Welcome to Close Combat Series
  Login or Register Home  ·  Downloads  ·  Forums  ·  Combat Camera  ·  Help  

  Survey
Do incapacitations count as a soldier's kills?

Yes
No



Results
Polls

Votes 1270
Comments: 1

  Shout Box!!

Only registered users can shout. Please login or create an account.

  Main Menu
Articles & News  
    Help
    Player`s News
    Site News
    Multiplayer
    Terrain Challenge
    Boot Camp
Community  
    Forums
    Downloads
    Combat Camera
    MOOXE @ Youtube
    Statistics
Members  
    Private Messages
    Your Account
    Logout

  Donations
Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
12/18/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
11/08/2021

Anonymous - $15.00
04/09/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
04/05/2021

Anonymous - $20.00
02/20/2021

Anonymous - $10.00
12/29/2020

Anonymous - $1.00
11/06/2020

ZAPPI4 - $20.00
10/10/2020

Find our site useful? Make a small donation to show your support.



Search for at
Close Combat Series Advanced Search


 Author
Message
 
king_tiger_tank

Rep: 0.1


PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:52 pm Post subject: Should B1 bis 75mm heavy tanks be considered heavy tanks? Reply with quote

i don't understand how a tank from 1940 can still be a heavy tank after 4 years of no improvements and other tanks fly right by them in advanced armor, gun, and MGs


What would H Jones do?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
mooxe

Rep: 221.7
votes: 25


PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:54 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Killing a Char from head on is hard. Its got heavy armour but light guns.


Join Discord for technical support and online games.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
king_tiger_tank

Rep: 0.1


PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 10:04 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

it's great against infantry on CC5 but is not a good choice against tanks. the 75mm base cannon is good, but the 40mm AT cannon used by the driver is weak.


What would H Jones do?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
Pzt_Mac

Rep: 3.4


PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 10:29 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

At this point it would probably be considered a Medium tank at best. More like an intemidating looking light-medium tank with lots of guns and thick armor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
king_tiger_tank

Rep: 0.1


PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 1:25 am Post subject: Reply with quote

on the game i have the problem where the tank's cannons don't want to shoot but the MG does all the work


What would H Jones do?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
mooxe

Rep: 221.7
votes: 25


PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 1:45 am Post subject: Reply with quote

The 75mm cannon is forward firing only. Its attached the hull.


Join Discord for technical support and online games.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
Dima

Rep: 87.3
votes: 16


PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 10:42 am Post subject: Reply with quote

if iam not mistaken B2 tank was designated as medium by germans in 1944.

According US/USSR designation it was medium as well as it weighted 32t.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
God4Saken

Rep: 0.7


PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 12:22 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Afternoon all! With regards to the Char B (Depending on which of the 3 versions built that we are talking about here), it was classed as a heavy tank. Weighing in between 28 and 36 tonnes, with 60mm frontal amour, it was a leviathan compared to other tanks of it's day. But it had a lot of drawbacks. Slow speed, short range, fixed 75mm howitzer facing frontwards and the worst aspect - a one-man turret in which the commander had to direct the crew, fire/re-load the primary 47mm gun and a machine-gun and order other tanks in their troop as well (A little demanding perhaps? Maybe that's why in the CC5 game, it has such a slow fire-rate) and the turrets on most Char B's had no hatch which meant the commander's vision was severely limited (Not to mention his chances of escape if the tank was hit or one of the crew farted)

As well, they were developed by the French to fight another WW1, not to fight in WW2. They were designed to storm trenches and penetrate other front-line defences (Hence the exposed tracks going around the hull), it wasn't really envisaged that they would take on other AFV's or have to contend with targets on it's flanks. Also the French high command only ever used them in small numbers to support the attacking infantry. Unlike the Blitzreig tactics of the Germans, where the tanks were used in mass numbers with the infantry supporting them (A pity the French didn't think of Blitzreig tactics to invade Germany in 1939-40 whilst the Germans were still busy in Poland, but oh well).

But when the Char B was used against German tanks, it performed pretty well. A Char B tank called Eure attacked and destroyed 13 German tanks in the French town of Stonne on the 16th May 1940, most of them Mk III's and Mk IV's, in only a few minutes. The tank safely returned to French lines despite being hit 140 times, a testimony to it's crew and armour.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
king_tiger_tank

Rep: 0.1


PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2006 8:25 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

mooxe wrote:
The 75mm cannon is forward firing only. Its attached the hull.

no i ment the message says no target for both cannons but the MG attacks any emeny in sight


What would H Jones do?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
mikwarleo

Rep: 38.5
votes: 2


PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:42 am Post subject: Reply with quote

very interesting mr 4saken


20min games | Replace Commander | Disband Rule | CC5 Strat Guide
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message GameRanger Account
 
ANZAC_Lord4war

Rep: 3.5


PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 5:21 am Post subject: mmm Reply with quote

im sure the allies classified the panther as a heavy tank too.
but it is up to the army using the vehicle how they want to classify it.
plus any tank who can take 140 shots is heavy in my books Smile

also recently Stumpy tried to take on my command sherman with a bistank
he had the cover of a hedgerow,which normally gives 1 tank a slight advantage over the one in the open.
but poor old stumpy did not realise the 75mm on the hull could not fire coz its los was blocked by the hedge.
and i was essentially have a duel with a slow reloading 47mm Smile
meant to tell him after the game,guess he will read it here.


Forget words,actions will show your true ambitions!The Battlefield,In many cases, the terrain of a battlefield can be the best resource a commander has. A clump of trees, an abandoned house, or a drainage ditch can all be powerful tools in the right hands
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
Dima

Rep: 87.3
votes: 16


PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 11:04 am Post subject: Reply with quote

in 1940 majority of german ATG/tank guns were 3.7cm. So no wonder they couldn't pen. B1bis armour.
Actually germans started to work on VK 3001(that became PzVI in 1942) rite after they met first B1 and Matilda II.

In 1940 it was classified as Hvy by all nations i believe. But by 1944 even PzIII was reclassified to lite by germans.

B1's 75mm gun was v weak AT wise. It had ~twice less penetration than 47mm gun in turret. So it was equipped with HE/smoke shells.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
ronson

Rep: 36.7
votes: 5


PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 1:37 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Your right there Dima, the standard German ATG in the battle of France was the 37mm PAK36, the 50mm PAK38 was not issued until the middle part of 1940. The 38 being the design date, not the date of introduction (confusing isn't it). The 37mm was as you say unable to penetrate the thick armour of the CharB.

As to the armament, what was the doctrine behind this? could it have been designed with a view that armoured targets eg. tanks be engaged with the 47mm, with the hull mounted 75mm being reserved for Infantry or fortifications?

Anyone out there with knowledge of French armour and tactics?

Cheers

Ronson


GR member Ronson1  ac 4247033
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Dima

Rep: 87.3
votes: 16


PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 1:43 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes Ronson, 47mm for armored targets and 75mm was for soft targets(it didn't have AP shells as they were too weak).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
king_tiger_tank

Rep: 0.1


PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 8:28 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

after looking at some real life Char B heavy tanks the 75mm cannon look like a civil war cannon to me


What would H Jones do?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
Volksjager_cn

Rep: 47.5


PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 3:37 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

In the Meuse Mod, the Char B is the king on the battlefield. Most German tanks are PzII, PzIII with 37mm. Only a few PzIV with 75mm short barrel gun. These Char B/Bis are equivalent to Tigers and Panthers in GJS mod. Really hard to knock out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
W_Model




PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 11:15 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

ronson wrote:

Anyone out there with knowledge of French armour and tactics?


To understand the design and use of AFVs in the beginning of WWII you have to look back at WWI and the time in between. France and UK were of the opinion that defence, not offence, was the future in warefare (they "won" the WWI by defending themselves from the germans). Armour enthusiasts as JFC Fuller, Liddell Hart and JB Estienne didn't get much attention. The tank had made an good infantry support weapon in WWI, therefore it should stay as an support weapon. There was no need to think ahead since the tactics employed won the war.
The fact that tanks probably would meet eachother on the battlefield was vaguely foreseen, but in some way accounted for by thick armour in France and speed in England. No allied tank in the outbreak of WWII possesed any real AT capability.

In USA the tank was restricted by law as an auxilary infantry weapon and therefore the development of tanks and tactics was very slow.

Before the outbreak of WWII France was forming Armoured divisions, but it could not resist to fragment these for distribution among the infantry divisions. The tank was seen as an support weapon, to use against infantry and strongpoints. The idea of tank vs tank was not considered in any extent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
 
Post new topicReply to topic printer-friendly view Close Combat Series Forum Index -> Close Combat 5: Invasion Normandy


 
   
 


Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




Forums ©





In August of 2004, Zappi, Homba, Bambam887, RedScorpion and MOOXE all pitched
in to create this Close Combat site. I would to thank all the people who have visited and
found this site to thier liking. I hope you had time to check out some of the great Close Combat
mods and our forums. I'd also like to thank all the members of our volunteer staff that have
helped over the years, and all our users that contributed to this site!