Close Combat Series » Forums » Close Combat Wacht am Rhein » How can you say it is easy to mod!?

AT_Stalky · Rep: **27.4** votes: 10

Sapa is right. Its in the comersial files.

There you have it:

squadleader_id · Rep: **53.2** votes: 7

Click Scenario Settings and set Axis Supply = Low...and you will see the anomalies Sapa pointed out.

Nomada_Firefox · Rep: **32.9** votes: 9

Sorry but Sapa is wrong because it does not happen on VetBoB mod. I have tested it with all possible changes on supply or other difficult settings first than put my previous answer and I have seen it again now. It does not happen on VetBoB.

Sapa · Rep: **76.3** votes: 8

:bye

Sapa · Rep: **76.3** votes: 8

:eek2

Pzt_Serk · Rep: **8.7**

Looks like these blanks simply mean there is no unit available for that particular day.

For exemple, create a battle involving the 14th/5FJ on day 20, and play the battle as germans. In the scenario editor, there are many blanks. However, once in the BG screen, you will see these units are still listed in the forcepool but none are available because of attrition.

It is the case for the PAK 43 88mm. It will still be listed at its place in the forcepool (in the BG screen before battle) but with no gun available. So instead of listing the forcepool in the scenario editor screen with 0 unit available, they just left it blank.

AT_Stalky · Rep: **27.4** votes: 10

Thats ONE of the reasons why ppl here say its a shame that BGedit tool for CC5 cant be used in WaR,
becose with it we remove them emty lines so easy and fast in BGedit.
Then we would not have those "knocked out teath" as we see here.

The other reasons and more importent reasons have been mention so many times over 5 pages,
that I will not repeat em one more time.

In general it seem ppl have trubble read what is said here, I hope the reson simply is becose we are so bad in english.
But I can only hope.

Edit spelling

Nomada_Firefox · Rep: **32.9** votes: 9

schrecken · Rep: **195** votes: 15

I agree it does have a slightly odd look about it... but

As further illustration.

Day 23 on left day 24 on right.

The grille is no longer available.

It does look a little odd with empty spaces starting to appear around the lists.

Wouldn't it be better if it displayed the team but stated 0 available as written in the fpools.txt?

As it is it does point to the fact that the BG is becoming depleted, a good pointer to the scenario designer, but does have the odd look about it.

If it just slides the team up there is no indication to the scenario designer that the team has already seen battle and may be suffering the effects.

Suggestions, proposals any other thoughts.
[/b]

AT_Stalky · Rep: **27.4** votes: 10

Yeh, as BGedit dont work in WaR, one have to "settle" with either i guess.

IMO I much rather have "NAME 0", than the "knocked out teath".

Tejszd · Rep: **133.6** votes: 19

My preference would be to list the unit name with a quantity of zero

Sapa · Rep: **76.3** votes: 8

Nomada_Firefox · Rep: **32.9** votes: 9

AT_Stalky · Rep: **27.4** votes: 10

ADMIN INFO:

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:

This has started to derail,
ANY MORE POST NOT IN LINE WITH SAPAs ORIGINAL TOPIC: "How can you say it is easy to mod!?" will be moved to the garbage bin thread.
STAY ON TOPIC.

Nomada_Firefox · Rep: **32.9** votes: 9

The line from Sapa topic should be fully garbage because he started attacking my work from many answers ago.

CSO_Sbufkle · Rep: **32.2** votes: 1

I dont think mod is perfect, so you cant throw stones at it.. however full blown versions of game are open game.

Namada has done mods, period.. so cut him slack if things arent perfect. the fact is moddoing CC4 and 5 isnt as easy as CC3, which shlubs like me mod for! Wink

as for Sapa, his modding is outstanding as well.. so its a hard debate to take any side too... Im happy you ar eboth modders!

Sorry stalky.. we should keep this on topic, its an importnat one... I hope what I wrote above is soemthign which calms everyone down!

AT_Stalky · Rep: **27.4** votes: 10

I have not said some post are garbage, I have said that any more oftopic post will be moved into garbage thread.
@ Buf, no need to take side, as this thread IS NOT gona be turn into a "who makes best mod"... Thought, Feel free to make such thread. Or why not some excelent map guids? Smile

Sapa have with images made clear what he meent, no ware have he said firefox mod is bad, please read his post one more time and we see that Firefox. Sapa just pointed out the missing lines that is so easy awoided when use BGedit tool, when that was shallanged and it was said non had em mising lines he just posted images to "prove" that he was right, there was missing lines. And thats a part of what is debated here, how easy modded CC5 is, and how sad it is the tool dont work for WaR.

Last time I say this,
Back on topic plz....
IM LOCKING THIS THREAD FOR 48 houers so everyone can reflect on this in calmness.

AT_Stalky · Rep: **27.4** votes: 10

Okay Im unlocking this one, and remember its not about whos mod is best etc.
Stay on topic plz.

The TOPIC IS:

How can you say it is easy to mod!?

And this time its direct movement of any oftopic posts.

AT_Stalky · Rep: **27.4** votes: 10

Squad points out that this post belong here but he was unable to place it here as it was locked. So I make a qoute of it instead of moving it as its sort of belongs in the original thread to.

Sapa · Rep: **76.3** votes: 8

Please accept my apologize Nomada!

And it is not the knowledge of modmaking that makes me post images in this thread. If people wants to spend weeks looking through these txt files in the forcepool its there choice, I haven’t said anything about that, just stated that it’s a work I don’t like!

I didn’t say your mod was bad! when you said this and I saw all the missing lines in your forcepool it was for me like shoot in an open goal:


	Login or Register	Home · Downloads · Forums · Combat Camera · Help