preview 26.PNG | ||
Description: |
|
|
Filesize: | 274.25 KB | |
Viewed: | 13134 Time(s) | |
Victory Previews.PNG | ||
Description: |
|
|
Filesize: | 70.38 KB | |
Viewed: | 13115 Time(s) | |
Mech Infantry Company TO&E.PNG | ||
Description: |
|
|
Filesize: | 187.67 KB | |
Viewed: | 13064 Time(s) | |
DAK_Legion wrote (View Post): |
Thanks!
next week I'll put the list of teams for each side. then decide the composition of battlegroups for make the forcepool! The colour of the vehicles.........Green or Desert? |
Stwa wrote (View Post): |
So, what maps are you guys gonna use
Are they gonna be brand new, and if so, I guess southern_land is doing those. |
imagesCATV5AXX.jpg | ||
Description: |
|
|
Filesize: | 5.74 KB | |
Viewed: | 13042 Time(s) | |
DAK_Legion wrote (View Post): |
Perhaps Gary want use your NATO Upgrade for BGpics
Data file 90% Tanks 100% do you prefer....Names OPFOR Russian or Arabs?? do you prefer...voices OPFOR Russian or Arabs?? I also think we should use maps RSR. |
Stwa wrote (View Post): |
Excellent
This mod is moving very rapidly, with only 2 guys on the team too. Screen art - check! Maps - check! Vehicles - check! Voices - check! Data - check! Ok, so please tell us if the Strat Map is finished. |
Stwa wrote (View Post): |
Hi DAK_Legion,
Which vehicle set are you using. Is it RSR, CCMT, or something altogether different. If this is just going to be a redo of RSR, then just use its strat map, and be done with things chop chop. Otherwise, just wait for PitF. You know, unless something really radical changes with these new CC games, I am thinking CCMT is my last game. A good ending point for the 2D stuff, IMHO. |
GaryChildress wrote (View Post): |
The reason we are using LSA is because you can stack battlegroups in LSA which might be better for a hex based map. I'm not sure of the scale in RSR but this mod is using 1 battlegroup = 1 company and a hex based map. Those will probably be the key difference between this and most other mods. |
Stwa wrote (View Post): | ||
I really like your idea of using company sizes for the force pools. (assuming 1:1 relationship to battlegroup). Sometimes, people use the force pools to feed a lot of different battlegroups, and since only 15 teams fight at a time, the echelon might not even matter. I think that also goes a long way to solving the abstaction down to 15 teams during combat. It would also be even better, me thinks, if you could have 21 teams, like what is planned with PitF. It also makes stacking more meaningful, since the BG units are companies. Also, I am wondering if PitF will also support battlegroup stacking on the strat map. You would probably know better that me. I just recently saw the feature list for PitF. If true, since PitF is going to be in Q4, it might be really cool to wait on it, if for no other reason than I think the UI will be modernized. If that too is true, how awesome will that be. We have been putting up with a dinky UI for years, and even into the widescreen era. |
UO0004.jpg | ||
Description: |
|
|
Filesize: | 199.47 KB | |
Viewed: | 2985 Time(s) | |
DAK_Legion wrote (View Post): |
continuing with your crusade against MATRIX GAMES but PLEASE outside this post. |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT