Hoogley wrote (View Post):
|
I'm still not sure that going backwards with the trees is preferable. The change of philosophy - tree foliage would mostly be above eye-level, and therefore not block LOS - makes a lot of sense to me. It took me by surprise at first, I'll admit, but I've now switched to always having the trees turned off, and I've quickly grown to like the new system. Maybe there could be a compromise where the element beneath trees - "undergrowth", or "leaf litter", or something like that - could hamper LOS slightly... ?
|