AT_Stalky
Rep: 27.4  
votes: 10
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:10 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| schrecken wrote:
|
S3T are looking at a further patch for CCMT.
|
Finally…. Thank you.
But I will not smile until I have seen the patch, and tested it.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
|
Therion
Rep: 27.4
votes: 4
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| squadleader_id wrote:
|
Umm...CCM was produced by Simtek 
|
I'm talking about CCM 3.1. |
Wonderland - my mod for Armored Brigade
Killing for peace is like fucking for orgasm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
ANZAC_Tack
Rep: 22.3
votes: 1
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 3:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| how can we send youl this list, start a new post or email? i always had a problem with the infantry AT weapons capability of the US, i used some 6 rounds on a meseum piece T55 at 450M,it still shot me to hell...because the rounds hit the front, not top as designed. |
espree de corp |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
AT_Stalky
Rep: 27.4
votes: 10
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Serious Tack, its more easy to send a list of the weapon data THAT DON’T NEED serious attention. This is not a "adjust" or “tweaking” that is needed it’s a massive total remake of basically all weapon data.
If the patch are to be made it shall be done properly. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Therion
Rep: 27.4
votes: 4
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ANZAC_Tack wrote:
|
|
how can we send youl this list, start a new post or email? i always had a problem with the infantry AT weapons capability of the US, i used some 6 rounds on a meseum piece T55 at 450M,it still shot me to hell...because the rounds hit the front, not top as designed.
|
My mod has tripled penetration for Javelin and Predator to replace top-attack.
CCMT engine isn't really suitable for simulating modern warfare - it doesn't simulate guided missiles, AA weapons, etc. |
Wonderland - my mod for Armored Brigade
Killing for peace is like fucking for orgasm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
ANZAC_Tack
Rep: 22.3
votes: 1
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| excellent idea! make the penertation simulate top attack. i was truely bumbfounded lastyear i was told modern at weapons fly up and hit top of tank! reminds me of british project of the 80's when they tried to make 81mm morter rounds tank finders, smart as it has 25mm on average on top not 100mm+ |
espree de corp |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
schrecken
Rep: 195
votes: 15
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I would argue that PB penetration should be quite low to simulate direct fire and then as the range goes beyond that increase the penetration to simulate the top attack. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Therion
Rep: 27.4
votes: 4
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I would argue that PB range must be very high to simulate the accuracy of said missile. |
Wonderland - my mod for Armored Brigade
Killing for peace is like fucking for orgasm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
schrecken
Rep: 195
votes: 15
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Accuracy does not correlate with penetration |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
ANZAC_Tack
Rep: 22.3
votes: 1
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| both good arguments, keep penetration low untill the missile rises up,i dont know, 150M? then *4 penetration after that range. brilliant. |
espree de corp |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Dima
Rep: 87.3
votes: 16
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Therion,
CC engine simulates "top attack" pretty good w/o such perversions u make or other suggest here. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Therion
Rep: 27.4
votes: 4
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
By making it indirect?
Whouldn't it, like, allow to fire them without LOS?
| schrecken wrote:
|
|
Accuracy does not correlate with penetration
|
Doesn't, like, accuracy drop to 5/8 of the base value when range is close and to 3/5 on medium?
It's a fire and forget ATGM, not a big bazooka. |
Wonderland - my mod for Armored Brigade
Killing for peace is like fucking for orgasm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Therion
Rep: 27.4
votes: 4
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey, At Stalky, do you know that "Accurate and realistic modern equipment modeling" and
"Accurately depicting modern tactical warfare and it’s challenge" are some of the main selling points of CCMT  ?
Will there be a patch that implements various types of guided missiles, different kinds of armour, AA weapons, top-attack guided missiles and other things neccessary for an accurate modern equipment modelling or are these just empty promises? |
Wonderland - my mod for Armored Brigade
Killing for peace is like fucking for orgasm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
AT_Stalky
Rep: 27.4
votes: 10
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Therion wrote:
|
1) Hey, At Stalky, do you know that "Accurate and realistic modern equipment modeling" and
"Accurately depicting modern tactical warfare and it’s challenge" are some of the main selling points of CCMT ?
2) Will there be a patch that implements various types of guided missiles, different kinds of armour, AA weapons, top-attack guided missiles and other things neccessary for an accurate modern equipment modelling or are these just empty promises?
|
1) Wow non could have guessed that.
2) Yeh, I wonder to, |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Therion
Rep: 27.4
votes: 4
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It makes me wonder. Are there any laws that forbid intentionally deceiving customers? |
Wonderland - my mod for Armored Brigade
Killing for peace is like fucking for orgasm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
stormrider_sp
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| schrecken wrote:
|
| Quote:
|
|
Are you Serious? Get to work man!
|
Please send money, it greases the the gears of industry.
or like everyone else, volunteer your time and and much can be achieved.
|
I just sent for a broken game. Why dont you FUCK YOURSELF! Do your job motherfucker. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
stormrider_sp
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| schrecken wrote:
|
I don't get it stalky.
You are not being made to shut up.. your concerns are being noted.
No one is contradicting your posts... except when you go off the rails and start talking about things you know nothing about.
No one has asked you to stop criticising the game...please continue, some of your posts make sense when you stick to factual arguments instead of heading off into flights of fancy.
You cannot ask for any more, surely?
When questions are asked I give honest answers eg 30mm cannon cannot defeat an Abrams etc.
It's you, stalky, doing the badmouthing, read your own posts.
Neural eclipse
The game plays very well as is... there may be a few anomilies within the data but these , generally, aren't born out in game play.
If you played the game you would see that.
|
No, the problem is clearly YOU! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
schrecken
Rep: 195
votes: 15
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Welcome stormrider_sp
Nice to see you
Very interesting and thought provoking comments..I'll look into your suggestions today as you are obviously skilled and experienced in such matters.
Maybe you have some screen shots we can look at, I know most posters here would be interested.
see you on the battlefield
cheers |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
QM
Rep: 49.4
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| schrecken wrote:
|
Welcome stormrider_sp
Nice to see you
Very interesting and thought provoking comments..I'll look into your suggestions today as you are obviously skilled and experienced in such matters.
Maybe you have some screen shots we can look at, I know most posters here would be interested.
see you on the battlefield
cheers
|
 |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Stwa
Rep: 308.9
votes: 16
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
 |
Last edited by Stwa on Fri Jul 17, 2015 3:22 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
