @ Matrix. IMO |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT