Welcome to Close Combat Series
  Login or Register Home  ·  Downloads  ·  Forums  ·  Combat Camera  ·  Help  

  Survey
Do incapacitations count as a soldier's kills?

Yes
No



Results
Polls

Votes 1247
Comments: 1

  Shout Box!!

Only registered users can shout. Please login or create an account.

  Main Menu
Articles & News  
    Help
    Player`s News
    Site News
    Multiplayer
    Terrain Challenge
    Boot Camp
Community  
    Forums
    Downloads
    Combat Camera
    MOOXE @ Youtube
    Statistics
Members  
    Private Messages
    Your Account
    Logout

  Donations
Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
12/18/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
11/08/2021

Anonymous - $15.00
04/09/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
04/05/2021

Anonymous - $20.00
02/20/2021

Anonymous - $10.00
12/29/2020

Anonymous - $1.00
11/06/2020

ZAPPI4 - $20.00
10/10/2020

Find our site useful? Make a small donation to show your support.



Search for at
Close Combat Series Advanced Search


Goto page 1, 2  Next
 Author
Message
 
Mr_Tank




PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:18 pm Post subject: Got it! (almost) Reply with quote

Facing another saturday night at home with the loving companionship of my laptop.
I just got my hands on a beta version of W.A.R. ( gotta love the abbreviation).
Theres still a lot of glitches and faults in it.
Theres a bunch of new maps and BGs, the total is now 64. Edit: 54 BGs, 64 maps.The strategic map is very large now
So far it works ok with my Vista OS.
Edit: No naval support, but instead there's artillary attack, morter barrage, air assult and a parachute thingy, which should be air supply, but i cant get it to work.
Edit: Each battlegroup has about 140 units for the allied/americans, and 80 units for the axis/germans, of which 15 can be selected, just like CCV. But each unit is also worth a certain number of points, somewhat similar to COI.


Last edited by Mr_Tank on Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:44 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
ANZAC_Tack

Rep: 22.3
votes: 1


PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:56 pm Post subject: ha Reply with quote

oh i so jumped the gun on that one...hook line and sinker, but still its a breach of NDA for soembody.


espree de corp
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
 
Mr_Tank




PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:29 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

I do agree that it is borderline at best....
If the game is worth playing, then I will purchase it when/if released. You have my word.
I thought that it would be of interest to the community that someone actually had some info on the progress of this game.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
ANZAC_Tack

Rep: 22.3
votes: 1


PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:26 am Post subject: Reply with quote

well it is coming...soon a Q and A style from some die hard 'IV corp" non s3t/matrix persons.

if u have a Q about WaR im sure it can be added.


espree de corp
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
 
QM

Rep: 49.4


PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:58 am Post subject: Reply with quote

New maps? What do you mean new maps? CCIV has always been my fav of the series.

I have a 'Q' about W.A.R. What does does it stand for? (what is it good for...LOL)

Edit: Forget it just answered my own question.........duuh. Watch am Rhein.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Digs

Rep: 56.7
votes: 5


PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:27 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

If they don't get the a.i. right, then I'm not bothering to waste my money!.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
ANZAC_Tack

Rep: 22.3
votes: 1


PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 5:46 am Post subject: Reply with quote

well ai is always a problem with CC, but if it has kept my interest for 6 months, it cant be to bad, cause its at least that long since i played ANY VERSION OF CC H2H, sad, but true...mostly im to busy testing stuff,not all s3t,some for pj,dima initially,but lately all u know who...

once its released,ill try to give it an objective opinion,not just 'yeah its good' but how,over the last few months, i have noticed how the AI has changed,what it does,how it moves etc...remember a lot of ai's stupid movements are pathing issues...put ai in big open map,and its game on.


espree de corp
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
 
Mr_Tank




PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:09 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Well , sofar I'm having problems beating the ai when it is defending, however I am not impressed when it is attacking me. It always goes after VL, and if the first is to well defended the ai tries the next one and so on.
I've found a couple of maps that are exact copies from ccv.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Therion

Rep: 27.4
votes: 4


PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:24 am Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder if it's possible to make a good attacking CC AI at all.
Can it grasp the concept of fire and manoeuvre? Or shooting a building with a tank cannon "just in case"? Or positioning snipers/machine guns in right places?

All I see in CC series games is units crawling/running towards objectives like zombies or moving in circles.


