Welcome to Close Combat Series
  Login or Register Home  ·  Downloads  ·  Forums  ·  Combat Camera  ·  Help  

  Survey
Do incapacitations count as a soldier's kills?

Yes
No



Results
Polls

Votes 1245
Comments: 1

  Shout Box!!

Only registered users can shout. Please login or create an account.

  Main Menu
Articles & News  
    Help
    Player`s News
    Site News
    Multiplayer
    Terrain Challenge
    Boot Camp
Community  
    Forums
    Downloads
    Combat Camera
    MOOXE @ Youtube
    Statistics
Members  
    Private Messages
    Your Account
    Logout

  Donations
Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
12/18/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
11/08/2021

Anonymous - $15.00
04/09/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
04/05/2021

Anonymous - $20.00
02/20/2021

Anonymous - $10.00
12/29/2020

Anonymous - $1.00
11/06/2020

ZAPPI4 - $20.00
10/10/2020

Find our site useful? Make a small donation to show your support.



Search for at
Close Combat Series Advanced Search


 Author
Message
 
Blackstump

Rep: 24.5
votes: 1


PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:05 am Post subject: Early Anti Tank plane Reply with quote


I bet the bloke who thought up the panzerfaust BU antitank aircraft, also got to test fly it !! Note the sights mounted fore and aft of cowling....


"percute et percute velociter"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message GameRanger Account
 
pvt_Grunt

Rep: 99.7
votes: 5


PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:15 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Is that for real? Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Heeresarmee




PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:30 am Post subject: Reply with quote

And some testflying it would be...Imagine that being the panzerfaust 30, you had to fly in so close even the tankcommander could shoot you with a handgun. Then...if you manage to hit the target, you get blown to bits or torn apart by schrapnel from the exploding tank. Hmmm i wonder why it never got past the experimental stage. Rolling Eyes

Here`s a link for those wanting to know more about the Panzerfaust.
http://www.geocities.com/Augusta/8172/panzerfaust2.htm#pzfaust30
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
king_tiger_tank

Rep: 0.1


PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:59 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

there were longer ranged panzrfaust but the longest was a panzerfaust 90 with a huge rocket projectile but still you would have to get in to close range to hit a tank.


What would H Jones do?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
rufus

Rep: 50.4
votes: 1


PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:07 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

man those germans must of been desperate to steem the tide of allied armour to think this one up.the plane look's like a bucker BU bestmann which the luftwaffe used as a primary trainer ,top speed of 134 mph considering the stuka had a speed of 225 mph and look how they faired in the latter war years.Also the the wings had a basic construction of wood covered in plywood and fabric,obviously a siucide weapon,fire the fausts and the wings get wripped off! thats if you actually make to be in a position to fire the things in the first place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Pzt_Mac

Rep: 3.4


PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:10 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

It probably was just meant as a suicide weapon - fly the plane and all into the target, poping the fausts few second before impact, if you lived long enough to do it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Arg0n




PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:21 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that German engineers had a bad sense of humor. Even if you could approach the tank it would have to be a direct hit. If airplanes are going to use HEAT it would have to be a ****load of small shaped charge projectiles. You could see that they were desperate at that point.
Arg0n.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Heeresarmee




PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:51 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

@King_Tiger_Tank

Haven`t found anything on a Panzerfaust 90, as far as i could find the Panzerfaust had the following names;

Faustpatrone
Panzerfaust 30 (improved Faustpatrone) produced untill August 1944
Panzerfaust 60 (improved Panzerfaust 30) prod. untill end of WW2
Panzerfaust 100 November 1944 untill the end of the war
Panzerfaust 150 March 1945 produced untill the end of the war
Panzerfaust 250 Development stage 1945, scheduled, but never produced
GroBe Panzerfaust Development stage 1945, never produced

You can check yourself at the link i posted in my ealier post. If the site is down, check back later. It`s a Geocities page Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
mooxe

Rep: 221.7
votes: 25


PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:56 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Those are clearly antitank weapons, but was this an aircraft employed for antitank duties? It looks more like a scout plane with some weapons added on for targets of opportunity. This plane is to slow and unarmoured to really be used in an antitank role, even later 30s and early 40s.


Join Discord for technical support and online games.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
king_tiger_tank

Rep: 0.1


PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 1:54 am Post subject: Reply with quote

hmmmm... i thought it went up by 30 meters but a 250 meter range would be crazy


What would H Jones do?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
Arg0n




PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 9:29 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Mooxe the airplane was a prototype for the antitank but the project was discontinued. But think for just a second: Who would be crazy enough to fly this thing? I personally think there's not a chance in hell that that thing would be sucsessful. When you are flying a ground attack plane with cannons and rockets you only have a few seconds to score a hit, no more, and with the PF you would have a 0.5 seconds window of oportunity. Usually I don't insult people but that guy that thought of the idea is an idiot.

P.S. 250m in an airplane is like 10m on foot so draw your conclusions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
RD_Roach

Rep: 1.9
votes: 1


PostPosted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 3:32 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I think that German engineers had a bad sense of humor


They all start out looking funny/useless type of weapon,look how this prototype changed the art of aireal warfare!

WW1 they had guys throwing gernades/bombs by hand ,while flying very low over the battlefeild.That lead them to design a bomb release on the underside of the plane.

They all start out as odd/funny looking weapons,but then become a very leathal weapon.


CC Greatest Game Ever!
www.reddevilscc.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
 
Dima

Rep: 87.3
votes: 16


PostPosted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:52 am Post subject: Reply with quote

That's not early war pic for sure, guess late 1944 or 1945.

But while such armament is useless vs tanx/planes or any mobile targets it could be v effective vs big stationary targets like houses, towers and etc. And low speed of that type of plane could allow it to be rather accurate vs such targets.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Luft_Karabiner




PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 8:36 am Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that aircraft is a Fieseler Storch reconnaisance plane. That would be way too slow to use in combat, and was probably just to test this method of rocket installation.
By the way, here is an Fw190 mounted with a better version of rockets -

These were WGr.28 anti tank rockets. Some Fw190s also carried 88m
panzershreck 2s, Panzerblitz 1s and R4M rockets.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
 
StormGrenadiar




PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 10:24 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

you would have to be flying pretty fast to not get by the main gun, and what if the tank was in trees


And the men rushed foward in a giant wave and lo and behold they stoped in the middle of the field they were rushing over. And what made them stop askes you, the answer is simple. Anyone except for the very brave and stupid would stop if 5 King Tiger were
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Luft_Karabiner




PostPosted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:37 am Post subject: Reply with quote

The tank main gun would not shoot as its elevation would not be high enough. The plane would attack from an 80 degree or so angle as to pierce the top of the turret.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
 
Nembo

Rep: 36.7


PostPosted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:00 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

I would assume that that was more of a test bed then any thing realy meant to see combat. It was common practive to test out new weapons/engines on old planes that weren't needed at the front. What the germans realy needed was more Hs 129 known as the Panzerknacker, (tank cracker). Thou slow and ungainly that small plane was well armored and carried a good punch. One of the final varients mounted a modified version of the same 75cm cannon as the Pz IV.


-Nembo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
rufus

Rep: 50.4
votes: 1


PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:02 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

take a look here http://www.luft46.com/profiles/paother.html at what the germans were trying to develop in ground attack aircraft.some vvery weird designs there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Luft_Karabiner




PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:17 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Nembo wrote:
I would assume that that was more of a test bed then any thing realy meant to see combat. It was common practive to test out new weapons/engines on old planes that weren't needed at the front. What the germans realy needed was more Hs 129 known as the Panzerknacker, (tank cracker). Thou slow and ungainly that small plane was well armored and carried a good punch. One of the final varients mounted a modified version of the same 75cm cannon as the Pz IV.

No, they needed a Ju87G1. It packed two anti tank guns.

These would penetrate most armoured vechiles with ease.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
 
Cytral




PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:47 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

they would have loved the a10
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
 
Post new topicReply to topic printer-friendly view Close Combat Series Forum Index -> The Mess


 
   
 


Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




Forums ©





In August of 2004, Zappi, Homba, Bambam887, RedScorpion and MOOXE all pitched
in to create this Close Combat site. I would to thank all the people who have visited and
found this site to thier liking. I hope you had time to check out some of the great Close Combat
mods and our forums. I'd also like to thank all the members of our volunteer staff that have
helped over the years, and all our users that contributed to this site!