This is where Close Combat should have gone. Isn't that what they told us with CC:Red Phoenix? But that one seesm to have died? Was there ever an announcement that simtek was not going to make this game in the end?
This is where Close Combat should have gone. Isn't that what they told us with CC:Red Phoenix? But that one seesm to have died? Was there ever an announcement that simtek was not going to make this game in the end?
To be quite honest. I lost hope with CC6, it's nothing but talk. No screnshoots no info and for how many years is it in production ?
To be quite honest. I lost hope with CC6, it's nothing but talk. No screnshoots no info and for how many years is it in production ?
Try one half year. CC6 is not Red Phoenix. Simtek is finishing up the military contracts associated with it, but it is up to Destineer to revive Red Phoenix.
I think you need to inform yourself a little better before you compare this game to sudden strike.
And let me make it clear so there is no misunderstanding. This is not create it by the people who created Close combat series. And it is quite different game.
But the values of the armor soldiers are real. There is LOS and morale for the soldiers. And many other stuff that makes this game a realistic one not just a another : get your soldiers together and use WW1 tactics on your enemy.
I think you need to inform yourself a little better before you compare this game to sudden strike.
maybe u need to get some more knowlegdes about CC before u compare WW2 with CC?
i've bought it the day it was out in Russia (half year ago or so) just to prove myself that i was rite about that game . IMO even GIC was better (not to mention about SA).
Quote:
But the values of the armor soldiers are real.
ye, same for Sudden Strike as well and LOS also.
anyway, that's all IMO.
but they have asked help on russian history forums for help to make WW2 more historical and realistic, guess for v2.
I think you need to inform yourself a little better before you compare this game to sudden strike.
maybe u need to get some more knowlegdes about CC before u compare WW2 with CC?
i've bought it the day it was out in Russia (half year ago or so) just to prove myself that i was rite about that game . IMO even GIC was better (not to mention about SA).
I have played CC since cc2 was out in the stores. . And that was back in 1997. And then one i played every single close combat i could find.
Quote:
Quote:
But the values of the armor soldiers are real.
ye, same for Sudden Strike as well and LOS also.
anyway, that's all IMO.
but they have asked help on russian history forums for help to make WW2 more historical and realistic, guess for v2.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
In August of 2004, Zappi, Homba, Bambam887, RedScorpion and MOOXE all pitched
in to create this Close Combat site. I would to thank all the people who have visited
and found this site to thier liking. I hope you had time to check out some
of the great Close Combat mods and our forums. I'd also like to thank
all the members of our volunteer staff that have helped over
the years, and all our users that contributed to this site!