Welcome to Close Combat Series
  Login or Register Home  ·  Downloads  ·  Forums  ·  Combat Camera  ·  Help  

  Survey
Do incapacitations count as a soldier's kills?

Yes
No



Results
Polls

Votes 1180
Comments: 1

  Shout Box!!

Only registered users can shout. Please login or create an account.

  Main Menu
Articles & News  
    Help
    Player`s News
    Site News
    Multiplayer
    Terrain Challenge
    Boot Camp
Community  
    Forums
    Downloads
    Combat Camera
    MOOXE @ Youtube
    Statistics
Members  
    Private Messages
    Your Account
    Logout

  Donations
Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
12/18/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
11/08/2021

Anonymous - $15.00
04/09/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
04/05/2021

Anonymous - $20.00
02/20/2021

Anonymous - $10.00
12/29/2020

Anonymous - $1.00
11/06/2020

ZAPPI4 - $20.00
10/10/2020

Find our site useful? Make a small donation to show your support.



Search for at
Close Combat Series Advanced Search


Goto page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
 Author
Message
 
tigercub

Rep: 23.5
votes: 2


PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:27 am Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

He is on beer and Wiskey now NO chance for months!

This is the sort of work commitment we need here!



thai floods.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  27.86 KB
 Viewed:  353 Time(s)

thai floods.jpg




The best Target is the one you just Hit!

Started with CC1 Demo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
Cathartes

Rep: 101.3
votes: 15


PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:23 pm Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

Looks like Tigercub posted a picture of me (above) when I first started working on GJS.  Ah, youth.  Of course spending so much time indoors lightens your skin, and things have changes since that image was taken.

I'm very close, the new forcepool system is a bear to sort out and is key to the GC success, or at least a reasonable beta. A straight forcepool portage over to LSA is meaningless.  This is the final hurdle and I'm over 70% finished.  More previews and detailed info coming very soon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Cathartes

Rep: 101.3
votes: 15


PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:29 pm Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

Another GJS video preview:
A Stug III is threatening a narrow lane.  A CO commander unit is engaged in an overrun attack and is repeatedly directed to disengage (before they commit suicide). Meanwhile a PIAT unit attempts to get a shot. Before the command unit pulls completely away, one of the CO unit soldiers successfully hucks a gammon bomb. Note that the infantry overrun/assault is an issue with LSA, and is something that we have to live with unless a future final patch fixes.


Link
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
mooxe

Rep: 221.1
votes: 25


PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:39 am Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

Cathartes wrote (View Post):
Note that the infantry overrun/assault is an issue with LSA, and is something that we have to live with unless a future final patch fixes.


What the issue exactly?


Join Discord for technical support and online games.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
Cathartes

Rep: 101.3
votes: 15


PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:05 am Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

mooxe wrote (View Post):
Cathartes wrote (View Post):
Note that the infantry overrun/assault is an issue with LSA, and is something that we have to live with unless a future final patch fixes.


What the issue exactly?


infantry teams will almost always attempt to assault a close-topped tank by crawling around, trying to place grenades (with internal morale check), yet somehow avoid using relevant AT weapons like HHL or Gammon (whether available or not). End result: infantry crawl around, breaking, rallying, detonating occasional grenade, and generally running around in circles, sometimes in range of AFV MG or main gun, eventually committing suicide or getting hopelessly caught up in ridiculous behavior. This was noted and changed in betatesting for PitF.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Wittmann81

Rep: 11.2
votes: 1


PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 3:39 am Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

Cathartes wrote (View Post):


infantry teams will almost always attempt to assault a close-topped tank by crawling around, trying to place grenades (with internal morale check), yet somehow avoid using relevant AT weapons like HHL or Gammon (whether available or not). End result: infantry crawl around, breaking, rallying, detonating occasional grenade, and generally running around in circles, sometimes in range of AFV MG or main gun, eventually committing suicide or getting hopelessly caught up in ridiculous behavior. This was noted and changed in betatesting for PitF.


That is bad. Really bad. Heavy infantry assaults on tanks is one of the most thrilling and enjoyable parts of the game.

I haven´t bought LSA yet, since I am waiting for your mod. But this sounds like a major bug to me. So I really, really, really hope this will be fixed in a patch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Cathartes

Rep: 101.3
votes: 15


PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:02 pm Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

Quote:
That is bad. Really bad. Heavy infantry assaults on tanks is one of the most thrilling and enjoyable parts of the game.

I haven´t bought LSA yet, since I am waiting for your mod. But this sounds like a major bug to me. So I really, really, really hope this will be fixed in a patch.


In my experience it's annoying, but not a show-stopper.  Troops will still fire panzerfausts, piats, AT grenades, etc. before assaulting if in ambush or directed to attack.  Also, it's only large infantry and command teams that initiate this behavior--and only against tanks.  Halftracks and open-topped AFVs don't provoke the behavior.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
tigercub

Rep: 23.5
votes: 2


PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:43 am Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

Cathartes wrote (View Post):
Quote:
That is bad. Really bad. Heavy infantry assaults on tanks is one of the most thrilling and enjoyable parts of the game.

I haven´t bought LSA yet, since I am waiting for your mod. But this sounds like a major bug to me. So I really, really, really hope this will be fixed in a patch.


In my experience it's annoying, but not a show-stopper.  Troops will still fire panzerfausts, piats, AT grenades, etc. before assaulting if in ambush or directed to attack.  Also, it's only large infantry and command teams that initiate this behavior--and only against tanks.  Halftracks and open-topped AFVs don't provoke the behavior.


Cathartes

i would open just one of the amor slots on the top of all AFV just to byepass this happering! there is 6 anyway?...

Tigercub


The best Target is the one you just Hit!

Started with CC1 Demo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
schrecken

Rep: 195
votes: 15


PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:04 pm Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

that is an interesting idea...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website GameRanger Account
 
Cathartes

Rep: 101.3
votes: 15


PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:23 pm Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

thoughtful and interesting idea, but unfortunately doesn't work.  You have to turn all the armor top values in the turret to "0" to change the infantry team's behavior.  This then turns the tank into an open-topped AFV.  Not what the crew signed up for.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
tigercub

Rep: 23.5
votes: 2


PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:41 am Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

i am just talking just one slot on top set to "0" but if you have tryed it and failed was just an idea!

a few weeks now?


The best Target is the one you just Hit!

Started with CC1 Demo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
Tejszd

Rep: 133.6
votes: 19


PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:09 am Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

You have to release the mod and get the Matrix/Slitherine developer playing and when he gets frustrated that he can not do a close assault of a tank it will get fixed  Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Cathartes

Rep: 101.3
votes: 15


PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:11 pm Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

tigercub wrote (View Post):
i am just talking just one slot on top set to "0" but if you have tryed it and failed was just an idea!

a few weeks now?



Yes, tried and no go.  Just final testing & clean up.  Few weeks might be realistic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
buuface

Rep: 56.4
votes: 1


PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 4:58 am Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

Hi Cathartes. Any closer to a release??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Cathartes

Rep: 101.3
votes: 15


PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 4:40 pm Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

always closer, but right now trying to resolve a CTD  that came from h2h.  Waiting for some feedback whether it was mod-related or LSA engine related.  First CTD in test campaign, thus far.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
tigercub

Rep: 23.5
votes: 2


PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:32 pm Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

is matrix helping?


The best Target is the one you just Hit!

Started with CC1 Demo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
Cathartes

Rep: 101.3
votes: 15


PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 10:46 pm Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

tigercub wrote (View Post):
is matrix helping?


I wouldn't say it's Matrix, but I'm guessing any help I get will be from Steve out of his own time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
buuface

Rep: 56.4
votes: 1


PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:32 pm Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

Hi Cathartes.

Any progress with your CTD?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Cathartes

Rep: 101.3
votes: 15


PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:00 pm Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

never received and answer, but it didn't stop the game.  more to come soon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
southern_land

Rep: 155.2
votes: 14


PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:20 pm Post subject: Re: GJS for LSA Reply with quote

cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
 
Post new topicReply to topic printer-friendly view Close Combat Series Forum Index -> Close Combat Last Stand Arnhem
Goto page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next


 
   
 


Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




Forums ©





In August of 2004, Zappi, Homba, Bambam887, RedScorpion and MOOXE all pitched
in to create this Close Combat site. I would to thank all the people who have visited and
found this site to thier liking. I hope you had time to check out some of the great Close Combat
mods and our forums. I'd also like to thank all the members of our volunteer staff that have
helped over the years, and all our users that contributed to this site!