Wonderland - my mod for Armored Brigade

Killing for peace is like fucking for orgasm.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
ANZAC_Tack

Rep: 22.3
votes: 1


PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:42 am Post subject: Reply with quote

yes its beta,yes some maps are ccv, not for long. some maps are recoded cciv maps also.


espree de corp
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
 
schrecken

Rep: 195
votes: 15


PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:20 am Post subject: Reply with quote

They are called "placeholders"

same with data etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website GameRanger Account
 
CSO_Linebacker

Rep: 5.9
votes: 1


PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:31 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr_Tank wrote:
Well , sofar I'm having problems beating the ai when it is defending, however I am not impressed when it is attacking me. It always goes after VL, and if the first is to well defended the ai tries the next one and so on.
I've found a couple of maps that are exact copies from ccv.


Isn't that exactly what people have wanted? An AI opponent that is continually going after VLs rather than just hanging out.


'If it does not have a gun, it cannot be fun'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
CSO_Linebacker

Rep: 5.9
votes: 1


PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:44 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr_Tank wrote:
I do agree that it is borderline at best....
If the game is worth playing, then I will purchase it when/if released. You have my word.


Good to hear...of course, whatever asshole tester leaked this, just probably guaranteed at least one thing for the rest of us....that at the very best, the release will likely end up being delayed, because in the absence of the culprit stepping up and confessing...(and thereby risking legal action for NDA violation), all the testers will likely be dumped, and a whole new set of testers would have to be recruited.


'If it does not have a gun, it cannot be fun'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
ANZAC_Tack

Rep: 22.3
votes: 1


PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:17 am Post subject: Reply with quote

....this is bad....really bad....i am even sober for the occation....this is bad...


espree de corp
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
 
QM

Rep: 49.4


PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:49 am Post subject: Reply with quote

CSO_Linebacker wrote:
Mr_Tank wrote:
I do agree that it is borderline at best....
If the game is worth playing, then I will purchase it when/if released. You have my word.


Good to hear...of course, whatever asshole tester leaked this, just probably guaranteed at least one thing for the rest of us....that at the very best, the release will likely end up being delayed, because in the absence of the culprit stepping up and confessing...(and thereby risking legal action for NDA violation), all the testers will likely be dumped, and a whole new set of testers would have to be recruited.


Exactly right and you could possibly even say goodbye to the extant generation of CC members involved in the test team, why would you hang around after what this asshole has bought down on them? I know I wouldn't.

I hope the SOB owns up just so I could get my pound of flesh outa them. I would pay my way to wherever just to get that.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Mr_Tank




PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:36 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

CSO_Linebacker wrote:
Mr_Tank wrote:
I do agree that it is borderline at best....
If the game is worth playing, then I will purchase it when/if released. You have my word.


Good to hear...of course, whatever asshole tester leaked this, just probably guaranteed at least one thing for the rest of us....that at the very best, the release will likely end up being delayed, because in the absence of the culprit stepping up and confessing...(and thereby risking legal action for NDA violation), all the testers will likely be dumped, and a whole new set of testers would have to be recruited.


To be honest I did'nt think of that.
I have no idea where/who the version comes from. But I doubt they will change their testing team because of it. The company is every bit as eager to get the game released, as you or I am.
I have heard of other games and movies where testers/vievers/editors each got an individual version, with a tiny differnce in each, so if the product were to appear on the web, the leaker could be caught.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
ANZAC_Tack

Rep: 22.3
votes: 1


PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:40 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

well mr tank, thanks for nothing, you've F*^ked me up.


espree de corp
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
 
Mr_Tank




PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:46 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

ANZAC_Tack wrote:
well mr tank, thanks for nothing, you've F*^ked me up.


Well, if you want a scapegoat I'm an easy target.
I haven't shared my version with anybody, but still there are others who have the beta version, and they probably had it weeks before I did.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
CSO_Linebacker

Rep: 5.9
votes: 1


PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:31 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Tack, I'm as pissed as you are, but the real blame is on the S3T team member that passed on the installer. Not weeks ago actually...from the screenshots, the powers that be know exactly which version was leaked, and they know when the torrent was uploaded.


'If it does not have a gun, it cannot be fun'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
Therion

Rep: 27.4
votes: 4


PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:25 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, but on the other hand, downloading a leaked beta and then posting about it publicly instead of quietly notifying the company is very, very, very wrong too.


Wonderland - my mod for Armored Brigade

Killing for peace is like fucking for orgasm.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
 
Post new topicReply to topic printer-friendly view Close Combat Series Forum Index -> Close Combat Wacht am Rhein
Goto page 1, 2  Next


 
   
 


Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




Forums ©





In August of 2004, Zappi, Homba, Bambam887, RedScorpion and MOOXE all pitched
in to create this Close Combat site. I would to thank all the people who have visited and
found this site to thier liking. I hope you had time to check out some of the great Close Combat
mods and our forums. I'd also like to thank all the members of our volunteer staff that have
helped over the years, and all our users that contributed to this site!