Quote: |
And perhaps CC2 and CC3 might not actually run well on W7. I haven't heard if they do or dont. |
Stwa wrote (View Post): |
Gary,
I am not trying to be argumentative, but I do think in the end, one needs to determine just what Matrix accomplished. To what extent has CC been revived? I truely cannot say. If CC5 and CC4 do run well on W7, then just looking at the content of this site alone, one might argue that Matrix accomplished nada (or very little), for at least those titles. Maybe "disservice" is strong language, but 50 bucks for a CC remake is equally strong language. True, there would not have been CCMT. And perhaps CC2 and CC3 might not actually run well on W7. I haven't heard if they do or dont. But I can remember being in the camp that just wanted the games patched (i.e. no new features). But you can see Matrix went much further than all that, with new features, new e-book manuals, digital download and boxed versions, a web site so Matrix could post up add-on content, servers for mass multiplayer events, overly elaborate marketing pages in their product section, outiside Matrix marketing, and fake game reviews (they cost money too). They didn't have to do all that, but you see this is the type of stuff that makes a software war game cost a lot of money. Gary, perhaps you have a built in bias for game producers in general, rather than a built in bias for game users/consumers. |
Stwa wrote (View Post): |
Gary,
Your acting like its difficult (or impossible) for you to understand the points being made in this thread. |
Stwa wrote (View Post): |
Come on Gary,
THIS IS CCS Close Combat Series The Thrill of Combat - The Power of Command But just to be fair, I did go back to your posts, and I just didn't see any real point being made at all. |
GaryChildress wrote (View Post): | ||
So do I understand correctly that you are actually complaining that Matrix added new features and material to CC and made it easier to find opponents online? Other people are complaining about remakes and you are complaining that they added things? I guess Matrx can't win? I suppose I do tend to sympathize with those who do the tedious work so that others can have fun and consume. I don't think anyone forced anyone to buy a remake of CC. You are perfectly free to not buy them. Did Matrix engage in false advertising saying they weren't remakes? Where is the "disservice" in all this? |
Stwa wrote (View Post): | ||||
Muhahahahaha - OF COURSE I TRIED Look, I am even resorting to using the quote thingy. Feel free to ACTUALY respond to some of the fans. It looks like some of them have some legitimate concerns regarding Matrix's service to the community. Meanwhile, I am going to enjoy REG CC5 on my wife's laptop, while you mull things over. |
Stwa wrote (View Post): |
I suppose I should acknowledge that others in the thread have some valid points about the CC re-releases. I guess I've had some really great experiences with Matrix games and just don't want to believe that the same Matrix games could be a source of frustration for others. Maybe I'm wrong.
Come on dood, Matrix is a business. Think of it as a restuarant. Some of the menu items are good and some of them are crap. If a repeat customer guesses wrong and always orders the crap off the menu, then they are not going to be customers for very long. It really isn't a psycho drama or anything. Either Matrix stops feeding me crap, or I am going to be pissed. Its nothing personal, its business. |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT