Historical Accuracy or Game Play? | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Total Votes : 50 |
ArmeeGruppeSud wrote (View Post): |
ahhhhhhhhhhhhh i feel better now _________ |
Dima wrote (View Post): |
I believe that historical balance is the best balance, that's why my goal was to make GJS 4.4 TRSM as historically accurate as CC5 can afford and i believe i've achived that .
AGS, i suggest you ignore that guy as he is real troll (if you have questions about EF, just drop me PM). |
Pzt_Kevin_dtn wrote (View Post): |
I think we all want as much historical accuracy as we can get but it must be balanced against game play. Let's take mortars into consideration. Its obvious that mortars had a minimum range that more oftern than not would require them to be somewhere off the (cc) field of battle. But since we're only taking a snapshot of a much larger battlefield as a whole the mortar range has to be tweaked downward to allow it to be on the small size battlefield being used. Some would argue this runs contrary to historical accuracy and place a minimum range that basically negates the use of the mortar team in game play. Give us balance baby.... |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT