Welcome to Close Combat Series
  Login or Register Home  ·  Downloads  ·  Forums  ·  Combat Camera  ·  Help  

  Survey
Do incapacitations count as a soldier's kills?

Yes
No



Results
Polls

Votes 1224
Comments: 1

  Shout Box!!

Only registered users can shout. Please login or create an account.

  Main Menu
Articles & News  
    Help
    Player`s News
    Site News
    Multiplayer
    Terrain Challenge
    Boot Camp
Community  
    Forums
    Downloads
    Combat Camera
    MOOXE @ Youtube
    Statistics
Members  
    Private Messages
    Your Account
    Logout

  Donations
Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
12/18/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
11/08/2021

Anonymous - $15.00
04/09/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
04/05/2021

Anonymous - $20.00
02/20/2021

Anonymous - $10.00
12/29/2020

Anonymous - $1.00
11/06/2020

ZAPPI4 - $20.00
10/10/2020

Find our site useful? Make a small donation to show your support.



Search for at
Close Combat Series Advanced Search


Goto page 1, 2  Next
 Author
Message
 
ANZAC_Lord4war

Rep: 3.5


PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 3:07 am Post subject: Some armour values to debate Reply with quote

Hey all been looking at armour values recently
here is some tanks open for discussion
i searched there armour values are all from 1 website.
im sure there a few variations of thickness of amour,angle and quality.
but in the end ill most likely take a combination of info
and try to interpret it.
the equal part of their sums is where i have used the panzerworld
armour slope calculator
i need people to dispute the figures and why!


kingtiger
Hull Front (Upper) : 150mm @ 40°=233
Hull Front (Lower) : 100mm @ 40°=155
Hull Sides (Upper) : 80mm @ 65°=88
Hull Sides (Lower) : 80mm @ 90°=80
Hull Rear : 80mm @ 60°=92
Hull Top : 40mm @ 0°=40
Hull Bottom : 25mm @ 0°=25
Turret Front : 180mm @ 81°=182
Turret Mantlet : 100mm @ Saukopf
Turret Sides : 80mm @ 69°=85
Turret Rear : 80mm @ 69°=85
Turret Top : 25mm @ 0° =25

Tiger
Hull Front (Upper) : 100mm @ 80°=101
Hull Front (Lower) : 100mm @ 66°=109
Hull Sides (Upper) : 80mm @ 90°=80
Hull Sides (Lower) : 60mm @ 90°=60
Hull Rear : 80mm @ 82°=81
Hull Top : 25mm @ 0°=25
Hull Bottom : 25mm @ 0°=25
Turret Front : 100mm @ 82°=101
Turret Mantlet :100mm - 120mm @ 90°=110
Turret Sides : 80mm @ 90°=80
Turret Rear : 80mm @ 90°=80
Turret Top : 25mm @ 0° =25

panther vg
Hull Front (Upper) : 80mm @ 35°=139
Hull Front (Lower) : 60mm @ 35°=104
Hull Sides (Upper) : 50mm @ 50°=65
Hull Sides (Lower) : 40mm @ 90°=40
Hull Rear : 40mm @ 60°=46
Hull Top : 16mm @ 0°=16
Hull Bottom : 16mm @ 0°=16
Turret Front : 110mm @ 80°=112
Turret Mantlet : 100mm @ Round
Turret Sides : 45mm @ 65°=50
Turret Rear : 45mm @ 65°=50
Turret Top : 16mm @ 0°=16

panther vd
Hull Front (Upper) : 80mm @ 35°=139
Hull Front (Lower) : 60mm @ 35°=104
Hull Sides (Upper) : 40mm @ 50°=52
Hull Sides (Lower) : 40mm @ 90°=40
Hull Rear : 40mm @ 60°=46
Hull Top : 16mm @ 0°=16
Hull Bottom : 16mm @ 0°=16
Turret Front : 100mm @ 80°=101
Turret Mantlet : 100mm @ Round
Turret Sides : 45mm @ 65°=50
Turret Rear : 45mm @ 65°=50
Turret Top : 16mm @ 0° =16

Thanks
added panther VA as well
panther va
Hull Front (Upper) : 80mm @ 35°=139
Hull Front (Lower) : 60mm @ 35°=104
Hull Sides (Upper) : 40mm @ 50°=52
Hull Sides (Lower) : 40mm @ 90°=40
Hull Rear : 40mm @ 60°=46
Hull Top : 16mm @ 0°=16
Hull Bottom : 16mm @ 0°=16
Turret Front : 110mm @ 80°=112
Turret Mantlet : 100mm @ Round
Turret Sides : 45mm @ 65°=50
Turret Rear : 45mm @ 65°=50
Turret Top : 16mm @ 0°=16

Some instant differences that standout
VA & VG Turret Front : 110mm @ 80°=112
but VD has Turret Front : 100mm @ 80°=101
most likely a misprint,as makes no sense to lessen armour for 1 model.
Apart from that VA,VD looks identical.
With major difference being in VG model being the improvement in
Hull Sides (Upper) : 50mm @ 50°=65
im open to being incorrect about that also.


Forget words,actions will show your true ambitions!The Battlefield,In many cases, the terrain of a battlefield can be the best resource a commander has. A clump of trees, an abandoned house, or a drainage ditch can all be powerful tools in the right hands


Last edited by ANZAC_Lord4war on Tue May 30, 2006 11:47 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
schrecken

Rep: 195
votes: 15


PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 7:34 am Post subject: Reply with quote

In late 1942, a small pre-production series of 20 tanks was ordered. This was the Null-Serie, or Zero Series. Those 20 tanks were designated Panzerkampfwagen V Panther Ausfuehrung A and were technically different from later Ausf A production models. All were lightly armored (with 60mm frontal armor) and armed with the early version of the 75mm KwK 42 L/70 gun.

Could this be the VA they are referring to?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website GameRanger Account
 
ANZAC_Lord4war

Rep: 3.5


PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 12:40 pm Post subject: mmm Reply with quote

yes good possibility that data posted may have been mixed up.
and VD is really VA,and vice versa.
do u know how many VAs were made after the first run.
i think best use value that most had largest/consistent Smile production run
and im guessing the runs after had the 100mm for rest of va run
and then they upgraded that in the vd to 110
which stayed on thru to vg with vg receiving improved hull sides.
that defintely sounds more logical.


Forget words,actions will show your true ambitions!The Battlefield,In many cases, the terrain of a battlefield can be the best resource a commander has. A clump of trees, an abandoned house, or a drainage ditch can all be powerful tools in the right hands
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
AT_Stalky

Rep: 27.4
votes: 10


PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 12:47 pm Post subject: Ye Reply with quote

This page is rather Good:

http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/introduction.html
http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/germany.html

Etc:
http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/germany.html#Face_Hardened_Armour

http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/german_turret7.html

Here u have quality of Germans armoure plates for each year:
1942
http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/german_hardness_veh.html
1943
http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/german_hardness_veh.html
1944
http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/german_hardness_veh.html

(All the page is good, but its somthing "wrong" when one click on links that whi i set many links to same homepage)

Here is some more in general,
http://www.battlefield.ru/

Here some documents etc:
http://www.battlefield.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=section&id=13&Itemid=123&lang=en

Fire test vs KT
http://www.battlefield.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=282&Itemid=123&lang=en

Maybe some help...

Stalk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
ANZAC_Lord4war

Rep: 3.5


PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 1:18 pm Post subject: mmmm Reply with quote

gee wiz all them links...lol
i was wanting to have the debate sometime this week. Razz


Forget words,actions will show your true ambitions!The Battlefield,In many cases, the terrain of a battlefield can be the best resource a commander has. A clump of trees, an abandoned house, or a drainage ditch can all be powerful tools in the right hands
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
AT_Stalky

Rep: 27.4
votes: 10


PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 1:23 pm Post subject: Sry Lord Reply with quote

Its just two main pages really, the reson there so many links, is that first place is somewhat strange its links, so one can sometimes not come to the pages one whant to, atleast its so for me.

So it looks far more then it is.


Keep answer Lord. plz. The links i provided is not compleat, just cover some small details in subject, keep posting plz,


Stalky
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
schrecken

Rep: 195
votes: 15


PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 11:38 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

You can see below the administrative efficiency the Germans are renowned for.


1. Late 1942 pre-production Ausf A (technically different to later Ausf. A)

2. In December 1942, a new and improved model, designated Ausf D, was ready. In February 1943, 20 Ausf A tanks were re-designated Ausf D1.

3. In December 1942, Ausf D entered production, and the first D model left the factory on January 11, 1943.

4. August 1943 Ausf. A in Production

5. March 1944 Ausf. G in Production

Total production 6,0209

A. 20 Ausf A

B. 250 Ausf. D1

C. 600 Ausf. D2

D. 2,200 Ausf. A

E. 2,950 Ausf G
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website GameRanger Account
 
ANZAC_Lord4war

Rep: 3.5


PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 1:43 am Post subject: mmm Reply with quote

any chance u can bracket them to the names i was using.
as that ausf naming is confusing.
i.e to VA,VD and VG and applying them to the largest runs of that model
as im trying to get a consistent setting across the models.


Forget words,actions will show your true ambitions!The Battlefield,In many cases, the terrain of a battlefield can be the best resource a commander has. A clump of trees, an abandoned house, or a drainage ditch can all be powerful tools in the right hands
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
Silencer




PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 2:13 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Panzer V Ausf A= panther Ausf A (V=5)

like

Panzer VI and VIb = Tiger & Kingtiger


There were about 3 main variations in Panther types, 5 smaller variations.

the First 20 or Null serie (prototype - only had 60mm glacis plate)
then the PZ V ausf D
then the PZ V ausf A
then the PZ V ausf G
then the PZ V ausf G - late (from september '44 and most produced type)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
ANZAC_Lord4war

Rep: 3.5


PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:48 pm Post subject: mmm Reply with quote

yer thats great.
see problem is i have no intention to do first run of 20
im doing 3 models VA,VD and VG.
i know they were variants
some with higher quality armour ect
but im looking for the largest run to represent a model
instead of making 3 to 4 makes of 1 tank with a slight variation in it

and the name is not so important as the armour plating is.
which is mine fault as i prefer to use simplistic english terms for my team names.
but i have no problem databasing any info on them particular models.
but name alone is not enuff to start a database.

some stuffs corrected and collected already
schrecken=In late 1942, a small pre-production series of 20 tanks was ordered. This was the Null-Serie, or Zero Series. Those 20 tanks were designated Panzerkampfwagen V Panther Ausfuehrung A and were technically different from later Ausf A production models. All were lightly armored (with 60mm frontal armor) and armed with the early version of the 75mm KwK 42 L/70 gun.

(Guess we wouldnt be shocked if this series of 20 was destroyed faster than any other 20 panthers with only 60mm armour.)

Stalky=This page is rather Good:

http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/introduction.html
http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/germany.html
http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/germany.html#Face_Hardened_Armour
http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/german_turret7.html
Here u have quality of Germans armoure plates for each year:
1942
http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/german_hardness_veh.html
1943
http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/german_hardness_veh.html
1944
http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/german_hardness_veh.html

(All the page is good, but its somthing "wrong" when one click on links that whi i set many links to same homepage)

Here is some more in general,
http://www.battlefield.ru/

Here some documents etc:
http://www.battlefield.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=section&id=13&Itemid=123〈=en

Fire test vs KT
http://www.battlefield.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=282&Itemid=123〈=en

(a series of valuable links)

schrecken=You can see below the administrative efficiency the Germans are renowned for.

1. Late 1942 pre-production Ausf A (technically different to later Ausf. A)

2. In December 1942, a new and improved model, designated Ausf D, was ready. In February 1943, 20 Ausf A tanks were re-designated Ausf D1.

3. In December 1942, Ausf D entered production, and the first D model left the factory on January 11, 1943.

4. August 1943 Ausf. A in Production

5. March 1944 Ausf. G in Production

Total production 6,0209

A. 20 Ausf A

B. 250 Ausf. D1

C. 600 Ausf. D2

D. 2,200 Ausf. A

E. 2,950 Ausf G

(Some valuable numbers on production and the models.)

SIlencer=Panzer V Ausf A= panther Ausf A (V=5)

like

Panzer VI and VIb = Tiger & Kingtiger

There were about 3 main variations in Panther types, 5 smaller variations.

the First 20 or Null serie (prototype - only had 60mm glacis plate)
then the PZ V ausf D
then the PZ V ausf A
then the PZ V ausf G
then the PZ V ausf G - late (from september '44 and most produced type)

(Further naming descriptions with highlight on Panzer V is Panther Ausf A (V=5))


Forget words,actions will show your true ambitions!The Battlefield,In many cases, the terrain of a battlefield can be the best resource a commander has. A clump of trees, an abandoned house, or a drainage ditch can all be powerful tools in the right hands
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
schrecken

Rep: 195
votes: 15


PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:43 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Ausf. A was the model seen most in Normandy


WHat/where is your scenario being set?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website GameRanger Account
 
Silencer




PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 6:56 am Post subject: Reply with quote

the most produced version was the pantherG late.
Besides other improvements (like heating & option to add IR equipment) a visual feature was the improved mantlet. (to avoid the shot trap)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
ANZAC_Lord4war

Rep: 3.5


PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 8:41 am Post subject: mmm Reply with quote

its not a cc scenario
its a start of a cc armour database
things like heaters wether it had a radio fitted not important
nor the name really.
im looking for 3 base panthers VA,VD and VG
i no problem with databasing the minority production runs
but no use only supplying name
without armour data.
but also at same time i invite debate about collected figures.
look at my first post
if u were to look at 1 panther by itself
u would not notice the mistake
no prizes given for getting anything right.
wont think less of u if u get something wrong.
open debate about armour values i just threw the panther up there first
coz is popular tank.


Forget words,actions will show your true ambitions!The Battlefield,In many cases, the terrain of a battlefield can be the best resource a commander has. A clump of trees, an abandoned house, or a drainage ditch can all be powerful tools in the right hands
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
kwp




PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:42 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

My recommendation would be to find a copy of "Encyclopedia of German Tanks of World War Two" by Peter Chamberlain and Hilary Doyle, ISBN 1-85409-518-8.

It covers the differences in armor between the various models of just about every German armored vehicle. It also lists the dates of production, even gives range of chassis numbers for each model's production run, ammo carried, etc...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
ANZAC_Lord4war

Rep: 3.5


PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 10:47 pm Post subject: mmm Reply with quote

i wouldnt know how to ask for one.if u have and have time to scan pages,plz do so.
so starting to look like we have a lack of armour hobbiests in the community.
or people r just happy to go with 1 source data.
or worried previous datas may be shown up?


Forget words,actions will show your true ambitions!The Battlefield,In many cases, the terrain of a battlefield can be the best resource a commander has. A clump of trees, an abandoned house, or a drainage ditch can all be powerful tools in the right hands
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
kwp




PostPosted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 5:45 am Post subject: Reply with quote

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?z=y&isbn=1854095188&itm=1

I don't know if they ship overseas. You might want to ask at a public library if they have a copy you could check out. That is where I located a copy to inspect prior to making a purchase.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Silencer




PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:01 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

One of the best books about panther is:

Militärfahrzeuge, Bd.9, Der Panzerkampfwagen Panther und seine Abarten
von Walter J. Spielberger

http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3879435278/qid=1149425857/sr=8-2/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i2_xgl/302-4160589-8146415

The author was a former jagdpanther commander.
-->Only requirement is that you can read German.
It has by far the most original blueprints and specs of all panther variants. I own this book, and it even today, I discover new things!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
ANZAC_Lord4war

Rep: 3.5


PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:00 pm Post subject: mmm Reply with quote

thanks for the replies and info all.
but due to lack of debate and figures submitted.
ive cancelled the plan to go ahead with a database that all can use.


Forget words,actions will show your true ambitions!The Battlefield,In many cases, the terrain of a battlefield can be the best resource a commander has. A clump of trees, an abandoned house, or a drainage ditch can all be powerful tools in the right hands
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
schrecken

Rep: 195
votes: 15


PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:31 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Lord4war

i think a data base like you have in mind would be welcomed in the community.

You need to do the research first then publish it.

Keep it as a work in progress as the data will constantly be challenged , ridiculed and debated over.... and unltimately referenced and used in andy future mods of CC and other WWII based games.

the challenge is great... seize the day!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website GameRanger Account
 
ANZAC_Lord4war

Rep: 3.5


PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:41 am Post subject: mmm Reply with quote

yer i agree it has potential
id already made a database on 1 source
was hoping others would submit theirs
i was prepared to go thru the results
post the different results
post an average of the results
but im ok with my database for me
but the part me going out buying books doing all the research
id rather make a mod instead.
id still might do it,if some1 submit their sources,we would need 3 sources minimum.
just wont be buying books as a cross referance.
and personally id like to see some submissions by other modders
as they have a huge part in cc5
and at same time not discounting any1 who is not a modder
coz they can read as well as the rest of us.


Forget words,actions will show your true ambitions!The Battlefield,In many cases, the terrain of a battlefield can be the best resource a commander has. A clump of trees, an abandoned house, or a drainage ditch can all be powerful tools in the right hands
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
 
 
Post new topicReply to topic printer-friendly view Close Combat Series Forum Index -> The Mess
Goto page 1, 2  Next


 
   
 


Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




Forums ©





In August of 2004, Zappi, Homba, Bambam887, RedScorpion and MOOXE all pitched
in to create this Close Combat site. I would to thank all the people who have visited and
found this site to thier liking. I hope you had time to check out some of the great Close Combat
mods and our forums. I'd also like to thank all the members of our volunteer staff that have
helped over the years, and all our users that contributed to this site!