Welcome to Close Combat Series
  Login or Register Home  ·  Downloads  ·  Forums  ·  Combat Camera  ·  Help  

  Survey
The Tiger Tank was...

Overrated
Mystical
Distinguised
Abysmal
Impeccable



Results
Polls

Votes 1110
Comments: 17

  Shout Box!!

Only registered users can shout. Please login or create an account.

  Main Menu
Articles & News  
    Help
    Player`s News
    Site News
    Multiplayer
    Terrain Challenge
    Boot Camp
Community  
    Forums
    Downloads
    Combat Camera
    MOOXE @ Youtube
    Statistics
Members  
    Private Messages
    Your Account
    Logout

  Donations
Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
08/15/2022

Anonymous - $25.00
12/18/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
11/08/2021

Anonymous - $15.00
04/09/2021

Anonymous - $100.00
04/05/2021

Anonymous - $20.00
02/20/2021

Anonymous - $10.00
12/29/2020

Anonymous - $1.00
11/06/2020

ZAPPI4 - $20.00
10/10/2020

Find our site useful? Make a small donation to show your support.



"The Tiger Tank was..." | Login/Create an Account | 17 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.


No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register


Re: The Tiger Tank was... (Score: 1)
by mad2physicist on Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:01 am
(User Info | Send a Message)

All excellent points. But in the Ardennes, let's not forget that part of the failure was due to the really phenomenal defense put up by the American airborne and the green army troops, especially in their denying the Germans important fuel dumps.
However, the overall strategy was also a big reason for the failure. Focusing the main thrust south to get behind Patton would have created major issues for the Americans. I don't recall it being discussed by von Luck though; do you remember where he talks about it?

The Tiger I was still in many ways an example of a tank which was good not through good design, but through making a mediocre design bigger - it was basically a big heavy steel box. The Panther and T34 on the other hand used good design to achieve excellence. The Sherman used bad design badly executed to achieve.... a bad result (actually the Sherman wasn't as bad as it is sometimes made out to be I think. In many was it was probably not much worse than the T34. The problem is that whereas the T34 made its reputation against early Mk III and Mk IVs, the Sherman faced mid-to-late war Mk III and Mk IVs, which had learned from the lessons of the Russian front).
But the Tiger still did achieve very good combat results, because despite being just a big steel box... a big steel box with a big gun is still formidable (also of course, Tiger crews were always hand picked to be the very best).

| Parent






In August of 2004, Zappi, Homba, Bambam887, RedScorpion and MOOXE all pitched
in to create this Close Combat site. I would to thank all the people who have visited and
found this site to thier liking. I hope you had time to check out some of the great Close Combat
mods and our forums. I'd also like to thank all the members of our volunteer staff that have
helped over the years, and all our users that contributed to this site!