Search found 5 matches

It appears we will have to post more source links for any real debate. I posted a link to a source, and I will go get some more source links, (no hurry, just find them). You will have to post sources as well in order to have any real discussion of substance.

Let the sourcing begin...

Where can one get the CoI workbook?

Rommel knew the landings would be at Normandy and not Calais, he was not listened to. He also had 2 crack Panzer divisions waiting by Normandy to throw the 8 infantry divisions that landed back to the sea, yet he was not allowed to. If Rommel and Guderian were allowed to commandeer the direction of the war many many things would have went differently.
If Rommel had his way D-Day would have not succeeded and that alone would have been an enormous turn around.

Rommel's original plan before Barbarossa was to push his armies into the oil fields of Asia minor and beyond. If Barbarossa would have been delayed and full support given to Rommel he could have overtaken the British commonwealth and all allied countries in Asia Minor and beyond squeezing the British empire dry. There would have been a single front and the Germans would have presided from France to the Himalayas. They could basically have stopped right there and consolidated their empire and just built up a Western wall and not launch Barbarossa.
Thankfully, Rommel and Guderian were not listened to an this dreary scenario did not occur.

Dima, where are you getting your information from if I may ask? My information is from German and US military studies. So unless you can provide equivalent sources and research for your information what your saying can be just your opinion, not research.

I have been playing Cross of Iron for a while now and the IS-2 tank is off the mark as far as real world specs go.
First of all, the very first models did not even enter the battlefield until April of 1944 yet they are available all over the place in the campaign from before Kursk.

Secondly, they have consistently knocked out Tiger 1s, and Jagdpanthers on their front armor in a couple shots max, while the Tiger's 88 and the Jagdpanther need many repeated hits to knock out an IS-2 in CoI.

This is innaccurate mechanical modeling as according to:

IS-2: "German Army data on the penetration ranges of the 122 mm A-19 gun against the Panther tank showed it to be much less effective when the Panther stood at a side angle of 30 degrees to the incoming round: the A-19 gun was unable to penetrate the glacis plate of the Panther at any distance, and could only penetrate the bottom front plate of the hull at 100 m."(Sewell, Stephen ‘Cookie’ (2002). “Red Star – White Elephant?” in Armor, July–August 2002, pp 26–32. Fort Knox, KY: US Army Armor Center. ISSN 0004-2420)

"It was the large HE shell the gun fired which was its main asset, proving highly useful and destructive in the anti-personnel role. The size of its gun continued to plague the IS-2, and the two-piece ammunition was difficult to handle and slow to reload (the rate of fire was only about two rounds per minute). Another limitation imposed by the size of its ammunition was the payload: only 28 rounds could be carried inside the tank."(Zaloga, Steven (1994). IS-2 Heavy Tank 1944-1973. Osprey Publishing (UK). ISBN 978-1-85532-396-4.)

Panther: "German comparison of their tanks with the new (at the time) Russian T-34/85 medium tank and JS-II (122mm) heavy tank, from March 23rd of 1944, stated that: "The Panther is far superior to the T34-85 for frontal fire (Panther Ausf G could penetrate frontal armor of T-34/85 at 800m, while T-34/85 could penetrate frontal armor of Panther Ausf G at 500m), approximately equal for side and rear fire, superior to the JS for frontal fire and inferior for side and rear fire.

The main gun was capable of penetrating almost 150mm thick armor at the range of 1000 meters and its penetration capability was slightly better than that of Tiger’s 88mm gun. "

In 1943 and 1944, Panther was able to destroy any enemy tank in existence at ranges of 2000m, while in general veteran Panther crews reported 90 percent hit rate at ranges up to 1000m. According to US Army Ground Forces statistics, destruction of a single Panther was achieved after destruction of 5 M4 Shermans or some 9 T-34s. "
On September 13th of 1943, seven Panthers from 1st Battalion of 2nd SS Panzer Regiment of 2nd SSPanzer Division "Das Reich", commanded by SS Hauptsturmfuehrer Holzer (turret number 101) fought with a group of some 70 Soviet T-34 tanks near Kolomak. During the 20 minutes long engagement Panthers destroyed some 28 T-34 tanks without any losses.

During the battle around Siedlce on 28/29th July of 1944, 2nd Battalion of 5th SS Panzer Regiment of 5th SS Panzer Division "Wiking", destroyed some 107 Soviet tanks (including T-34s, Shermans and Valentines), while losing 6 tanks (one PzKpfw IV and five Panthers).

Web Page Name

This information is particularily pertinent: "the 122 mm A-19 gun against the Panther tank showed it to be much less effective when the Panther stood at a side angle of 30 degrees to the incoming round: the A-19 gun was unable to penetrate the glacis plate of the Panther at any distance, and could only penetrate the bottom front plate of the hull at 100 m."

An IS-2 should not be able to take out a Panther, much less a Jagdpanther etc. from the front, yet the game is flawed in that it happens many times.

Is there a mod that more accurately represents the actual qualities of the Russian vehicles?


	Login or Register	Home · Downloads · Forums · Combat Camera · Help